| Posted | Nick | Remark | |
|---|---|---|---|
| #openstack-nova - 2018-03-19 | |||
| 09:56:42 | openstackgerrit | Tetiana Lashchova proposed openstack/nova-specs master: Allow modification of user-data via the server update https://review.openstack.org/547964 | |
| 10:02:01 | diranerpi | Hi all There is a way to use instance metadata to schedule instance deployment on a specific host? | |
| 10:05:46 | openstackgerrit | Lee Yarwood proposed openstack/nova stable/queens: docs: Disable smartquotes https://review.openstack.org/554188 | |
| 10:05:57 | diranerpi | or on a specific host aggregate ? | |
| 10:05:57 | openstackgerrit | Lee Yarwood proposed openstack/nova stable/pike: docs: Disable smartquotes https://review.openstack.org/554189 | |
| 10:24:25 | johnthetubaguy | diranerpi: there are almost too many options right now, have a look at most of the filters with the word "aggregate" in them: https://docs.openstack.org/nova/latest/user/filter-scheduler.html | |
| 10:25:11 | bhagyashris | johnthetubguy: Hi, | |
| 10:29:14 | bhagyashris | johnthetubguy: I just want to discuss deeply regarding "Skip instance backup image creation when rotation 0" as we discussed in Dublin PTG #link: https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/nova-ptg-rocky so as per the suggestion I am following the the idea mentioned in etherpad 1. add a microversion to disallow 0 using the schema validation while creating the backup image | |
| 10:31:21 | bhagyashris | johnthetubguy: 2. add a new API for "purge all backups" to be used instead of passing 0 so for this I have introduce new cleanup-backup api to delete the backup images of specified instance in command | |
| 10:31:46 | bhagyashris | johnthetubguy: so i am on the right patch about this idea | |
| 10:32:37 | bhagyashris | johnthetubguy: s/patch/path | |
| 10:37:47 | bhagyashris | johnthetubaguy: Hi, Sorry for spelling mistake in name ^ | |
| 10:37:58 | diranerpi | johnthetubaguy: hi, i've read those filter but no one responds to my use case (i want to use instance metadata to choose which host aggregate will be used) | |
| 10:38:58 | diranerpi | So for example, if in my instance data i create a metadata like "service = database", i want this instance to be deployed on a specific aggregate host | |
| 10:39:14 | diranerpi | johnthetubaguy: So for example, if in my instance data i create a metadata like "service = database", i want this instance to be deployed on a specific aggregate host | |
| 10:50:23 | openstackgerrit | Silvan Kaiser proposed openstack/nova master: Exec systemd-run with privileges in Quobyte driver https://review.openstack.org/554195 | |
| 10:54:31 | openstackgerrit | Chris Dent proposed openstack/nova master: WIP: Ensure that os-traits sync is attempted only at start of process https://review.openstack.org/553857 | |
| 11:09:25 | johnthetubaguy | bhagyashris: hi | |
| 11:09:50 | johnthetubaguy | bhagyashris: that sounds spot on | |
| 11:17:47 | bhagyashris | johnthetubaguy: ok thank you :) actually cleanup-backup api will purge all the backup images of instance so is that be ok? or should i give the provision to cleanup the backup images for example cleanup last two backups etc? | |
| 11:24:10 | bhagyashris | johnthetubaguy: and on current master at the time of createbackup the delete image backup is implementated so should i remove that implementation from create backup so should i kept it as it is? | |
| 11:32:18 | gibi | melwitt: regarding the nova onboarding session in Vancouver. I can only give a tentative yes as my company haven't approved my travel yet. | |
| 11:39:32 | kashyap | Is it just me, fetching from: https://git.openstack.org/openstack/nova.git fails? | |
| 11:42:14 | kashyap | It's just me | |
| 11:42:31 | cdent | works for me | |
| 11:44:13 | kashyap | Fir me, it's just hung here: | |
| 11:44:20 | kashyap | Running: `GIT_CURL_VERBOSE=1 GIT_TRACE=1 git pull` | |
| 11:44:22 | kashyap | http://paste.openstack.org/show/704380/ | |
| 11:54:05 | johnthetubaguy | bhagyashris: the old API has to keep working like it does today | |
| 11:55:25 | johnthetubaguy | kashyap: you tried doing http rather than https? | |
| 11:55:45 | kashyap | johnthetubaguy: I tried all three, git, https, http. | |
| 11:55:49 | kashyap | None works for me, bizarrely | |
| 11:55:50 | johnthetubaguy | bummer | |
