| Posted | Nick | Remark | |
|---|---|---|---|
| #openstack-cyborg - 2019-03-07 | |||
| 02:07:54 | openstackgerrit | coco-Gao proposed openstack/cyborg master: let conductor to update DB and placement https://review.openstack.org/624340 | |
| 02:53:47 | openstackgerrit | Merged openstack/cyborg master: Modify the deployable's api for new database work https://review.openstack.org/640616 | |
| 03:33:40 | openstackgerrit | Merged openstack/cyborg master: Fix:add python-glanceclient to cyborg requirements https://review.openstack.org/639487 | |
| 03:42:33 | openstackgerrit | wangzhh proposed openstack/cyborg master: Add gpu driver https://review.openstack.org/574075 | |
| 10:29:57 | openstackgerrit | Xinran WANG proposed openstack/cyborg master: Improve Intel FPGA driver https://review.openstack.org/599960 | |
| 12:07:13 | openstackgerrit | wangzhh proposed openstack/cyborg master: Add gpu driver https://review.openstack.org/574075 | |
| #openstack-cyborg - 2019-03-08 | |||
| 02:26:27 | openstackgerrit | Biwei Guo proposed openstack/cyborg master: Fix failures in v1 accelerator API. Updated documentation https://review.openstack.org/641184 | |
| 02:37:36 | openstackgerrit | Biwei Guo proposed openstack/cyborg master: Fix failures in v1 accelerator API. Updated documentation https://review.openstack.org/641184 | |
| 03:27:19 | openstackgerrit | Xinran WANG proposed openstack/cyborg master: Improve Intel FPGA driver https://review.openstack.org/599960 | |
| 06:27:32 | openstackgerrit | Merged openstack/cyborg master: Improve Intel FPGA driver https://review.openstack.org/599960 | |
| #openstack-cyborg - 2019-03-09 | |||
| 03:31:29 | openstackgerrit | Merged openstack/cyborg master: Fix failures in v1 accelerator API. Updated documentation https://review.openstack.org/641184 | |
| 05:34:07 | openstackgerrit | Merged openstack/cyborg master: Report data to conductor https://review.openstack.org/640615 | |
| #openstack-cyborg - 2019-03-11 | |||
| 05:02:31 | openstackgerrit | Ghanshyam Mann proposed openstack/cyborg master: DNM: Testing all legacy jobs on bionic https://review.openstack.org/642334 | |
| #openstack-cyborg - 2019-03-13 | |||
| 02:57:44 | Coco_gao | hi all | |
| 02:58:16 | Li_Liu | Hi Coco | |
| 02:58:23 | Li_Liu | how's your trip? | |
| 02:58:33 | Coco_gao | great | |
| 02:58:59 | Li_Liu | nice | |
| 02:59:06 | xinranwang | Hi all | |
| 02:59:20 | Li_Liu | let's wait for a couple more min for others | |
| 02:59:24 | shaohe_feng_ | hi all | |
| 02:59:35 | Coco_gao | hi shaohe | |
| 02:59:53 | shaohe_feng_ | Coco_gao: morning. | |
| 03:01:17 | Li_Liu | #startmeeting openstack-cyborg | |
| 03:01:18 | openstack | Meeting started Wed Mar 13 03:01:17 2019 UTC and is due to finish in 60 minutes. The chair is Li_Liu. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot. | |
| 03:01:19 | openstack | Useful Commands: #action #agreed #help #info #idea #link #topic #startvote. | |
| 03:01:21 | openstack | The meeting name has been set to 'openstack_cyborg' | |
| 03:01:24 | Li_Liu | Let's get started | |
| 03:01:30 | Li_Liu | #topic Roll Call | |
| 03:01:36 | Li_Liu | #info Li_Liu | |
| 03:01:48 | Coco_gao | #info Coco_gao | |
| 03:01:54 | xinranwang | #info xinranwang | |
| 03:02:18 | Li_Liu | are sundar and zhenghao here yet? | |
| 03:02:40 | Li_Liu | #topic Code Freeze Status Update | |
| 03:03:17 | Li_Liu | https://review.openstack.org/#/q/status:open%20project:openstack/cyborg | |
| 03:03:21 | Coco_gao | I will update my patch according to the comments these two days. | |
| 03:03:38 | Li_Liu | Coco_gao, thanks | |
| 03:04:08 | Li_Liu | Why https://review.openstack.org/#/c/574075/ this one is not merged yet? | |
| 03:04:18 | Li_Liu | strange ><|| | |
| 03:04:52 | Coco_gao | That's depend on my patch | |
| 03:05:03 | Coco_gao | because my patch are not merged. | |
| 03:05:13 | zhipeng | Zuul not started | |
| 03:05:21 | Li_Liu | I see | |
| 03:06:33 | Li_Liu | By the hard dead line of code freeze, please add UT to the features you own | |
