Earlier  
Later
New Search
Posted Nick Remark
#openstack-nova - 2019-08-14
22:15:33 efried thanks mordred for saving me a failed zuul run on a stupid
22:17:31 openstackgerrit Merged openstack/nova stable/rocky: Fix misuse of nova.objects.base.obj_equal_prims https://review.opendev.org/676290
22:18:53 sean-k-mooney gibi: by the way you asked me over a month ago if i had an example of how to configure a host to use the same interface for both ovs and sriov. i am setting up my sriov servers again and this is the local.conf i use http://paste.openstack.org/show/757169/
22:20:55 sean-k-mooney im using port enp1s0f1 as teh ovs port on the br-ex and its also the pf of the sriov vfs with the neutron fdb extention enalbed to make sure that ovs vm to sriov vm traffic does nto need to hairpin at teh top of rack switch
#openstack-nova - 2019-08-15
00:03:58 openstackgerrit Shilpa Devharakar proposed openstack/nova master: Nova object changes for forbidden aggregates request filter https://review.opendev.org/671072
00:05:05 openstackgerrit Shilpa Devharakar proposed openstack/nova master: DB API changes to get non-matching aggregates from metadata https://review.opendev.org/671074
00:05:49 openstackgerrit Shilpa Devharakar proposed openstack/nova master: Add a new request filter to isolate aggregates https://review.opendev.org/671075
00:06:13 efried would be nice to have it merged by morning to unwedge https://review.opendev.org/#/c/676457/
00:06:13 efried dansmith, melwitt: If you're still around, this iteration of that fixture passed zuul: https://review.opendev.org/#/c/676495/
00:06:35 openstackgerrit Shilpa Devharakar proposed openstack/nova master: Enable request filter isolate_aggregates https://review.opendev.org/667952
00:26:41 melwitt efried: looking
00:28:12 efried thanks melwitt
00:31:09 melwitt guh, I don't know what I'm looking at here
00:31:35 efried melwitt: I can splain if you got a minute
00:32:01 melwitt ok. I see mordred said earlier that he thinks it looks good, if he could +1 it again that would be helpful too
00:36:10 efried So I can't just mock away the ksa stuff - which was my first PS on this fix - because then those all puke.
00:36:10 efried The problem is that the discovery stuff is done through ksa - and we have other things (glance, cinder, ironic...) that rely on those ksa-isms either not being mocked at all, or being mocked a certain way in their own tests.
00:36:10 efried And in unit/functional tests, we don't care about any of that.
00:36:10 efried When we try to load up sdk, it normally does some discovery for us, things like checking the service catalog and asking for version documents.
00:36:10 efried Without any fixturing, unit and functional tests fail because many of them hit paths that try to use placement, and placement now uses sdk.
00:36:11 efried The linked patch shows the code I cribbed from.
00:36:11 efried So instead I'm mocking the thing in the sdk that triggers that discovery. And I'm making it do almost all of what it would do anyway - just skipping that one part that hits ksa.
00:37:17 melwitt ok, thanks
00:38:57 efried The problem is that sdk is a moving target right now, which is why I had to change it; but hopefully this version will stick for a little while longer until we can get real fixtures from sdk.
00:38:57 efried As before, this is just making sure that unit/func tests that only care about a default no-op-ish ksa Adapter actually get something that looks like an Adapter.
00:39:21 melwitt yeah, I was looking through wondering why mocking get_endpoint didn't work
00:40:29 melwitt like, you're skipping around the get_endpoint call in the new mock, but yet mocking get_endpoint itself didn't work. and I wasn't seeing what/how this avoids the problem
00:40:56 efried Right - if you look at the PS1 failures, you can see where things like glance and cinder are relying on get_endpoint to "work" and be un-mocked.
00:41:26 efried So whereas mocking get_endpoint gets around the paths where *placement* tries to create an Adapter, it makes those other ones puke.
00:44:02 melwitt efried: could you have mocked get_endpoint conditionally if self.service_type is placement to get the same thing or no?
00:46:47 efried melwitt: I think then in tests that hit placement *and* one of the other things, it would still get mocked - possibly at an unpredictable time in the test
00:47:25 melwitt ok. sorry for all the questions, this is confusing to me
00:47:45 efried the right solution, long-term, and mordred is working on this, is for openstacksdk to publish fixtures that we can just import and use. Because openstacksdk will always know what it's doing internally and how.
