| Posted | Nick | Remark | |
|---|---|---|---|
| #openstack-nova - 2018-06-28 | |||
| 14:44:26 | openstackgerrit | Stephen Finucane proposed openstack/nova master: Convert 'placement_api_docs' into a Sphinx extension https://review.openstack.org/578826 | |
| 14:45:30 | openstackgerrit | Stephen Finucane proposed openstack/nova master: Convert 'placement_api_docs' into a Sphinx extension https://review.openstack.org/578826 | |
| 14:51:46 | openstackgerrit | Merged openstack/python-novaclient master: Add release note link in README https://review.openstack.org/578664 | |
| 14:57:22 | efried | stephenfin: You split https://review.openstack.org/#/c/534382/ into https://review.openstack.org/#/c/534382/9 and https://review.openstack.org/#/c/578825/1 right? | |
| 14:57:47 | mnaser | i asked this a bit earlier but | |
| 14:57:54 | mnaser | https://docs.openstack.org/nova/latest/user/cells.html#adding-a-new-cell-to-an-existing-deployment | |
| 14:57:57 | stephenfin | efried: Yes. https://review.openstack.org/#/c/534382/ is the one I really want but I need to sent a note to the mailing lsit first | |
| 14:57:59 | mnaser | "To expand your deployment with a new cell, first follow the usual steps for standing up a new Cells V1 cell." | |
| 14:58:00 | efried | stephenfin: but you moved the larger part of the change to the new change-id, making it harder to diff. | |
| 14:58:00 | stephenfin | *list | |
| 14:58:18 | stephenfin | efried: Sec. I can fix that, if you'd like? | |
| 14:58:20 | mnaser | is that a typo or do we really have to setup cells v1 and upgrade to cells v2... | |
| 14:58:39 | efried | stephenfin: Meh, it'll probably do me good to re-review from scratch anyway. | |
| 14:58:44 | mnaser | i'll be very happy to fix the docs if that's incorrect | |
| 14:58:46 | efried | was just giving you grief | |
| 14:59:13 | mriedem | mnaser: i think that's a typo | |
| 14:59:16 | mriedem | or out of context | |
| 14:59:22 | melwitt | mnaser: uh no, what I meant there was create a new db, mq, etc whatever you would have normally done to set up a new cell | |
| 14:59:56 | mnaser | okay, i'll be working on adding a new cells v2 over the next few days so there might be a bunch of doc patches that hopefully help | |
| 14:59:58 | melwitt | so it should be reworded if that's how it sounds to other people | |
| 14:59:59 | melwitt | (if it sounds like it's saying set up cells v1) | |
| 15:00:05 | melwitt | thanks mnaser | |
| 15:00:21 | mnaser | and hopefully adding cells v2 native support in openstack ansible (not just 1 cell) | |
| 15:01:04 | mriedem | yeah i'd just generalize https://docs.openstack.org/nova/latest/user/cells.html#adding-a-new-cell-to-an-existing-deployment into saying, create new db and mq, sync db, create cell with new db and mq, discover hosts, etc | |
| 15:01:26 | mriedem | don't need to run map_instances if it's a new deploy | |
| 15:01:36 | melwitt | right | |
| 15:02:37 | mriedem | if you're adding existing child cells to cells v2 mappings, then you skip the "create db and mq" part, and just create cell mapping with existing db and mq for child cell, discover hosts and map_instances | |
| 15:03:22 | mriedem | although step 4 in "Upgrade with Cells V1" already says that basically | |
| 15:03:34 | mriedem | "You will need to repeat this step for each cell in your deployment" | |
| 15:04:29 | mriedem | efried: doesn't the in-tree powervm driver support config drive now too? https://docs.openstack.org/nova/latest/user/config-drive.html#requirements-and-guidelines | |
