Earlier  
Later
New Search
Posted Nick Remark
#openstack-nova - 2017-01-10
20:28:39 diana_clarke cmartin: on sec, I think I know.
20:28:56 diana_clarke oops, I mean "one second"
20:29:24 cmartin diana_clarke: haha no problem
20:33:13 diana_clarke cmartin: Sadly, my hunch was wrong. The actually and expected callers are both using positional arguments, so it's not the same thing I saw recently.
20:33:56 diana_clarke (but I've recently been frustrated by something similar. I only fixed it by throwing away the code & starting again b/c my brain couldn't see the diff)
20:33:59 cmartin diana_clarke: dang it, thanks for trying though. I'm at a loss because it makes no sense lol
20:47:26 openstackgerrit Rafael Folco proposed openstack/nova: DELETE all inventory for a resource provider https://review.openstack.org/416669
20:54:42 openstackgerrit Eric Fried proposed openstack/nova: Introduce base PowerVM driver https://review.openstack.org/391288
21:00:01 openstackgerrit Dan Smith proposed openstack/nova: WIP: Test cellsv1 https://review.openstack.org/418141
21:04:22 diana_clarke cmartin: if you change the bdms parameter to mock.ANY, it gets past that error where actual looks like expected.
21:05:24 diana_clarke cmartin: I'm not entirely sure why... but note that the code you're replacing also did something special there: "mox.IsA(objects.BlockDeviceMappingList)"
21:06:10 diana_clarke cmartin: Anyhoo, I'm not necessarily saying that you should go with mock.ANY, but it's probably a clue.
21:06:42 cmartin diana_clarke: yea it gives me some direction, mox/mock testing can get super confusing sometimes lol
21:09:33 alaski equality testing doesn't necessarily work on nova objects, so even if the BlockDeviceMappingList looks the same to you python can't determine that
21:10:02 alaski that's why it was testing the type of the parameter before
21:12:41 cmartin alaski: I see, that's good to know in the future. Also setting bdms to mock.ANY worked I just fixed a few other lines and the tests pass now. Thanks for the help and explanations
21:15:45 openstackgerrit Christopher Martin proposed openstack/nova: Stop using mox in test_compute_cells.py https://review.openstack.org/389750
21:37:53 Neon`` i upgraded openstack to newton release and now when ever i boot instance it stuck at group like "inconsistent file system structure" with cirros and with windows blue screen or recovery. In centos same in grub screen. Is something changed in newton release ?
21:50:47 openstackgerrit Dan Smith proposed openstack/nova: Make placement client keep trying to connect https://review.openstack.org/418590
21:53:29 openstackgerrit Dan Smith proposed openstack/nova: Make placement client keep trying to connect https://review.openstack.org/418590
22:05:15 openstackgerrit Sarafraj Singh proposed openstack/nova: Add service_token for nova-cinder interaction https://review.openstack.org/397399
22:06:39 openstackgerrit Sarafraj Singh proposed openstack/nova: Add service_token for nova-neutron interaction https://review.openstack.org/410394
22:07:55 openstackgerrit Eric Fried proposed openstack/nova: WIP(2): Introduce base PowerVM driver (disk drv) https://review.openstack.org/409401
22:13:49 openstackgerrit Dan Smith proposed openstack/nova: Make placement client keep trying to connect https://review.openstack.org/418590
22:18:12 openstackgerrit Sarafraj Singh proposed openstack/nova: Add service_token for nova-neutron interaction https://review.openstack.org/410394
22:19:40 openstackgerrit Sarafraj Singh proposed openstack/nova: WIP: Add service_token for nova-glance interaction https://review.openstack.org/412634
22:39:44 openstackgerrit Dan Smith proposed openstack/nova: WIP: Test cellsv1 https://review.openstack.org/418141
23:27:05 openstackgerrit Dan Smith proposed openstack/nova: Make placement client keep trying to connect https://review.openstack.org/418590
23:43:57 openstackgerrit Sivasathurappan Radhakrishnan proposed openstack/nova: Make allocate_for_instance take consistent args https://review.openstack.org/418024
#openstack-nova - 2017-01-11
00:04:54 openstackgerrit Dan Smith proposed openstack/nova: WIP: Test cellsv1 https://review.openstack.org/418141
00:15:11 openstackgerrit Takashi NATSUME proposed openstack/python-novaclient: Microversion 2.42 - Enable cold migration with target host https://review.openstack.org/406707
00:21:59 openstackgerrit OpenStack Proposal Bot proposed openstack/nova: Updated from global requirements https://review.openstack.org/415978
00:33:47 openstackgerrit Alex Szarka proposed openstack/nova: Transform instance-exists notification https://review.openstack.org/403660
