| Posted | Nick | Remark | |
|---|---|---|---|
| #openstack-nova - 2017-04-14 | |||
| 19:49:35 | feeblepipes | yeah, maybe. | |
| 19:49:39 | mriedem | those don't line up with what the supported migration statuses are though | |
| 19:49:54 | mriedem | also, i've always found it odd that we filter what we return to just in-progress migrations | |
| 19:50:10 | mriedem | that is an artifact of when os-migrations was added, and i think it was only there for the cancel action | |
| 19:50:16 | mriedem | so those were tightly coupled | |
| 19:50:40 | mriedem | i don't think we should restrict the returned set to in-progress migrations by default, but rather allow a status filter parameter | |
| 19:54:37 | mriedem | i might blast the ML on that one unless there is a good reason i'm missing | |
| 19:54:40 | mriedem | i'd also like operator feedback | |
| 19:54:55 | feeblepipes | cool with me. | |
| 19:55:06 | feeblepipes | almost done with the VGPU spec. | |
| 20:01:10 | sdague | mriedem: hmmm... that does make me wonder if I could pillage instance actions in a reasonable way then for statistics. Perhaps I'll ponder that next week | |
| 20:01:26 | mriedem | and that reminds me to ask about instance actions for shelve in the ops list | |
| 20:05:49 | sdague | I think it would mostly be useful if we put something into nova-manage that would build statistics based on it for dump | |
| 20:11:30 | mriedem | yeah | |
| 20:11:40 | mriedem | also, crap, but we return db primary keys for the migrations api | |
| 20:11:56 | feeblepipes | sfinucan: -1 from me for a few remaining niggles on https://review.openstack.org/#/c/450122/, but it's pretty close. | |
| 20:12:04 | mriedem | so when you want to cancel an in-progress live migration out of the api, you pass in the id but with multi-cell we won't know which cell it's in | |
| 20:12:08 | feeblepipes | mriedem: yeah... that needs to die in a fire. | |
| 20:12:24 | mriedem | feeblepipes: well that's dying for services and compute nodes in the api, but i missed migrations | |
| 20:12:30 | feeblepipes | mriedem: also, since migrations list runs in all cells, you get duplicate migration IDs. fun! | |
| 20:12:38 | mriedem | feeblepipes: true story | |
| 20:12:43 | mriedem | i don't think dansmith has fixed that one yet | |
| 20:12:49 | mriedem | which is why we didn't think about it earlier | |
| 20:13:19 | feeblepipes | mriedem: it's not terribly important really... now that we removed the top-level os-migrations/ REST resource, it's not like there's a global key. | |
| 20:13:42 | feeblepipes | mriedem: meaning it's always under servers/.../os-migrations | |
| 20:13:58 | feeblepipes | mriedem: so, no harm no foul. the primary key is within the server's cell. | |
| 20:14:05 | feeblepipes | mriedem: but still, annoying and should die in a fire. | |
| 20:18:59 | mriedem | feeblepipes: oh you're right yeah, we'll lookup the instance via uuid, and when we do that we target the context to the cell that the instance is in | |
| 20:19:04 | mriedem | so looking up the migration by id after that is ok | |
| 20:19:05 | mriedem | whew | |
| 20:19:09 | feeblepipes | ya | |
| 20:19:29 | feeblepipes | #success mriedem said I was right. | |
| 20:19:31 | openstackstatus | feeblepipes: Added success to Success page | |
| 20:26:15 | mriedem | ha | |
| 20:33:10 | feeblepipes | mriedem: so, quick question on mgagne's extend volume spec... | |
| 20:33:37 | feeblepipes | mriedem: we didn't add a microversion when we added the network-vif-deleted external event. why are we requiring one here? | |
| 20:34:14 | mriedem | feeblepipes: i think that predated microversions | |
| 20:34:17 | feeblepipes | mriedem: and the answer could easily be "we didn't have microversions then"... I just honestly don't know. | |
| 20:34:20 | mriedem | that was like havana or icehouse | |
| 20:34:20 | feeblepipes | ah, ok. | |
| 20:34:26 | feeblepipes | sdague: any memory of above? | |
| 20:34:32 | feeblepipes | mriedem: k. | |
| 20:34:48 | mriedem | i remember talking about that at the first midcycle in provo utah | |
| 20:34:49 | feeblepipes | mriedem: I'm going to approve this then. | |
| 20:34:50 | mriedem | which was icehouse | |
