Earlier  
Posted Nick Remark
#openstack-cyborg - 2026-03-26
14:39:23 opendevreview chandan kumar proposed openstack/python-cyborgclient master: Drop dead code common/http.py https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/python-cyborgclient/+/982246
14:49:31 opendevreview chandan kumar proposed openstack/python-cyborgclient master: Cleanup requirements.txt unused packages https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/python-cyborgclient/+/982244
16:09:49 opendevreview chandan kumar proposed openstack/cyborg master: Add Grenade upgrade support for Cyborg https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/cyborg/+/979802
16:20:51 opendevreview chandan kumar proposed openstack/cyborg master: Add Grenade upgrade support for Cyborg https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/cyborg/+/979802
17:38:32 opendevreview Joan Gilabert proposed openstack/cyborg-specs master: Add generic mdev driver spec for 2026.2 https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/cyborg-specs/+/982276
19:18:19 opendevreview Merged openstack/cyborg master: Fix cyborg-status upgrade check tests https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/cyborg/+/981901
#openstack-cyborg - 2026-03-27
14:03:34 bogdando[m] jgilaber: hi, I provided comments to the cyborg mdevs driver support spec based on cross-project issues discovered by an AI tool. I've made my best to post-process them before commenting, but there are still could be gaps in my expertise for both projects. FTR I used my fork of this tool https://github.com/melwitt/nova-spec-summarizer, and the command 'python nova_spec_summarizer.py -v --url
14:03:34 bogdando[m] https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/cyborg-specs/+/982276 --specs-repo openstack/cyborg-specs --cross-ref https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova-specs/+/967515'
14:05:25 jgilaber thanks for the feedback bogdando[m]! I definitely have gaps, particularly in the nova side. Next week I'll be on PTO, but I'll go through both specs once I'm back and update them
#openstack-cyborg - 2026-03-30
13:10:28 chandankumar sean-k-mooney: Hello, https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/cyborg/+/981754/1#message-3ee08cf51f9710d8e2c8000e48b6e2f6047e36f7 on 2025.2 tox pep8 job is failing while checking for cherry picks here. It worked in 2026.1 but it fails in 2025.2 and 2025.1
13:11:34 sean-k-mooney that is because i have not cherry picked the cherry pick helper script to those yet
13:11:58 sean-k-mooney https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/cyborg/+/982300 need to be merged first then i need to pull it to 2025.2 adn 2025.1 before that will pass
13:12:15 sean-k-mooney sorry wrong link
13:12:44 sean-k-mooney https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/cyborg/+/981529
13:13:17 sean-k-mooney https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/cyborg/+/981754 and https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/cyborg/+/977838 shoudl fix it but i need to update the latter
13:15:07 chandankumar sorry tox -e pep8 failing on cherry-pick script itself i.e. 981754: Fix check-cherry-picks.sh for numeric stable branches | https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/cyborg/+/981754
13:15:48 sean-k-mooney ill need ot look into it unless you have time but any fix needs to be made on master first
13:16:19 sean-k-mooney i saw the comment that perhaps i need to defautl to HEAD or and replied that a better fix woudl be to remove the ""
13:16:33 chandankumar let me try with removing ""
13:16:53 sean-k-mooney without it when the viarble is not defiend hte partmer just wont be passed to the command
13:16:56 sean-k-mooney so that should work
13:17:22 sean-k-mooney we could default to HEAD but that might break in other ways
13:18:01 sean-k-mooney this script came form nova and there we do not defualt to HEAD but we also do not quote https://github.com/openstack/nova/blob/master/tools/check-cherry-picks.sh
13:18:26 sean-k-mooney so i think that is hte regression
13:20:09 sean-k-mooney if you fix it on master we cna backport that quickly to the branches where its already merged and update the unmerged ones to squash in your fix
13:25:03 chandankumar removing quotes works
13:25:06 chandankumar let me push the patch
13:29:21 opendevreview chandan kumar proposed openstack/cyborg master: Fix check-cherry-picks.sh empty commit_hash argument https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/cyborg/+/982644
13:29:42 chandankumar sean-k-mooney: ^^
13:32:58 sean-k-mooney i wonder why that works on 2026.1 perhaps because in someplaces in ci its using master deps?
13:33:43 sean-k-mooney i woudl have prefered to keep the ${} syntax consitently by the way but we can
13:33:58 sean-k-mooney but the file is not using tha tat the moment
13:34:01 sean-k-mooney so can you update
13:34:07 sean-k-mooney https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/cyborg/+/982644/1/tools/check-cherry-picks.sh#22
13:34:14 sean-k-mooney so it no tthe only place using that
13:34:36 chandankumar ok good catch
13:34:42 sean-k-mooney chandankumar: otherwise this looks good to me
13:35:59 opendevreview chandan kumar proposed openstack/cyborg master: Fix check-cherry-picks.sh empty commit_hash argument https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/cyborg/+/982644
13:58:22 sean-k-mooney chandankumar: can you submit a cherry-pick of tha to 2026.1 as well and lets confirm that passes there before merging
13:58:55 sean-k-mooney ideally we woudl squash it into 2025.2 as well since that is where it was failing
13:59:33 sean-k-mooney but i guess its better to just test this locally
13:59:45 sean-k-mooney since we cant eaislly test this in ci so ill see if i cna do that later today
14:00:50 sean-k-mooney to test it properly i need to have a seprate git repo where i can merge the changes into the relevent branhces 1 by one
14:38:32 chandankumar 2026.1 backport https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/cyborg/+/982665
14:59:28 sean-k-mooney thanks this wil proably fail ci. but i can test it locally by tryign the backport without the orgianl on master then i can apply the change to master and i should see that runign it on stable then works
15:01:04 chandankumar ok thanks!