00:48:39 efried This - like the previous iteration of the fixture that mocked Adapter.get_major_api_version - is just a stopgap to let us move forward until that happens.
00:49:20 efried and it's only affecting unit/func tests. The real proof that sdk is working for us is in the fact that all the tempest tests - which all use placement, which uses sdk - pass.
00:49:41 melwitt yeah, I get that part, I just didn't want to fast approve something I had zero understanding of. I'll look at it some more and if I can grok it, I'll send it on
00:50:06 melwitt thanks for explaining all that
00:50:32 efried I think alex_xu might be arriving on the scene soon, so if you prefer not to +W it, he might be able to do so while we sleep.
00:50:32 efried Thanks for looking.
00:52:50 melwitt it might just take me a bit longer to get this
00:53:13 efried It's not the end of the world if it has to wait for morning.
00:53:55 efried It would just be nice to be able to recheck the u-c patch and have it merged by morning so I can move on with the stuff that builds on it.
00:54:48 melwitt yeah, I understand. I'll keep looking at it, just need a bit more time
00:55:00 efried thanks melwitt
01:43:18 openstackgerrit Dongcan Ye proposed openstack/nova master: Libvirt: Rename _guest_add_memory_balloon https://review.opendev.org/676534
01:45:56 openstackgerrit Takashi NATSUME proposed openstack/nova master: Fix 'has_calls' method calls in unit tests https://review.opendev.org/676536
01:53:16 openstackgerrit Mohammed Naser proposed openstack/nova master: cleanup: remove osapi_v21.project_id_regex https://review.opendev.org/676537
01:58:38 melwitt efried: +W (finally)
02:02:21 openstackgerrit Takashi NATSUME proposed openstack/nova master: Fix 'has_calls' method calls in unit tests https://review.opendev.org/676536
02:06:35 yonglihe melwitt: Hi, I hope the comments address your concern, very nice to have you review that, thank. https://review.opendev.org/#/c/627765/
02:14:01 openstackgerrit Mohammed Naser proposed openstack/nova master: config: remove deprecated checksum options https://review.opendev.org/676539
02:29:54 openstackgerrit Mohammed Naser proposed openstack/nova master: Remove nova.image.download.modules extension point https://review.opendev.org/676540
02:32:39 melwitt yonglihe: I'll try to take a look tomorrow, sorry for the delay
03:13:50 openstackgerrit CHENGLEI proposed openstack/nova stable/pike: Insert the description of the change. https://review.opendev.org/676541
05:17:36 openstackgerrit ZhengMa proposed openstack/nova master: Check container_format on instance creation https://review.opendev.org/673407
07:52:34 gibi sean-k-mooney: thanks for the devstack conf with the mixed sriov ovs setup
08:11:40 gibi sean-k-mooney: did you set up connectivity between br-ex and enp1s0f1 on the physical host?
08:24:41 openstackgerrit Ghanshyam Mann proposed openstack/nova master: Pass RequestContext to oslo_policy https://review.opendev.org/674038
08:28:30 openstackgerrit ZhengMa proposed openstack/nova master: Check container_format on instance creation https://review.opendev.org/673407
08:28:35 sean-k-mooney gibi: that config does it automatically
08:28:55 sean-k-mooney it add enp1sof1 to the br-ex
08:29:01 sean-k-mooney *adds
08:30:00 sean-k-mooney i also put the echo to allocate the vf in the local.conf and set the pci whitelist based on the vendor id and procut id of the vf so it automaticl allows the correect vfs
08:31:14 sean-k-mooney when stacking compltes you are basiaclly ready to boot a vm with an sriov port and it will get a dhcp adress for the dhcp agent attached to ovs
08:32:18 sean-k-mooney i say basiacally ready as cirros may not have your nic driver so you might need to upload a new image first
08:45:51 openstackgerrit Ghanshyam Mann proposed openstack/nova master: Add test coverage of existing os-services policies https://review.opendev.org/669181
08:49:28 openstackgerrit Ghanshyam Mann proposed openstack/nova master: Add test coverage of existing os-services policies https://review.opendev.org/669181
08:50:27 openstackgerrit Ghanshyam Mann proposed openstack/nova master: Introduce scope_types in os-services https://review.opendev.org/645427
08:51:06 openstackgerrit Ghanshyam Mann proposed openstack/nova master: Add new default roles in os-services API policies https://review.opendev.org/648480
08:54:37 openstackgerrit Ghanshyam Mann proposed openstack/nova master: Add test coverage of existing admin_actions policies https://review.opendev.org/657698
08:54:55 openstackgerrit Ghanshyam Mann proposed openstack/nova master: Ensure we pass a target in admin actions https://review.opendev.org/663095
09:03:54 gibi sean-k-mooney: thanks
09:14:06 openstackgerrit Ghanshyam Mann proposed openstack/nova master: Add test coverage of existing os-agents policies https://review.opendev.org/669578
09:19:28 gibi gmann: hi! If you have time, could you give your oppinion in https://review.opendev.org/#/c/675371/ ?
