Earlier  
Later
New Search
Posted Nick Remark
#openstack-nova - 2017-01-20
04:03:03 openstackgerrit Matt Riedemann proposed openstack/nova: placement: create aggregate map in report client https://review.openstack.org/407309
04:03:09 mriedem jaypipes: i went ahead and scoped the 1.1 microversion request to just the GET on the RP aggregates in ^
04:03:18 mriedem jaypipes: don't hate me
04:03:45 mriedem i might be overthinking that one but i'm a bit touchy on the rollout of this stuff now
05:04:04 Kevin_Zheng the nova intergration gate got stacked?
05:04:09 Kevin_Zheng stucked
05:31:47 openstack Launchpad bug 1636489 in OpenStack Compute (nova) "Volume attachment fails for all the available instances after running different volume operations for 1-2 hours or more." [Undecided,New]
05:31:47 archies @swamireddy, Hi, wants to check your views on the https://bugs.launchpad.net/nova/+bug/1636489
05:32:24 archies @swamireddy, appears from the bug which you are working on, seems similar to me
05:50:53 gmann Kevin_Zheng: yea with oslo release i think
06:04:56 openstackgerrit Wang Qing wu proposed openstack/nova: Introduce base PowerVM driver https://review.openstack.org/391288
06:06:20 openstackgerrit Hironori Shiina proposed openstack/nova: Ironic: Add soft power off support to Ironic driver. https://review.openstack.org/407977
06:08:56 Kevin_Zheng gamnn: so what can we do to solve this?
06:10:15 gmann Kevin_Zheng: as mriedem said, let it merge and then rebase - https://review.openstack.org/#/c/422323/4
06:10:28 gmann alex_xu: oomichi johnthetubaguy in case you guys around ^^
06:10:47 Kevin_Zheng ah， good
06:12:19 gmann we need to wait for that to merge
06:12:52 Kevin_Zheng understood
06:18:23 openstackgerrit Hironori Shiina proposed openstack/nova: Ironic: Add soft power off support to Ironic driver. https://review.openstack.org/407977
06:19:29 gmann alex_xu: thanks,
06:19:54 alex_xu gmann: thanks for your info also
06:20:20 alex_xu gmann: Kevin_Zheng still thinking of whether we can merge this one first https://review.openstack.org/#/c/415142/23
06:20:29 alex_xu the policy one looks like still have something to figure out
06:24:53 Kevin_Zheng alex_xu: hmm, hope we can work it out soon
06:26:32 dtp howdy. to propose a blueprint for pike, it sounds like i should drop a link in the nova meeting agenda?
06:27:52 gmann alex_xu: in meeting, ll check right after that
06:29:46 alex_xu gmann: thanks
06:30:49 gokhan hi team, I need help about nova -lxd . My openstaCk installation is newton on ubuntu 16.04 LTS. I created image with run 'glance image-create --name="trusty" --public --progress --container-format=bare --disk-format=raw --file xenial-server-cloudimg-amd64-root.tar.gz --property hypervisor_type=lxd' . but when I launched instance I am getting bad image format error. These are logs: http://paste.openstack.org/show/595724/
06:34:33 openstackgerrit zhangyanxian proposed openstack/nova: Fix typo in 216_havana.py https://review.openstack.org/423075
06:35:16 openstackgerrit zhangyanxian proposed openstack/nova: Fix typo in 216_havana.py https://review.openstack.org/423075
07:05:46 openstackgerrit Alex Xu proposed openstack/nova: [POC][placement] Report cpu features to placement Traits API https://review.openstack.org/417288
07:14:47 openstackgerrit zhangyanxian proposed openstack/nova-specs: Fix typos in docs https://review.openstack.org/412338
07:17:14 openstackgerrit Istvan Imre proposed openstack/python-novaclient: Pass relevant parameters to Token based authentication https://review.openstack.org/419441
07:20:29 openstackgerrit Sergey Nikitin proposed openstack/nova: do not merge https://review.openstack.org/422841
07:31:52 openstackgerrit Takashi NATSUME proposed openstack/nova: Enable cold migration with target host(1/2) https://review.openstack.org/408955
07:32:17 openstackgerrit Takashi NATSUME proposed openstack/nova: Enable cold migration with target host(2/2) https://review.openstack.org/408964
07:32:39 openstackgerrit Takashi NATSUME proposed openstack/nova: Add functional tests for cold migration to same host https://review.openstack.org/414926
07:32:57 openstackgerrit Takashi NATSUME proposed openstack/nova: Refactor a test method including 3 test cases https://review.openstack.org/394738
07:33:11 openstackgerrit Takashi NATSUME proposed openstack/nova: Refactor a test method including 7 test cases https://review.openstack.org/395436
07:33:26 openstackgerrit Takashi NATSUME proposed openstack/nova: Avoid forcing translation on logging calls https://review.openstack.org/413876
07:44:11 openstackgerrit Wang Qing wu proposed openstack/nova: Introduce base PowerVM driver (disk drv) https://review.openstack.org/409401
07:57:23 openstackgerrit Zhenyu Zheng proposed openstack/nova-specs: Extend tag length limit to 80 https://review.openstack.org/423112
08:01:45 tdurakov gibi: hi, are you around?
