Earlier  
Posted Nick Remark
#openstack-cyborg - 2026-06-22
11:01:31 sean-k-mooney this is assuming managed=yes semantics
11:02:12 sean-k-mooney so cyborg will assume that we can just use nvmcli witht hedefivce and we cna declare all device driver binding out of scope
11:02:30 sean-k-mooney otherwise that sumamry is close to what i woudl write in the spec
#openstack-cyborg - 2026-06-23
13:17:07 opendevreview sean mooney proposed openstack/cyborg-specs master: Add consistent and secure RBAC spec for Cyborg https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/cyborg-specs/+/991932
13:37:04 opendevreview Merged openstack/cyborg-specs master: Add consistent and secure RBAC spec for Cyborg https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/cyborg-specs/+/991932
13:53:08 sean-k-mooney fyi we will start the meeting at the top of the hour
14:01:28 sean-k-mooney #Start-Meeting
14:01:37 sean-k-mooney #start-meeting
14:01:51 sean-k-mooney ah no -
14:01:57 raukadah it should startmeeting cyborg with #
14:01:57 sean-k-mooney #startmeeting
14:01:57 opendevmeet sean-k-mooney: Error: A meeting name is required, e.g., '#startmeeting Marketing Committee'
14:02:12 sean-k-mooney ping list sean-k-mooney amoralej bogdando jgilaber rlandy chandankumar
14:02:26 sean-k-mooney we will give everyone a minitue to join
14:02:28 rlandy o/
14:02:31 jgilaber o/
14:02:34 chandankumar o/
14:02:49 skovili o/
14:03:00 sean-k-mooney as alwasys if you have topic feel free to add them to the adgenda
14:03:04 sean-k-mooney #link https://etherpad.opendev.org/p/openstack-cyborg-irc-meeting
14:03:06 melwitt I don't think the meetbot started it (have to give meeting name when starting)
14:03:06 chandankumar sean-k-mooney: we need to re-run the command for start the meeting `#startmeeting cyborg`
14:03:27 sean-k-mooney oh right
14:03:35 sean-k-mooney #startmeeting cyborg
14:03:35 opendevmeet Meeting started Tue Jun 23 14:03:35 2026 UTC and is due to finish in 60 minutes. The chair is sean-k-mooney. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot.
14:03:35 opendevmeet Useful Commands: #action #agreed #help #info #idea #link #topic #startvote.
14:03:35 opendevmeet The meeting name has been set to 'cyborg'
14:03:43 sean-k-mooney #link https://etherpad.opendev.org/p/openstack-cyborg-irc-meeting
14:04:22 sean-k-mooney i think we are all here now
14:04:29 sean-k-mooney so first topic
14:04:35 sean-k-mooney #topic abandoned specs
14:04:53 amoralej o/
14:04:57 sean-k-mooney so i did a clean up of olad specs a while ago and i decied to continue that today
14:05:08 sean-k-mooney 3 specs of note
14:05:11 sean-k-mooney Refactor API Structure Proposal
14:05:19 sean-k-mooney #link https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/cyborg-specs/+/841077/3/specs/zed/approved/refactor-api-structure.rst
14:05:27 sean-k-mooney Add NVIDIA MIG management spec
14:05:40 sean-k-mooney #link https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/cyborg-specs/+/885778
14:05:47 sean-k-mooney Add api to support change device vgpu_type
14:05:55 sean-k-mooney #link https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/cyborg-specs/+/885439
14:06:14 sean-k-mooney these are all 2-3 years old and while some of the fucntionaltiy or refactor may be desireable
14:06:38 sean-k-mooney i closed thse as i think we will need to aproch them form first principals
14:07:01 sean-k-mooney the nvidia mig management is actully kind fo superceaded
14:07:39 sean-k-mooney #link https://github.com/openstack/cyborg-specs/blob/master/specs/2026.2/approved/support-vfio-variant-driver-managed-mode.rst
14:08:08 sean-k-mooney the basic supprot for mig mode will be enabled by genericly supprotign vfio-variant drivers
14:09:00 sean-k-mooney i do think we should spend some time before the next ptg considering larger api refactoring but again i think that need some careful tought so i have abandoned that spec for now
14:09:06 sean-k-mooney any concerns with that?
