Earlier  
Later
New Search
Posted Nick Remark
#openstack-nova - 2019-08-19
15:59:16 efried so you mean, elasticsearch is only good if something blows up in a small way?
15:59:36 mriedem i wonder why job-output is not compressed
15:59:48 mriedem i don't see subsequent ansible task failures for compressing and publishing logs though
15:59:56 efried swift cutover something something
16:00:45 mriedem the b' is screwing with your query
16:01:23 efried that's going to be prevalent in py3* logs, tho
16:01:29 mriedem yes i know
16:01:30 efried And I'm not including the b'' in my search
16:01:31 efried should I be?
16:01:32 mriedem and it's always been a problem
16:01:35 efried o
16:01:47 mriedem message:"b'TypeError: open: path should be string, bytes or os.PathLike, not _NormalAccessor'" AND tags:"console"
16:01:47 mriedem so i'm using:
16:02:06 mriedem but that's not showing hits either,
16:02:12 efried I got hits
16:02:20 efried (this got resolved over the weekend, so you have to spread to last week)
16:02:30 mriedem i'm goign to 7 days
16:03:01 mriedem are you sure those are real hits? kibana has this weird thing where the first query results are always garbage
16:03:07 efried weird, I'm getting lots of hits with that sea... oh, 'and' is case-sensitive
16:03:07 mriedem and i have to hit the magnifying glass thing to re-query
16:03:25 efried so yeah, I'm getting nothing.
16:03:34 mriedem then we need to talk to clarkb
16:10:36 openstackgerrit Shilpa Devharakar proposed openstack/nova master: Nova object changes for forbidden aggregates request filter https://review.opendev.org/671072
16:11:21 openstackgerrit Shilpa Devharakar proposed openstack/nova master: DB API changes to get non-matching aggregates from metadata https://review.opendev.org/671074
16:12:09 openstackgerrit Shilpa Devharakar proposed openstack/nova master: Add a new request filter to isolate aggregates https://review.opendev.org/671075
16:13:00 openstackgerrit Shilpa Devharakar proposed openstack/nova master: Enable request filter isolate_aggregates https://review.opendev.org/667952
16:37:18 openstackgerrit Adam Spiers proposed openstack/nova master: Extract SEV-specific bits on host detection https://review.opendev.org/636334
16:37:19 openstackgerrit Adam Spiers proposed openstack/nova master: Apply SEV-specific guest config when SEV is required https://review.opendev.org/644565
16:37:19 openstackgerrit Adam Spiers proposed openstack/nova master: Add and to config.py https://review.opendev.org/636318
16:37:20 openstackgerrit Eric Fried proposed openstack/nova-specs master: tox -e fast-specs https://review.opendev.org/673356
16:41:20 openstackgerrit Adam Spiers proposed openstack/nova master: Add extra spec parameter and image property for memory encryption https://review.opendev.org/664420
16:42:04 openstackgerrit Adam Spiers proposed openstack/nova master: Extract SEV-specific bits on host detection https://review.opendev.org/636334
16:42:05 openstackgerrit Adam Spiers proposed openstack/nova master: Apply SEV-specific guest config when SEV is required https://review.opendev.org/644565
16:42:05 openstackgerrit Adam Spiers proposed openstack/nova master: Add and to config.py https://review.opendev.org/636318
16:48:54 openstackgerrit Adam Spiers proposed openstack/nova master: Make it easier to run a selection of tests relevant to ongoing work https://review.opendev.org/677180
16:54:52 openstackgerrit sean mooney proposed openstack/nova master: Libvirt: add support for vPMU configuration. https://review.opendev.org/671338
16:55:14 sean-k-mooney mriedem: ^ should address your vpmu nits. im going to grab something to eat quickly but if you see anything else leave a comment and ill fix it in an hour or so
16:55:22 openstackgerrit Adam Spiers proposed openstack/nova master: Enable booting of libvirt guests with AMD SEV memory encryption https://review.opendev.org/666616
17:01:44 efried Basically (IMO) we need *some* reasonable py37 coverage in there, and nova seemed as good as any.
17:01:44 efried mriedem: are you in favor of gating requirements on py37 using cross-nova? https://review.opendev.org/#/c/677071/5
17:06:15 mriedem gmann: comments in your novaclient 2.75 change https://review.opendev.org/#/c/676275/
17:07:43 mriedem is openstack-py37 voting on nova changes?
17:07:53 mriedem looks like yes
17:08:16 mriedem https://opendev.org/openstack/openstack-zuul-jobs/src/branch/master/zuul.d/jobs.yaml#L166
17:09:13 mriedem so yeah +1
17:09:37 efried thanks mriedem
17:13:39 openstackgerrit Matt Riedemann proposed openstack/nova master: doc: cleanup 2.75 REST API microversion history doc https://review.opendev.org/677259
17:29:46 openstackgerrit Akihiro Motoki proposed openstack/nova master: PDF documentation build https://review.opendev.org/676730
17:38:13 openstackgerrit Adam Spiers proposed openstack/nova-specs master: Allow deep-linking to memory reservation section of AMD SEV spec https://review.opendev.org/677264
18:01:12 aspiers err, why is there no direct link from https://docs.openstack.org/nova/latest/ to https://docs.openstack.org/nova/latest/user/ ?
