| Posted | Nick | Remark | |
|---|---|---|---|
| #openstack-nova - 2017-01-26 | |||
| 16:58:02 | edleafe | jaypipes_: not sure, but that sounds about right | |
| 16:58:54 | bauzas | johnthetubaguy: dansmith: so I made the spit | |
| 16:58:57 | bauzas | split even | |
| 16:59:13 | bauzas | johnthetubaguy: dansmith: are you suggesting me other way to verify if the placement section is correct? | |
| 16:59:16 | bauzas | I'm all ears | |
| 16:59:20 | edleafe | jaypipes_: https://review.openstack.org/#/c/404472/8..20/nova/scheduler/client/report.py@174 | |
| 16:59:30 | edleafe | jaypipes_: that's where it got added | |
| 16:59:31 | dansmith | bauzas: I said check os_region right? | |
| 16:59:38 | johnthetubaguy | bauzas: I was thinking of using auth_url CONF instead | |
| 16:59:43 | dansmith | bauzas: that's our config value, should be there by the time you need it | |
| 17:00:07 | dansmith | johnthetubaguy: is that going to be different than password from an order of loading perspective? because his patch fails on password not even being a thing by the time we're loading | |
| 17:00:12 | dansmith | s/loading/running/ | |
| 17:00:40 | bauzas | dansmith: you mean os_region_name? | |
| 17:00:48 | bauzas | that's something coming from us ? | |
| 17:01:05 | johnthetubaguy | dansmith: unsure, but I like your os_region suggestion better | |
| 17:01:12 | johnthetubaguy | https://github.com/openstack/nova/blob/master/nova/conf/placement.py#L22 | |
| 17:01:44 | johnthetubaguy | dansmith: bauzas: password is part of the pluggable auth and not not actually required, so it shouldn't be that one | |
| 17:02:08 | bauzas | okay, let's try os_region_name then | |
| 17:02:19 | bauzas | dansmith is right, given it's the only one we have in tree | |
| 17:02:30 | johnthetubaguy | (assuming we don't later decide os_region_name should be defaulted to RegionOne, but lets just be sure not to do that this cycle!) | |
| 17:02:32 | bauzas | and password means a password auth, which could be changing in the future | |
| 17:03:00 | bauzas | johnthetubaguy: I could write an unittest for preventing that | |
| 17:03:11 | johnthetubaguy | bauzas: cool | |
| 17:03:16 | bauzas | johnthetubaguy: meaning that I'm expecting a None value | |
| 17:03:20 | johnthetubaguy | ack | |
| 17:03:27 | openstackgerrit | Claudiu Belu proposed openstack/nova: hyper-v: Adds support for VMs with nested virtualization https://review.openstack.org/398509 | |
| 17:03:28 | bauzas | so someone defaulting the opt would have to cut that | |
| 17:03:50 | bauzas | okay, let's try again | |
| 17:07:22 | bauzas | shit, I need a fixturre | |
| 17:07:25 | jaypipes_ | edleafe: I must be seeing something different than you... I don't see placement latest being added in that patch? | |
| 17:07:31 | bauzas | dansmith: johnthetubaguy ^ | |
| 17:07:54 | jaypipes_ | edleafe: i.e. that line isn't green in gerrit. | |
| 17:08:28 | jaypipes_ | edleafe: in any case, not sure it matter, right? solution is straight-forward. just s/latest/1.2/, yesh? | |
| 17:09:07 | sfinucan | erm, vladikr - you're looking at this, right? https://review.openstack.org/#/c/424786/ :) | |
| 17:09:24 | mriedem | jaypipes: i'd prefer the calling code is explicit about the microversion it needs, so GET and POST for resource classes, | |
| 17:09:28 | mriedem | not globally in the init | |
| 17:09:34 | mriedem | edleafe: ^ | |
| 17:09:56 | vladikr | sfinucan, yeah, but it's not really possible to test this with tempest | |
| 17:10:19 | sfinucan | vladikr: Oh, wait - that was the thing that required hardware, right? | |
| 17:10:23 | edleafe | jaypipes_: this is what I see: http://imgur.com/a/ocO8X | |
| 17:10:33 | vladikr | sfinucan, yeah, I should abandon that | |
| 17:10:36 | edleafe | jaypipes_: just so you don't think I crazy (well, crazier) | |
| 17:10:41 | sfinucan | vladikr: Do please | |
| 17:10:48 | sfinucan | though I'd also suggest submitting a patch for https://github.com/wznoinsk/hw-tests | |
| 17:11:02 | dansmith | bauzas: I'm confused -- is os_region_name what you're going to use instead of password? | |
| 17:11:08 | vladikr | yeah | |
| 17:11:09 | bauzas | dansmith: yup | |
| 17:11:11 | sfinucan | vladikr: wznoinsk should be able to provide more information on that project, if you ask nicely | |
| 17:11:15 | dansmith | okay I thought you were saying you weren't | |