00:43:26 openstackgerrit Sarafraj Singh proposed openstack/nova: WIP: Add service_token for nova-glance interaction https://review.openstack.org/412634
00:43:54 openstackgerrit Sarafraj Singh proposed openstack/nova: DNM: Test service token https://review.openstack.org/413232
01:14:08 oomichi alex_xu: can you take a look at https://review.openstack.org/#/c/320375 ? it is a little difficult to understand for me
01:18:23 openstackgerrit Dan Smith proposed openstack/nova: WIP: Test cellsv1 https://review.openstack.org/418141
01:25:31 openstackgerrit melanie witt proposed openstack/nova: Add online migration to move quotas to API database https://review.openstack.org/410946
01:25:31 openstackgerrit melanie witt proposed openstack/nova: Make Quotas object favor the API database https://review.openstack.org/410945
01:25:31 openstackgerrit melanie witt proposed openstack/nova: WIP Count resources to check quota for cells https://review.openstack.org/416521
01:27:08 openstackgerrit Huan Xie proposed openstack/nova: XenAPI Use os-xenapi lib for nova https://review.openstack.org/406059
01:54:30 oomichi alex_xu: johnthetubaguy: can you take a look at https://review.openstack.org/#/c/389314 ? That seems making sense for me.
02:06:36 alex_xu oomichi: will review the patch after the meeting
02:08:31 openstackgerrit Huan Xie proposed openstack/nova: XenAPI Remove useless files when use os-xenapi lib https://review.openstack.org/411241
02:12:56 openstackgerrit Artom Lifshitz proposed openstack/nova: Plumbing for tagged nic attachment https://review.openstack.org/415622
02:12:57 openstackgerrit Artom Lifshitz proposed openstack/nova: Plumbing for tagged volume attachment https://review.openstack.org/391941
02:12:57 openstackgerrit Artom Lifshitz proposed openstack/nova: Libvirt support for tagged volume attachment https://review.openstack.org/418100
02:12:58 openstackgerrit Artom Lifshitz proposed openstack/nova: Libvirt support for tagged nic attachment https://review.openstack.org/415520
02:12:58 openstackgerrit Artom Lifshitz proposed openstack/nova: API support for tagged device attachment https://review.openstack.org/376021
02:53:32 gmann oomichi: alex_xu johnthetubaguy : yea even i did not find why we enforced volume policy in attachment APIs.
02:54:19 gmann oomichi: alex_xu johnthetubaguy : for clear view we should separate volume attachment controller in separate file for easy maintenance.
02:54:50 openstackgerrit huangtianhua proposed openstack/python-novaclient: Make _console() public https://review.openstack.org/414364
03:07:22 openstackgerrit zhangyujun proposed openstack/nova: Use JSON-Schema to validate bmd https://review.openstack.org/418654
03:09:22 openstackgerrit zhangyujun proposed openstack/nova: Use JSON-Schema to validate bdm https://review.openstack.org/418654
03:17:38 openstackgerrit Wang Qing wu proposed openstack/nova: Introduce base PowerVM driver https://review.openstack.org/391288
03:20:33 openstackgerrit Zhenyu Zheng proposed openstack/nova: Add query parameters white list for server list/detail https://review.openstack.org/408571
03:26:59 openstackgerrit zhangyujun proposed openstack/nova: Use JSON-Schema to validate bdm https://review.openstack.org/418654
04:07:26 openstackgerrit Artom Lifshitz proposed openstack/nova: Plumbing for tagged nic attachment https://review.openstack.org/415622
04:07:26 openstackgerrit Artom Lifshitz proposed openstack/nova: Libvirt support for tagged volume attachment https://review.openstack.org/418100
04:07:27 openstackgerrit Artom Lifshitz proposed openstack/nova: Plumbing for tagged volume attachment https://review.openstack.org/391941
04:07:27 openstackgerrit Artom Lifshitz proposed openstack/nova: API support for tagged device attachment https://review.openstack.org/376021
04:07:28 openstackgerrit Artom Lifshitz proposed openstack/nova: Libvirt support for tagged nic attachment https://review.openstack.org/415520
05:20:00 openstackgerrit zhangyujun proposed openstack/nova: Update JSON Schema for flavor access https://review.openstack.org/418683
05:20:33 openstackgerrit ChangBo Guo(gcb) proposed openstack/nova: DNM: just test https://review.openstack.org/415413
05:58:03 openstackgerrit Wang Qing wu proposed openstack/nova: WIP(2): Introduce base PowerVM driver (disk drv) https://review.openstack.org/409401
06:05:30 openstackgerrit OpenStack Proposal Bot proposed openstack/nova: Updated from global requirements https://review.openstack.org/415978
06:08:48 alex_xu oomichi: johnthetubaguy re:https://review.openstack.org/#/c/389314/ I added comment about a solution for deprecate the rule first and remove it next release, if we care about this should be process for removing a policy rule.
