Earlier  
Later
New Search
Posted Nick Remark
#openstack-nova - 2017-04-14
15:18:30 feeblepipes jangutter: what about having "iommu_passthrough" as the feature, then?
15:19:44 jangutter feeblepipes: well, iommu_passthrough won't tell us anything of the device type that's going to appear inside the VM.
15:19:46 feeblepipes jangutter: would an end-user say "I want a vNIC that is associated to a VF that has IOMMU passthrough features" or would the end user say "I want a vNIC that is associated with a VF that is a Netronome Agilio SmartNIC PF"?
15:23:10 jangutter feeblepipes: my view of one usecase is this: an end-user says "I want a vNIC, associated with a VF, passed through via IOMMU, with <insert-hw-driver-here> PCI driver, additionally pin everything for me optimally, pretty please!"
15:23:29 feeblepipes :)
15:23:42 feeblepipes jangutter: ok, cool. we're getting somewhere here :)
15:23:56 jangutter feeblepipes: with DPDK applications being specifically compiled for specific PCI drivers, it's sometimes a _must_.
15:24:11 feeblepipes jangutter: the <insert-hw-driver-here> goes in the *image metadata*, though.
15:25:04 feeblepipes jangutter: because the image metadata is what describes the workload to be launched. that image metadata can describe the HW driver's installed on the image, and that information can/should be used by os-vif in setting up the VIF plug on the host.
15:25:07 jangutter feeblepipes: yeah, but that leads to the other bit of fun. Give me one vNIC on control, standard TAP, and vNIC 2 for my DPDK NFV application.
15:25:14 feeblepipes jangutter: so I think we're *almost* there.
15:25:46 jangutter feeblepipes: is it possible to spec stuff that fine-grained?
15:26:02 feeblepipes jangutter: ah, indeed. so perhaps that information (hw driver) does need to be in the port binding profile.
15:26:18 feeblepipes jangutter: yes, it is possible. via the port profile information.
15:26:34 feeblepipes jangutter: I still don't think we need to have vendor_id/product_id in there, though. :)
15:26:54 feeblepipes jangutter: in any case... I think this is also something we can hash out in the code rather than the spec.
15:27:33 jangutter feeblepipes: I am definitely not averse to having a "driver list". That's actually a pretty good idea from a user's perspective.
15:27:34 feeblepipes jangutter: I'm willing to +2 the spec on condition that you just place a note in the spec that we've discussed on IRC how to make the information passed between Neutron and Nova via os-vif as generic as possible.
15:27:50 feeblepipes jangutter: if you can do that quick, I'll +2 it and mriedem can as well.
15:30:53 mriedem sfinucan: how do i reference another link within the same docs using rst again?
15:31:08 mriedem like i want to link to a section in the nova-manage man page from the nova-cells man page
15:31:43 jangutter I shall definitely do so: to summarize: It is undesirable to send the VF selection parameters to Nova as PCI vendor/product ID, further work should be done to develop a capability or driver list that would abstract this away from users.
15:32:01 mriedem oh maybe :ref:
15:32:11 efried mriedem Looks like that kolla thing got sorted. Can you throw me a link to whatever dashboard/view I should be using, so I can maybe pick off some lhf?
15:32:42 mriedem efried: not sorted yet, docs change coming soon
15:32:55 efried I meant triaged
15:33:05 efried That's the goal of the current sweep, right?
15:33:23 efried Not to resolve, but to get 'em out of 'New'?
15:33:44 mriedem efried: yeah
15:33:54 mriedem like 'unexpected api error' is usually always invalid
15:33:58 mriedem and a misconfiguration
15:34:05 openstackgerrit Matt Riedemann proposed openstack/nova master: Add release note and update cell install guide for multi-cell limitations https://review.openstack.org/456923
15:34:12 mriedem melwitt: ^
15:35:40 mriedem EmilienM: owalsh: ^
15:38:26 efried This thing about having to run a new discovery command to make stuff work... Could it not just be made to work out of the box if you only have one cell?
15:47:49 efried [irony: when --help doesn't automatically page, and you have to say --help|less]
15:50:14 mriedem efried: we have a config option if you want things discovered automatically,
15:50:20 mriedem but it's a bit heavy for large deployments
15:50:27 mriedem dan has a series up to improve that
15:50:32 jangutter Is there a way to refer to today's IRC chat in a spec?
15:50:34 efried mriedem Okay, neat.
15:50:40 mriedem jangutter: yeah, esc
15:50:41 mriedem *Sec
15:50:43 efried http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/irclogs/%23openstack-nova/
15:50:47 efried jangutter ^^
15:50:48 mriedem efried: https://blueprints.launchpad.net/nova/+spec/discover-hosts-faster
15:51:03 mriedem jangutter: http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/irclogs/%23openstack-nova/%23openstack-nova.2017-04-14.log.html#t2017-04-14T14:44:06
15:52:24 jangutter Whatever you write is now memorialized forever. Or until cats reclaim their rightful place on top of the food chain.
