Earlier  
Later
New Search
Posted Nick Remark
#openstack-nova - 2019-10-30
14:41:13 dansmith mriedem: enqueued
14:41:28 dansmith 35.0%? pretty precise grossness measurement
14:41:39 mriedem i was in the lab all last night
14:41:57 dansmith heh
14:42:23 efried mriedem: I was working through that
14:42:47 efried I have some questions, so dansmith if you wouldn't mind holding off approving it...
14:43:01 mriedem efried: which? the az one?
14:43:08 efried sorry, the host_status-unknown one
14:43:13 mriedem oh
14:43:27 mriedem dan and i are talking about the az one
14:43:36 efried ack
14:55:58 sean-k-mooney dansmith: thanks for reviewing the image metadta prefilter series. ill try and adress your comments this week
14:56:18 dansmith sean-k-mooney: np
14:56:45 mriedem easy multi-cell functional test-only change that's been sitting a long time https://review.opendev.org/#/c/452006/
14:56:56 mriedem 2.5 years...
14:57:44 dansmith let's not rush that one
15:00:55 efried mriedem, melwitt: I'm +2 on the host_status UNKNOWN policy patch, but would like some help understanding a thing before +Wing. (No hurry)
15:03:41 efried mriedem: how come those other release patches are stacked on the queens-em one?
15:03:58 mriedem no particular reason, laziness
15:03:58 dansmith mriedem: for N volumes your patch also avoids making N volume.get() calls instead opting for the bulk query once yeah?
15:04:04 efried ight
15:04:17 mriedem dansmith: yeah - which is where i mentioned i could split that part out if it helps
15:04:42 dansmith oh wait
15:05:01 dansmith it actually just does volume.get() on each one in _get_volumes_for_bdms()
15:05:23 dansmith I was thinking this was an improvement, but it just moves where you make all the individual calls
15:07:59 mriedem efried: i replied in https://review.opendev.org/#/c/679181/
15:08:35 mriedem dansmith: yeah, i mentioned using GET /volumes with a list but as commented i don't think that would work and i should remove that comment
15:08:52 dansmith yeah, sorry, just pulling all this context back in
15:09:04 mriedem it does mean we'd avoid multiple GETs on the same volume, but you can't really boot from volume with multiple servers and the same pre-existing volume anyway
15:09:37 mriedem unless it's a multiattach volume anyway
15:10:41 melwitt efried: let me fix it, I think I just spaced bc gmann added those two in a patch below mine
15:10:52 mriedem melwitt: do it in a follow up
15:11:00 melwitt ok
15:11:00 mriedem it's hard enough getting things through the gate right now
15:11:14 efried I just want to understand why the tests work
15:11:21 efried still reading mriedem's reply...
15:11:25 mriedem efried: the policy docs are just an omission
15:11:39 mriedem note that those are just docs...not code
15:11:40 efried oh, that's just a doc thing? (/me doesn't really understand policy)
15:11:41 efried got it.
15:11:57 mriedem right, the policy rule is real, the API method / route stuff is docs
15:12:38 openstackgerrit Balazs Gibizer proposed openstack/nova master: Add functional test for two-cell scheduler behaviors https://review.opendev.org/452006
15:13:13 mriedem ah gdi, fake_nodes
15:13:33 efried melwitt, mriedem: +W. If you want to hit any of that other stuff in the fup too, feel free, but none of it was super important.
15:14:08 melwitt ok, thanks
15:14:20 gibi mriedem: fix is on the way, and then I will +2 it
15:14:27 efried - the fact that the host_status field is omitted, not included as ""
15:14:27 efried - the name of the policy rule
15:14:27 efried melwitt: also, wouldn't hurt to update the bp text for at least these two things:
15:15:01 efried (there turned out to be no spec for this, right?)
