Earlier  
Posted Nick Remark
#openstack-nova - 2017-05-05
16:27:55 openstackgerrit Sandeep Pawar proposed openstack/nova master: Libvirt volume driver for Veritas HyperScale https://review.openstack.org/443951
16:36:31 johnthetubaguy mdbooth: yeah, maybe its just the connector we update in the BDM, rather than calling initalize on the new host, I don't remember now...
16:36:52 johnthetubaguy mdbooth: i remember some of this being why I wanted the connector in cinder and an attachment for each host
16:39:51 johnthetubaguy mdbooth: wow, yeah, its totally a blind connect right now: https://github.com/openstack/nova/blob/master/nova/virt/libvirt/driver.py#L6706
16:42:01 mdbooth johnthetubaguy: I'm assuming this works most setups, though.
16:42:24 johnthetubaguy mdbooth: I think ISCSI works, if the password is volume specific not host specific
16:42:34 johnthetubaguy mdbooth: that probably means yes (shrugs)
16:42:50 mdbooth Hehe. That's good, anyway. This is iscsi.
16:43:16 mdbooth Although could be a funky proprietary iscsi target.
16:52:48 cdent needs to remember to pack before leaving
16:52:54 cdent anybody want anything from england?
17:03:43 openstackgerrit Chris Friesen proposed openstack/python-novaclient master: 2.46: Show flavor info in server details https://review.openstack.org/435141
17:04:45 cfriesen cdent: beer. though I'm not sure how the head will hold up on the flight over.
17:10:09 openstackgerrit Dan Smith proposed openstack/nova master: WIP: Debug race in delete-while-booting test https://review.openstack.org/461513
17:10:10 openstackgerrit Dan Smith proposed openstack/nova master: DNM: Canary test against multi-cell devstack https://review.openstack.org/458537
17:10:19 dansmith melwitt: I fixed that vnc thing.. it was a thing I missed in my context usage conversion
17:10:38 dansmith melwitt: now hitting that weird delete case again, but hoping I can repro with debug and not have it dropped by journal this time
17:13:48 openstackgerrit Balazs Gibizer proposed openstack/nova master: Add separate instance.create payload type https://review.openstack.org/463001
17:13:48 openstackgerrit Balazs Gibizer proposed openstack/nova master: Add keypairs field to InstanceCreatePayload https://review.openstack.org/419730
17:13:49 openstackgerrit Balazs Gibizer proposed openstack/nova master: Add key_name field to InstancePayload https://review.openstack.org/463002
17:43:32 openstackgerrit Balazs Gibizer proposed openstack/nova master: Add BDM to InstancePayload https://review.openstack.org/448779
17:48:53 melwitt dansmith: ah, okay. cool
17:50:54 openstackgerrit Balazs Gibizer proposed openstack/nova master: Add BDM to InstancePayload https://review.openstack.org/448779
17:50:55 openstackgerrit Balazs Gibizer proposed openstack/nova master: Add keypairs field to InstanceCreatePayload https://review.openstack.org/419730
17:50:55 openstackgerrit Balazs Gibizer proposed openstack/nova master: Add key_name field to InstancePayload https://review.openstack.org/463002
17:50:56 openstackgerrit Balazs Gibizer proposed openstack/nova master: Add separate instance.create payload type https://review.openstack.org/463001
17:50:56 melwitt I had been looking at the code on master
17:52:52 dansmith yeah
17:56:04 mriedem dansmith: armax: didn't this already come up awhile back https://blueprints.launchpad.net/nova/+spec/sriov-bond?
17:56:07 mriedem for trunk ports?
17:56:38 armax I think so
17:56:42 armax that doesn’t sound new
17:59:05 knikolla hey guys. why does the 'deleted' column in block_device_mapping have a number which is not zero or one. which i would expect from a column showing state? we're having to do some database surgery and not sure what value to manually set it to.
18:01:03 mriedem knikolla: that's a legacy bdm v1 thing
18:01:06 mriedem just take the default
18:01:42 knikolla mriedem: so any nonzero number means deleted?
18:02:33 knikolla mriedem: anywhere else we need to clean up for a stuck volume in the nova side of things?
18:03:03 mriedem knikolla: actually sorry i was confusing that with the no_device field
18:03:15 mriedem knikolla: 'deleted' is whether or not it's "soft" deleted in the database,
18:03:18 cfriesen I'm hitting gate-tempest-dsvm failures in https://review.openstack.org/#/c/434514/. Is this a known thing at the moment?
18:03:20 mriedem so deleted=0 means it's not deleted
18:03:28 mriedem knikolla: if it's 'deleted', then deleted=id
18:03:40 mriedem where id is the block_device_mappings.id primary key
18:05:40 knikolla mriedem: i see, thanks a lot!
