| Posted | Nick | Remark | |
|---|---|---|---|
| #openstack-nova - 2020-02-20 | |||
| 15:00:33 | brinzhang__ | -root-certificate-details-detail,list-cloudpipes-detail,create-cloudpipe-detail,update-cloudpipe-detail,ping-instances-detail,ping-an-instance-detail,list-virtual-interfaces-detail,show-fixed-ip-details-detail,reserve-or-release-a-fixed-ip-detail,list-floating-ips-detail,create-floating-ips-detail,bulk-delete-floating-ips-detail,list-floating-ips-by-host-detail,list-dns-domains-detail,create-or-update-dns-domain-detai | |
| 15:00:38 | brinzhang__ | l,delete-dns-domain-detail,list-dns-entries-detail,find-unique-dns-entry-detail,create-or-update-dns-entry-detail,delete-dns-entry-detail,list-cells-detail,create-cell-detail,capacities-detail,list-cells-with-details-detail,info-for-this-cell-detail,show-cell-data-detail,update-a-cell-detail,delete-a-cell-detail,show-cell-capacities-detail,lists-consoles-detail,id562-detail,show-console-details-detail,delete-console-d | |
| 15:00:45 | brinzhang__ | etail,list-default-security-group-rules-detail,show-default-security-group-rule-details-detail,create-default-security-group-rule-detail,delete-default-security-group-rule-detail,get-vnc-console-os-getvncconsole-action-deprecated-detail#list-volume-attachments-for-an-instance | |
| 15:00:49 | brinzhang__ | gmann, alex_xu: sorry | |
| 15:00:51 | brinzhang__ | gmann: alex_xu said is List volume attachments for an instance API | |
| 15:00:53 | brinzhang__ | alex_xu: gmann said in GET server API, we support show delete_on_determination in microversion 2.3 | |
| 15:01:10 | alex_xu | also in 2.79, you can get that from volume-attachment api | |
| 15:01:18 | brinzhang__ | gmann, alex_xu: It seems that there is not the same API we are disscussing | |
| 15:01:29 | alex_xu | so i'm ok now. it sounds like patch can avoid the mess of put method | |
| 15:02:17 | alex_xu | brinzhang__: I can +2 after you update the spec | |
| 15:02:44 | gmann | alex_xu: 'also in 2.79, you can get that from volume-attachment api' you mean to return in list attachment API also ? | |
| 15:03:04 | openstackgerrit | Merged openstack/nova master: zuul: Add Fedora based jobs to the experimental queue https://review.opendev.org/701231 | |
| 15:03:09 | brinzhang__ | alex_xu: I will update seen-k-mooney's words nit, thanks | |
| 15:03:13 | gmann | i think returning in GET server detail is enough and list only return list of attachment without too much details ? | |
| 15:08:42 | openstackgerrit | Merged openstack/nova-specs master: Support volume local cache https://review.opendev.org/689070 | |
| 15:46:23 | openstackgerrit | Brin Zhang proposed openstack/nova-specs master: Support re-configure deleted_on_termination in server https://review.opendev.org/580336 | |
| 15:47:18 | brinzhang__ | gibi, alex_xu: Update done of destroy-instance-with-datavolume spec, thanks | |
| 15:55:40 | openstackgerrit | Ivaylo Mitev proposed openstack/nova master: Faults from cell DB missing in GET /servers/detail https://review.opendev.org/699176 | |
| 16:04:53 | gibi | brinzhang__: ack, will check soon | |
| 16:05:09 | brinzhang__ | gibi: thanks, good night :) | |
| 16:05:19 | gibi | brinzhang__: good night to you too | |
| 16:31:08 | gibi | brinzhang: sorry but as far as I understood the PATCH method was the agreement on the nova meeting | |
| 16:31:40 | sean-k-mooney | ya that was what i tought too | |
| 16:31:47 | sean-k-mooney | rather then an alternitive | |
| 16:32:06 | gibi | but alex_xu was against PATCH | |
| 16:32:12 | gibi | so we have a bit of a deadlock | |
| 16:32:27 | gibi | http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/nova/2020/nova.2020-02-20-14.00.log.html#l-82 | |
| 16:33:03 | sean-k-mooney | im kind of nutral on this i prefer patch but i can live with either | |
| 16:33:21 | dansmith | I'm not generally a fan of PATCH | |
| 16:33:36 | gibi | honestly I can live with both PUT and PATCH now. | |
| 16:33:45 | gibi | damn, this is hard. | |
| 16:33:50 | gibi | soo many decisions | |
| 16:33:54 | gibi | :) | |
| 16:35:17 | gmann | i am ok with any new API (PATCH or Action) other than changing existing PUT. | |
| 16:35:32 | gmann | action can be one option then. | |
| 16:43:20 | sean-k-mooney | action would have made sense for swap volume | |
| 16:43:35 | sean-k-mooney | im not sure it makes sense here but it would be an option i guess | |
| 16:45:00 | melwitt | I think the ideal would be move swap volume to an action and let PUT be for changing stuff like delete_on_termination, right? but that turns it into boiling the ocean when the author is just trying to add something simple | |
