Earlier  
Later
New Search
Posted Nick Remark
#openstack-nova - 2017-12-14
07:59:11 openstackgerrit Takashi NATSUME proposed openstack/nova master: List/show all server migration types (2/2) https://review.openstack.org/459483
08:01:41 openstackgerrit Chason Chan proposed openstack/nova master: Fix the bug report link of API Guide https://review.openstack.org/527660
09:00:35 openstackgerrit Takashi NATSUME proposed openstack/nova master: [placement] Add sending global request ID in delete (2) https://review.openstack.org/526263
09:00:54 openstackgerrit Takashi NATSUME proposed openstack/nova master: [placement] Add sending global request ID in delete (3) https://review.openstack.org/526557
09:17:53 openstackgerrit Takashi NATSUME proposed openstack/nova master: [placement] Add sending global request ID in post https://review.openstack.org/526823
09:30:11 openstackgerrit Dai Dang Van proposed openstack/nova master: WIP: Allow multi-attach in compute api https://review.openstack.org/271047
09:36:00 openstackgerrit Ya Lian Pan proposed openstack/nova master: z/VM Driver: Spawn and destroy function of z/VM driver https://review.openstack.org/527658
10:01:09 openstackgerrit Matthew Booth proposed openstack/nova master: Improve error message on invalid BDM fields https://review.openstack.org/527915
10:02:28 openstackgerrit Matthew Booth proposed openstack/nova master: Give volume DriverBlockDevice classes a common prefix https://review.openstack.org/526346
10:02:28 openstackgerrit Matthew Booth proposed openstack/nova master: DriverBlockDevice: make subclasses inherit _proxy_as_attr https://review.openstack.org/524167
10:02:29 openstackgerrit Matthew Booth proposed openstack/nova master: Use real block_device_info data in test_blockinfo https://review.openstack.org/527916
10:02:29 openstackgerrit Matthew Booth proposed openstack/nova master: Add DriverLocalImageBlockDevice https://review.openstack.org/526347
10:16:10 openstackgerrit Balazs Gibizer proposed openstack/nova master: Fix possible TypeError in VIF.fixed_ips https://review.openstack.org/527920
10:21:19 openstackgerrit Balazs Gibizer proposed openstack/nova master: handle traits with sharing providers https://review.openstack.org/517119
10:21:20 openstackgerrit Balazs Gibizer proposed openstack/nova master: Test alloc_cands with one RP shared between two RPs https://review.openstack.org/519617
10:21:20 openstackgerrit Balazs Gibizer proposed openstack/nova master: Test alloc_cands with non overlapping sharing RPs https://review.openstack.org/519380
10:21:21 openstackgerrit Balazs Gibizer proposed openstack/nova master: Test helper: validate provider summaries https://review.openstack.org/518982
10:21:21 openstackgerrit Balazs Gibizer proposed openstack/nova master: Test allocation candidates: multiple aggregates https://review.openstack.org/518633
10:21:22 openstackgerrit Balazs Gibizer proposed openstack/nova master: Add aggregates check in allocation candidates https://review.openstack.org/522407
10:21:22 openstackgerrit Balazs Gibizer proposed openstack/nova master: Fix accumulated nits in refactor series https://review.openstack.org/521189
10:21:23 openstackgerrit Balazs Gibizer proposed openstack/nova master: placement: func tests for multiple shared RPs https://review.openstack.org/498737
10:21:23 openstackgerrit Balazs Gibizer proposed openstack/nova master: Fix missing rps in allocation candidates https://review.openstack.org/522409
10:23:41 gibi jaypipes: ^^ rebased the series as master already has the fix for the frequently failing functional test that prevented these to be merged
10:26:48 openstackgerrit rahul bardia proposed openstack/python-novaclient master: nova limits ERROR (Exception): Field names must be unique This happens when 'Others' field is occuring more than once which is not handled in code causing multiple columns having same name. Which throws above exception and does not pretty prints absolute https://review.openstack.org/527922
11:11:50 kashyap stephenfin: Hi there, when you get a moment, you know why is Zuul complaning here - https://review.openstack.org/#/c/527691/
11:21:35 stephenfin kashyap: Looking
11:22:45 stephenfin kashyap: That job's been failing a lot lately, but I don't know why. It's unrelated to this, in any case
11:23:03 stephenfin We should probably investigate that, actually
11:24:38 stephenfin bauzas: Ta for the review :)
11:25:32 kashyap stephenfin: Yeah, noted; right now I need to run an errand.
11:34:45 openstackgerrit Merged openstack/nova stable/ocata: Add regression test for rebuilding a volume-backed server https://review.openstack.org/525664
11:41:42 openstackgerrit Balazs Gibizer proposed openstack/nova master: Add regression test for bug 1735407 https://review.openstack.org/526095
11:41:43 openstackgerrit Balazs Gibizer proposed openstack/nova master: Add late server group policy check to rebuild https://review.openstack.org/525242
11:41:43 openstack bug 1735407 in OpenStack Compute (nova) "[Nova] Evacuation doesn't respect anti-affinity rules" [Medium,In progress] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1735407 - Assigned to Balazs Gibizer (balazs-gibizer)
11:51:35 openstackgerrit Balazs Gibizer proposed openstack/nova master: Transform missing delete notifications https://review.openstack.org/410297
11:51:36 openstackgerrit Balazs Gibizer proposed openstack/nova master: Send soft_delete from context manager https://review.openstack.org/476459
12:01:57 gibi kashyap, stephenfin: the test_live_migration_actions functional test failure has already been fixed on master so you just have to rebase
12:02:22 stephenfin gibi: Aha. What patch fixed it, out of curiosity?
