| Posted | Nick | Remark | |
|---|---|---|---|
| #openstack-nova - 2020-01-30 | |||
| 14:20:08 | efried | nope. | |
| 14:20:20 | efried | I never knew/understood all of them even when I was working on it day to day. | |
| 14:20:41 | efried | Very specialized knowledge for operators of a power data center. | |
| 14:20:51 | sean-k-mooney | in that case the only thing that will save us is commit history | |
| 14:20:51 | efried | some pretty mysterious stuff in there. | |
| 14:20:55 | efried | no | |
| 14:20:59 | efried | commit history won't help | |
| 14:21:11 | efried | why would commit history have documentation if we don't have documentation? | |
| 14:21:39 | sean-k-mooney | the commit that added it should at least explain what it does to soem degree | |
| 14:21:48 | efried | yeah, no. | |
| 14:21:48 | sean-k-mooney | am i hoping for too much | |
| 14:22:07 | efried | Maybe for newer ones that were added after the main blob was put in. | |
| 14:22:10 | sean-k-mooney | well then i second your suggest to punt this to #openstack-powervm | |
| 14:23:05 | sean-k-mooney | oh i ment the out of tree drivers git repo history not the nova one | |
| 14:23:15 | efried | yeah, I know what you meant. Same answer. | |
| 14:23:39 | sean-k-mooney | :) | |
| 14:24:01 | sean-k-mooney | im going to grab breakfast/lunch brb | |
| 14:29:32 | efried | Oh snap! stephenfin: turns out PowerVC (the $ product that sits on top of this) allows you to pass the extra specs through, and actually documented them: https://www.ibm.com/support/knowledgecenter/SSXK2N_1.4.4/com.ibm.powervc.standard.help.doc/powervc_pg_flavorsextraspecs_hmc.html | |
| 14:35:18 | sean-k-mooney | damb good fined. so ya powervm:dedicated_proc is cpu pinning like i guessed | |
| 14:35:20 | efried | [3] https://opendev.org/openstack/nova/src/branch/master/nova/virt/powervm/vm.py#L466-L473 | |
| 14:35:20 | efried | [2] https://opendev.org/openstack/nova/src/branch/master/nova/virt/powervm/vm.py#L442-L443 | |
| 14:35:20 | efried | [1] https://opendev.org/openstack/nova/src/branch/master/nova/virt/powervm/vm.py#L376 | |
| 14:35:20 | efried | I think you'll find these are a subset of what's in the above doc; that's just because the in-tree driver is still behind the oot driver. For your purposes, just ignore the rest. | |
| 14:35:20 | efried | And we know those are all the allowable keys because [2] and [3]. | |
| 14:35:20 | efried | As you probably already figured out, VMBuilder._ATTRS_MAP [1] is the list of extra specs the powervm driver pays attention to. | |
| 14:35:50 | efried | sean-k-mooney: I think it's actually a bit more complex than that. | |
| 14:36:08 | efried | I think dedicated proc means you get a whole physical processor. | |
| 14:36:20 | efried | whereas shared means you get a piece of one | |
| 14:36:21 | sean-k-mooney | well its pinnign with the isolate polciy in libvirt parlance | |
| 14:36:28 | efried | but I think you're pinned regardless. | |
| 14:36:48 | efried | because powervm can hard partition a proc | |
| 14:37:30 | sean-k-mooney | oh ok well it its basicaly hw:cpu_policy=dedicated + hw:cpu_thread_policy=isolate pre train | |
| 14:37:34 | efried | so you can have, like, 20 virtual procs off of a physical proc, but you can set a minimum guarantee. | |
| 14:37:39 | sean-k-mooney | at least the semantic meaning is the same | |
| 14:38:00 | efried | I suspect powervm ops would disagree with you, but I'm not knowledgeable enough to do so :P | |
| 14:38:18 | efried | Let me put it this way: if the semantic meaning were the same, we would have just mapped the existing extra specs. | |
| 14:38:35 | sean-k-mooney | are you sure about that :) | |
| 14:38:38 | efried | no | |
| 14:38:51 | sean-k-mooney | adding your own might have just been quicker | |
| 14:38:54 | efried | but pretty sure. | |
| 14:39:37 | sean-k-mooney | in anycase when this validation work is complete i think it would be workthseeing if we can normalise the extra specs | |
| 14:40:47 | efried | If we had all the dev resources in the world, sure. | |
| 14:40:55 | efried | realistically, I see no chance of that happening. | |
| 14:41:02 | sean-k-mooney | i dont think it will mater in all cacuse but the powervm:shared_weight seam a lot like the cpu:shares option the libvirt and vmware | |
| 14:41:07 | sean-k-mooney | ya i guess | |
| 14:42:06 | sean-k-mooney | anyway really food this time o/ stephenfin when you get a chance can you review https://review.opendev.org/#/c/703373/ in os-vif | |
| 14:58:16 | francoisp | "If something is failing to complete after 5 loops, surely that's an issue that bumping the value will only mask?" | |
| 14:58:16 | francoisp | stephenfin you put in a comment at nova/conf/compute.py, line 871: | |
| 14:58:16 | francoisp | hello lyarwood, stephenfin, doing code rework for https://review.opendev.org/#/c/669674/ and I have a question for you: | |
| 14:58:17 | francoisp | I understand we want do do away with the config option, and stick with a hard-coded value for max number of re-tries. | |