| 15:04:35 | mriedem | "The following hypervisors support the configuration drive: libvirt, XenServer, Hyper-V, and VMware. Also, the Bare Metal service supports the configuration drive. " | |
| 15:05:20 | efried | mriedem: yes. Will propose an update to that, unless you're already in there for some reason. | |
| 15:05:26 | mriedem | go for it | |
| 15:05:39 | mriedem | note the release the support was added for powervm | |
| 15:06:12 | mriedem | looks like queens https://review.openstack.org/#/c/409404/ | |
| 15:07:14 | efried | agree | |
| 15:07:15 | openstack | Launchpad bug 1779159 in OpenStack Compute (nova) "Store metadata on a configuration drive in nova - missing powervm" [Low,Triaged] | |
| 15:07:15 | mriedem | https://bugs.launchpad.net/nova/+bug/1779159 | |
| 15:08:51 | mriedem | hmm, when was xenapi_disable_agent removed? | |
| 15:08:55 | openstackgerrit | Yikun Jiang (Kero) proposed openstack/nova master: Add policy to InstanceGroup object and api models. https://review.openstack.org/563375 | |
| 15:10:06 | openstackgerrit | Eric Fried proposed openstack/nova master: Mention PowerVM support of config drive https://review.openstack.org/578840 | |
| 15:10:13 | efried | mriedem, edmondsw: ^ | |
| 15:10:22 | efried | edmondsw: not sure if there's more stuff we should mention in other places in there. | |
| 15:10:39 | mriedem | +2 | |
| 15:10:40 | mriedem | thanks | |
| 15:11:03 | yikun | mriedem: I upload the recent patch and address comments from you and dans, but still WIP (lack testcase), if you have time can take a look, I will add test case tomorrow. | |
| 15:11:13 | mriedem | yikun: ok | |
| 15:11:33 | mriedem | yikun: were you going to split out the _policies backref modles change? | |
| 15:11:36 | mriedem | *models | |
| 15:11:41 | openstackgerrit | Stephen Finucane proposed openstack/nova master: conf: Correct documentation for '[pci] passthrough_whitelist' https://review.openstack.org/552874 | |
| 15:11:42 | openstackgerrit | Stephen Finucane proposed openstack/nova master: Revert "docs: Disable smartquotes" https://review.openstack.org/578841 | |
| 15:12:58 | yikun | yes, but I noticed that not a easy thing. - - | |
| 15:13:34 | yikun | because we use old _policies in some other method. | |
| 15:15:03 | yikun | and I'm going to complete it in tomorrow, : ) | |
| 15:15:59 | yikun | now time for me to back home, hah, 11:15 PM, :( | |
| 15:16:49 | yikun | have a good day! :) and have a good night for me. :D | |
| 15:17:02 | mriedem | yikun: np, ttyl | |
| 15:22:45 | openstackgerrit | Matthew Booth proposed openstack/nova master: Don't delete disks on shared storage during evacuate https://review.openstack.org/578846 | |
| 15:24:42 | openstackgerrit | Matt Riedemann proposed openstack/nova master: Update xenapi_disable_agent config option usage in docs https://review.openstack.org/578848 | |
| 15:25:29 | efried | stephenfin: have a look at https://review.openstack.org/#/c/534382/ if you please. If I'm full of malarkey, let me know and I'll flip to +2. | |
| 15:26:33 | stephenfin | efried: Looks good. Lemme try it | |
| 15:26:46 | efried | k | |
| 15:32:34 | edmondsw | efried looking | |
| 15:35:08 | stephenfin | efried: Yeah, Can't | |
| 15:35:15 | efried | stephenfin: Boo, how come? | |
| 15:35:20 | stephenfin | *Yeah, can't do that as that only works for explicitly defined things | |
| 15:35:29 | stephenfin | Not implicitly defined | |
| 15:35:52 | stephenfin | So I could manually set envdir for the environments I'm inheriting from but then what's the point | |
| 15:36:43 | efried | I see. I mean, it would still have the same dedup-ish effect. You'd only be defining it for what, three, four envs? | |
