Earlier  
Posted Nick Remark
#openstack-nova - 2018-03-30
18:15:39 edmondsw might still be a good idea to keep claudiub's patch so that this weirdness doesn't crop up in other places
18:16:05 fried_bunny I'm fine with that too. Weighed against the desire to keep those classes private, though - that's up to claudiub|2 I guess.
18:16:09 mriedem why are nova-powervm repo changes showing up in the nova channel?
18:16:21 fried_bunny mriedem: Because triggered by a nova change
18:16:34 mriedem ?
18:16:39 mriedem https://review.openstack.org/#/c/557975/ isn't nova
18:16:41 fried_bunny mriedem: Oh, that wasn't a bot, that was a copy/paste by me.
18:16:50 mriedem ah
18:16:51 fried_bunny thought you were going crazy
18:17:40 fried_bunny mriedem: We were discussing here because the trigger was https://review.openstack.org/#/c/447505/
18:17:55 mriedem yar
18:18:14 mriedem i noticed an alarming amount of claudiub|2 in the channel
18:18:29 claudiub|2 fried_bunny: edmondsw: this should also work, as a temporary hack: https://review.openstack.org/557976
18:18:47 fried_bunny claudiub|2: Cool, that's useful to know. Thanks.
18:19:29 fried_bunny claudiub|2: If https://review.openstack.org/557975 doesn't fix us, we'll use that.
18:19:45 claudiub|2 gotcha. :)
18:20:10 claudiub|2 mriedem: yeah, usually when there's a fire somewhere. :D
18:20:43 claudiub|2 because you know, a lot of fire leads to getting fired. ha.
18:21:02 mriedem it is that time of the quarter
18:35:45 openstack bug 1750672 in OpenStack Compute (nova) "failure to generate Nova's doc in Python 3.6" [Medium,Confirmed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1750672
18:35:45 stephenfin melwitt: RE: bug 1750672, I already fixed that with https://review.openstack.org/#/c/556894/2
18:37:05 openstackgerrit Merged openstack/nova stable/pike: Return 400 when compute host is not found https://review.openstack.org/550707
18:57:28 fried_bunny melwitt: On vacation, yah?
18:58:12 mriedem yes, mandatory pto
19:03:21 fried_bunny leakypipes: I answered here https://review.openstack.org/#/c/533821/ -- in your estimation was there something more she was expecting to see in the tests?
19:11:43 openstackgerrit Merged openstack/nova stable/pike: Always deallocate networking before reschedule if using Neutron https://review.openstack.org/555907
19:20:10 fried_bunny leakypipes: Likewise https://review.openstack.org/#/c/520246/
19:27:28 openstackgerrit Takashi NATSUME proposed openstack/nova master: Remove unnecessary code encoding specification https://review.openstack.org/557903
19:53:36 leakypipes fried_bunny: yeah, I'm just not sure :(
20:05:48 fried_bunny mriedem: If you were waiting for my nod on https://review.openstack.org/#/c/553122/ it's done.
20:06:12 mriedem ack
20:13:12 openstackgerrit Arvind Nadendla proposed openstack/nova master: Update ImageMetaProp object to expose traits https://review.openstack.org/557795
20:16:57 mriedem gah, trying to mock context managers, my old nemesis
20:20:09 openstackgerrit Arvind Nadendla proposed openstack/nova master: Update ImageMetaProp object to expose traits https://review.openstack.org/557795
20:29:58 fried_bunny mriedem: Ditto https://review.openstack.org/#/c/533396/
20:30:07 fried_bunny mriedem: I can help with that if you like. Or were you just grumbling?
20:30:52 mriedem i think i've got a way around it
20:39:12 mriedem ugh
20:39:13 mriedem fake_virtapi.return_value.wait_for_instance_event.side_effect = exc
20:39:13 mriedem with mock.patch.object(self.compute, 'virtapi') as fake_virtapi:
20:39:19 mriedem i must be blind
20:39:32 mriedem that is not hitting
20:42:39 mriedem or
20:42:40 mriedem wait_for_event.return_value.__enter__.return_value.side_effect = exc
20:42:40 mriedem 'wait_for_instance_event') as wait_for_event:
20:42:40 mriedem with mock.patch.object(self.compute.virtapi,
20:43:29 fried_bunny mriedem: Is self.compute.virtapi a method or a property?
