Earlier  
Posted Nick Remark
#openstack-nova - 2018-01-11
18:06:52 dansmith bauzas: ^
18:07:00 dansmith he has the full story in his head I bet
18:08:03 openstackgerrit Dan Smith proposed openstack/nova master: WIP: Pass limit to /allocation_requests https://review.openstack.org/531517
18:10:42 openstackgerrit Matt Riedemann proposed openstack/nova master: Pass multiattach flag to reserve_block_device_name https://review.openstack.org/531244
18:10:43 openstackgerrit Matt Riedemann proposed openstack/nova master: Handle swapping to a multiattach volume https://review.openstack.org/532928
18:10:43 openstackgerrit Matt Riedemann proposed openstack/nova master: [api] Allow multi-attach in compute api https://review.openstack.org/271047
18:10:49 mriedem ildikov: gibi: johnthetubaguy: ^ swap volume change is in the middle
18:11:24 ildikov mriedem: gorgeous, thank you!
19:24:28 openstackgerrit Eric Fried proposed openstack/nova master: ProviderTree.populate_from_iterable https://review.openstack.org/520756
19:24:29 openstackgerrit Eric Fried proposed openstack/nova master: Raise conflict exception on RP create 409 https://review.openstack.org/532563
19:24:29 openstackgerrit Eric Fried proposed openstack/nova master: Track tree-associated providers in report client https://review.openstack.org/526541
19:24:30 openstackgerrit Eric Fried proposed openstack/nova master: WIP: Scheduler[Report]Client.get_provider_tree https://review.openstack.org/521098
19:24:30 openstackgerrit Eric Fried proposed openstack/nova master: SchedulerReportClient.set_traits_for_provider https://review.openstack.org/532564
19:24:31 openstackgerrit Eric Fried proposed openstack/nova master: WIP: Use update_provider_tree from resource tracker https://review.openstack.org/520246
19:24:31 openstackgerrit Eric Fried proposed openstack/nova master: WIP: ComputeDriver.update_provider_tree() https://review.openstack.org/521187
19:24:32 openstackgerrit Eric Fried proposed openstack/nova master: Fix nits in update_provider_tree series https://review.openstack.org/531260
19:24:48 openstackgerrit Ed Leafe proposed openstack/nova master: Fix invalid UUIDs in test_compute.py https://review.openstack.org/531479
19:28:23 mriedem edleafe: comments in the resize + alternates patch https://review.openstack.org/#/c/526436/
19:28:33 mriedem as far as i can tell, there is nothing in there claiminig resources on the alternate hosts
19:30:10 mriedem dansmith: we need to get this fixed before rc1 https://review.openstack.org/#/q/topic:bug/1741307+project:openstack/nova
19:30:41 dansmith okay
19:38:31 sean-k-mooney mriedem: if we do a release of os-vif on monday are you ok with bumping the minium version for queens
19:40:23 mriedem i won't be around on monday
19:40:32 mriedem i was going to do the os-vif release today, and os-traits for that matter
19:40:35 mriedem now that you mention it
19:40:59 mriedem dansmith: melwitt: thanks for getting those; i'll add something to the ptg etherpad about migrating caching scheduler people to filter scheduler
19:41:30 sean-k-mooney mriedem: it would be nice to include https://review.openstack.org/#/q/status:open+project:openstack/os-vif+branch:master+topic:bug/1672812 and https://review.openstack.org/#/q/status:open+project:openstack/os-vif+branch:master+topic:bug/1666917 in queens
19:42:41 mriedem jesus
19:42:48 mriedem and what requires the minimum version bumps for those?
19:43:09 mriedem with jay on his deathbed i'm not sure how that's going to get done
19:43:28 sean-k-mooney mriedem: sorry i ment to say upperconstriats not minium version
19:43:37 mriedem u-c bumps are automatic
19:43:46 mriedem g-r bumps are when some consumer needs to rely on the changes
19:44:06 mriedem and presumably we're doing this work so something can use it
19:44:56 sean-k-mooney its used by os-vif itself it allow use to not use process exec to create port and insted use the openvswitch python libs
19:45:17 mriedem sean-k-mooney: ok, but that's not a super high priority is it?
19:45:22 mriedem at this point in queens i think that's a bit risky
19:45:29 mriedem and would be better deferred to an early release in rocky
19:46:33 sean-k-mooney its just a nice to have yes so it we branched today and did a release it would not break anything
19:47:07 mriedem has claudiub seen this? https://review.openstack.org/#/c/487405/
19:47:16 mriedem i think the hyperv driver is using os-vif so how are they not blowing up?
