| Posted | Nick | Remark | |
|---|---|---|---|
| #openstack-cyborg - 2026-07-28 | |||
| 14:43:43 | melwitt | ok | |
| 14:43:44 | jgilaber | +1 seems fine as is | |
| 14:43:48 | chandankumar | sean-k-mooney: chnaged it to wishlist | |
| 14:43:51 | sean-k-mooney | ist a mini enhancment | |
| 14:43:53 | melwitt | thanks | |
| 14:44:04 | sean-k-mooney | melwitt: since we are on this topic | |
| 14:44:04 | chandankumar | it is already triaged, thank you | |
| 14:44:24 | sean-k-mooney | i ased for some enhacned docs in teh review i left | |
| 14:44:42 | sean-k-mooney | but i was also thinking maybe we shoudl clean up https://github.com/openstack/cyborg/blob/master/cyborg.conf.intelnic.sample | |
| 14:45:04 | sean-k-mooney | its really weird to have a random config example at the root of the repo | |
| 14:45:16 | melwitt | ok sure | |
| 14:45:55 | sean-k-mooney | my prefence woudl be to add a local.conf exmaple instead https://github.com/openstack/cyborg/blob/master/devstack/local-conf.pci-sim.sample | |
| 14:46:03 | sean-k-mooney | but ya that basiclly what i said in the review | |
| 14:46:25 | sean-k-mooney | i am fine with adding a speicif driver doc later | |
| 14:46:29 | melwitt | I thhink that would make sense | |
| 14:46:34 | melwitt | *think | |
| 14:46:42 | sean-k-mooney | so im not really asking for fully docs just capture the impaont parts form the gist you rote | |
| 14:47:30 | melwitt | ok, can do | |
| 14:47:33 | sean-k-mooney | i.e. if your automating the cofniguration with devstack add a small devstack local.conf samepel adn a littel prose to descibe how to set it up. | |
| 14:47:35 | sean-k-mooney | cool | |
| 14:47:50 | melwitt | thanks | |
| 14:47:58 | sean-k-mooney | by the way the reaon i said its not entirly a bug | |
| 14:48:08 | sean-k-mooney | is until this cycle | |
| 14:48:19 | sean-k-mooney | there really wast any devstack automation for any fo the drivers | |
| 14:48:54 | sean-k-mooney | im fine with filign wishlist bugs as tracker but we are missing devstack supprot for most of the rest of the drivrs as well | |
| 14:49:12 | sean-k-mooney | and i dont thnk fixing that when we have time shoudl need a lot of paper work | |
| 14:49:34 | melwitt | yeah I mean for this, it's the general device_profile extension so seems required for any cyborg use no? | |
| 14:49:54 | sean-k-mooney | only if using cyborg with neutron ports | |
| 14:50:03 | melwitt | yeah, it's good we have Wishlist | |
| 14:50:07 | melwitt | ah right. ok | |
| 14:50:23 | sean-k-mooney | that why i was debting if this shoudl only be enabled if you enable the intel driver | |
| 14:50:36 | sean-k-mooney | or sriov nic agent but its harmless to alwasy enabel | |
| 14:50:52 | sean-k-mooney | neutron will ignore it if your usign ovn af far as im aware | |
| 14:51:14 | melwitt | yeah. I think a guard would make sense. I guess intel is the only nic driver under nic/? I forgot already | |
| 14:51:26 | sean-k-mooney | currently yes | |
| 14:51:46 | sean-k-mooney | https://github.com/openstack/cyborg/blob/master/pyproject.toml#L52-L63 | |
| 14:51:49 | sean-k-mooney | at least in tree | |
| 14:52:05 | melwitt | ok cool. bc really it would be if any nic driver enabled but if we only have the one, then yeah | |
| 14:52:13 | sean-k-mooney | its technically a stevador entriy point i think but i woudl have to check | |
| 14:53:17 | chandankumar | we have one more bug to discuss, then we can talk more about that after meeting | |
| 14:53:37 | sean-k-mooney | cool | |
| 14:53:52 | chandankumar | #link | |
| 14:53:52 | chandankumar | [cyborg-tempest-plugin] Cyborg tempest tests fail in role manager does not exist https://bugs.launchpad.net/openstack-cyborg/+bug/2161909 | |
| 14:54:06 | chandankumar | amoralej: opened it. | |
| 14:54:13 | sean-k-mooney | melwitt: https://github.com/openstack/cyborg/blob/master/cyborg/agent/resource_tracker.py#L53-L57 | |
| 14:54:19 | chandankumar | It comes only when manager role does not exist in the environment | |
| 14:54:29 | sean-k-mooney | chandankumar: ya so i dug into this a bit | |
| 14:54:53 | sean-k-mooney | the reaosn this fails downtram is we are using keystone form antelope 2023.1 | |
| 14:55:06 | sean-k-mooney | and the manager rule is created by default in bobcat 2023.2 | |
| 14:55:20 | sean-k-mooney | so for all suprpoted branches we can unconditonly rely on it existing | |