15:01:57 sean-k-mooney becaus of how these scritp work you kindof need to test them with clean repos each time
15:02:16 sean-k-mooney which iskind of annoying but its the only way to test it properly
15:02:54 sean-k-mooney you can use existing repso but you need to be carful to rest the head fo the relevent brnahces to create the correct view of the repo
15:03:31 sean-k-mooney i.e. testing with and without the change merged into your master branch locally
15:10:04 chandankumar Ok
15:10:17 chandankumar I squashed 2025.2 cherry pick
15:10:26 chandankumar or are you also updating it?
15:12:33 chandankumar https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/cyborg/+/981754 for 2025.2
15:16:03 sean-k-mooney no im workign on the watcher-dashboard patch reorder so ill pick up and test the updated 2025.2 patch when i start my testing
15:16:09 sean-k-mooney thanks for updating it
17:55:59 chandankumar gmaan: Hello, Please have a cyborg grenade patch https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/cyborg/+/979802 when free, thank you!
17:56:33 gmaan chandankumar: good timing. I am on that, checking the jobs log
17:56:59 chandankumar ++ thank you!
17:58:54 gmaan lgtm +1
18:55:18 opendevreview chandan kumar proposed openstack/cyborg master: Add NVMe DevStack development guide and local.conf template https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/cyborg/+/982711
19:11:35 sean-k-mooney gmaan: chandankumar ill take a look at the greade job again during the week but we need to fix the cherry pick sctip adn cyborg status command backports on the sable branches before we can proceed with that on master
19:11:57 sean-k-mooney so it will likely take a week or two to resolve those issues
19:12:36 sean-k-mooney with that said once we merge the master version we can look at cherry-picking the grenade job to 2026.1
19:13:38 sean-k-mooney im not sure if we want to also backport that to 2025.2 and 2025.1 but if we do we shoudl consdier if we only backport the grenade part and not the skiplevel alwasy part
19:14:38 gmaan yes, skip level not required on 2025.2 and 2025.1 because of their previous base release to upgrade not in maintenance
19:14:50 sean-k-mooney 2024.1 is alreay unmaintaiend and we dont test upgrades form unmaineted branches
19:15:07 sean-k-mooney ya that
19:15:29 sean-k-mooney 2024.2 will be eol soon too
19:15:38 gmaan but greande job can be backported till 2025.1 (though 2024.2 is going to EOL soon)
19:15:55 gmaan yeah, I will say if it is more work then doing till 2025.2 is worth
19:16:05 sean-k-mooney ya so 2026.1 is my main focus and im ont againt 2025.2 or 2025.1 if it works
19:16:15 gmaan ++ indeed
19:17:07 sean-k-mooney gmaan: did the nodeset change merged for grenade by the way?
19:17:38 gmaan sean-k-mooney: I think not yet, let me ping dan also once he will be back
19:17:54 sean-k-mooney ack
#openstack-cyborg - 2026-03-31
10:57:24 opendevreview Takashi Kajinami proposed openstack/cyborg-tempest-plugin master: Add stable/2026.1 job https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/cyborg-tempest-plugin/+/982768
13:38:36 opendevreview chandan kumar proposed openstack/cyborg master: Add NVMe DevStack development guide and local.conf template https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/cyborg/+/982711
13:39:08 chandankumar Hello all, Cyborg team meeting starts in 22 mins, Please add your here: https://etherpad.opendev.org/p/openstack-cyborg-irc-meeting#L45
14:00:35 chandankumar Hello, who all are around for cyborg meeting?
14:00:46 sean-k-mooney o/
14:00:53 chandankumar #startmeeting cyborg
14:00:53 opendevmeet Meeting started Tue Mar 31 14:00:53 2026 UTC and is due to finish in 60 minutes. The chair is chandankumar. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot.
14:00:53 opendevmeet Useful Commands: #action #agreed #help #info #idea #link #topic #startvote.
14:00:53 opendevmeet The meeting name has been set to 'cyborg'
14:01:14 chandankumar #courtesy ping rlandy bogdando[m]
14:01:33 chandankumar Feel free to add your topics to the agenda
14:01:42 chandankumar #link https://etherpad.opendev.org/p/openstack-cyborg-irc-meeting#L45
14:03:19 chandankumar we have few topics today and less attendence due to holidays
14:03:24 chandankumar Let me start with first one
14:03:55 chandankumar #topic Dropping devstack_setup.rst in favor of devstack_nvme rst: Needs suggestion
14:04:05 chandankumar #link https://opendev.org/openstack/cyborg/src/branch/master/doc/source/contributor/devstack_setup.rst
14:04:26 chandankumar I am working on adding a fresh guide for cyborg nvme devstack setup https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/cyborg/+/982711/2/doc/source/contributor/devstack_nvme.rst
14:04:30 chandankumar #link https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/cyborg/+/982711/2/doc/source/contributor/devstack_nvme.rst
14:04:55 chandankumar Since devstack_setup.rst is quite old and we have similar content kind of in devstack_nvme.rst
14:05:13 chandankumar Do we want to drop the devstack_setup.rst in favor of devstack_nvme.rst?
14:05:20 sean-k-mooney in my opion no
14:05:32 sean-k-mooney i just started reviewing https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/cyborg/+/982711/2/doc/source/contributor/devstack_nvme.rst
14:05:36 sean-k-mooney before the meeting
14:05:48 chandankumar https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/cyborg/+/982711 provides https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/cyborg/+/982711/2/devstack/local-conf

Earlier   Later