15:15:03 melwitt ah, right, will do
15:15:09 efried thx
15:15:10 melwitt yeah no spec
15:15:25 openstackgerrit Balazs Gibizer proposed openstack/nova master: Add functional test for two-cell scheduler behaviors https://review.opendev.org/452006
15:18:32 dansmith mriedem: question for you in there, and figure I'm standing by for you to remove that comment and split the patches if you're going to
15:19:27 mriedem i'll split the patches if needed but not keen to if i can help it, at least for the volume GET stuff since that touches a lot of unit tests. the config option docs and such are easy to split out though, but also minor.
15:19:48 dansmith mriedem: yep I figured, hence my comment about it :)
15:20:05 dansmith it's easy enough to see what test changes are related to the refactor so I'm not too concerned
15:20:15 dansmith mriedem: are you planning to backport this?
15:26:42 mriedem dansmith: replied, it's about pinning the instance to the default 'nova' zone which is a no-no
15:27:04 mriedem dansmith: backporting it would probably be difficult, at least past train
15:28:01 mriedem i guess it depends on how much people/distros need it, but it's extremely latent and from talking to smorrison about this he says his users just have to always specify an az
15:28:05 dansmith mriedem: okay, I didn't think about the cinder default being 'nova'
15:28:17 dansmith mriedem: sure, was just curious
15:29:38 mriedem actually it won't even backport cleanly to train b/c of https://review.opendev.org/#/c/667133/
15:29:58 mriedem that's pretty trivial to resolve though
15:33:33 openstackgerrit Matt Riedemann proposed openstack/nova master: Add support matrix for Delete (Abort) on-going live migration https://review.opendev.org/625781
15:35:01 artom mriedem, can https://review.opendev.org/#/c/649419/ be expected to merge? I want to know if I can backport it internally to Newton
15:35:06 dansmith mriedem: yeah, it's cool, I just kinda thought you'd be wanting that, is all
15:35:09 artom Or should I stick to the merged pike version
15:37:22 openstackgerrit Matthew Booth proposed openstack/nova master: Allow alternate implementations of mount/umount in _HostMountState https://review.opendev.org/692174
15:37:22 openstackgerrit Matthew Booth proposed openstack/nova master: Cleanup libvirt test_mount unit tests https://review.opendev.org/692173
15:38:20 mriedem artom: ask your stable core brethren
15:39:03 artom lyarwood, around? plz to be lookink at https://review.opendev.org/#/c/649419/ :)
15:39:20 mriedem dansmith: i'm cool with not backporting it and letting it bake on master. if let's say some edge distro product thing needed it then i could be convinced to backport...
15:39:26 openstack artom: Error: Error getting bugzilla.redhat.com bug #1633909: NotPermitted
15:39:26 artom lyarwood, it would facilitate the backport for https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1633909, which we want for OSP10z14
15:39:31 dansmith mriedem: heh
15:39:36 artom openstack, apologies
15:40:18 artom Ah, he took the whole day off as PTO
15:40:27 mriedem there are others
15:40:52 mriedem there is one in france always saying he's happy to review backports
15:41:55 artom He's on PTO as well
15:42:00 mriedem jesus
15:42:02 dansmith artom: I can hit that if you want
15:42:13 artom dansmith, thank you :)
15:42:23 dansmith seems reasonable, it's a nasty issue, if we still care about it
15:42:34 artom melwitt, you were next on the list! But dansmith preempted tht
15:42:37 artom *that
15:42:42 melwitt woohoo
15:42:48 openstackgerrit Eric Fried proposed openstack/nova master: Only allow one scheduler service in tests https://review.opendev.org/682486
15:44:15 dansmith artom: I just couldn't stand to see where it was going with mriedem calling out all the team
15:44:47 artom dansmith, ... it was going to melwitt :P
15:45:31 dansmith artom: right, who I figured was stranded with no services in the third world country we call California
15:45:38 artom And on fire.
15:46:31 melwitt haha
15:46:33 mriedem you can always bug tonyb https://review.opendev.org/#/admin/groups/540,members
15:47:49 openstackgerrit Eric Fried proposed openstack/nova master: Only allow one scheduler service in tests https://review.opendev.org/682486
15:48:04 melwitt I have learned to greatly appreciate when I have internet access
15:48:39 mriedem my grandpappy always said internet is a privilege not a right

Earlier   Later