| 14:56:21 | sean-k-mooney | it would not be hardd to add supprot for older release but those are technially not supproted on master | |
| 14:56:31 | chandankumar | for upstream stable branches, It does not seems to be a bug then | |
| 14:56:46 | sean-k-mooney | right its not | |
| 14:57:02 | sean-k-mooney | it just a question of do we wnat to add one off support for older branches | |
| 14:57:10 | sean-k-mooney | in generall we should not try to supprot antelope | |
| 14:57:39 | sean-k-mooney | but we coudl supprot it in this case if we choose too | |
| 14:58:03 | jgilaber | how extensive would the changes be? | |
| 14:58:14 | sean-k-mooney | like an if or two | |
| 14:58:39 | sean-k-mooney | https://github.com/openstack/cyborg-tempest-plugin/blob/master/cyborg_tempest_plugin/tests/api/base.py#L73-L107 | |
| 14:59:02 | sean-k-mooney | the fix is to only create the role specific client if we are using the new defaults | |
| 14:59:29 | sean-k-mooney | so move | |
| 14:59:31 | sean-k-mooney | https://github.com/openstack/cyborg-tempest-plugin/blob/master/cyborg_tempest_plugin/tests/api/base.py#L82-L94 | |
| 14:59:42 | sean-k-mooney | under the if branches | |
| 14:59:44 | sean-k-mooney | https://github.com/openstack/cyborg-tempest-plugin/blob/master/cyborg_tempest_plugin/tests/api/base.py#L100-L107 | |
| 14:59:47 | jgilaber | ok, I think that is acceptable | |
| 15:00:03 | chandankumar | ok | |
| 15:00:19 | chandankumar | coming to bug importance to low? | |
| 15:00:24 | sean-k-mooney | whishlist | |
| 15:00:31 | sean-k-mooney | again its for an unsuprpoted release | |
| 15:00:43 | jgilaber | yes, wishlist seems right | |
| 15:00:47 | sean-k-mooney | but we can fix it up fairly eaislly this time | |
| 15:00:54 | chandankumar | Done | |
| 15:00:59 | sean-k-mooney | if the issue was usign a newer api provided by tempest | |
| 15:00:59 | chandankumar | we are running out of time | |
| 15:01:04 | sean-k-mooney | or somehtign liek that we woudl not fix it | |
| 15:01:07 | chandankumar | #topic Open Discussion | |
| 15:01:42 | melwitt | I just wanted to mention that I am thinking of proposing a spec for what I'm calling "services API" summary here https://gist.github.com/melwitt/66443c2606ae69280ea1effff7c30437 | |
| 15:01:57 | melwitt | this will just mean adding a services table and heartbeat mechanism | |
| 15:02:16 | melwitt | if anyone has any thoughts or concerns please let me know (doesn't have to be now given the time) | |
| 15:02:34 | sean-k-mooney | i have one posisbel scope expantion to run by you | |
| 15:02:38 | sean-k-mooney | but we can dicuss that later | |
| 15:02:41 | chandankumar | melwitt: thank you! | |
| 15:02:57 | chandankumar | #topic volunteer to chair for next meeting | |
| 15:03:06 | chandankumar | Anyone up for chairing next meeting? | |
| 15:03:25 | jgilaber | I can do it chandankumar | |
| 15:03:33 | chandankumar | thank you jgilaber ! | |
| 15:03:39 | chandankumar | thank you all for joining! | |
| 15:03:39 | sean-k-mooney | ack i can if you need ot skip | |
| 15:03:42 | chandankumar | #endmeeting | |
| 15:03:42 | opendevmeet | Meeting ended Tue Jul 28 15:03:42 2026 UTC. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot . (v 0.1.4) | |
| 15:03:42 | opendevmeet | Minutes: https://meetings.opendev.org/meetings/cyborg/2026/cyborg.2026-07-28-14.01.html | |
| 15:03:42 | opendevmeet | Minutes (text): https://meetings.opendev.org/meetings/cyborg/2026/cyborg.2026-07-28-14.01.txt | |
| 15:03:42 | opendevmeet | Log: https://meetings.opendev.org/meetings/cyborg/2026/cyborg.2026-07-28-14.01.log.html | |
| 15:04:12 | sean-k-mooney | melwitt: so you included https://gist.github.com/melwitt/66443c2606ae69280ea1effff7c30437#related-work-http-healthcheck-endpoint | |
| 15:04:27 | sean-k-mooney | i dont think we shoudld supprot the oslo.middleware | |
| 15:04:48 | sean-k-mooney | but i would love to supprot https://specs.openstack.org/openstack/nova-specs/specs/2024.2/approved/per-process-healthchecks.html | |
| 15:04:56 | melwitt | ok cool I wondered about that | |
| 15:04:57 | sean-k-mooney | for all of our service binaries | |
| 15:05:21 | sean-k-mooney | so i have not issue with a healtcheck endpoint | |
| 15:05:28 | sean-k-mooney | i just woudl prefer to have a more useful one | |