| 03:06:53 | wangzhh | hi all | |
| 03:06:58 | Li_Liu | Hi wangzhh | |
| 03:07:07 | wangzhh | Sorry for late. | |
| 03:08:26 | Coco_gao | I will add my UTs. | |
| 03:08:30 | Sundar | #info Sundar | |
| 03:08:38 | Li_Liu | Hi Sundar | |
| 03:08:43 | Sundar | Sorry for the delay | |
| 03:08:47 | Sundar | Hi Li_Liu | |
| 03:08:48 | Coco_gao | Hi Sundar | |
| 03:08:58 | Sundar | Hi Coco_gao and all | |
| 03:09:44 | Li_Liu | I think are in a good shape so far | |
| 03:10:30 | zhipeng | Any luck to have xilinx driver lol ? | |
| 03:10:40 | Li_Liu | no updates tho | |
| 03:11:10 | Li_Liu | I can follow up with Chuck later | |
| 03:11:42 | Li_Liu | but prob not gonna make to the deadline | |
| 03:12:43 | Li_Liu | zhipeng, we can still refine our docs after the deadline right? | |
| 03:13:23 | zhipeng | Need to do it before the RC | |
| 03:14:16 | Sundar | What is needed for docs? | |
| 03:14:38 | Li_Liu | RC1 is Mar 18 - Mar 22 | |
| 03:15:54 | Li_Liu | https://docs.openstack.org/cyborg/latest/#developer-documentation | |
| 03:16:14 | Li_Liu | yumeng already added quite some stuff there | |
| 03:16:25 | Sundar | Li_Liu: We have feedback that we should improve our API docs. I can document the current v1 API, if nobody else volunteers. | |
| 03:16:31 | Li_Liu | we need to keep improving it | |
| 03:16:41 | Li_Liu | Sundar, sure thanks a lot | |
| 03:17:20 | Li_Liu | I will take some time to work on the python-clinet | |
| 03:17:41 | Li_Liu | as least make it align with our docs and APIs | |
| 03:18:30 | Coco_gao | Hi Sundar, still one thing about driver ovo. Is deployable name unique? why is that? | |
| 03:18:35 | Coco_gao | Thanks a lot. | |
| 03:19:08 | Sundar | Coco_gao: I think so, because it will be used as resource provider name in Placement, and that must be unique AFAIK | |
| 03:19:43 | Li_Liu | How are we going to guarantee deployable's name's uniqueness | |
| 03:20:05 | Li_Liu | are we doing the check when the resource is reported? | |
| 03:20:25 | Coco_gao | we can't if we set the name field in the drivers. | |
| 03:20:33 | Sundar | Coco_gao: I don't see explicit documentation that it must be unique. I will check and get back. | |
| 03:21:31 | Sundar | Coco_gao and all: why can't Cyborg agent construct the name from other fields like vendor, type, etc., and add a unique id? | |
| 03:21:55 | Sundar | E.g. 'INTEL_FPGA_PAC_CARD_ID1' | |
| 03:22:08 | Li_Liu | is this ID1 a uuid? | |
| 03:22:26 | Sundar | Li_Liu: I was thinking a simple integer | |
| 03:22:38 | Sundar | Oh, wait | |
| 03:22:50 | Sundar | There is a convention for naming nested RPs | |
| 03:22:59 | Sundar | It is based on compute node name | |
| 03:23:07 | Sundar | I will check and send email. | |
| 03:23:22 | xinranwang | now the deployable name is the filename in /sys/class/fpga, it's unique | |
| 03:24:01 | Sundar | xinranwang: It is unique within a compute node | |
| 03:24:10 | Sundar | The same name can repeat across nodes | |
| 03:24:16 | Coco_gao | Sundar, I agree we'd better do that in agent. | |
| 03:25:01 | Sundar | We are not reporting anything ti Placement yet, right? | |
| 03:25:04 | Coco_gao | xinranwang, that's the problem when across nodes, name maybe same right? | |
| 03:25:07 | Li_Liu | how about when we report the deployable to placement API, we concate name+uuid | |
| 03:25:53 | Sundar | Li_Liu: good idea. I'll get back with the name convention for nested RPs | |
| 03:26:16 | wangzhh | xinranwang, what if different node has same device? Is it unique? | |
| 03:26:33 | xinranwang | if we support NRP, we can identify which host the deployable locate, should it be ok to have same deployable name in different compute node ? | |
| 03:27:13 | Coco_gao | xinranwang, that will be ok, i think. | |
| 03:27:33 | shaohe_feng_ | the fpga devices name is generated by the kernel. | |
| 03:27:37 | wangzhh | xinranwang, Not really, Now it is global unique. | |
| 03:27:43 | shaohe_feng_ | the name is unique | |
| 03:28:33 | shaohe_feng_ | it does not mater if different node has same device | |