| 11:56:56 | bhagyashris | johnthetubaguy: ok . i just need to add the functionality of roatation parameter value 0 in cleanup backup api right? | |
| 11:57:54 | johnthetubaguy | bhagyashris: yes, that sounds correct. Will be easier to review the spec with all the details, to make sure I haven't missed a bit :) | |
| 11:59:09 | bhagyashris | johnthetubaguy: ok thank you for your inputs will upload spec ASAP :) | |
| 11:59:33 | johnthetubaguy | bhagyashris: no problem, sounds good | |
| 12:24:19 | openstackgerrit | Theodoros Tsioutsias proposed openstack/nova-specs master: Add PENDING vm state https://review.openstack.org/554212 | |
| 12:28:42 | openstackgerrit | Chris Dent proposed openstack/nova-specs master: Provide error codes for placement API https://review.openstack.org/418393 | |
| 12:55:08 | openstackgerrit | Theodoros Tsioutsias proposed openstack/nova-specs master: Enable rebuild for instances in cell0 https://review.openstack.org/554218 | |
| 13:29:34 | openstackgerrit | Matt Riedemann proposed openstack/nova master: Add VIFMigrateData object for live migration https://review.openstack.org/515423 | |
| 13:29:35 | openstackgerrit | Matt Riedemann proposed openstack/nova master: Port binding based on events during live migration https://review.openstack.org/434870 | |
| 13:29:35 | openstackgerrit | Matt Riedemann proposed openstack/nova master: WIP: libvirt: use dest host vif migrate details for live migration https://review.openstack.org/551370 | |
| 13:29:36 | openstackgerrit | Matt Riedemann proposed openstack/nova master: compute: use port binding extended API during live migration https://review.openstack.org/551371 | |
| 13:29:36 | openstackgerrit | Matt Riedemann proposed openstack/nova master: Add "delete_port_binding" network API method https://review.openstack.org/552170 | |
| 13:29:37 | openstackgerrit | Matt Riedemann proposed openstack/nova master: WIP: Turn on new port binding extended live migrate flow https://review.openstack.org/552173 | |
| 13:29:37 | openstackgerrit | Matt Riedemann proposed openstack/nova master: conductor: use port binding extended API in during live migrate https://review.openstack.org/522537 | |
| 13:30:32 | openstackgerrit | Zhenyu Zheng proposed openstack/nova master: nova-manage db archive_deleted_rows is not multi-cell aware https://review.openstack.org/507486 | |
| 13:44:01 | kaisers1 | efried: Hi! Regarding https://review.openstack.org/#/c/554195/ : I looked into using privsep but as the spec says true root user context will continue to use rootwrap i went with that. If privsep does offer a root execution mechanism i can go that way. Do you have a hint on docs/examples of that for me? | |
| 13:45:11 | efried | kaisers1: mikal is the expert on that. I believe he's in Australia, so time zones may be a bit of a challenge. I'm sure I can at least dig up the spec for the privsep work. Stand by... | |
| 13:45:55 | efried | kaisers1: Meanwhile, if you want to see some examples for how mikal has transitioned existing code over to privsep: https://review.openstack.org/#/q/topic:bp/hurrah-for-privsep+(status:open+OR+status:merged) | |
| 13:47:03 | dansmith | kaisers1: you should be using privsep not rootwrap for new things | |
| 13:47:21 | dansmith | kaisers1: the whole point of privsep is to replace rootwrap, and doing so does indeed get you root escalation for your code | |
| 13:47:52 | efried | dansmith: Is there a spec (I can't find one) or documentation for how to use privsep? | |
| 13:48:12 | dansmith | efried: there's lots of code now | |
| 13:48:22 | kaisers1 | I did read the spec | |
| 13:48:32 | kaisers1 | dansmith: thanks for the inputs! | |
| 13:48:47 | efried | kaisers1: For my edification, where did you find that spec? | |
| 13:49:00 | kaisers1 | efried: https://specs.openstack.org/openstack/oslo-specs/specs/liberty/privsep.html | |
| 13:49:04 | dansmith | privsep was born of lots of conversation and design, I'm sure there are things to read, but I expect a lot of the formal documentation focuses on capability contexts, which we've short-circuited to a single root one, | |
| 13:49:07 | efried | ah, in oslo. | |
| 13:49:10 | dansmith | so it may be more reading than you need | |
| 13:49:40 | efried | So yeah, kaisers1 you may do best following the code examples I linked above. | |
| 13:50:05 | kaisers1 | efried: will do, thanks! | |
| 13:50:09 | dansmith | definitely | |
| 13:50:10 | efried | enjoy | |