18:04:03 efried aspiers: fix it!
18:07:39 aspiers efried: I was wondering if it was deliberate
18:08:14 aspiers "Todo
18:08:17 aspiers The rest of this document should probably move to the admin guide."
18:08:51 aspiers The top-level page directly links to some of the stuff under doc/source/user/
18:09:21 efried I can't imagine why the nova doc landing page wouldn't have a link to the user landing page anyway.
18:09:45 aspiers It does seem odd
18:09:53 aspiers but I find the whole doc organisation pretty confusing
18:10:12 efried agree
18:10:43 efried At some point donnyd was on a mission to reorganize, perhaps y'all could meet minds
18:11:16 aspiers when I've got this damn SEV series done
18:11:33 aspiers I'm pretty close now, just addressing your feedback on the tip of the series and then my backlog is clear I think
18:11:47 aspiers that is, until the next flood of -1s come in ;-)
18:14:53 aspiers efried: now I'm longing for tox -e fast-docs ...
18:15:36 openstackgerrit Matt Riedemann proposed openstack/nova master: api-ref: add config_drive to 2.75 rebuild response parameters https://review.opendev.org/677267
18:17:30 efried mriedem: Does this https://review.opendev.org/675908 smell like a stat mining / ATC grab exercise to you?
18:18:33 mriedem you mean just b/c it's nova-specs?
18:21:00 efried and because it's pointless, and because they put a co-author without any evidence of that person having co-authored anything, and because there's really nothing to co-author
18:21:21 efried basically this patch now has three contributors
18:21:50 efried Tempting to say, "you want a free summit ticket, go get it from somebody else's project"
18:21:51 donnyd efried: Still on that mission, but its hard to even get a start
18:22:09 efried I hear ya.
18:23:07 donnyd I am starting in docs with cyborg atm
18:49:51 mriedem efried: yeah... https://review.opendev.org/#/c/675908/3..4//COMMIT_MSG
18:50:49 mriedem i know "Add Python 3 Train unit tests" is a Train cycle goal - i don't really know what it is, but i know it's a goal
18:51:07 mriedem https://review.opendev.org/#/q/owner:%22Filippo+Inzaghi%22+status:open
18:51:27 efried yeah, I was okay with it at that point
18:52:03 efried But when Vieri, a notorious silent +1er, uploaded a new PS that added not him/her, but 98k, another notorious silent +1er, as co-author, my spidey sense went nuts.
19:00:59 efried dustinc: Are you busily debugging the ironic CI failure in patch #3 at this point?
19:01:52 openstackgerrit Matt Riedemann proposed openstack/nova master: doc: cleanup 2.75 REST API microversion history doc https://review.opendev.org/677259
19:01:53 openstackgerrit Matt Riedemann proposed openstack/nova master: api-ref: add config_drive to 2.75 rebuild response parameters https://review.opendev.org/677267
19:01:55 sean-k-mooney efried: well give we dont run the in repo test in the nova-specs gate i dont think https://review.opendev.org/#/c/675908/4 is relly useful
19:02:39 efried agree, it would be just for consistency with other projects, but I really don't think it's worthwhile.
19:02:48 mriedem efried: welcome to my world of being annoyed with random changes like this that just look like stat padding
19:03:06 mriedem and then my annoyance with people that are like, "what's the harm?! let them have their fun."
19:03:29 efried I don't mind stat padding if the change has *some* utility. But this one... doesn't.
19:05:55 efried mriedem: btw, I made this for you https://review.opendev.org/#/c/674678/
19:06:05 efried cmon man, I need to pad my stats
19:06:24 sean-k-mooney also nova-specs does not actully have any python deliverables. so personally i would rather remvoe the setup.cfg ectra that came form teh template to make it claer this is just a repo of text files and the tools needed to manage it. but i also dont really feel like writing a patch to do that or wasing your time reviewing it
19:07:26 sean-k-mooney i.e. rather then saying i support py37 and such. but thats just me
19:08:21 efried cmon sean-k-mooney, you need the stats
19:08:33 efried okay, enough of that joke
19:09:49 sean-k-mooney i -1'd it that will bump them enough
19:13:14 dustinc efried: actually was working on the providers stuff
19:13:19 dustinc providers.yaml
19:13:49 efried okay. Not trying to pressure you one way or another. Just lmk if you want help on that.
19:16:33 dustinc thanks, I probably need help on everything but just focusing on one thing at a time :)
19:33:37 openstackgerrit melanie witt proposed openstack/nova master: Re-use DB MetaData during archive_deleted_rows https://review.opendev.org/675218
19:33:38 openstackgerrit melanie witt proposed openstack/nova master: Verify archive_deleted_rows --all-cells in post test hook https://review.opendev.org/672840
19:33:38 openstackgerrit melanie witt proposed openstack/nova master: nova-manage db archive_deleted_rows is not multi-cell aware https://review.opendev.org/507486

Earlier   Later