| 15:36:56 | efried | and then sharing it for the rest. | |
| 15:37:31 | stephenfin | So defining '[testenv] envdir' and overriding where I need it? | |
| 15:38:56 | efried | stephenfin: Oh, I thought like defining envdir in [testenv:{venv|doc|py27|py35}], not overriding it anywhere, and then using the suggested syntax wherever you want to share it. | |
| 15:39:23 | efried | (which is overriding, I suppose - not sure if we're talking the same terms here) | |
| 15:40:40 | stephenfin | Is there any difference, in that case? Those unclear attributes are still going to be there, there'll just be less of them | |
| 15:40:55 | stephenfin | Unclear attributes being e.g. 'envdir = {toxworkdir}/venv' | |
| 15:41:24 | efried | stephenfin: Well, except {toxworkdir}/venv will be defined in the [testenv:venv] env, which seems pretty clear. | |
| 15:41:55 | efried | anyway, you're right, this certainly reduces the usefulness of the suggestion. So I'm fine if you want to do it or skip it. | |
| 15:42:25 | efried | stephenfin: were you wanting to respin to add those two missed ones anyway? | |
| 15:42:30 | stephenfin | I might skip it, if that's OK. It's not any shorter and, IMO, is probably less clear | |
| 15:42:37 | stephenfin | Yup, working at that atm | |
| 15:42:37 | efried | okay | |
| 15:42:40 | efried | k | |
| 15:42:50 | edmondsw | efried I added a couple comments on https://review.openstack.org/#/c/578840 that you might want to squeeze into that, but could also be a follow-on | |
| 15:43:00 | edmondsw | burgerk would be a good source for information / reviewer | |
| 15:44:50 | openstackgerrit | Eric Fried proposed openstack/nova master: Mention PowerVM support of config drive https://review.openstack.org/578840 | |
| 15:45:20 | efried | added him. | |
| 15:48:07 | mdbooth | mriedem: This is a WIP, but you had a (now abandoned) patch up for this bug a couple of years ago: https://review.openstack.org/#/c/578846/ | |
| 15:48:12 | mdbooth | cfriesen: You killed it :) | |
| 15:53:40 | mriedem | mdbooth: you kind of left me hanging here https://review.openstack.org/#/c/572790/ | |
| 15:53:43 | mriedem | so you're in my doghouse | |
| 15:54:21 | mriedem | and yeah looks like my failed attempt was https://review.openstack.org/#/c/288109/ | |
| 15:57:54 | mdbooth | mriedem: Sorry, thought we were good on the other patch. I'll pick it up again. | |
| 16:03:02 | openstackgerrit | Matt Riedemann proposed openstack/osc-placement master: Usages per project and user (v1.8, v1.9) https://review.openstack.org/514646 | |
| 16:03:03 | openstackgerrit | Matt Riedemann proposed openstack/osc-placement master: CLI allocation candidates (v1.10) https://review.openstack.org/514647 | |
| 16:03:04 | openstackgerrit | Matt Riedemann proposed openstack/osc-placement master: New dict format of allocations (v1.11, v1.12) https://review.openstack.org/542819 | |
| 16:03:05 | openstackgerrit | Matt Riedemann proposed openstack/osc-placement master: Transactionally update allocations (v1.13) https://review.openstack.org/546674 | |
| 16:03:06 | openstackgerrit | Matt Riedemann proposed openstack/osc-placement master: Add nested resource providers (v1.14) https://review.openstack.org/546675 | |
| 16:03:07 | openstackgerrit | Matt Riedemann proposed openstack/osc-placement master: Limit allocation candidates (v1.15, v1.16) https://review.openstack.org/548043 | |
| 16:03:08 | openstackgerrit | Matt Riedemann proposed openstack/osc-placement master: Allocation candidates parameter: required (v1.17) https://review.openstack.org/548326 | |
| 16:03:27 | mriedem | gibi: i think the bottom of that series is good now ^ | |