09:23:10 openstackgerrit Merged openstack/nova master: Enhance SDK fixture for 0.34.0 https://review.opendev.org/676495
09:39:14 gmann gibi: sure, i will check.
09:42:24 openstackgerrit Ghanshyam Mann proposed openstack/nova master: Add new default roles and mapping in policy base class https://review.opendev.org/645452
09:42:57 openstackgerrit Ghanshyam Mann proposed openstack/nova master: Add new default roles in os-services API policies https://review.opendev.org/648480
09:54:17 openstackgerrit Ghanshyam Mann proposed openstack/nova master: Add test coverage of existing admin_actions policies https://review.opendev.org/657698
09:54:38 openstackgerrit Ghanshyam Mann proposed openstack/nova master: Ensure we pass a target in admin actions https://review.opendev.org/663095
10:14:45 openstackgerrit Ghanshyam Mann proposed openstack/nova master: Introduce scope_types in Admin Actions https://review.opendev.org/657823
10:19:49 openstackgerrit Guo Jingyu proposed openstack/nova master: define and catch InstanceGuestAgentNotRunning for set-password failure https://review.opendev.org/676667
10:39:11 openstackgerrit Guo Jingyu proposed openstack/nova master: define and catch InstanceAgentNotRunning for set-password failure https://review.opendev.org/676667
10:42:40 openstackgerrit Ghanshyam Mann proposed openstack/nova master: Add policy deprecation fixture and Suppress warnings in tests https://review.opendev.org/676670
10:44:15 openstackgerrit Ghanshyam Mann proposed openstack/nova master: Add new default roles in os-services API policies https://review.opendev.org/648480
10:44:27 openstackgerrit Ghanshyam Mann proposed openstack/nova master: Add new default roles in os-services API policies https://review.opendev.org/648480
10:48:42 openstackgerrit Ghanshyam Mann proposed openstack/nova master: Add new default roles in os-services API policies https://review.opendev.org/648480
10:53:45 openstackgerrit Chris Dent proposed openstack/nova master: Add a "Caveats" section to the eventlet profiling docs https://review.opendev.org/676672
10:56:39 sean-k-mooney what time does matt normally log on? about 1-2 hours form now?
10:57:22 stephenfin sean-k-mooney: We have a conflict with cpu-resources
10:57:23 sean-k-mooney i started early today so it feels weird to have been online for a while and not see the us folks about
10:57:34 sean-k-mooney we do?
10:57:44 sean-k-mooney with what
10:58:17 stephenfin There's a workaround option to disable VCPU -> PCPU flavor translation and we've decided to report both PCPUs and VCPUs for compute nodes without explicit CPU pinset configuration
10:58:33 sean-k-mooney yes
10:58:42 sean-k-mooney i was talking about this yesterday
10:58:47 stephenfin If I reshape, I move every allocation for pinned instances on that host from VCPUs to PCPUs
10:58:59 sean-k-mooney right
10:59:19 sean-k-mooney which is why i raised that workaround option as an issue
10:59:23 stephenfin But if you enable the workaround option (so your pinned instances continue to request VCPUs), more pinned instances will land on that host that use VCPUs instead of PCPUs

Earlier   Later