20:43:42 mriedem it's an attribute
20:43:48 fried_bunny mriedem: Then take out .return_value
20:43:49 mriedem with a wait_for_instance_event method
20:44:14 fried_bunny (in the first paste)
20:46:39 mriedem i don't think the first one will work,
20:46:48 mriedem wait_for_instance_event is a context manager,
20:46:52 mriedem so need to mock the __enter__
20:47:41 fried_bunny okay, but fake_virtapi.return_value will never hit, because it's not self.compute.virtapi().wait_for_instance_event - just self.compute.virtapi.wait_for_instance_event, right?
20:47:51 fried_bunny so that's a start...
20:48:16 mriedem right
20:48:46 fried_bunny mriedem: Is it FakeVirtAPI you're actually using here?
20:48:52 mriedem no
20:48:59 fried_bunny ComputeVirtAPI?
20:49:00 mriedem also, trying to model this after https://github.com/openstack/nova/blob/master/nova/tests/unit/compute/test_compute_api.py#L1749
20:49:07 mriedem yeah it's ComputeVirtAPI in this case
20:49:58 mriedem i don't think using FakeVirtAPI will help, since that also defines wait_for_instance_event as a context manager
20:50:00 mriedem it's just a noop
20:50:25 openstackgerrit Arvind Nadendla proposed openstack/nova master: Update ImageMetaProp object to expose traits https://review.openstack.org/557795
20:50:27 fried_bunny mriedem: No, was just going to suggest the possibility of using a mock.patch('....ComputeVirtAPI') instead of a mock.patch.object.
20:50:46 fried_bunny mriedem: But okay, I think I see the problem.
20:50:51 fried_bunny Try this:
20:51:26 fried_bunny wait_for_event.return_value.__enter__.side_effect = exc
20:51:26 fried_bunny with mock.patch.object(self.compute.virtapi, 'wait_for_instance_event') as wait_for_event:
20:51:41 fried_bunny you had a different mistake in each attempt.
20:51:52 mriedem i just tried that,
20:51:59 mriedem believe me, i've tried about every iteration of this
20:52:07 mriedem anyway, trying something else here
20:54:12 fried_bunny mriedem: I'm not sure that mocking wait_for_instance_event as if it were a context manager is going to do what you expect.
20:54:25 fried_bunny (well, clearly not)
20:54:40 fried_bunny because it's using the decorator instead of being a real context manager.
20:55:12 fried_bunny w4ie.side_effect = exc
20:55:12 fried_bunny with mock.patch('nova.compute.manager.ComputeVirtAPI#wait_for_instance_event') as w4ie:
20:55:12 fried_bunny You could try
20:55:22 fried_bunny s/#/./
20:55:41 mriedem as far as i can tell, what i'm doing is basically the same as https://github.com/openstack/nova/blob/master/nova/tests/unit/compute/test_compute_api.py#L1749
20:55:46 mriedem just a different context manager
20:56:15 fried_bunny ahh
20:56:28 mriedem but wait a sec, i might have something else screwed up here
20:56:48 fried_bunny I don't actually know whether side_effect does the right thing for yield. Though I guess it should...
21:03:18 mriedem got it
21:03:28 mriedem it wasn't even the mock, it was the thing i was using as the exc
21:03:35 mriedem i knew it would be dumb
21:03:55 fried_bunny mriedem: Good, because I just tried it out in mini form and it's all working like it's sposedta
21:18:23 imacdonn mriedem: around ?
21:24:32 mriedem depends
21:24:50 imacdonn mriedem: heh ... looking at https://review.openstack.org/#/c/554759/
21:25:07 imacdonn mriedem: I think that's the wrong fix ... I think the right fix is to remove the check entirely
21:26:04 mriedem ?
21:26:08 mriedem placement is required to start nova-compute
21:26:11 mriedem since ocata
21:26:11 openstack Launchpad bug 1751692 in OpenStack Compute (nova) "os_region_name an unnecessary required option for placement " [Low,Triaged] - Assigned to Digambar (digambarpatil15)
21:26:11 imacdonn mriedem: see Sylvain's comment on https://bugs.launchpad.net/nova/+bug/1751692
21:26:51 imacdonn Isn't the recommendation to only specify region_name if you need to override what keystone offers ?

Earlier   Later