14:09:35 jgilaber not really, all those specs were quite short and looked like wip anyway
14:09:56 jgilaber if we need them at any point we could recover them
14:09:58 sean-k-mooney we have them in gerrit anyway so we can alwasy find them again if needed
14:10:04 sean-k-mooney exactly
14:10:32 sean-k-mooney ok if there is noitng else lets move on to the next topic
14:10:39 sean-k-mooney #topic spec freeze
14:11:02 sean-k-mooney tradtionally for projects that use spec the default deadlien is milestone 2
14:11:12 sean-k-mooney #link https://releases.openstack.org/hibiscus/schedule.html#hibiscus-2-milestone
14:11:20 sean-k-mooney that would be july 2nd this year
14:12:07 sean-k-mooney since we have not elected a difent date im prposing we work towards that goal adn we can review the status of the spec/blueprints in the irc meeting
14:12:14 chandankumar oh that is one week from now
14:12:15 sean-k-mooney on july 7th
14:12:36 sean-k-mooney yes thrusday week
14:14:22 sean-k-mooney ok if there is no objection lets proceed with that plan
14:14:31 sean-k-mooney and we will check in 2 weeks form now in the irc meeting
14:14:43 chandankumar sounds good to me!
14:15:03 jgilaber +1
14:15:23 sean-k-mooney #agreed spec and blueprint freeze will be july 2nd (milestone 2) and we will check in in the july 7th irc meeting
14:15:39 sean-k-mooney #topic completed spec
14:15:50 sean-k-mooney atirbutes api
14:16:02 sean-k-mooney #link https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/cyborg-specs/+/896076
14:16:14 sean-k-mooney so this is more or less just paperwork and markign it implemented
14:16:29 sean-k-mooney it was added in 2023.2
14:16:45 sean-k-mooney the reason i call thi sout is i think we still could do with more tempest testing of this
14:17:08 sean-k-mooney so we may decied to file a tracker bug for the tempst plugin
14:17:30 sean-k-mooney but for all practical cases this is done so i appoved https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/cyborg-specs/+/896076 to reflect that
14:18:07 sean-k-mooney i think we can move on to reviews
14:18:52 sean-k-mooney #topic reviews
14:19:01 sean-k-mooney ok first one consistent and secure RBAC spec for Cyborg
14:19:09 sean-k-mooney #link https://blueprints.launchpad.net/openstack-cyborg/+spec/consistent-and-secure-rbac
14:19:15 sean-k-mooney #link https://review.opendev.org/q/topic:%22bp/consistent-and-secure-rbac%22
14:19:34 sean-k-mooney chandankumar: and jgilaber: have reviewd the spec so i approved it to merge this morning
14:20:00 sean-k-mooney i have a complete impleaiton aviable and im hoping to merge that in the next 1-2 weeks.
14:20:16 sean-k-mooney obviously spec freeze has precedence so we should focus on those
14:20:35 sean-k-mooney but if you have extra review bandwith feedback is welcome
14:21:20 sean-k-mooney any questions on the topic of SRBAC that anyone want to ask now?
14:21:24 jgilaber I hope to start reviewing this series this week
14:22:01 sean-k-mooney i kicked of my review ci on it overnight
14:22:13 sean-k-mooney im gogn to go though and triage its fineidng later in the week
14:22:16 sean-k-mooney proably firday
14:22:25 opendevreview Merged openstack/cyborg-specs master: move attribute spec to impletment https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/cyborg-specs/+/896076
14:22:26 sean-k-mooney so ill also look at any other feedback
14:22:41 sean-k-mooney i expect at leat one revison in the next week
14:22:59 sean-k-mooney while i belive its mergable as is im sure there are things that can be impvoed
14:23:13 sean-k-mooney one thing ill call out
14:23:15 sean-k-mooney https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/cyborg/+/992722
14:23:34 sean-k-mooney the first patch is baisclly dead code removal and a minor bug fix
14:23:52 sean-k-mooney so i pulled that out to the front
14:24:54 sean-k-mooney the rest is the actual srbac implementation
14:25:09 sean-k-mooney i think we can move on ?
14:25:32 sean-k-mooney #topic Add generic NVMe driver spec with secure cleanup
14:25:36 sean-k-mooney #link https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/cyborg-specs/+/985349/14/specs/2026.2/approved/generic-nvme-driver-with-secure-cleanup.rst
14:25:57 sean-k-mooney this is chandans feature. i hope to do another pass on that on thrusday

Earlier   Later