Earlier  
Posted Nick Remark
#openstack-nova - 2019-02-28
15:40:48 jangutter cfriesen: because the computer likes repetition because the computer likes repetition (paranoia reference)
15:42:11 jangutter cfriesen: I found this ( https://docs.openstack.org/project-team-guide/dependency-management.html ) a while ago and I'm not 100% sure.
15:42:13 openstackgerrit Chris Friesen proposed openstack/nova master: Add emulated TPM support to Nova https://review.openstack.org/631363
15:42:14 openstackgerrit Chris Friesen proposed openstack/nova master: Add support for resize and cold migration of emulated TPM files https://review.openstack.org/639934
15:44:08 sean-k-mooney cfriesen: proably pinned in upperconstraitns
15:44:25 cfriesen sean-k-mooney: turns out I missed updating lower_constraints
15:44:32 sean-k-mooney oh ok
15:45:27 sean-k-mooney i chekcked that but you had already fixed it when i did i guess
15:46:37 cfriesen sean-k-mooney: don't know if you saw my comment last night....this patch series ^ is working as far as local resize with emulated TPM.
15:46:51 openstackgerrit Balazs Gibizer proposed openstack/nova master: Remove port allocation during detach https://review.openstack.org/622421
15:48:27 sean-k-mooney cfriesen: im reworking https://review.openstack.org/#/c/602432/ but that is next on my list
15:49:05 cfriesen cool. I'm working on adding more unit tests to bring it up to the proper level.
15:54:18 openstackgerrit Balazs Gibizer proposed openstack/nova master: Add remove_resources_from_instance_allocation to report client https://review.openstack.org/639653
15:54:19 openstackgerrit Balazs Gibizer proposed openstack/nova master: Remove port allocation during detach https://review.openstack.org/622421
15:55:04 gibi mriedem, jaypipes: the bottom two patches are up to date ^^ (and I think they are ready to fly)
15:55:32 mriedem looking
15:55:37 openstackgerrit Matt Riedemann proposed openstack/nova master: Test live migration with config drive https://review.openstack.org/567860
16:01:31 gibi mriedem: regarding filing InstancePCIRequest.requester_id with flavor.flavorid or network_id . Which one do you prefere? Fill it properly (e.g. use flavor.flavorid) or keep it None and fill it only when it is needeD?
16:02:20 mriedem gibi: i haven't yet looked at how that is used,
16:02:33 mriedem and i saw avolkov asked about a requester_type,
16:03:02 mriedem my one worry is that we have something in that field which isn't a port_id, but we assume it's a port_id and then something fails later because it turns out it was a flavor or network
16:03:26 mriedem so maybe it's better to not set it for flavor/network in order to avoid confusion about when it can be used
16:04:12 mriedem i guess you are future-proofing for when flavor resources are in a RequestGroup in the RequestSpec?
16:04:22 gibi mriedem: InstancePCIRequest.requester_id is matched against RequestGroup.requester_id
16:04:35 gibi mriedem: in https://review.openstack.org/#/c/623543/34/nova/compute/manager.py
16:05:03 gibi so it is a bit of future proofing yes, but now I feel it would be better to keep it empty
16:05:29 gibi so I think I will remove the flavor.id and netwokr_id bits
16:05:33 openstackgerrit Eric Fried proposed openstack/nova master: WIP: Use aggregate_add_host in nova-manage https://review.openstack.org/640080
16:05:40 efried mriedem: This bud's for you ^
16:05:45 efried ...bud
16:06:27 mriedem gibi: that is probably safest
16:06:31 efried mriedem: LMK if you're on board with it conceptually and I'll fix up the testes.
16:06:36 gibi mriedem: OK, cool
16:07:16 efried mriedem: in particular, if you think I should split out the aggregate_add_host signature change.
16:07:21 mriedem gibi: worst case is we'd set the InstancePCIRequest.request_id to a flavor.flavorid (which makes sense if the pci request comes via the flavor), and then we try finding the matching request group mapping and it's not found, so we just wasted time looking for something that we never setup
16:07:37 gibi mriedem: agreed
16:07:40 mriedem well, i guess worst case is ^ and we log something like "couldn't find mapping" or raise or something
16:07:45 gibi mriedem: it was to early to add it
16:07:51 mriedem you're ahead of your time
16:07:55 gibi yeah
16:08:22 mriedem efried: i can't digest that right now
16:08:34 efried mriedem: No urgency
16:24:55 openstackgerrit Balazs Gibizer proposed openstack/nova master: Record requester in the InstancePCIRequest https://review.openstack.org/625310
16:25:38 gibi jaypipes, mriedem: and the third one is up-to-date as well
16:29:28 mriedem gibi: +2 on https://review.openstack.org/#/c/622421/ - nits inline so it's up to you if you want to address those quick or follow up
16:30:04 gibi mriedem: I think I can respin it real quick
16:33:58 gibi mriedem: FYI ALLOCATIN for https://review.openstack.org/#/c/622421/32/nova/network/neutronv2/api.py@1734 need a rebase first.