19:47:49 sean-k-mooney the code that is pertected by the if would not fail if the if was removed so it does not explode
19:48:52 sean-k-mooney that said checking if an interface exists via a file exits check under sys on windows is not exactly well fucntional
19:49:20 mriedem the other 2 things in https://review.openstack.org/#/q/status:open+project:openstack/os-vif+branch:master+topic:bug/1672812 are not really something we need to get released
19:49:24 mriedem the testing related patches i mean
19:49:40 mriedem so i'm going to push an os-vif release today, and if something else gets in afteward before next thursday, bauzas or someone can propose a release
19:50:00 sean-k-mooney mriedem: ok that sound fine to me
19:50:18 sean-k-mooney as i said they are just nice to have not required
19:50:37 mriedem sean-k-mooney: kit me up when rocky rolls around and we can push for the native ovs ones
19:50:39 mriedem *hit me up
19:51:46 sean-k-mooney sure. we are keeping support for process exec and not enableing it by default anyway. we had push out makeing that change to S instead.
19:52:13 sean-k-mooney has a name been chosen for S yet by the way
20:07:05 mriedem squish
20:07:47 mriedem shizer?
20:10:22 bauzas mriedem: sylvain :p
20:10:31 mriedem there is nothing german about that
20:10:35 mriedem shizer it is
20:11:28 bauzas schnauze :p
20:12:09 bauzas mriedem: question for https://review.openstack.org/#/c/528128/7/novaclient/exceptions.py
20:12:12 bauzas mriedem: why ?
20:12:45 mriedem because if you do six.text_type(ex) you don't get the message from the exception
20:13:29 bauzas interesting to know
20:13:35 mriedem https://review.openstack.org/#/c/528128/7/novaclient/tests/unit/v2/test_servers.py@1640
20:13:40 mriedem if you remove it, that stuff blows up
20:13:42 dansmith bauzas: if we name it that, people will be pronouncing it wrong for a long time
20:14:19 bauzas I know :p
20:22:57 sean-k-mooney like meltdown and specter im sure marketing will prevent any name being chossen that would not be family frendly
20:23:26 sean-k-mooney or well are inside/techy jokes
20:25:42 bauzas dansmith: got a sec ?
20:25:48 openstackgerrit Lee Yarwood proposed openstack/nova master: WIP libvirt: QEMU native LUKS decryption for volumes https://review.openstack.org/523958
20:25:52 dansmith bauzas: finishing an email, but then yes
20:25:57 bauzas dansmith: cool
20:26:32 bauzas dansmith: that's just about the libvirt issue about regenerating a wrong XML because missing allocs
20:26:35 bauzas so take your time
20:27:07 openstackgerrit Eric Berglund proposed openstack/nova master: PowerVM Driver: vSCSI volume driver https://review.openstack.org/526094
20:27:24 efried Could one of y'all please re+W https://review.openstack.org/#/c/521686/ (auto rebase)
20:28:25 bauzas efried: .
20:28:37 efried bauzas Merci bien.
20:32:22 mriedem stvnoyes: on those tempest patches, when you push the changes, you need to use git review -R
20:32:29 mriedem you pulled my approved changes out of the gate
20:32:52 mriedem stvnoyes: i thought you were going to push a separate patch on top of https://review.openstack.org/#/c/266605/ ? not add to it.
20:33:17 stvnoyes hmm cr*p. what's the best way to undo that?
20:33:55 stvnoyes i can submit a new change that pulls it out...
20:34:10 claudiub mriedem: so, at the moment, hyperv-neutron-agent is still used in the CI. But i've fetched that patch and instances still spawn when using OVS.
20:34:21 mriedem stvnoyes: too late now
20:34:31 mriedem well too late for the git review -R
20:34:38 mriedem stvnoyes: you could just put the resize test on top in a different change
20:34:41 mriedem just don't git commit --amend
20:35:20 stvnoyes just to be clear, on top, you mean by using depends on?
20:35:35 mriedem no
20:35:40 mriedem stack the changes like i've done in that series
20:35:49 mriedem you don't need depends-on within the same repo
20:36:13 mriedem so just remove the resize test from the top patch, then commit it into a new change at the top of the series,
20:36:14 sean-k-mooney claudiub: ya the way os-vif is written it should work with or without the patch but it annoys me that it works just because we happened ot make the functions not fail if there preconditions were violated
20:36:19 mriedem and then git review -R -y
20:36:24 stvnoyes ok
20:36:51 mriedem if you need to go back within the series to change something, you do an interactive rebase (git rebase -i HEAD~4) or whatever
20:39:44 efried git restack is your friend
20:40:00 efried Well, *my* friend, anyway.
20:40:13 sean-k-mooney efried: git restack?

Earlier   Later