| Posted | Nick | Remark | |
|---|---|---|---|
| #openstack-nova - 2017-07-07 | |||
| 16:13:08 | mriedem | and we create that bdm in the cell compute service | |
| 16:34:57 | openstack | Launchpad bug 1702959 in OpenStack Compute (nova) "MigrationNotFound in multi-cell setup doing server external events processing" [High,Triaged] | |
| 16:34:57 | mriedem | another one https://bugs.launchpad.net/nova/+bug/1702959 | |
| 16:38:13 | mriedem | i'll take a crack at that one | |
| 16:38:54 | dfisher | anybody know of attach/detach issues with current nova/cinder (via devstack) bits? I can't seem to get a simple volume to attach to a simple Ubuntu or Cirros VM | |
| 16:39:16 | mriedem | no known issues | |
| 16:39:22 | dfisher | hmm, ok. | |
| 16:39:28 | dfisher | thanks | |
| 16:43:21 | superdan | mriedem: is that one resolved by the patch that is up already? | |
| 16:43:42 | superdan | mriedem: https://review.openstack.org/#/c/445142/ | |
| 16:46:00 | clarkb | mriedem: http://logs.openstack.org/31/476631/18/gate/gate-nova-tox-functional-ubuntu-xenial/2cafb17/console.html#_2017-07-07_15_29_18_416631 known issue? that reset the gate not too long ago. Looks like test is attempting admin request and failing without admin rights | |
| 16:50:23 | mriedem | clarkb: i'm not aware of that one | |
| 16:50:47 | mriedem | superdan: maybe given https://review.openstack.org/#/c/445142/10/nova/compute/api.py@4263 | |
| 16:51:07 | mriedem | superdan: are you ok with me making the fleetify change depend on that patch as well? | |
| 16:51:19 | superdan | mriedem: sure | |
| 16:56:27 | openstackgerrit | melanie witt proposed openstack/nova master: Use ConsoleConnection object to generate authorizations https://review.openstack.org/325414 | |
| 16:56:27 | openstackgerrit | melanie witt proposed openstack/nova master: Add periodic task to clean expired console tokens https://review.openstack.org/325381 | |
| 16:56:28 | openstackgerrit | melanie witt proposed openstack/nova master: Add access_url_base to console_auth_tokens table https://review.openstack.org/334614 | |
| 16:56:28 | openstackgerrit | melanie witt proposed openstack/nova master: Add console connection object https://review.openstack.org/320063 | |
| 16:56:29 | openstackgerrit | melanie witt proposed openstack/nova master: Add console_auth_token_get() method to DB API https://review.openstack.org/481700 | |
| 16:56:29 | openstackgerrit | melanie witt proposed openstack/nova master: Convert websocketproxy to use db for token validation https://review.openstack.org/333990 | |
| 16:56:41 | mriedem | ok, fleeitify updated, will check out the api logs when that's done to see if the migration not found is gone | |
| 16:58:33 | mriedem | clarkb: have you checked logstash? | |
| 17:00:11 | mriedem | probably can't really | |
| 17:00:23 | clarkb | mriedem: not yet trying to diagnose problems with my desktop :/ | |
| 17:00:42 | mriedem | in general we've had very weird failures like that with the nova functional tests, | |
| 17:01:03 | mriedem | something is making a request to the placement service and another is making a request to the compute api service, and the response goes the wrong way, | |
| 17:01:07 | mriedem | assuming eventlet weirdness | |
| 17:05:45 | mriedem | aha | |
| 17:05:57 | mriedem | vdrok: found that weird sql connection thing in the fleetify patch | |
| 17:06:08 | openstackgerrit | John Griffith proposed openstack/nova master: Implement new attach Cinder flow https://review.openstack.org/330285 | |
| 17:06:15 | mriedem | http://logs.openstack.org/56/477556/3/check/gate-tempest-dsvm-neutron-multinode-full-ubuntu-xenial-nv/ee3e9b6/logs/subnode-2/screen-n-cpu.txt.gz#_Jul_05_20_44_19_705646 | |
| 17:06:41 | mriedem | the subnode n-cpu is doing the server group affinity check, which blows up b/c the cell conductor doesn't have an api db connection, | |
| 17:06:52 | mriedem | the nova-cpu.conf on the subnode is missing the config option to disable that upcall | |
| 17:10:38 | vdrok | mriedem: cool, thanks! Do we need to set it in ironic plugin or it's going to be handled on Nova side? | |
| 17:10:50 | mriedem | not sure, it needs to be handled in https://review.openstack.org/#/c/477556/4/lib/nova though | |
| 17:11:18 | mriedem | i think this is where the nova-cpu.conf is used https://review.openstack.org/#/c/477556/4/lib/nova@818 | |
| 17:13:33 | vdrok | mriedem: aha, ok. | |
| 17:15:05 | mriedem | i don't know what nova.conf it's copying though, or where that is configured | |
| 17:17:30 | mriedem | ah i think i know where to set it | |
| 17:17:36 | mriedem | if dan is ok with me touching his change | |
| 17:19:22 | mriedem | superdan: i think i know how to fix the subnode nova.conf thing for the upcall in https://review.openstack.org/#/c/477556/ - ok with me doing that? | |
| 17:20:58 | superdan | mriedem: not sure what you mean "fix the upcall" | |