| 20:35:24 | mriedem | yeah https://github.com/openstack/nova/commit/ce936ea5f3ae0b4d3b816a7fe42d5f0100b20fca | |
| 20:35:35 | mriedem | f man, to the t | |
| 20:35:37 | mriedem | icehouse it was | |
| 20:35:58 | feeblepipes | mriedem: +W'd. | |
| 20:36:34 | feeblepipes | mriedem: any more high-priority specs you need reviewed? | |
| 20:37:06 | feeblepipes | mriedem: what about the "use service catalog for glance" one? I think that's actually a really good one to do and is a relatively small amount of work. | |
| 20:37:38 | feeblepipes | mriedem: well, technically it's not just glance, but all services. | |
| 20:37:39 | mriedem | there was a spec for that? | |
| 20:37:47 | mriedem | i thought we were just doing that | |
| 20:37:49 | mriedem | and had been | |
| 20:37:53 | feeblepipes | https://review.openstack.org/#/c/454983/ | |
| 20:38:08 | feeblepipes | looks new :) | |
| 20:38:15 | mriedem | heh, i don't think we really need a spec for that, | |
| 20:38:16 | feeblepipes | still has that new car smell. | |
| 20:38:20 | mriedem | that's been part of the move to ksa for awhile now | |
| 20:38:23 | feeblepipes | ya | |
| 20:38:53 | mriedem | let me read quick | |
| 20:41:10 | feeblepipes | mriedem: cburgess has responded positively on your suggestion for not limiting migrations in the listing. I say based on that feedback, we don't do it. :P | |
| 20:42:22 | mriedem | ha | |
| 20:42:24 | mriedem | oh chet | |
| 20:42:27 | mriedem | always the punching bag | |
| 20:42:50 | feeblepipes | indeed. | |
| 20:44:18 | mriedem | i'm going to pull the service catalog one down and fix some nits then +2 | |
| 20:51:39 | feeblepipes | mriedem: k, lemme know when you do and I'll review. | |
| 20:53:04 | feeblepipes | cfriesen: nice "does anyone actually use shelve?" :) | |
| 20:53:11 | feeblepipes | cfriesen: my feelings precisely. | |
| 20:53:14 | feeblepipes | should die in a fire :) | |
| 20:53:46 | mriedem | feeblepipes: ^ | |
| 20:53:46 | openstackgerrit | Matt Riedemann proposed openstack/nova-specs master: Use service catalog to get endpoint URLs https://review.openstack.org/454983 | |
| 20:53:53 | feeblepipes | danke | |
| 20:54:16 | mriedem | sdague: yeah nova-manage is probably what we have to use since we can't list instance actions out of the api for all tenants | |
| 20:55:03 | mriedem | sdague: if you wanted to brain dump ideas for an interface in a blueprint it could be hacked on | |
| 20:55:16 | mriedem | like, list total number of all actions or something | |
| 20:55:25 | mriedem | maybe provide a time window | |
| 21:02:22 | feeblepipes | mriedem: actually, -1 from me. see review.. | |
| 21:06:47 | mriedem | i commented on some of that in PS1 | |
| 21:07:25 | mriedem | looking something up | |
| 21:08:22 | mriedem | i guess ksa doesn't provided endoint_override | |
| 21:08:32 | mriedem | i know we have api_endpoint for ironic conf in nova and i thought that was coming from ksa | |
| 21:11:35 | mriedem | replied | |
| 21:11:42 | mriedem | feeblepipes: your turn to update that one? | |
| 21:12:00 | mriedem | i'm good with no endpoint_override backdoor, but also want to see the old options deprecated when we're using the service catalog | |
| 21:15:44 | cburgess | feeblepipes Have I wronged you in some way recently? :P | |
| 21:16:13 | cburgess | feeblepipes Yes shelve should die in a fire, preferably a very very hot one. | |
| 21:17:20 | mriedem | cburgess: you know, the lowest level of hell is actually ice | |
| 21:17:40 | cburgess | Hmmm I missed that. | |
| 21:17:43 | cburgess | Dante? | |
| 21:17:45 | mriedem | yup | |
| 21:17:59 | cburgess | Huh... not sure how I missed that. Didn't read it that closely though. | |
| 21:18:57 | cburgess | I haven't looked yet... is there any type of agenda for Boston? | |
| 21:19:05 | cburgess | I know its not typical summit format... | |
| 21:19:30 | mriedem | yes | |
| 21:19:41 | efried | cburgess If you get the app, you can see (and flag) all the sessions. | |
| 21:19:57 | mriedem | http://forumtopics.openstack.org/ are the sessions, but yeah they are in the schedule too now | |
| 21:21:43 | efried | So - a bp to deprecate and ultimately remove shelve? | |