08:12:24 openstackgerrit sahid proposed openstack/nova: numa: add numa constraints for emulator threads policy https://review.openstack.org/385023
08:12:27 openstackgerrit sahid proposed openstack/nova: libvirt: return a CPU overhead if isolate emulator threads requested https://review.openstack.org/385364
08:12:28 openstackgerrit sahid proposed openstack/nova: numa: fit instance topology with cpus reserved onto cores https://review.openstack.org/400875
08:12:28 openstackgerrit sahid proposed openstack/nova: objects: add new field cpus_reserved in NUMACell https://review.openstack.org/400874
08:12:31 openstackgerrit sahid proposed openstack/nova: virt: update overhead to take into account vCPUs https://review.openstack.org/385024
08:12:36 openstackgerrit sahid proposed openstack/nova: libvirt: make emulator threads to run on the reserved pCPU https://review.openstack.org/400878
08:12:37 openstackgerrit sahid proposed openstack/nova: numa: update numa usage incording the cpu reserved https://review.openstack.org/400877
08:12:37 openstackgerrit sahid proposed openstack/nova: numa: take into account cpus reserved https://review.openstack.org/400876
08:31:05 openstackgerrit Zhenyu Zheng proposed openstack/nova: Add sort_key white list for server list/detail https://review.openstack.org/415142
08:36:05 gibi tdurakov: hi
08:36:39 tdurakov gibi, could you take a look, please https://review.openstack.org/#/c/421981/
08:38:53 gibi tdurakov: looking...
08:45:05 gibi tdurakov: I'm wondering why this not cause any notification sample test to fail
08:45:44 tdurakov gibi, good question, I think we need to change functional tests that verify these templates
08:46:21 tdurakov I'd expect it compares 2 json objects, where timestamps are already converted to datetime.datetime objects
08:46:30 tdurakov or smth. like that
08:48:05 openstackgerrit Sylvain Bauza proposed openstack/nova: Add ComputeNodeList.get_all_by_uuids method https://review.openstack.org/418134
08:48:06 openstackgerrit Sylvain Bauza proposed openstack/nova: WIP: Scheduler calling the Placement API https://review.openstack.org/417961
08:49:14 tdurakov gibi: so, what do you think about this change?
08:49:41 tdurakov is it worth merging it, and then figure out what's wrong with tests
08:50:08 gibi tdurakov: direction is good. I'm worried about the test and we might have to look in not just the instance.update code path but the instance.<action> pathes as well
08:51:39 tdurakov gibi, could you please leave a comment with details?
08:51:56 gibi tdurakov: will do
08:53:00 tdurakov gibi: maybe you could explain me, why nova handles some fields explicilty? I'd expect it should be done by serializer
08:56:16 gibi tdurakov: what do you mean by explicitly in this context?
08:56:42 tdurakov gibi: conversion of datetime objects to string
08:56:49 tdurakov for example
08:57:44 tdurakov gibi: we briefly discussed this patch with mriedem yesterday, what do you think about version bump for this change
08:59:40 gibi the explicit conversion was part of the legacy notification (for example in case of audit fields) and during the versioned transformation we did not changed that
09:00:22 gibi I personally didn't want to change the legacy code path of the instance.update
09:00:32 gibi to avoid behavior change in the legacy
09:01:14 gibi unfortunately I also piggybacked on that legacy implementation so the explicitness become the part of the versioned path as well
09:01:27 gibi regarding the version bump
09:01:45 gibi as far as I understand we didn't use to bump api versions for bugfixes
09:02:01 gibi but here bumping a version is a lot cheaper
09:02:08 gibi than in the apu
09:02:09 gibi api
09:03:00 gibi btw you patch now changes the legacy instance.update as well
09:06:26 tdurakov gibi, should I worry about that?
09:06:37 tdurakov about the legacy instance.update
09:08:19 diga gibi: Hi
09:08:40 diga I am writting spec for placement notification now
09:08:53 diga gibi: have some questions on that
09:12:40 openstackgerrit Wang Qing wu proposed openstack/nova: Introduce base PowerVM driver (console) https://review.openstack.org/409402
09:15:31 diga gibi: I need to bring all the resource provider field inside the versioned objects, correct ?
09:16:27 openstackgerrit Claudiu Belu proposed openstack/nova: Hyper-V PCI Passthrough https://review.openstack.org/420614
09:22:03 gmann bauzas: just this merge will work on py35 failure - https://review.openstack.org/#/c/422323/
09:22:09 gmann no rebase i think
09:22:26 gibi tdurakov: this might cause pain for the legacy consumers as the date is now in different format
09:23:09 gibi tdurakov: but I think the legacy notification causes this kind of pain all the time so I think we can ignore it
09:23:14 tdurakov gibi, honestly I'd expect current approach cause more pain
09:23:33 tdurakov gibi: ++
09:23:37 gibi tdurakov: agree
09:24:05 gibi diga: hi! good question
09:24:33 gibi diga: I think we have to judge how usefull a field for the notification consumer
09:24:46 diga gibi: :) okay
09:25:08 gibi diga: I suggest propose what you think is usefull and then in the spec review the placement guys can suggest improvements there

Earlier   Later