| 17:21:11 | mriedem | the subnode n-cpu conf isn't configured to disable the server group upcall | |
| 17:21:17 | mriedem | i know where to fix it in the fleetify change | |
| 17:21:21 | mriedem | asking permission | |
| 17:21:23 | superdan | it's not? | |
| 17:21:26 | mriedem | f no | |
| 17:21:44 | superdan | ohh, subnode | |
| 17:21:45 | superdan | gotcha | |
| 17:21:47 | superdan | yes please | |
| 17:21:57 | mriedem | aye aye | |
| 17:22:20 | mriedem | is it weird when i can see the mail man out of the corner of my eye and look at him and he nods at me cross my yard to drop something off? | |
| 17:22:27 | mriedem | should we have such a familiar relationship at this point? | |
| 17:23:41 | mriedem | ok it's up https://review.openstack.org/#/c/477556/4..5/lib/nova | |
| 17:23:43 | mriedem | and now it's taco time | |
| 17:24:31 | smcginnis | mriedem: But it's not Tuesday. | |
| 17:28:17 | openstackgerrit | Mathieu Gagné proposed openstack/nova master: Add ability to signal and perform online volume size change https://review.openstack.org/454322 | |
| 17:34:34 | melwitt | unless I'm missing something, we have some bugs in nova/conductor/manager.py where RequestSpec objects are being passed to _set_vm_state_and_notify() that doesn't handle them | |
| 17:39:32 | melwitt | nevermind, I think I see where it's being converted to a dict before calling the notify | |
| 17:43:08 | mriedem | melwitt: i need you to solve the riddle of why shelved offloaded volume attach wasn't failing in the multi-cell setup | |
| 17:43:17 | mriedem | only you are capable of cracking that nut | |
| 17:44:54 | melwitt | now that you've said that, you'll probably figure it out within a few minutes :) | |
| 17:45:47 | mriedem | no i gave up | |
| 17:46:12 | melwitt | dangit | |
| 17:52:08 | melwitt | I keep reading _BaseTaskTestCase as BasketCase | |
| 17:52:54 | figleaf | do you have the time to listen to me whine? | |
| 18:01:00 | melwitt | it was for the channel. important stuff | |
| 18:01:23 | figleaf | for all the basket cases in the channel | |
| 18:02:01 | figleaf | superdan: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NUTGr5t3MoY | |
| 18:02:23 | superdan | ah, dang, I didn't make the connection | |
| 18:23:43 | mriedem | leakypipes: is this complete now? https://blueprints.launchpad.net/nova/+spec/shared-resources-pike | |
| 18:24:01 | mriedem | there are no open changes, and the allocation request candidate stuff handles RPs associated via aggregate | |
| 18:24:55 | leakypipes | mriedem: yeah. #4 on that list is the only one not done, and the allocation candidates will handle that (not in the scheduler reporting client, but rather int he scheduler during claims) | |
| 18:25:25 | mriedem | leakypipes: ok cool i'm going to close it out then | |
| 18:25:26 | mriedem | thanks | |
| 18:25:29 | leakypipes | kk | |
| 18:26:43 | mriedem | fried_rice: same with https://blueprints.launchpad.net/nova/+spec/powervm-nova-compute-driver - i think i'm going to close that out | |
| 18:26:52 | mriedem | i don't see anything critical in there that we need to get in for pike | |
| 18:27:27 | fried_rice | mriedem Critical, no. Some nice-to-haves. But closing the bp shouldn't preclude further changes in pike, right? | |
| 18:29:25 | mriedem | closing it means i'm not going to look at anything proposed for it | |
| 18:29:26 | mriedem | in pike | |
| 18:29:37 | mriedem | because i need to narrow my focus on what still needs to get done | |
| 18:31:47 | openstackgerrit | Jay Pipes proposed openstack/nova master: placement: scheduler uses allocation candidates https://review.openstack.org/476631 | |
| 18:31:48 | openstackgerrit | Jay Pipes proposed openstack/nova master: placement: claim resources in scheduler https://review.openstack.org/476632 | |
| 18:32:06 | leakypipes | mriedem, superdan: ^^ | |
| 18:32:43 | leakypipes | definitely should add some functional testing for that. | |
| 18:32:56 | leakypipes | but it's good enough to get reviews on IMO. | |
| 18:34:04 | superdan | did you just kick that out of the gate with that push? | |
| 18:34:09 | superdan | yup | |
| 18:35:42 | mriedem | git review -R | |
| 18:35:44 | mriedem | ftw | |
| 18:35:50 | superdan | yeah | |
| 18:36:34 | leakypipes | mriedem, superdan: yeah, sorry about that :( | |
| 18:37:25 | leakypipes | figleaf had a worry about the previous patch, so perhaps you could see his review on the previous revision of https://review.openstack.org/476632 | |
| 18:39:21 | clarkb | fwiw git review -R shouldn't really be necessary anymore. You should only get a rebase from git review if it hits a merge conflict | |
| 18:39:27 | clarkb | in which case you hvae to push a rebase at some point | |
| 18:42:31 | superdan | clarkb: gerrit identified the bottom as a rebase only. | |
| 18:42:51 | superdan | so I don't think that is accurate for this case | |
| 18:43:12 | leakypipes | superdan: I rebased to master explicitly (by mistake) | |