18:09:56 openstackgerrit Sandeep Pawar proposed openstack/nova master: Libvirt volume driver for Veritas HyperScale https://review.openstack.org/443951
18:10:25 mriedem armax: yeah this is what i was thinking of https://review.openstack.org/#/c/213644/
18:10:46 armax mriedem: no I have a diffeent one in mind
18:10:47 armax hang on
18:11:31 armax https://review.openstack.org/#/c/182242/
18:11:52 mriedem yeah i pointed that one out in the bp
18:12:06 armax mriedem: you always a step ahead of me
18:51:57 openstackgerrit Dan Smith proposed openstack/nova master: DNM: Canary test against multi-cell devstack https://review.openstack.org/458537
18:51:57 openstackgerrit Dan Smith proposed openstack/nova master: WIP: Debug race in delete-while-booting test https://review.openstack.org/461513
18:54:04 mriedem hemna: you might need to clarify for these guys https://review.openstack.org/#/c/443951/10/etc/nova/rootwrap.d/compute.filters
18:56:46 mriedem hemna: can all of that root_helper stuff be removed from os-brick?
19:10:43 mriedem melwitt: i think i can say with a high level of confidence, that me starting on the counting quotas series at this time of day on a friday before travel, is not going to happen
19:13:01 sdague dansmith: so... I didn't fully forget about the notes on the boot path. I just did a thing, which might be useful for that (or might not, you tell me), which is annotating a log dump tracing the server build request - https://dague.net//testing/flow.html
19:13:50 mriedem i smell onboarding material
19:13:53 dansmith sdague: that's not unhelpful
19:15:13 sdague mriedem: you have a url pattern you've been using for etherpads for the forum?
19:15:23 mriedem sdague: yeah
19:15:37 mriedem https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Forum/Boston2017
19:15:38 sdague dansmith: ok... well, is that enough of a bit of backing material to feel comfortable that we've got notes?
19:15:42 mriedem BOS-forum-...
19:15:51 mriedem BOS-forum-nova-project-onboarding
19:15:54 dansmith sdague: that's probably way too much detail to talk through, but if you cut it down to your notes, and then remove/rename some, that'd be a good skeleton
19:15:58 mriedem sdague: in fact https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/BOS-forum-nova-project-onboarding
19:16:24 dansmith sdague: if we don't have something to draw on, we could project that and handwave through it
19:16:27 mriedem sdague: maybe you just want to push all of that crap down to the way bottom and do your things at the top
19:16:28 sdague dansmith: yeh, I don't think we'd actually write that up there, it's just backing material
19:16:55 dansmith yeah
19:17:10 sdague mriedem: did you discover if we have flipboard?
19:17:57 mriedem i didn't get a definitive answer no
19:18:14 sdague you all and your friday double negatives
19:18:33 dansmith I don't not know what you mean
19:18:33 mriedem i didn't not get no answer
19:19:15 mriedem i believe i was told i'd get a $20 and could deal with it myself - as a joke, but maybe not totally
19:19:32 mriedem i'm calling the foundations' HR dept as we speak
19:19:38 sdague .... deep breaths....
19:19:49 mriedem was just told the request was made so they should be there
19:20:00 dansmith I will feel less bad about squandering the time if not provided with any tools to conduct something useful
19:21:38 sdague mriedem: ok, my inclination is to move that existing etherpad to -ideas, make official one include a Questions section at the bottom. Encourage people to enter there questions while we are talking, and we can use that as fodder as we go.
19:22:00 sdague but I don't want to stomp toes here
19:22:44 mriedem as far as i'm concerned you're running this onboarding show
19:22:46 mriedem so go nuts
19:22:50 mriedem like i said, i don't get there until noon
19:23:23 mriedem looking at your flow page, we shouldn't be creating a port twice,
19:23:39 mriedem but we do POST a port and then PUT (update it with the host binding) later
19:24:14 dansmith sdague: is that rst?
19:24:24 sdague dansmith: I have rst
19:24:42 dansmith can I have rst?
19:24:43 sdague https://dague.net//testing/flow.rst
19:24:57 sdague I can also stick this in a throw away git repo if you want
19:24:59 mriedem sdague: i only see "POST /v2.0/ports.json" once
19:25:10 dansmith thanks, I'll try to trim it
19:25:10 sdague mriedem: yeh, my bad, I glossed over
19:25:21 openstackgerrit Eric Fried proposed openstack/nova master: nova.utils.get_service_url() https://review.openstack.org/458257
19:25:28 sdague dansmith: how about I do an import into a git repo
19:25:50 dansmith sdague: that seems entirely overkill to me, but as you wish
19:25:52 mriedem i'm not sure what this is: May 05 14:12:54 os4 neutron-server[24158]: DEBUG neutron.api.v2.base [req-8b4ccea7-1462-43cc-9a21-f0013b797999 demo demo] Request body: {u'port': {u'network_id': u'8356212e

Earlier   Later