| Posted | Nick | Remark | |
|---|---|---|---|
| #openstack-nova - 2017-09-21 | |||
| 21:32:13 | dansmith | right, all I'm saying is I hope that if we need to have discussions for in-progress things, we can do that as that was part of why the midcycle was important.. for rescuing things that were flailing before it was too late | |
| 21:32:33 | mriedem | dansmith: we can, if you can figure out what those things are going to be in the next 8 days :) | |
| 21:32:34 | edleafe | cdent: no, not a midcycle, but that would be the time to make sure you are on course for completing what you set out to do at the PTG | |
| 21:32:51 | edleafe | dansmith: sorta jinx | |
| 21:32:53 | cdent | if that’s an expectation people have, I think they will be disappointed | |
| 21:32:56 | dansmith | edleafe: exactly | |
| 21:33:02 | mriedem | dansmith: and minus a lot of the developers involved | |
| 21:33:05 | cdent | a) there won’t be time, b) there won’t be the people | |
| 21:33:09 | dansmith | mriedem: certainly for this one | |
| 21:33:13 | cdent | b jinx with mriedem | |
| 21:33:28 | cdent | we should treat it as feedback time | |
| 21:33:45 | mriedem | ^ is why i'd rather just sit in on ops sessions | |
| 21:33:49 | edleafe | many developers couldn't get companies to pay for the midcycles, since it wasn't an "official" event | |
| 21:34:10 | cdent | mriedem: maybe just make that so then? state: we’re not gonna do nova-oriented forum sessions, we’re going to go to ops ones | |
| 21:34:37 | mriedem | cdent: that will be the case if we don't have anything to propose | |
| 21:34:42 | mriedem | which might just happen naturally | |
| 21:34:53 | cdent | I suspect most people whould approve of that, especially if you spread the idea around | |
| 21:35:07 | mriedem | ultimately i just don't want to have to propose topics to fill time | |
| 21:35:27 | mriedem | s/i/us/we/everyone/ | |
| 21:35:54 | dansmith | the topics we proposed in boston were pretty well-attended by ops no? | |
| 21:36:56 | mriedem | yeah | |
| 21:37:18 | mriedem | some of the stuff we talked about in boston is just carrying over into queens | |
| 21:37:29 | mriedem | so that's where i'm thinking, this isn't news, this is stuff we're still working on | |
| 21:37:45 | openstackgerrit | Eric Berglund proposed openstack/nova master: Add PowerVM hypervisor configuration doc https://review.openstack.org/505665 | |
| 21:37:50 | dansmith | I think if we don't propose sessions to get specific feedback from ops, we'll be perceived as not caring to gather input, even if the actual goal is to attend other things | |
| 21:38:15 | mriedem | i don't know what specifically we're trying to get feedback on | |
| 21:38:48 | mriedem | and we've done the general ops feedback sessions in the past which weren't well attended | |
| 21:39:37 | mriedem | getting feedback from pike would be great, hell even ocata | |
| 21:39:49 | dansmith | isn't that likely to be the outcome if we just say we're not proposing things and expect everyone else to do it? | |
| 21:40:36 | mriedem | so are you thinking like a pike feedback session? | |
| 21:41:03 | dansmith | I think that by the time that rolls around several of the people we know of as early movers will be on pike already | |
| 21:41:11 | dansmith | cern, vexxhost already being there, etc | |
| 21:42:03 | mriedem | L10 in https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/SYD-ops-session-ideas | |
| 21:42:21 | mriedem | we do have the project update talk for pike | |
| 21:42:47 | dansmith | surely someone has an opinion on the quotas changes by that point | |
| 21:42:50 | mriedem | i'm totally fine with a pike feedback / update session if people are armed with issues/questions | |
| 21:42:52 | melwitt | I think a good topic would be something like "upgrades", how did it go when you upgraded nova and what issues did you run into, what would make it easier | |
| 21:43:08 | mriedem | ok, so, | |
| 21:43:18 | mriedem | you all know you can throw stuff in this etherpad right? | |
| 21:43:20 | openstackgerrit | OpenStack Proposal Bot proposed openstack/os-traits master: Updated from global requirements https://review.openstack.org/503646 | |
| 21:43:26 | melwitt | I know we've covered it before in the past but it's kind of a moving target I think. each release has its own upgrade gotchas | |
| 21:43:30 | melwitt | yes, sorry | |
| 21:43:44 | dansmith | mriedem: sure, but ya'll were arguing about not having anything here | |
| 21:44:31 | mriedem | i'm basically just trolling myself at this point | |
| 21:44:35 | melwitt | in my case, my brain is totally fried from the PTG and the ideas are emerging slowly | |
| 21:44:38 | mriedem | right | |
| 21:44:40 | mriedem | same here | |
| 21:45:04 | dansmith | mriedem: do you want my alternate color up on L20 or to delete your dupes on L37? | |
| 21:45:05 | mriedem | i would love to have ops people come armed with issues/questions for a pike feedback session | |
| 21:45:10 | dansmith | er, 38-39 | |