| 16:45:22 | sean-k-mooney | ya | |
| 16:47:05 | melwitt | on the admin-only aspect, I think any "other" params that might end up being allowed in the PUT API need to be able to be controlled by a new separate policy rule right. so that an operator could leave swap volume admin-only but delete_on_termination could be non-admin | |
| 16:47:27 | openstackgerrit | Stephen Finucane proposed openstack/nova master: libvirt: Report storage bus traits https://review.opendev.org/666914 | |
| 16:47:28 | openstackgerrit | Stephen Finucane proposed openstack/nova master: trivial: Update '_get_foo_traits' docstrings https://review.opendev.org/708912 | |
| 16:47:28 | openstackgerrit | Stephen Finucane proposed openstack/nova master: Add transform_image_metadata request filter https://review.opendev.org/665775 | |
| 16:47:28 | openstackgerrit | Stephen Finucane proposed openstack/nova master: libvirt: Use domain capabilities to get supported device models https://review.opendev.org/666915 | |
| 17:06:02 | openstackgerrit | Merged openstack/nova master: Clean up allocation if unshelve fails due to neutron https://review.opendev.org/706868 | |
| 17:25:54 | sean-k-mooney | alex_xu: do you have any documentation on how to configre a host use pmem with openstack. | |
| 17:26:58 | sean-k-mooney | alex_xu: we would like to test it in the next few weeks to plan for how to support it downstream in the osp product but it appears that the defivcie do not have regions avaiable | |
| 17:27:15 | sean-k-mooney | so we are stuck at the create namespace step | |
| 17:28:20 | sean-k-mooney | alex_xu: if you can point use in the right direction for how to create a regaion i think we should be able to create namespaces and configure nova form that point | |
| 17:29:42 | sean-k-mooney | do we have to cofigure kernel memmap options? memmap=12G!4G | |
| 17:30:14 | sean-k-mooney | or is that just for emulated nvdimms | |
| 17:32:02 | sean-k-mooney | i thnk it is jsut for emulated devices and based on https://docs.pmem.io/persistent-memory/getting-started-guide/creating-development-environments/linux-environments it does not support DevDax mode so that is not what we are looking for i guess | |
| 17:34:16 | sean-k-mooney | ah i might have found what i was looking for https://docs.pmem.io/ndctl-user-guide/managing-regions#enabling-regions | |
| 17:46:34 | sean-k-mooney | alex_xu: actully no that is not what i watn but looking at https://software.intel.com/en-us/articles/quick-start-guide-configure-intel-optane-dc-persistent-memory-on-linux i need to use ipmctl to create the regions on teh device then ndctl can be used to manage the namespaces after that point | |
| 17:54:53 | sean-k-mooney | ok i think i understand how to configre this but i might ping you about it at some other point if we get stuck | |
| 18:05:50 | openstackgerrit | Lee Yarwood proposed openstack/nova master: docs: Add stable device rescue docs https://review.opendev.org/700837 | |
| 18:36:27 | openstackgerrit | Ivaylo Mitev proposed openstack/nova master: Faults from cell DB missing in GET /servers/detail https://review.opendev.org/699176 | |
| 19:15:21 | lucidguy | We still can't get instances to launch with over 1TB of mem. Soooo frustrating. | |
| 19:15:49 | lucidguy | Anyone have experience with this? | |
| 19:17:16 | artom | melwitt, you might be able to clarify this - but in the Ironic case (that's the only virt drive that I can think of where this would apply), the compute host is where the nova-compute and ironic virt driver run, and the compute *node* is the actual baremetal machine that serves as hypervisor, right? | |
| 19:17:34 | artom | So a single compute *host* manages multiple compute *nodes*? | |
| 19:17:45 | melwitt | artom: that's correct | |
| 19:18:20 | melwitt | the values in the compute_nodes table are "host" and "hypervisor_hostname" where the latter is the ironic node | |
| 19:19:45 | artom | melwitt, ok, so my thinking was correct, thanks! | |
| 19:33:57 | lucidguy | Can someone tell me why this vm crashes/kernel panics on startup. | |
| 19:34:05 | lucidguy | https://paste.ubuntu.com/p/KPC9qXVgPK/ | |
| 23:59:08 | openstackgerrit | Merged openstack/nova master: trivial: Update '_get_foo_traits' docstrings https://review.opendev.org/708912 | |
| #openstack-nova - 2020-02-21 | |||
| 00:26:43 | brinzhang | sean-k-mooney: are you around? | |
| 02:18:33 | openstackgerrit | Brin Zhang proposed openstack/nova-specs master: Support re-configure deleted_on_termination in server https://review.opendev.org/580336 | |
