Earlier  
Posted Nick Remark
#openstack-nova - 2020-01-15
15:05:53 Sundar sean-k-mooney: ^
15:10:55 sean-k-mooney am i still have it deploy it seamed to create the profile fine as the list shows
15:11:12 sean-k-mooney its a littel weird to just dump the raw json on the command line
15:11:25 sean-k-mooney when defining the groups
15:12:08 sean-k-mooney as far as i can tell the issue was the root_required patch not being present on the branch i tested
15:14:04 sean-k-mooney Sundar: next time i try goign though the work flow of deploying a vm ill see if i can capture the api logs too
15:14:37 gibi stephenfin, efried: the qos live migration patches are ready for review, if you have some time https://review.opendev.org/#/q/status:open++topic:bp/support-move-ops-with-qos-ports-ussuri
15:16:51 Sundar sean-k-mooney: Thanks
15:18:10 Sundar dansmith: Re. https://review.opendev.org/#/c/631244/53/nova/tests/unit/compute/test_compute_mgr.py@6098 , I stepped through the code and noticed that the return value was a dict, not a list. In fact, the first dict from the list.
15:19:02 Sundar dansmith: Your concerns about clarity are probably addressed by having mock_get_arqs.assert_has_calls() and clarifying the comments, right?
15:19:45 dansmith Sundar: then I think something else is going on: https://pastebin.com/7Rr1CVfd
15:21:14 dansmith Sundar: side_effect is the one that behaves the way you're describing (as you know): https://pastebin.com/PHiKTtew
15:22:03 Sundar dansmith: let me take another look and get back
15:22:56 dansmith thanks
15:39:15 openstackgerrit Sylvain Bauza proposed openstack/nova-specs master: Proposes NUMA topology with RPs https://review.opendev.org/552924
15:39:25 bauzas huzzah ^
15:42:14 sean-k-mooney well it nice that you rejoin us with such a simple and non contorviral proposal :P
15:49:48 artom Controviral?
15:50:08 artom I kinda like that. Becomes viral because it's so controversial
15:50:33 sean-k-mooney hehe
15:50:47 sean-k-mooney you figured it out so its close enough
15:51:39 sean-k-mooney but yes i think the decieion we have been making related to mixed cpus makes modeing numa in plamcent more controversial
15:52:06 stephenfin gibi: Done (the QoS live migration series)
15:52:17 gibi stephenfin: thanks a lot!
15:52:53 sean-k-mooney i was less concerned when we used the hw:* syntax but if we go with the placementese syntax then i have deep concerns with granuarl request groups and the group_policy as they exist today
15:55:11 Sundar dansmith: Please see http://paste.openstack.org/show/788413/. The main change I made is http://paste.openstack.org/show/788415/. The first call to get_arqs_for_instance is mocked properly, but the second call hits a StopIteration error.
15:57:38 dansmith Sundar: no, return_value will work as many times as you want: https://pastebin.com/2Wdgb64J
15:58:20 sean-k-mooney if you want to have a limited number of retruns or different retrun i think you use sideffect with an iterable
15:58:42 Sundar Ah, my bad, I still have it as side_effect. Will fix that
15:58:53 dansmith ...
16:01:04 Sundar I think it should work with these changes. This was the only pending point, AFAICS. Are you good with updating the patch set once this is resolved?
16:01:11 Sundar dansmith: ^
16:01:45 dansmith Sundar: unless you've replied to other comments I had, I think so
16:02:56 Sundar I pretty much agreed to other changes, even if it is a matter of preference.
16:03:24 aarents lyarwood: I replied to your remark https://review.opendev.org/#/c/696084 maybe kashyap can confirm that implemeting finish_unshelved as you suggest is the way to go
16:23:03 openstackgerrit Sundar Nadathur proposed openstack/os-traits master: Add a trait that compute manager can handle accelerator requests. https://review.opendev.org/698961
16:43:53 openstack bug 1859766 in OpenStack Compute (nova) stein "functional tests intermittently fails with "ReadOnlyFieldError: Cannot modify readonly field uuid"" [Undecided,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1859766 - Assigned to Balazs Gibizer (balazs-gibizer)
16:43:53 openstackgerrit Balazs Gibizer proposed openstack/nova stable/stein: DNM: try to trace bug 1859766 https://review.opendev.org/702700
17:27:53 openstackgerrit Kashyap Chamarthy proposed openstack/nova-specs master: Re-propose "Secure Boot support for KVM & QEMU guests" for Ussuri https://review.opendev.org/693844
17:28:41 kashyap aarents: Sorry, I wasn't ignoring that change, just been buried.
17:46:06 stephenfin efried_afk: not sure if you're gone for the day, but https://review.opendev.org/#/c/697537/ could probably be revisited now that x-cell resize has merged
17:47:03 stephenfin and melwitt, I think I've clarified my (new) intent in https://review.opendev.org/#/c/696745/, which should assuage some of your concerns hopefully
17:47:08 stephenfin with that
17:47:32 melwitt stephenfin: ack
18:02:52 openstack bug 1845146 in OpenStack Compute (nova) train "NUMA aware live migration failed when vCPU pin set" [High,Fix committed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1845146 - Assigned to Dan Smith (danms)
18:02:52 openstackgerrit Artom Lifshitz proposed openstack/nova master: NUMA LM: Add func test for bug 1845146 https://review.opendev.org/687404
18:03:46 artom dansmith, could I ask you to look at that 2-patch series ^^ when you get a chance? stephenfin's the other reviewer, but your +1 or +W'less +2 can still carry weight and help the evential non-RH approver (efried, I'm guessing)
18:12:05 dansmith artom: yeah, although I'm a couple layers deep on the stack and have a call in 18 minutes
18:12:27 dansmith artom: meaning, don't let me forget
18:14:15 fungi anybody remember how far back nova started providing configdrive by default without needing to manually enable it in the config?