| 14:58:18 | francoisp | are you suggesting we use a lower value (ex.: max 3 retries) ? | |
| 15:28:37 | Sundar | Hello dansmith, sean-k-mooney: I am here if you have any questions. | |
| 15:31:42 | dansmith | Sundar: about what? the latest rev? I haven't gone through anything yet this morning, but was hoping efried was going to take the next pass through pretty soon | |
| 15:33:29 | efried | "pretty soon" yah. | |
| 15:34:05 | efried | bauzas: I didn't give you a chance for another swing at ^ -- please lmk if you have issues. | |
| 15:34:05 | efried | stephenfin: sending https://review.opendev.org/#/c/682655/ | |
| 15:34:41 | bauzas | oh cool | |
| 15:34:46 | bauzas | honestly, I trust you | |
| 15:35:14 | bauzas | if I have time, I'll leave a +1 for the posterity | |
| 15:35:18 | efried | cool | |
| 15:35:54 | efried | bauzas: did you get a chance to catch up on the discussion for the numa topo spec? | |
| 15:36:05 | bauzas | efried: unfortunately no | |
| 15:36:26 | bauzas | yesterday evening my time you mean ? | |
| 15:36:53 | efried | Yes, but summarized in the spec comments and an etherpad linked therefrom. No need to read the whole IRC log. | |
| 15:36:56 | sean-k-mooney | bauzas: efried sumerised it in the spec and linked to the conversation on irc and an ehterpad | |
| 15:37:22 | efried | bauzas: no real hurry (other than spec freeze in a couple weeks), but buzz me or sean-k-mooney if you have concerns or need clarification or whatever. | |
| 15:37:33 | openstackgerrit | Stephen Finucane proposed openstack/nova master: Recalculate 'RequestSpec.numa_topology' on resize https://review.opendev.org/662522 | |
| 15:39:09 | bauzas | sean-k-mooney: efried: no worries, i'll look at it | |
| 15:39:09 | stephenfin | gibi: fixed those functional tests ^ | |
| 15:39:17 | stephenfin | got burned by my own refactoring work /o\ | |
| 15:39:25 | bauzas | and thanks for discussing this, even if I was parenting | |
| 15:39:25 | stephenfin | I really need to stop changing how those things work | |
| 15:40:16 | bauzas | gibi: stephenfin: efried: we have this very old cmd that would help ops, if you like getting it a swing https://review.opendev.org/#/c/670112/ | |
| 15:40:32 | bauzas | mriedem would be surprised if we eventually merge it :p | |
| 15:40:37 | sean-k-mooney | after backporting acrouss 4 release im not sure you can resist it | |
| 15:41:19 | sean-k-mooney | the sad part is each refactoring does make them better | |
| 15:42:46 | stephenfin | bauzas: Oh, that looks hairy. Can you ask me Monday once FOSDEM's behind me? :) | |
| 15:43:04 | bauzas | stephenfin: well, if you're not hit by the Coronavirus, of course :D | |
| 15:43:36 | sean-k-mooney | na stephen has better taste in beer then to be hit by that | |
| 15:44:14 | bauzas | at least there should be good news | |
| 15:44:32 | bauzas | the Delirium bar shouldn't be packed like usual times | |
| 15:44:36 | bauzas | stephenfin: ^ | |
| 15:46:17 | openstackgerrit | Merged openstack/nova-specs master: Re-propose the flavor extra spec validation spec https://review.opendev.org/682655 | |
| 15:48:51 | openstackgerrit | Stephen Finucane proposed openstack/nova-specs master: Address comments on 'flavor-extra-spec-validators' spec https://review.opendev.org/705047 | |
| 15:53:31 | bauzas | every year I consider going to FOSDEM | |
| 15:54:12 | bauzas | and every year I think it wouldn't be worth the energy I would need for being a speaker | |
| 15:54:25 | bauzas | so, unless I pay... | |
| 15:54:29 | Sundar | dansmith: I responded and addressed your comments in my latest update last night. Understand you want efried to review first. | |
| 15:54:42 | dansmith | ack | |
| 15:55:05 | Sundar | efried: I understand you have other things to take care of. I'll wait. | |
| 15:55:11 | sean-k-mooney | bauzas: jay was thinking of going this year. i was hoping to see him but since i taough i would be getting the keys to the house im buying on monday i did not want to travel this weekend | |
| 15:56:11 | bauzas | that also means I would miss a skiing weekend. Unfair. | |
| 15:57:39 | efried | Sundar: I need to do some PM-ish paperwork (reconcile blueprints with specs, kind of thing) ahead of this afternoon's meeting, but reviewing your series is next on my list after that. | |
| 15:59:24 | Sundar | efried: Thanks. | |
| 16:16:02 | openstackgerrit | Merged openstack/nova-specs master: Address comments on 'flavor-extra-spec-validators' spec https://review.opendev.org/705047 | |
| 16:16:18 | efried | stephenfin: did you see response earlier about powervm extra specs? | |
| 16:16:58 | stephenfin | efried: I did. Did you happen to leave comments on the patch, out of curiosity? | |
| 16:17:17 | stephenfin | If not, could you? I probably won't get a chance to respin that until next week now | |
| 16:18:10 | efried | stephenfin: The code side? No, I wasn't planning to do a pass through that until... uh, later. But assuming you've got a placeholder in there for powervm, I'll go stuff the link in there. | |
| 16:20:33 | efried | stephenfin: done | |