| 17:11:19 | dansmith | so.. good | |
| 17:11:21 | bauzas | dansmith: sorry then | |
| 17:11:22 | dansmith | :) | |
| 17:11:27 | edleafe | mriedem: ok, I'll look for where those are needed. | |
| 17:11:31 | bauzas | dansmith: so, it works with devstack (like the t-shirt) | |
| 17:11:51 | bauzas | dansmith: but for UTs and functional tests, I need to make a fixture and add it to nova.test | |
| 17:12:06 | bauzas | dansmith: in order to set the config opt | |
| 17:12:19 | mriedem | bauzas: just throw it in the global conf patcher | |
| 17:12:22 | bauzas | unless I'm just setting the opt straight | |
| 17:12:23 | mriedem | that is run on all tests by default | |
| 17:12:25 | mriedem | it's a 1 line change | |
| 17:12:32 | bauzas | mriedem: oh right | |
| 17:12:38 | bauzas | I forgot it, but yeah, much better | |
| 17:13:14 | jaypipes_ | edleafe: yes, that's what I see too. Notice that the line he is referring to is white, meaning the patch has not changed that line. | |
| 17:14:26 | jaypipes_ | mriedem: you mean passing in a specific microversion header for each GET/POST call? | |
| 17:14:55 | mriedem | jaypipes_: yes, like we're already doing for 1.1 with aggregates | |
| 17:15:12 | jaypipes_ | mriedem: got it. edleafe, got it? :) | |
| 17:15:47 | edleafe | jaypipes_: yeah, but if you compare to PS7, it's green | |
| 17:15:58 | openstackgerrit | Eric Fried proposed openstack/nova: Introduce base PowerVM driver (cfg drv) https://review.openstack.org/409404 | |
| 17:16:00 | edleafe | meaning it's been in the code since PS8 | |
| 17:16:09 | edleafe | IAC, I'm working on the changes | |
| 17:17:23 | mriedem | bauzas: yeah in here somewhere https://github.com/openstack/nova/blob/master/nova/tests/unit/conf_fixture.py#L30 | |
| 17:17:34 | bauzas | mriedem: already did | |
| 17:17:40 | mriedem | dansmith: oh nice https://review.openstack.org/319379 is approved | |
| 17:17:43 | bauzas | running tests and uploading in a sec | |
| 17:17:44 | mriedem | was just going to check on that | |
| 17:17:53 | dansmith | mriedem: #10 in the gate MOFO | |
| 17:18:01 | dansmith | mriedem: I'm watching it like my life depends on t | |
| 17:18:29 | johnthetubaguy | melwitt: I sent a note on that quota patch, its not a blocker I am just curious what you think though. | |
| 17:18:44 | johnthetubaguy | melwitt: looking at the latest one now. | |
| 17:19:07 | mriedem | dansmith: was melwitt good with it? | |
| 17:19:14 | dansmith | mriedem: she pushed the last change | |
| 17:19:28 | dansmith | so I'm guessing | |
| 17:19:34 | mriedem | oh excellent | |
| 17:19:39 | melwitt | mriedem, dansmith: yes, all good | |
| 17:20:39 | melwitt | johnthetubaguy: I just saw, thanks. I do like the idea of making the limit check atomic but I'm not familiar with the generation id and how passing a deltas dict helps? | |
| 17:21:12 | johnthetubaguy | melwitt: I was really thinking, we do the generation thing much later, but the new interface would allow us to do that without changing all the callers | |
| 17:21:27 | melwitt | johnthetubaguy: ah, gotcha | |
| 17:21:51 | jaypipes_ | edleafe: danke | |
| 17:24:53 | melwitt | johnthetubaguy: okay, so you mean moving the counting call inside of Quotas.check_deltas for now. that makes sense | |
| 17:25:12 | johnthetubaguy | melwitt: yeah, squash the two calls into a single call | |
| 17:25:48 | mriedem | vladikr: question in https://review.openstack.org/#/c/405954/ | |
| 17:26:01 | vladikr | mriedem, looking | |
| 17:26:26 | melwitt | johnthetubaguy: it would clean things up a lot too | |
| 17:26:34 | johnthetubaguy | melwitt: its a nit, I was wondering if get counts should be on the list object? | |
| 17:28:01 | melwitt | johnthetubaguy: it could. I wasn't opinionated about it. I feel like there might be an example of a count on an existing list object already | |
| 17:28:39 | johnthetubaguy | melwitt: I could see arguments both ways I guess | |
| 17:29:38 | mriedem | vladikr: similar in https://review.openstack.org/#/c/405951/ | |
| 17:29:54 | mriedem | vladikr: basically, we're doing the same stuff in both the metadata api code as in the libvirt driver, | |
| 17:30:14 | mriedem | vladikr: i'm not sure why we don't just store the vlan on the NetworkInterfaceMetadata object in the libvirt driver, like the tag, | |
| 17:30:18 | mriedem | and then use that in the metadata api | |