| 21:45:43 | mriedem | a lot of times i feel like we get a room full of people and then are pushing the topics on them, without much response unless you cattle prod someone | |
| 21:46:01 | dansmith | same goes for us just waiting for other people to propose topics | |
| 21:46:15 | edleafe | mriedem: are you bringing a cattle prod to Sydney? | |
| 21:46:26 | mriedem | edleafe: kangerprod | |
| 21:46:32 | mriedem | i think you can get them at the corner store | |
| 21:46:49 | edleafe | damn you, I was typing that! | |
| 22:05:50 | dansmith | mriedem: did you see this? https://review.openstack.org/#/c/506370/ | |
| 22:06:03 | dansmith | I don't think the bot barfed it into here else I missed it | |
| 22:06:24 | mriedem | ha, no | |
| 22:07:47 | mriedem | http://docs-draft.openstack.org/70/506370/1/check/gate-nova-docs-ubuntu-xenial/08cdb00//doc/build/html/reference/live-migration.html | |
| 22:07:58 | dansmith | I almost have migration_uuid claims working for cold migration | |
| 22:08:13 | dansmith | gibi laid down the gauntlet with his tests | |
| 22:09:51 | mriedem | efried: you're a docs machine | |
| 22:10:13 | efried | mriedem I was waiting for that to build so I could send you the rendered version. But you what, did it locally? | |
| 22:10:24 | mriedem | no looked at the job results | |
| 22:10:28 | efried | oh, you found it before it was done, cool. | |
| 22:10:36 | mriedem | status.openstack.org/zuul | |
| 22:10:37 | melwitt | he probably spied it on the zuul status page | |
| 22:10:39 | efried | So it ain't perfect, but it's not bad. | |
| 22:10:41 | melwitt | dammit | |
| 22:10:55 | mriedem | efried: 1000% better than what we have today, which is nothing | |
| 22:11:14 | mriedem | you'll have to add that new dependency to global-requirements | |
| 22:11:20 | efried | It's already there | |
| 22:13:14 | efried | Oh - I misread the dot version: https://github.com/openstack/requirements/blob/master/global-requirements.txt#L424 | |
| 22:13:59 | efried | mriedem Do you want to add some words around that doc in this patch? | |
| 22:15:54 | openstackgerrit | Eric Fried proposed openstack/nova master: Live Migration sequence diagram https://review.openstack.org/506370 | |
| 22:16:08 | efried | mriedem Fixed that version and added co-author line ^ | |
| 22:17:25 | mriedem | we can describe the operations in a follow up | |
| 22:17:42 | mriedem | not as pretty is right! | |
| 22:18:01 | mriedem | not sure why the reqs job was failing then | |
| 22:18:46 | mriedem | oh it's the space | |
| 22:18:53 | mriedem | it literally has to match "sphinxcontrib-seqdiag>=0.8.4 # BSD" | |
| 22:19:48 | mriedem | maybe not, this might work | |
| 22:20:20 | efried | I had it as .5 before | |
| 22:20:36 | mriedem | yup see that now | |
| 22:20:40 | mriedem | cool, this should pass | |
| 22:20:42 | mriedem | glorious | |
| 22:20:52 | efried | yeah, it's not complaining about the actdiag one, which has two spaces before the comment as well. | |
| 22:42:04 | openstackgerrit | Merged openstack/nova master: Drop support for the Cinder v2 API https://review.openstack.org/501874 | |
| 22:45:19 | openstackgerrit | Jay Pipes proposed openstack/nova master: placement: set/check if inventory change in tree https://review.openstack.org/470575 | |
| 22:45:20 | openstackgerrit | Jay Pipes proposed openstack/nova master: placement: integrate ProviderTree to report client https://review.openstack.org/415921 | |
| 22:45:23 | openstackgerrit | Jay Pipes proposed openstack/nova master: placement: allow filter providers in tree https://review.openstack.org/377215 | |
| 22:45:23 | openstackgerrit | Jay Pipes proposed openstack/nova master: placement: add nested resource providers https://review.openstack.org/377138 | |
| 22:45:26 | openstackgerrit | Jay Pipes proposed openstack/nova master: placement: adds REST API for nested providers https://review.openstack.org/384807 | |
| 22:45:28 | openstackgerrit | Jay Pipes proposed openstack/nova master: placement: update client to set parent provider https://review.openstack.org/385693 | |
| 23:15:06 | openstackgerrit | Matt Riedemann proposed openstack/nova master: Add recreate test for unshelve offloaded instance spawn fail https://review.openstack.org/506414 | |
| 23:18:14 | openstackgerrit | Matt Riedemann proposed openstack/nova master: Add a regression test for bug 1718455 https://review.openstack.org/506092 | |
| 23:18:15 | openstack | bug 1718455 in OpenStack Compute (nova) "[pike] Nova host disable and Live Migrate all instances fail." [Medium,In progress] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1718455 - Assigned to Sylvain Bauza (sylvain-bauza) | |
| 23:19:10 | openstackgerrit | Matt Riedemann proposed openstack/nova master: Fix definitely move single instance when created concurrently https://review.openstack.org/506093 | |
| 23:31:12 | openstackgerrit | Hongbin Li proposed openstack/nova master: Remove method "_get_host_ref_from_name" https://review.openstack.org/504796 | |