| Posted | Nick | Remark | |
|---|---|---|---|
| #openstack-cyborg - 2020-01-28 | |||
| 07:13:40 | openstackgerrit | Li Liu proposed openstack/cyborg master: Added initial dummy functional test https://review.opendev.org/702428 | |
| 07:20:31 | openstackgerrit | Li Liu proposed openstack/cyborg master: Added initial dummy functional test https://review.opendev.org/702428 | |
| #openstack-cyborg - 2020-01-29 | |||
| 02:52:28 | openstackgerrit | Li Liu proposed openstack/cyborg master: Added initial dummy functional test https://review.opendev.org/702428 | |
| 05:32:15 | openstackgerrit | Li Liu proposed openstack/cyborg master: Added initial dummy functional test https://review.opendev.org/702428 | |
| #openstack-cyborg - 2020-02-01 | |||
| 10:02:00 | openstackgerrit | Brin Zhang proposed openstack/cyborg master: Add functional tests frame to the Cyborg https://review.opendev.org/702863 | |
| #openstack-cyborg - 2020-02-03 | |||
| 06:12:20 | openstackgerrit | Xinran WANG proposed openstack/cyborg-specs master: Specification of Cyborg API microversion https://review.opendev.org/699149 | |
| 09:43:22 | openstackgerrit | Merged openstack/cyborg-specs master: Specification of Cyborg API microversion https://review.opendev.org/699149 | |
| 18:05:24 | openstackgerrit | Merged openstack/cyborg master: testcase for FPGAExtARQ https://review.opendev.org/699153 | |
| 18:19:14 | openstackgerrit | Ghanshyam Mann proposed openstack/cyborg-specs master: Update tox py version conflict flag https://review.opendev.org/698824 | |
| #openstack-cyborg - 2020-02-05 | |||
| 02:30:20 | openstackgerrit | Sundar Nadathur proposed openstack/cyborg master: bugs fix for compatibility issues between Py2 and Py3 https://review.opendev.org/700261 | |
| 02:30:20 | openstackgerrit | Sundar Nadathur proposed openstack/cyborg master: Some bug fixes in async bind path. https://review.opendev.org/703253 | |
| 02:30:21 | openstackgerrit | Sundar Nadathur proposed openstack/cyborg master: Send a separate bind event to Nova for each ARQ in an instance. https://review.opendev.org/698846 | |
| 02:30:21 | openstackgerrit | Sundar Nadathur proposed openstack/cyborg master: Fix warning in logs that '' is not a valid UUID. https://review.opendev.org/703261 | |
| #openstack-cyborg - 2020-02-06 | |||
| 03:00:37 | Sundar | Hello all | |
| 03:00:59 | Yumeng | hi Sundar | |
| 03:01:02 | s_shogo | Hi Sundar | |
| 03:01:11 | brinzhang | Hi Sundar | |
| 03:01:37 | Sundar | Good, we have many people already :) | |
| 03:01:41 | Yumeng | hi 11:01:02 | |
| 03:01:44 | Sundar | #startmeeting | |
| 03:01:45 | openstack | Sundar: Error: A meeting name is required, e.g., '#startmeeting Marketing Committee' | |
| 03:01:50 | chenke | Hi | |
| 03:01:54 | Sundar | #startmeeting openstack-cyborg | |
| 03:01:55 | openstack | Meeting started Thu Feb 6 03:01:54 2020 UTC and is due to finish in 60 minutes. The chair is Sundar. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot. | |
| 03:01:56 | openstack | Useful Commands: #action #agreed #help #info #idea #link #topic #startvote. | |
| 03:01:58 | openstack | The meeting name has been set to 'openstack_cyborg' | |
| 03:02:25 | Sundar | #topic Roll call | |
| 03:02:31 | Sundar | #info Sundar | |
| 03:02:43 | chenke | #info chenke | |
| 03:02:44 | s_shogo | #info s_shogo | |
| 03:02:50 | Yumeng | #info Yumeng | |
| 03:02:52 | brinzhang | #info brinzhang | |
| 03:03:11 | Sundar | #topic Agenda | |
| 03:03:44 | xinranwang | Hi | |
| 03:03:44 | xinranwang | #info xinranwang | |
| 03:03:57 | Yumeng | hi Xinran | |
| 03:04:37 | Li_Liu | #info Li_Liu | |
| 03:05:27 | Li_Liu | Hi guys | |
| 03:05:38 | Sundar | First, I'd like to start by saying that Cyborg has been a long journey for me, in my current role at Intel. I have been spending anywhere from 50-100% of my time on it, with the rest going to some Kubernetes efforts for FPGA. | |
| 03:06:08 | Sundar | But my role is changing, and it seems unlikely that I can stay engaged with Cyborg to the same extent. :( It is a big disappointment for me. | |
| 03:06:47 | Li_Liu | Thanks a lot for all the great efforts Sundar | |
| 03:07:10 | Sundar | Welcome, Li_Liu. | |
| 03:07:14 | Sundar | However, I am trying hard to close the Nova integration as quickly as I can. For the rest, I think we have a good blueprint for further development. | |
| 03:07:24 | brinzhang | I think this is a big loss for Cyborg and everyone. | |
| 03:07:35 | shaohe_feng73 | hi all | |
| 03:07:47 | xinranwang | Thanks for your great efforts Sundar | |
| 03:07:47 | shaohe_feng73 | sorry for late | |
| 03:07:58 | shaohe_feng73 | something wrong with my network | |
| 03:08:39 | s_shogo | Thanks a lot, Sundar | |
| 03:08:56 | chenke | that's too regretful, | |
| 03:10:15 | brinzhang | We should imporve the priority to colse the Nova integration as soon as possible | |
