Earlier  
Posted Nick Remark
#openstack-nova - 2017-09-21
21:33:09 dansmith mriedem: certainly for this one
21:33:13 cdent b jinx with mriedem
21:33:28 cdent we should treat it as feedback time
21:33:45 mriedem ^ is why i'd rather just sit in on ops sessions
21:33:49 edleafe many developers couldn't get companies to pay for the midcycles, since it wasn't an "official" event
21:34:10 cdent mriedem: maybe just make that so then? state: we’re not gonna do nova-oriented forum sessions, we’re going to go to ops ones
21:34:37 mriedem cdent: that will be the case if we don't have anything to propose
21:34:42 mriedem which might just happen naturally
21:34:53 cdent I suspect most people whould approve of that, especially if you spread the idea around
21:35:07 mriedem ultimately i just don't want to have to propose topics to fill time
21:35:27 mriedem s/i/us/we/everyone/
21:35:54 dansmith the topics we proposed in boston were pretty well-attended by ops no?
21:36:56 mriedem yeah
21:37:18 mriedem some of the stuff we talked about in boston is just carrying over into queens
21:37:29 mriedem so that's where i'm thinking, this isn't news, this is stuff we're still working on
21:37:45 openstackgerrit Eric Berglund proposed openstack/nova master: Add PowerVM hypervisor configuration doc https://review.openstack.org/505665
21:37:50 dansmith I think if we don't propose sessions to get specific feedback from ops, we'll be perceived as not caring to gather input, even if the actual goal is to attend other things
21:38:15 mriedem i don't know what specifically we're trying to get feedback on
21:38:48 mriedem and we've done the general ops feedback sessions in the past which weren't well attended
21:39:37 mriedem getting feedback from pike would be great, hell even ocata
21:39:49 dansmith isn't that likely to be the outcome if we just say we're not proposing things and expect everyone else to do it?
21:40:36 mriedem so are you thinking like a pike feedback session?
21:41:03 dansmith I think that by the time that rolls around several of the people we know of as early movers will be on pike already
21:41:11 dansmith cern, vexxhost already being there, etc
21:42:03 mriedem L10 in https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/SYD-ops-session-ideas
21:42:21 mriedem we do have the project update talk for pike
21:42:47 dansmith surely someone has an opinion on the quotas changes by that point
21:42:50 mriedem i'm totally fine with a pike feedback / update session if people are armed with issues/questions
21:42:52 melwitt I think a good topic would be something like "upgrades", how did it go when you upgraded nova and what issues did you run into, what would make it easier
21:43:08 mriedem ok, so,
21:43:18 mriedem you all know you can throw stuff in this etherpad right?
21:43:20 openstackgerrit OpenStack Proposal Bot proposed openstack/os-traits master: Updated from global requirements https://review.openstack.org/503646
21:43:26 melwitt I know we've covered it before in the past but it's kind of a moving target I think. each release has its own upgrade gotchas
21:43:30 melwitt yes, sorry
21:43:44 dansmith mriedem: sure, but ya'll were arguing about not having anything here
21:44:31 mriedem i'm basically just trolling myself at this point
21:44:35 melwitt in my case, my brain is totally fried from the PTG and the ideas are emerging slowly
21:44:38 mriedem right
21:44:40 mriedem same here
21:45:04 dansmith mriedem: do you want my alternate color up on L20 or to delete your dupes on L37?
21:45:05 mriedem i would love to have ops people come armed with issues/questions for a pike feedback session
21:45:10 dansmith er, 38-39
21:45:43 mriedem a lot of times i feel like we get a room full of people and then are pushing the topics on them, without much response unless you cattle prod someone
21:46:01 dansmith same goes for us just waiting for other people to propose topics
21:46:15 edleafe mriedem: are you bringing a cattle prod to Sydney?
21:46:26 mriedem edleafe: kangerprod
21:46:32 mriedem i think you can get them at the corner store
21:46:49 edleafe damn you, I was typing that!
22:05:50 dansmith mriedem: did you see this? https://review.openstack.org/#/c/506370/
22:06:03 dansmith I don't think the bot barfed it into here else I missed it
22:06:24 mriedem ha, no
22:07:47 mriedem http://docs-draft.openstack.org/70/506370/1/check/gate-nova-docs-ubuntu-xenial/08cdb00//doc/build/html/reference/live-migration.html
22:07:58 dansmith I almost have migration_uuid claims working for cold migration
22:08:13 dansmith gibi laid down the gauntlet with his tests
22:09:51 mriedem efried: you're a docs machine
22:10:13 efried mriedem I was waiting for that to build so I could send you the rendered version. But you what, did it locally?
