| Posted | Nick | Remark | |
|---|---|---|---|
| #openstack-cyborg - 2018-04-25 | |||
| 15:16:38 | zhipeng | if by then we still could not get it landed, then I will block it for Rocky but could be land first thing in Stein :) | |
| 15:16:47 | Li_Liu | zhipeng, let me know if you need some help on that one | |
| 15:16:57 | zhipeng | sounds reasonable | |
| 15:16:58 | zhipeng | ? | |
| 15:17:06 | zhipeng | Li_Liu sure :) | |
| 15:17:29 | Li_Liu | since I think I have some thoughts on it | |
| 15:17:34 | zhipeng | #agreed os-acc spec extended to MS2 for approval | |
| 15:17:53 | zhipeng | Li_Liu no problem, feel free to share it | |
| 15:18:04 | zhipeng | okey moving on | |
| 15:18:14 | zhipeng | #topic open patches/bugs | |
| 15:18:31 | zhipeng | I will push up the fix for mutable-config this week | |
| 15:20:16 | zhipeng | maybe combined with the fix lenovo folk has provided but blocked by me due to trivial fix | |
| 15:21:07 | zhipeng | any other issues on this topic ? | |
| 15:22:04 | zhipeng | okey then | |
| 15:22:09 | zhipeng | #topic AoB | |
| 15:22:32 | zhipeng | any other business | |
| 15:23:31 | xinran_ | what is AoB...... | |
| 15:23:45 | xinran_ | Ah i know! | |
| 15:24:11 | zhipeng | xinran_ bien :) | |
| 15:25:07 | xinran_ | ;) | |
| 15:26:10 | zhipeng | okey if there are no other topics | |
| 15:26:17 | zhipeng | let's conclude the meeting today | |
| 15:26:28 | zhipeng | thx for the great conversation :) | |
| 15:26:31 | zhipeng | #endmeeting | |
| 15:26:33 | openstack | Meeting ended Wed Apr 25 15:26:31 2018 UTC. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot . (v 0.1.4) | |
| 15:26:34 | openstack | Minutes: http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/openstack_cyborg/2018/openstack_cyborg.2018-04-25-13.59.html | |
| 15:26:35 | openstack | Minutes (text): http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/openstack_cyborg/2018/openstack_cyborg.2018-04-25-13.59.txt | |
| 15:26:36 | openstack | Log: http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/openstack_cyborg/2018/openstack_cyborg.2018-04-25-13.59.log.html | |
| 15:26:40 | NokMikeR | thanks all, bye | |
| #openstack-cyborg - 2018-04-27 | |||
| 07:52:24 | openstackgerrit | Xinran WANG proposed openstack/cyborg master: Introduce Cyborg Resource Quota -- Usage Part https://review.openstack.org/560285 | |
| 13:04:50 | openstackgerrit | ShaoHe Feng proposed openstack/cyborg master: bug fix: amend keyston endpoint register info https://review.openstack.org/564753 | |
| #openstack-cyborg - 2018-04-28 | |||
| 02:28:58 | openstackgerrit | wangzhh proposed openstack/cyborg master: Fix remote call conductor error https://review.openstack.org/564962 | |
| 03:36:17 | openstackgerrit | Xinran WANG proposed openstack/cyborg master: Introduce quota_usage and reservation table to Cyborg https://review.openstack.org/564968 | |
| 07:13:44 | openstackgerrit | ShaoHe Feng proposed openstack/cyborg master: bug fix: endpoint register, import and devstack broken issues. https://review.openstack.org/564753 | |
| 07:40:34 | openstackgerrit | wangzhh proposed openstack/cyborg master: Fix remote call conductor error https://review.openstack.org/564962 | |
| 10:27:17 | openstackgerrit | Merged openstack/cyborg master: Fix remote call conductor error https://review.openstack.org/564962 | |
| 10:39:22 | openstackgerrit | Xinran WANG proposed openstack/cyborg master: Introduce quota_usage and reservation table to Cyborg https://review.openstack.org/564968 | |
| 14:11:08 | openstackgerrit | ShaoHe Feng proposed openstack/python-cyborgclient master: base framework for cyborg client. https://review.openstack.org/565023 | |
| 14:15:45 | openstackgerrit | ShaoHe Feng proposed openstack/python-cyborgclient master: base framework for cyborg client. https://review.openstack.org/565023 | |
| 14:30:47 | openstackgerrit | ShaoHe Feng proposed openstack/python-cyborgclient master: base framework for cyborg client. https://review.openstack.org/565023 | |
| #openstack-cyborg - 2018-04-29 | |||
| 03:24:31 | openstackgerrit | Merged openstack/cyborg master: bug fix: endpoint register, import and devstack broken issues. https://review.openstack.org/564753 | |
| #openstack-cyborg - 2018-05-01 | |||
| 02:17:50 | openstackgerrit | Li Liu proposed openstack/cyborg master: Added attribute object and its unit tests https://review.openstack.org/565382 | |
| #openstack-cyborg - 2018-05-02 | |||
| 01:23:22 | openstackgerrit | Xinran WANG proposed openstack/cyborg master: Introduce quota_usage and reservation table to Cyborg https://review.openstack.org/564968 | |
| 02:52:31 | openstackgerrit | Xinran WANG proposed openstack/cyborg master: Introduce quota_usage and reservation table to Cyborg https://review.openstack.org/564968 | |
| 02:54:30 | openstackgerrit | Xinran WANG proposed openstack/cyborg master: Introduce Cyborg Resource Quota -- Usage Part https://review.openstack.org/560285 | |