15:54:10 mriedem our cat can easily be defeated with a bag of chips
15:54:47 openstackgerrit Jan Gutter proposed openstack/nova-specs master: Spec to enable Netronome SmartNIC support https://review.openstack.org/456386
15:57:26 openstackgerrit Matt Riedemann proposed openstack/nova master: Tell people that the nova-cells man page is for cells v1 https://review.openstack.org/456925
15:57:29 jangutter Another newbie question. I've replied to a bunch of comments on an older review. They're in "draft" in gerrit now, am I too late?
15:57:41 mriedem jangutter: no, you can still publish those
15:57:43 efried jangutter No - go to that patch set and they'll show up.
15:58:15 efried Still not entirely understanding why a compute node can't automatically 'discover' itself into a cell if there's only one cell...
15:58:31 mriedem efried: it would require an upcall from the compute to the api layer, which we don't want
15:58:35 mriedem upcalls are the devil
15:58:43 mriedem s/the/a/
15:58:53 openstackgerrit Ildiko Vancsa proposed openstack/nova master: Add Cinder v3 detach call to _terminate_volume_connections https://review.openstack.org/456896
15:59:12 mriedem efried: also, that would require either an upcall or putting the nova api db credentials in the compute config
15:59:16 mriedem another thing we don't want
16:00:20 efried mriedem And all of that is different from how a compute node registered itself B.C. (before cells)?
16:00:52 mriedem yes
16:00:58 mriedem in the before times,
16:01:01 mriedem there was no api db
16:01:08 mriedem there were no host mappings in the api db
16:01:36 mriedem when you start nova-compute, it creates it's own compute_nodes table record for that host (happens in ResourceTracker.update_available_resource eventually)
16:01:57 mriedem when you start the service it also creates a record in the services table for the nova-compute binary
16:02:05 mriedem those all get mangled up in the api somehow
16:02:08 mriedem feeblepipes loves it
16:02:32 mriedem but with no cells, i.e. regular old stock nova, there was just a single db and everything was in there
16:03:05 mriedem efried: are you going to be in boston?
16:03:10 efried mriedem Yessir.
16:03:45 mriedem then put https://www.openstack.org/summit/boston-2017/summit-schedule/events/18727/ on your schedule
16:04:18 efried mriedem Roger wilco, and thanks.
16:12:46 EmilienM mriedem: ack
16:33:37 feeblepipes jangutter: yes, your summary of the requested changes above is good.
16:36:09 jangutter feeblepipes: if all else fails there's also that list of emulated vNICs that qemu uses: confusingly it's called "hw_vif_model"
16:36:23 feeblepipes jangutter: yeah, I know :(
16:43:06 feeblepipes peter-hamilton: approved.
16:43:30 peter-hamilton feeblepipes: awesome, thanks!
16:43:46 feeblepipes peter-hamilton: np. sorry again for the delay.
16:44:02 peter-hamilton feeblepipes: no problem, i hope you recover quickly
16:44:24 feeblepipes peter-hamilton: about 50% today. which is better than yesterday's 10% :)
16:44:52 peter-hamilton feeblepipes: yep, i've been there
16:45:05 peter-hamilton feeblepipes: thanks for the comment on the history btw
16:45:14 peter-hamilton feeblepipes: i find it helps to summarize decisions and the back-and-forth over the months
16:45:30 peter-hamilton feeblepipes: no one else seems to use it for much
16:45:30 feeblepipes yeah, it actually makes it a bit easier for those of us kinda coming into a spec late in its lifetime.
16:45:42 feeblepipes ++
16:52:44 jangutter Any more actions on https://review.openstack.org/456386 I need to take?
16:56:52 feeblepipes jangutter: did you push a new revision with wording around the "genericness" of parameters passed via os-vif/Neutron port binding profile?
16:57:49 jangutter feeblepipes: yeah, that's been updated, plus a link to the chat.
16:58:56 feeblepipes jangutter: awesome. reviewing again.
17:06:54 feeblepipes jangutter: k, +2 from me. mriedem, feel free to give 456386 another spin.
17:07:37 jangutter feeblepipes: thanks!
17:07:44 feeblepipes jangutter: np
17:08:03 feeblepipes dansmith: did you see johnthetubaguy's request for your review on https://review.openstack.org/#/c/407237/?
17:37:54 owalsh mriedem: yea, the related change in tripleo was to handle this
18:08:02 mriedem feeblepipes: jangutter: done

Earlier   Later