22:10:24 mriedem no looked at the job results
22:10:28 efried oh, you found it before it was done, cool.
22:10:36 mriedem status.openstack.org/zuul
22:10:37 melwitt he probably spied it on the zuul status page
22:10:39 efried So it ain't perfect, but it's not bad.
22:10:41 melwitt dammit
22:10:55 mriedem efried: 1000% better than what we have today, which is nothing
22:11:14 mriedem you'll have to add that new dependency to global-requirements
22:11:20 efried It's already there
22:13:14 efried Oh - I misread the dot version: https://github.com/openstack/requirements/blob/master/global-requirements.txt#L424
22:13:59 efried mriedem Do you want to add some words around that doc in this patch?
22:15:54 openstackgerrit Eric Fried proposed openstack/nova master: Live Migration sequence diagram https://review.openstack.org/506370
22:16:08 efried mriedem Fixed that version and added co-author line ^
22:17:25 mriedem we can describe the operations in a follow up
22:17:42 mriedem not as pretty is right!
22:18:01 mriedem not sure why the reqs job was failing then
22:18:46 mriedem oh it's the space
22:18:53 mriedem it literally has to match "sphinxcontrib-seqdiag>=0.8.4 # BSD"
22:19:48 mriedem maybe not, this might work
22:20:20 efried I had it as .5 before
22:20:36 mriedem yup see that now
22:20:40 mriedem cool, this should pass
22:20:42 mriedem glorious
22:20:52 efried yeah, it's not complaining about the actdiag one, which has two spaces before the comment as well.
22:42:04 openstackgerrit Merged openstack/nova master: Drop support for the Cinder v2 API https://review.openstack.org/501874
22:45:19 openstackgerrit Jay Pipes proposed openstack/nova master: placement: set/check if inventory change in tree https://review.openstack.org/470575
22:45:20 openstackgerrit Jay Pipes proposed openstack/nova master: placement: integrate ProviderTree to report client https://review.openstack.org/415921
22:45:23 openstackgerrit Jay Pipes proposed openstack/nova master: placement: allow filter providers in tree https://review.openstack.org/377215
22:45:23 openstackgerrit Jay Pipes proposed openstack/nova master: placement: add nested resource providers https://review.openstack.org/377138
22:45:26 openstackgerrit Jay Pipes proposed openstack/nova master: placement: adds REST API for nested providers https://review.openstack.org/384807
22:45:28 openstackgerrit Jay Pipes proposed openstack/nova master: placement: update client to set parent provider https://review.openstack.org/385693
23:15:06 openstackgerrit Matt Riedemann proposed openstack/nova master: Add recreate test for unshelve offloaded instance spawn fail https://review.openstack.org/506414
23:18:14 openstackgerrit Matt Riedemann proposed openstack/nova master: Add a regression test for bug 1718455 https://review.openstack.org/506092
23:18:15 openstack bug 1718455 in OpenStack Compute (nova) "[pike] Nova host disable and Live Migrate all instances fail." [Medium,In progress] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1718455 - Assigned to Sylvain Bauza (sylvain-bauza)
23:19:10 openstackgerrit Matt Riedemann proposed openstack/nova master: Fix definitely move single instance when created concurrently https://review.openstack.org/506093
23:31:12 openstackgerrit Hongbin Li proposed openstack/nova master: Remove method "_get_host_ref_from_name" https://review.openstack.org/504796
23:35:55 openstackgerrit Dan Smith proposed openstack/nova master: Use improved instance_list module in compute API https://review.openstack.org/505418
23:35:55 openstackgerrit Dan Smith proposed openstack/nova master: Fix a pagination logic bug in test_bug_1689692 https://review.openstack.org/505661
23:35:56 openstackgerrit Dan Smith proposed openstack/nova master: Fix CellDatabases fixture swallowing exceptions https://review.openstack.org/506312
23:35:56 openstackgerrit Dan Smith proposed openstack/nova master: Remove legacy fault-loading routines https://review.openstack.org/505456
23:35:57 openstackgerrit Dan Smith proposed openstack/nova master: Fix minor input items from previous patches https://review.openstack.org/506416
#openstack-nova - 2017-09-22
00:19:54 mriedem melwitt pulling out the zingers on the sorted instances list series tonight
00:21:33 melwitt trying to be a cool cat
00:24:24 openstackgerrit Merged openstack/nova master: Add base implementation for efficient cross-cell instance listing https://review.openstack.org/504983

Earlier   Later