| 14:10:05 | shaohe | hi all. | |
| 14:11:11 | zhipengh[m] | We don't have meeting today | |
| 14:11:17 | zhipengh[m] | You didn't see the email :P | |
| 14:11:18 | Li_Liu | #info Li_Liu | |
| 14:11:40 | Li_Liu | I didn't | |
| 14:11:46 | xinran_ | what mail | |
| 14:11:59 | sundar | Hi Li_Liu, can we chat a bit? | |
| 14:12:24 | jiapei | Good evening | |
| 14:12:26 | Li_Liu | sure | |
| 14:12:37 | zhipengh[m] | lol | |
| 14:12:38 | Li_Liu | you wanna chat here? | |
| 14:12:54 | Li_Liu | sundar | |
| 14:13:58 | zhipengh[m] | No meeting today , but feel free to chat :) | |
| 14:14:03 | sundar | Li_Liu: For the FPGA bitstreams, we plan to use Glance properties | |
| 14:14:40 | sundar | Your spec referes to a table. That is a table in Cyborg, right? | |
| 14:17:05 | sundar | The spec https://git.openstack.org/cgit/openstack/cyborg/commit/?id=f1355e51fe89021cdd27308829c333a98c14820b says: "For each metadata, it will be stored as a row in this Glance's image_properties in key-value pair format" | |
| 14:20:34 | Li_Liu | Sundar | |
| 14:20:50 | sundar | Hi Li_Liu | |
| 14:21:12 | Li_Liu | For the Glance properties. It's not a table in Cyborg | |
| 14:21:20 | Li_Liu | I am re-using the table in Glance | |
| 14:21:39 | sundar | Are you proposing to add it to Glance? | |
| 14:21:44 | Li_Liu | nope | |
| 14:22:02 | sundar | Cyborg can use glaceclient to create and query properties | |
| 14:22:07 | sundar | *glanceclient | |
| 14:22:15 | Li_Liu | I am just defining what should be in that table if it's meant for a bitstream | |
| 14:22:36 | sundar | If we propose a change to Glance, we should fly it by them. But, by using only the glanceclient, we should be ok | |
| 14:23:24 | Li_Liu | you are right | |
| 14:23:35 | Li_Liu | We are not changing anything in the Glance space | |
| 14:23:35 | sundar | Ok. Instead of phrasing it as rows in Glance, which is really Glance internals, we can say what properties we intend to create and query | |
| 14:24:05 | Li_Liu | hmm. ok I can make according changes | |
| 14:24:13 | sundar | Cool, thanks. | |
| 14:24:59 | sundar | Also, having fields for 'shell' makes me concerned. Today, we use shell. But there is no guarantee that all products tomorrow | |
| 14:25:07 | sundar | ... will also use a shell | |
| 14:25:34 | sundar | There are lots of FPGA products out there, and somebody may want to make a service out of them | |
| 14:28:30 | Li_Liu | but I think for at least Xilinx/Altera fpga, we are following such scheme | |
| 14:28:52 | Li_Liu | that field is also optional | |
| 14:29:09 | Li_Liu | user can totally ignore it | |
| 14:29:24 | sundar | There are plenty of Alter-based products out there that don;t use a shell. Same must be true of Xilinx too. We should not preclude them from being used in the cloud, by design | |
| 14:29:57 | sundar | The spec says: "Required shell bs-uuid for this bitstream" | |
| 14:30:27 | sundar | What we really need is 3 separate fields: shell, region type UUID, function type UUID. | |
| 14:30:33 | Li_Liu | oh, for that | |
| 14:31:03 | sundar | The shell ID is presumably used by the proposed API to update shell logic, presumably | |
| 14:31:18 | sundar | The region type UUID is what is matched by the bitstream. A bitstream is synthesized for a specific region type | |
| 14:31:20 | Li_Liu | I marked that filed as nullable=True. "Required shell bs-uuid for this bitstream" I mean if a shell is required for this bitstrea, | |
| 14:32:20 | sundar | OK, Thanks for clarifying that the shell-id is optional | |
| 14:32:40 | sundar | Can we add a region type UUID and a function type UUID also? | |
| 14:33:09 | sundar | We need region type for matching the bitstream to the region type | |
| 14:33:57 | shaohe | zhipengh[m]: Li_Liu: sundar: can cyborg manage MK-TME? https://en.wikichip.org/wiki/x86/tme | |
| 14:35:23 | sundar | ZHipeng: there are many aspects to MKTME (and SGX). Some are clearly within Cyborg's reach. For others, I need to investigate | |
| 14:36:45 | Li_Liu | sundar: the problem is where are these region types pointing to? | |
| 14:37:01 | Li_Liu | are they pointing to another bitstream image? | |
| 14:37:58 | sundar | Li_Liu: The current approach seems to assume a simple model of a shell and a single region within that. That may not remain true over time. We may want to support multiple regions in the same shell. Then, we need a separate region type UUID for each such region. When we synthesize a bitstream, its metadata would say which region type it was synthesized for | |
| 14:38:28 | sundar | Each bitstream corresponds to a single region type, so the metadata need only identify one region type UUID | |
| 14:38:59 | Li_Liu | I see you point. | |
| 14:39:19 | shaohe | zhipengh[m]: Li_Liu: sundar: For MKTME, the keyID is limitation. Cyborg can manage the keyID, for example, assign a keyID to a VM, and how multi-VM (belong to one tanent) share one keyID | |