06:23:49 gokhan Hi Team, I tried to create virtuozzo containers on nova but I am getting errors.My production is mitaka. I have a compute node which is installed virtuoozo.These are logs http://paste.openstack.org/show/594498/ Can you help me ?
06:38:01 mnestratov gokhan:hi
06:38:13 mnestratov I can help you
06:39:41 mnestratov gokhan: what virtuozzo version do you have?
06:41:03 gokhan mnestratov I have 7.0.1 I installed from https://download.openvz.org/virtuozzo/releases/openvz-7.0.1-554/x86_64/iso/openvz-iso-7.0.1.iso
06:41:35 gokhan and for openstack I followed https://help.virtuozzo.com/customer/portal/articles/2524013
06:43:02 mnestratov gokhan: so you are trying devstack, right?
06:43:51 gokhan mnestratov, no not devstack, I am using it on production
06:44:30 mnestratov gokhan: ok I see
06:47:13 gokhan mnestratov, I followed also https://openvz.org/Basic_operations_in_OpenVZ_environment for creating container. I have created container successfully. But with openstack, I didn't achieve it.
06:54:11 openstackgerrit Roman Dobosz proposed openstack/nova-specs: Provide detailed error information for placement API https://review.openstack.org/418393
07:06:03 mnestratov gokhan: looks like you need commit d4aa455d53c91c6dfebbf9a9850f7b6c3fef4545 to fix this issue
07:06:24 mnestratov gokhan: review https://review.openstack.org/#/c/182257/
07:07:35 mnestratov gokhan: there was a lot of changes merged since mitaka regarding virtuozzo support
07:09:11 gokhan thanks mnestratov, I will try it
07:09:14 mnestratov gokhan: thus, I'd recommend you to use newton
07:11:49 mnestratov gokhan: did you create a container image yourself or use our test one?
07:12:37 gokhan mnestratov: I used test one
07:13:29 mnestratov gokhan: ok, just wanted to clarify
07:16:18 gokhan mnestratov: ok firstly I will commit these changes . If it doesn't work, I will try newton
07:16:36 mnestratov gokhan: same error?
07:17:06 mnestratov oh I thought you tried already
07:17:42 gokhan no I haven't tried yet.
07:26:59 openstackgerrit Sergey Nikitin proposed openstack/nova: Standardization of VM diagnostics info API. https://review.openstack.org/355540
07:26:59 openstackgerrit Sergey Nikitin proposed openstack/nova: Change parent of diagnostics objects to NovaObject class https://review.openstack.org/394480
07:27:00 openstackgerrit Sergey Nikitin proposed openstack/nova: Completed implementation of instance diagnostics for Xen https://review.openstack.org/399613
07:27:21 openstackgerrit avnish proposed openstack/nova: Remove useless ddt requirements https://review.openstack.org/418747
08:57:21 openstackgerrit Zhenyu Zheng proposed openstack/nova: Add query parameters white list for server list/detail https://review.openstack.org/408571
09:12:28 alex_xu bauzas: johnthetubaguy good morning, I found this patch similar to the force param on evacuate https://review.openstack.org/#/c/408955/11/nova/compute/api.py@3145, but i feel that if the instance without request_spec obj, then the API just don't the thing user expected silently. Does it sounds ok? will Hydrate a fake spec very complex?
09:13:34 bauzas alex_xu: not sure I understand your concern
09:14:23 bauzas alex_xu: FWIW, all the instances are now having a RequestSpec
09:14:26 bauzas since Newton
09:14:59 bauzas because I wrote a DB migration for creating a RequestSpec for all the already created instances

Earlier   Later