| 02:19:34 | brinzhang | alex_xu, gibi: I was update the spec for PTACH API, please review | |
| 02:57:12 | openstackgerrit | Brin Zhang proposed openstack/nova-specs master: Support re-configure deleted_on_termination in server https://review.opendev.org/580336 | |
| 02:58:56 | brinzhang | alex_xu: thanks, updated | |
| 09:57:34 | openstackgerrit | Stephen Finucane proposed openstack/python-novaclient master: setup.cfg: Various Python 3 fixes https://review.opendev.org/708824 | |
| 09:57:35 | openstackgerrit | Stephen Finucane proposed openstack/python-novaclient master: Remove six https://review.opendev.org/708831 | |
| 09:57:35 | openstackgerrit | Stephen Finucane proposed openstack/python-novaclient master: tox: Configure 'ignore_basepython_conflict' https://review.opendev.org/708830 | |
| 09:57:36 | openstackgerrit | Stephen Finucane proposed openstack/python-novaclient master: trivial: Remove 'u' prefix from string https://review.opendev.org/709080 | |
| 09:57:36 | openstackgerrit | Stephen Finucane proposed openstack/python-novaclient master: Bump to hacking 2.x https://review.opendev.org/708832 | |
| 09:57:37 | openstackgerrit | Stephen Finucane proposed openstack/python-novaclient master: Random cleanups https://review.opendev.org/709081 | |
| 10:45:50 | openstackgerrit | Lee Yarwood proposed openstack/nova master: libvirt: Remove native LUKS compat code https://review.opendev.org/669121 | |
| 11:30:12 | happyhemant | Hi folks, I am creating instance in openstack with SRIOV, hugepages and cpu pinning. Creation of instance works with only SRIOV. Similarly with cpu-pinning and hugepage and without SRIOV works as well. But creating instance together with SRIOV, cpu-pinning and hugepages does not work. I found some logs in nova conductor and scheduler have a look to those if anybody can help would be really appreciated | |
| 11:30:45 | happyhemant | nova-scheduler logs https://www.irccloud.com/pastebin/KqD8zxqU/nova-scheduler%20 | |
| 11:31:42 | happyhemant | nova-conductor logs https://www.irccloud.com/pastebin/e580zd4R/nova-conductor | |
| 12:12:42 | Tony31 | hi nova team. When scheduling an instance via Horizon I can select `availability zone`. Is this availability zone information passed to Cinder? I would like to select a specific cinder backend with nova availability zone. I have tried setting the cinder `backend_availability_zone` to match the nova AZ but I am unable to get a match. I have enabled | |
| 12:12:43 | Tony31 | in Cinder `scheduler_default_filters = AvailabilityZoneFilter` which i had found in the docs is already enabled by default. Could anyone help nudge me in the right direction? | |
| 13:47:10 | redrobot | Hello, Nova friends! I would appreciate reviews on this updated bugfix patch: https://review.opendev.org/#/c/679502/ | |
| 14:07:02 | openstackgerrit | Ivaylo Mitev proposed openstack/nova master: Faults from cell DB missing in GET /servers/detail https://review.opendev.org/699176 | |
| 15:29:03 | openstackgerrit | Balazs Gibizer proposed openstack/nova master: Support unshelve with qos ports https://review.opendev.org/704759 | |
| 15:29:04 | openstackgerrit | Balazs Gibizer proposed openstack/nova master: Enable unshelve with qos ports https://review.opendev.org/705475 | |
| 15:31:01 | efried | gibi, alex_xu, brinzhang: Where are we on the delete-on-termination spec? Do we need to defer? | |
| 15:31:04 | gibi | stephenfin: I had to resolve a merge conflict so I lost your +2 on https://review.opendev.org/#/c/704759/ Could you plug it back? | |
| 15:31:47 | gibi | efried: as far as I understand gmann is OK to have PATCH or a POST with a different action and alex_xu does not like the idea of PATCH | |
| 15:31:52 | openstackgerrit | Balazs Gibizer proposed openstack/nova master: Merge qos related renos for Ussuri https://review.opendev.org/706766 | |
| 15:32:11 | gibi | efried: I don't see that alex_xu and gmann agreed on a compromise | |
| 15:32:13 | brinzhang | I want to look gibi and alex_xu, if they are agree with this patch, I will be ok whether defer or pass | |
| 15:33:18 | brinzhang | gibi: I was disscussed with alex_xu on wechat, he is ok for PTACH | |
| 15:33:50 | gibi | brinzhang: OK. Then we have an agreement. Let me quickly re-read the spec but then I'm +2 on it | |
| 15:34:08 | brinzhang | gibi: thanks | |
| 15:35:20 | gibi | done. I'm +2 | |
| 15:36:20 | brinzhang | gibi: cool, alex_xu maybe busy from afternoon, gmann are you around? | |
| 15:37:30 | brinzhang | efried: Is this need another +2 for it, that you can +1W ? | |