| 13:54:22 | jaypipes | ugh, the warnings barfed out in py36 test runs is getting ridiculous. | |
| 13:55:09 | edleafe | Scheduler subteam meeting in 5 minutes in #openstack-meeting-alt | |
| 13:55:53 | cdent | jaypipes: fun, isn't it? | |
| 13:57:04 | tssurya | dansmith: I am really sorry about this accidental rebase : https://review.openstack.org/#/c/553831/; could you please rebase it to the right topic before someone +W's it ? | |
| 13:57:44 | jaypipes | cdent: makes it very annoying to run tests. | |
| 13:58:16 | cdent | jaypipes: I keep meaning to find some to fix and then forget for whatever reason | |
| 13:58:50 | dansmith | tssurya: it doesn't really matter | |
| 13:59:16 | tssurya | dansmith: ok, yea still sorry | |
| 13:59:42 | dansmith | tssurya: it's not a problem, gerrit-review does that | |
| 13:59:58 | dansmith | tssurya: in the future -R will prevent you from rebasing the thing underneath you if you intentionally don't want it to move | |
| 14:00:29 | tssurya | dansmith: yep will keep that in mind next time | |
| 14:00:33 | tssurya | thank you | |
| 14:00:38 | dansmith | np | |
| 14:05:04 | Maddy | Hello, I was hitting this bug https://bugs.launchpad.net/nova/+bug/1717547 and I see that the workaround for that is not using the image parameters name as 'version', 'context' and 'method'. | |
| 14:05:05 | openstack | Launchpad bug 1717547 in OpenStack Compute (nova) "Creating snapshot fails when image metadata has version field" [Low,Confirmed] | |
| 14:05:14 | Maddy | This is not good because the user needs to be aware of that. One solution is make Glance to deny use of these parameters name on it's images. Other solution is to rename the variables in Nova 'Call' function to begin with '_' (underscore), but for that we also need to enforce Glance to now allow parameters beginning with '_' (underscore). | |
| 14:05:24 | Maddy | What's your thoughts about that? Any better solution? In case not, what do you think about implementing one the above solutions? | |
| 14:14:33 | openstackgerrit | Jay Pipes proposed openstack/nova master: add test for scenario with sum of child resources https://review.openstack.org/534339 | |
| 14:14:33 | openstackgerrit | Jay Pipes proposed openstack/nova master: tests for alloc candidates with nested and traits https://review.openstack.org/531899 | |
| 14:14:34 | openstackgerrit | Jay Pipes proposed openstack/nova master: add _get_usages_from_trees() function https://review.openstack.org/534967 | |
| 14:14:34 | openstackgerrit | Jay Pipes proposed openstack/nova master: _get_trees_matching_all_resources() sum children https://review.openstack.org/534866 | |
| 14:14:35 | openstackgerrit | Jay Pipes proposed openstack/nova master: WIP - populate alloc cands for trees https://review.openstack.org/534968 | |
| 14:14:35 | openstackgerrit | Jay Pipes proposed openstack/nova master: validate provider summary structure https://review.openstack.org/536516 | |
| 14:20:55 | openstackgerrit | Jay Pipes proposed openstack/nova master: add test for scenario with sum of child resources https://review.openstack.org/534339 | |
| 14:20:55 | openstackgerrit | Jay Pipes proposed openstack/nova master: tests for alloc candidates with nested and traits https://review.openstack.org/531899 | |
| 14:20:56 | openstackgerrit | Jay Pipes proposed openstack/nova master: add _get_usages_from_trees() function https://review.openstack.org/534967 | |
| 14:20:56 | openstackgerrit | Jay Pipes proposed openstack/nova master: _get_trees_matching_all_resources() sum children https://review.openstack.org/534866 | |
| 14:20:57 | openstackgerrit | Jay Pipes proposed openstack/nova master: WIP - populate alloc cands for trees https://review.openstack.org/534968 | |
| 14:20:57 | openstackgerrit | Jay Pipes proposed openstack/nova master: validate provider summary structure https://review.openstack.org/536516 | |
| 14:23:26 | openstackgerrit | Merged openstack/nova-specs master: Add host info to instance action events https://review.openstack.org/543277 | |
| 14:27:44 | jaypipes | efried: ^^ I'm getting that nested providers in allocation candidates series back inline... | |
| 14:27:53 | efried | jaypipes: Cool dude. | |
| 14:28:33 | efried | Did you see my potentially earth-shattering dissenting opinion on the "split one resource across multiple providers" thing? | |
| 14:28:45 | jaypipes | efried: no. link? | |