| 03:10:16 | Sundar | It is great that we have so many smart and enthusiastic developers in Cyborg who have lots of interest in seeing it succeed. I am sure you will all carry this forward. To be sure, OpenStack in Asia is expected to grow fast, much faster than the rest of the world. So, adoption by those companies is reassuring. | |
| 03:10:38 | Yumeng | That's really depressing news for cyborg. Thanks Sundar for all the progress you've made for cyborg. | |
| 03:10:56 | Sundar | brinzhang: Yes, I am pushing it almost every day. It is mostly small details now. | |
| 03:11:09 | Sundar | Yumeng and all: Thanks for your kind words. | |
| 03:11:21 | brinzhang | Sundar: yea, I see | |
| 03:11:23 | Li_Liu | Well, hope you can still come here on and off to chat with us :P | |
| 03:11:37 | zhurong | Sundar thanks for your leadership of Cyborg, you really did a great things for Cyborg | |
| 03:12:08 | Sundar | I am going to be around as much as I can. :) | |
| 03:12:32 | shaohe_feng73 | so what's your next work? still cloud related? | |
| 03:12:48 | Sundar | Apart from the Nova integration, what else do you all see as the next thing I should do soon? | |
| 03:14:15 | brinzhang | Sundar: Aha, I would like to see you complete your instance ops spec https://review.opendev.org/#/c/605237/ :) | |
| 03:15:08 | Sundar | brinzhang: Ok :) We had a discussion whether it really needs to be a spec, or should it be a doc. | |
| 03:15:36 | brinzhang | it just a document, it won't take up much of your time | |
| 03:15:44 | Sundar | Sure, I can do that | |
| 03:16:01 | Yumeng | I think V2 API and client are also important | |
| 03:16:20 | Yumeng | should be done asap | |
| 03:16:54 | Sundar | Yumeng: Yes. But Shogo is driving the client well, and you are all involved in different v2 APIs. Is there anything for me to do there? | |
| 03:17:03 | Yumeng | ops. sorry. that's Xinran and shogo's | |
| 03:17:47 | Sundar | np :) Yes. I could probably review them. But, for the client, reviews from Monty etc. are more important, honestly. | |
| 03:18:08 | brinzhang | Yeah, the v2 API's SPEC has been merged, I think while the PoC code pushed, Sundar can review it while he is free | |
| 03:18:35 | Sundar | brinzhang: You mean microversion spec? | |
| 03:18:48 | brinzhang | yea | |
| 03:19:00 | xinranwang | Yes, for Sundar, the most important is nova integration. The rest, we can take it over if needed. | |
| 03:19:12 | shaohe_feng73 | yes. | |
| 03:19:16 | shaohe_feng73 | agree. | |
| 03:19:40 | xinranwang | I think brinzhang means the api updated spec. | |
| 03:19:53 | shaohe_feng73 | not sure Sundar will start his new job. | |
| 03:20:12 | Sundar | Microversion spec is merged. I think https://review.opendev.org/608624 is obsolete. Anyway we actually got most of the code in. So I may abandon it. | |
| 03:20:28 | chenke | Agree with xinran's idea. | |
| 03:20:49 | Sundar | xinranwang: In https://review.opendev.org/#/q/status:open+project:openstack/cyborg-specs, which one are you referring to? | |
| 03:20:57 | shaohe_feng73 | hope these community jobs will increase his burden | |
| 03:21:17 | shaohe_feng73 | will not | |
| 03:21:41 | brinzhang | Sundar: yes, you can ignore what I said, it's not true | |
| 03:21:59 | xinranwang | I think brinzhang means this one https://review.opendev.org/#/c/696012/? | |
| 03:22:39 | Sundar | shaohe_feng: I plan to hang around for some time, may be till the end of U release if possible, or a few weeks in the worst case. I don't feel comfortable dropping the ball abruptly. | |
| 03:23:06 | brinzhang | xinranwang: right | |
| 03:24:46 | shaohe_feng73 | sundar: Thank you for your professionalism | |
| 03:25:07 | Sundar | NP. Good. If any of you have any further thoughts or concerns, you can ping me on WeChat or send me email. | |
| 03:25:38 | Sundar | For the rest of today, we can probably go over the important patches? | |
| 03:26:28 | Sundar | Yumeng: how do you feel about tehe policy refresh stuff? | |
| 03:27:06 | Yumeng | yes. I have mailny arq:create policy to discuss with you guys | |
| 03:28:03 | Yumeng | and another two quick questions on device and device_profile API policies. | |
| 03:28:43 | Yumeng | this spec is almost done, Collen and Lance from keystone have reviwed it and gave us many suggestions. | |
| 03:29:21 | Yumeng | ok. let's start. | |
| 03:29:34 | Sundar | If arq:create is open for all users, anybody who creates an ARQ can also start a bind, which can program devices. That is a security issue. But, if we make it admin only, most users cannot launch a VM. That is the issue, right? | |
| 03:30:56 | Yumeng | yes. from my understanding, user from nova should be able to arq initial creation,not only admin. | |
| 03:31:14 | Yumeng | maybe by two ways: either the user create itself with a specific project_id in the request context; | |
| 03:31:29 | shaohe_feng73 | green bitstream can be program by users, write? | |
| 03:31:54 | shaohe_feng73 | s/write/right? | |