18:14:29 fungi (i mean providing it if the client requests it at boot)
18:14:35 dansmith a long time
18:15:06 fungi cool, config reference only goes back as far as pike but seemed to indicate it was available by default at least that far back
18:15:10 fungi thanks dansmith!
18:15:27 sean-k-mooney fungi: its been availabel via the api
18:15:27 dansmith yeah I'm pretty sure it's been around for a real (real) long time
18:15:55 sean-k-mooney its not on by defualt unless you request it or set the force config drive options in the config
18:16:12 sean-k-mooney it might predate micorverions
18:16:23 fungi yep, thanks. trying to help a user in #zuul figure out whether they have to do anything fancy in nova's config to make configdrive available to nodepool
18:16:25 dansmith it definitely predates microversions
18:16:42 fungi sounds like no, just make sure nodepool asks for a configdrive
18:17:03 dansmith well, isn't there a way to configure it to *not* honor the user's configdrive request?
18:17:47 dansmith ah, nevermind, looks like they can always ask for it
18:17:48 dansmith so yeah I think you're good
18:18:45 sean-k-mooney fungi: the only thing they shoudl have to do is make sure the iso vfat tools are installed so nova can actully create the config drive
18:18:57 sean-k-mooney but they will be on any normal install
18:19:14 fungi right, already suggested that to them
18:19:24 fungi either genisofs or mkisofs depending on the vintage
18:19:36 sean-k-mooney yep
18:19:49 fungi i have a feeling they just need to adjust their nodepool launcher config
18:20:58 fungi they provided a `openstack show server` paste which indicated config_drive was not True and i expect that comes down to the boot parameters it provided
18:22:22 sean-k-mooney right. it could be forced in there config but nodepool has a setting for that too right
18:23:01 sean-k-mooney you can use https://zuul-ci.org/docs/nodepool/configuration.html#attr-providers.[openstack].diskimages.config-drive
18:24:04 sean-k-mooney actully it looks like node pool does not use the boot parmater since that is on the image and instead is using the image metadata right?
18:24:57 sean-k-mooney there are 3 ways to trun on cofig drive, the force_config_drive config option, the api boot request or the image metadata
18:31:46 openstackgerrit Sundar Nadathur proposed openstack/nova master: Add cyborg tempest job. https://review.opendev.org/670999
18:31:46 openstackgerrit Sundar Nadathur proposed openstack/nova master: Enable and use COMPUTE_ACCELERATORS trait. https://review.opendev.org/699554
18:31:46 openstackgerrit Sundar Nadathur proposed openstack/nova master: Enable start/stop of instances with accelerators. https://review.opendev.org/699553
18:31:46 openstackgerrit Sundar Nadathur proposed openstack/nova master: Enable hard/soft reboot with accelerators. https://review.opendev.org/697940
18:31:46 openstackgerrit Sundar Nadathur proposed openstack/nova master: Delete ARQs for an instance when the instance is deleted. https://review.opendev.org/673735
18:31:46 openstackgerrit Sundar Nadathur proposed openstack/nova master: Compose accelerator PCI devices into domain XML in libvirt driver. https://review.opendev.org/631245
18:31:46 openstackgerrit Sundar Nadathur proposed openstack/nova master: Pass accelerator requests to each virt driver from compute manager. https://review.opendev.org/698581
18:31:46 openstackgerrit Sundar Nadathur proposed openstack/nova master: Create and bind Cyborg ARQs. https://review.opendev.org/631244
18:31:46 openstackgerrit Sundar Nadathur proposed openstack/nova master: Define Cyborg ARQ binding notification event. https://review.opendev.org/692707
18:31:46 openstackgerrit Sundar Nadathur proposed openstack/nova master: Add Cyborg device profile groups to request spec. https://review.opendev.org/631243
18:31:46 openstackgerrit Sundar Nadathur proposed openstack/nova master: ksa auth conf and client for Cyborg access https://review.opendev.org/631242
18:39:56 openstackgerrit waleed mousa proposed openstack/os-vif master: [Follow Up] OVS DPDK port representors support https://review.opendev.org/665965
18:43:29 artom dansmith, sorry, was on a 1:1
18:43:36 artom dansmith, thanks! I'll be sure to hound your ass then
19:01:40 efried #success With the merging of https://review.opendev.org/#/c/696518/ mox is finally purged from nova \o/
19:02:02 sean-k-mooney cool
19:02:06 efried takashin, stephenfin: ^ I closed out the bp
19:02:20 efried hm, no response from successbot
19:02:30 efried shrug
19:02:43 sean-k-mooney it was so amazed that its finally done it need a minute
19:03:19 sean-k-mooney or its borked
19:06:03 dansmith maybe it is opinionated now and doesn't agree it's a successbot-worthy moment?
19:06:59 sean-k-mooney in that case can we get it to do code reviews for us too
19:07:42 sean-k-mooney its tallens are clearly being wasted
19:11:10 openstackgerrit Merged openstack/nova master: libvirt: Remove MIN_LIBVIRT_KVM_AARCH64_VERSION https://review.opendev.org/695901

Earlier   Later