12:02:23 gibi kashyap, stephenfin: this was the fix https://review.openstack.org/#/c/527440/
12:02:32 stephenfin jinx :)_
12:02:54 stephenfin Oh, nice
12:03:01 gibi stephenfin: there is one more fix in the pipe that fixes another failure mode of that test here https://review.openstack.org/#/c/527444/
12:04:12 openstackgerrit Balazs Gibizer proposed openstack/nova master: Extract instance allocation removal code https://review.openstack.org/513041
12:35:32 openstackgerrit Chris Dent proposed openstack/nova master: [placement] Enable limiting GET /allocation_candidates https://review.openstack.org/513526
12:40:44 openstackgerrit Chason Chan proposed openstack/nova master: Fix the bug report link of API Guide https://review.openstack.org/527660
12:43:31 openstackgerrit Stephen Finucane proposed openstack/nova master: trivial: Modify signature of _filter_non_requested_pfs https://review.openstack.org/527473
12:43:31 openstackgerrit Stephen Finucane proposed openstack/nova master: Add PCI NUMA policies https://review.openstack.org/527472
12:44:30 efried_cya_jan stephenfin gibi Thanks for looking after those patches!
12:45:26 cdent efried_cya_jan: since you're here (naughty!) I should report that I've not had a chance to do anything with your stuff: I've got a nasty cold so mostly done nothing for the past couple of days. But when I surface, I will.
12:46:17 efried_cya_jan cdent I somehow caught your cold, which is a sucky way to start a vacation. It looks like stephenfin has been addressing review comments and he & gibi have been rebasing stuff, so I think you're in the clear... for now :)
12:46:35 cdent internet germs are the worst
12:46:49 gibi efried_cya_jan: o/
12:48:19 openstackgerrit Raghad Qutteneh proposed openstack/nova master: Allow force-delete to delete instance in task_state block_device_mapping https://review.openstack.org/527951
12:53:13 gibi efried_cya_jan: if you are here I have a question. Do I understand correctly that the GET allocation_candidate API does not handle nested RPs yet?
12:53:57 efried_cya_jan gibi That's correct. That's a major piece we need before we can slot in the granular resource requests work.
12:54:16 gibi efried_cya_jan: OK, cool
12:54:23 efried_cya_jan gibi: jaypipes is on the hook for that.
12:55:13 gibi OK
13:48:55 kashyap gibi: Thanks for the (non-null) pointer :-)
13:52:27 mriedem oh crap today is thursday huh
13:52:32 mriedem gibi: can you run the meeting?
13:53:12 gibi mriedem: sure
13:54:04 mriedem thanks. i'll update the agenda quick.
13:54:09 gibi mriedem: thanks, that helps
13:54:17 openstackgerrit Chris Dent proposed openstack/nova master: [placement] Enable limiting GET /allocation_candidates https://review.openstack.org/513526
13:57:46 mriedem done https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Meetings/Nova#Agenda_for_next_meeting
13:58:09 gibi cool
14:00:17 gibi nova meeting is about to start on @openstack-meeting
14:00:29 cdent mriedem: just wanted to say: thanks for trying to keep it real in the cycle length thread.
14:00:43 mriedem np
14:01:05 cdent I'm trying to gather my thoughts, but not having much success
14:02:16 mriedem i think i will have to move on today from that thread
14:02:42 cdent that would be a bummer, you are uniquely positioned to, uh, keep it real
14:04:12 mriedem i don't have the energy to fight that battle, and it sounds like the majority of people (ops, users?) seem to like the idea. i think it will turn out to be more than what they bargained for (some things they'll lose, some things they won't get out of it)
14:05:44 mriedem we'll do what we need to do for nova, if that means intermediate releases just to give us a deadline to work toward even if no one ever consumes it
14:06:56 cdent i definitely think that if it happens hard interediate deadlines will be _very_ important
14:07:40 edleafe so if you don't meet a deadline, would that mean waiting a year? Or what?
14:09:58 edleafe just wondering how "dead" such a deadline would be
14:10:33 cdent as you know, I think all deadlines are made up and thus fungible, but they are useful encouragement tools?
14:11:14 edleafe IMO, deadlines work as sticks, not carrots.
14:12:02 cdent maybe call them boundaries?
14:13:19 mriedem jaypipes: i put this up for that dbdeadlock issue https://review.openstack.org/#/c/527836/ - not sure that's best, but it's a thing
14:13:40 mriedem edleafe: i think we'd do intermediate releases so we could have more than 1 freeze in a year
14:14:19 mriedem so either 1 or 2 intermediate releases (6 month or 4 month between them), and do our normal spec review, spec freeze, code churn, feature freeze, stability minute, then open up for new specs again
14:14:31 mriedem i don't think we can freeze out specs for an entire year,
14:14:45 mriedem and i don't think we can leave spec reviews open for an entire year and focus on actually getting things done
14:14:52 edleafe mriedem: so would they be Rocky I, Rocky II, ...
14:15:11 mriedem rocky IV is where we fight the mirantis guys
14:15:18 mriedem us guys,
14:15:19 mriedem and yous guys
14:16:37 mriedem having said that, i don't know what we'd do for upgrade testing with intermediate releases
14:16:53 mriedem do you do queens->rocky.1, queens->rocky.2, or queens->rocky.1->rocky.2?
14:17:09 mriedem today it would be the former because of how the CI system works on branches
14:17:31 mriedem i assume we would use minor version bumps for intermediate releases
14:17:34 edleafe yuck
14:17:46 cdent blargh
14:17:49 mriedem so rocky 1 would be 17.1.0
14:17:53 mriedem if rocky GA was 18.0.0
14:17:56 mriedem but,
14:18:08 mriedem that gets tricky if we actually need to backport something to stable/pike which would normally be a minor update

Earlier   Later