16:34:52 melwitt o/
16:35:49 mriedem gibi: yup
16:35:57 mriedem gibi: i'll fast re-approve your bottom change
16:36:04 gibi mriedem: coolio
16:36:05 mriedem cfriesen: comments in https://review.openstack.org/#/c/635350/
16:36:50 cfriesen okay, will do
16:38:56 mriedem edleafe: i'm glad you picked up on the az name struggle in https://review.openstack.org/#/c/639874/ :)
16:40:03 openstackgerrit sean mooney proposed openstack/nova master: libvirt: delegate ovs plug to os-vif https://review.openstack.org/602432
16:40:25 edleafe mriedem: As an east coast native, I felt slighted. :(
16:42:46 mriedem az=rochester-ne
16:42:47 mriedem there
16:42:51 mriedem locally sourced
16:43:19 edleafe no
16:43:20 mriedem az=building25-floor3-mens-br
16:43:33 edleafe az=teaneck-ne
16:45:31 openstackgerrit Chris Friesen proposed openstack/nova master: fix up numa-topology live migration hypervisor check https://review.openstack.org/635350
16:46:52 openstackgerrit Balazs Gibizer proposed openstack/nova master: Add remove_resources_from_instance_allocation to report client https://review.openstack.org/639653
16:46:53 openstackgerrit Balazs Gibizer proposed openstack/nova master: Record requester in the InstancePCIRequest https://review.openstack.org/625310
16:46:53 openstackgerrit Balazs Gibizer proposed openstack/nova master: Remove port allocation during detach https://review.openstack.org/622421
16:47:17 gibi mriedem: fixed ^^
16:50:28 mriedem ok +2 on https://review.openstack.org/#/c/622421/ now
16:50:31 mriedem jaypipes: ^
16:52:30 openstackgerrit Merged openstack/nova master: docs: ComputeDriver.update_provider_tree in nova https://review.openstack.org/633375
16:54:47 cfriesen can mock.patch.object change an object data member (not a function)?
16:57:37 jaypipes mriedem: yeah, I'm in-progress on that review.
16:58:21 efried cfriesen: Yes?
16:58:56 cfriesen efried: can you point me to an example?
16:59:40 cfriesen efried: do I use ".return_value" or something else?
16:59:41 efried cfriesen: http://paste.openstack.org/show/746513/
16:59:47 mriedem gibi: just a question on https://review.openstack.org/#/c/625310/
16:59:53 gibi looking
17:00:08 cfriesen efried: sweet, thanks
17:00:12 efried yw
17:00:33 mriedem cfriesen: you can also create the attribute if it might not exist
17:00:38 mriedem https://docs.python.org/3/library/unittest.mock.html#unittest.mock.patch create=True
17:00:43 mriedem normally shouldn't have to use that though
17:00:46 gibi mriedem: you are correct
17:01:05 gibi mriedem: it would be better to move the requester_id = request_net.port_id down where it is used
17:01:15 gibi mriedem: let me fix it
17:01:25 mriedem gibi: you might want to wait for jaypipes review to finish
17:02:04 gibi mriedem: OK
17:07:33 openstackgerrit Matt Riedemann proposed openstack/python-novaclient master: Add support for microversion 2.70 - expose device tags https://review.openstack.org/636779
17:07:39 mriedem melwitt: can you look at ^ again
17:07:46 mriedem takashin's comments should be addressed
17:08:13 melwitt yep, looking
17:09:09 mriedem dansmith: you want to send cells v1 docs to their watery grave? https://review.openstack.org/#/c/636718/
17:10:02 openstackgerrit Matt Riedemann proposed openstack/nova stable/rocky: Avoid BadRequest error log on volume attachment https://review.openstack.org/640110
17:10:03 dansmith mriedem: only if I can go with them
17:10:35 mriedem i'm struggling to make an under-the-sea merman joke here
17:11:02 mriedem https://i.imgur.com/qiJRWMM.gif
17:14:16 melwitt lol
17:14:59 mriedem gibi: oh i guess jay is reviewing the port detach / deallocate change, so feel free to respin the pci request one
17:15:29 gibi I did the fix locally, and I will publish it before I leave. which is in ~15 minutes

Earlier   Later