Earlier  
Posted Nick Remark
#openstack-cyborg - 2018-04-18
14:09:59 zhipeng #link https://governance.openstack.org/tc/goals/rocky/index.html
14:10:27 zhipeng we've already land a patch on mutable configuration enablement
14:10:41 zhipeng but I'm not sure about the mox/mox3 removal
14:10:48 zhipeng anyone volunteer to take a look ?
14:12:01 zhipeng nova seems to be the only project working on that
14:12:31 shaohe_feng_ Does cyborg use mox?
14:12:37 zhipeng i'm not sure
14:12:50 shaohe_feng_ let me check it.
14:13:26 zhipeng thx shaohe_feng_
14:13:37 zhipeng check our test files
14:13:38 Guest18705 #info Melissa - sorry I disconnected
14:13:43 zhipeng #link https://review.openstack.org/#/q/topic:bp/mox-removal+(status:open+OR+status:merged
14:13:46 shaohe_feng_ zhipeng: no mox found
14:13:51 zhipeng no worries melissa :)
14:14:00 zhipeng shaohe_feng_ oh great then :)
14:14:16 zhipeng we've accomplished the community goal then
14:14:58 zhipeng #info this week is MS1 freeze for all spec proposal
14:15:32 zhipeng #info should try to land those already heavily discussed patches
14:17:30 zhipeng #topic bug report on storyboard
14:17:53 zhipeng #link https://storyboard.openstack.org/#!/project_group/77
14:18:23 shaohe_feng_ zhipeng: just spec ready this week? no need for patches?
14:19:02 zhipeng shaohe_feng_ yes, we should try to land as many mature specs as possible this week
14:19:24 jiapei do we have a link of spec?
14:19:45 Li_Liu https://review.openstack.org/#/q/project:openstack/cyborg
14:20:23 zhipeng okey coming back to the bug report
14:20:29 zhipeng the first one
14:20:36 zhipeng #link https://storyboard.openstack.org/#!/story/2001827
14:22:13 shaohe_feng_ zhipeng: still can not work?
14:22:21 shaohe_feng_ zhipeng: how to reproduce it?
14:23:00 zhipeng i'm asking the author to join irc right now :)
14:23:01 shaohe_feng_ zhipeng: OK, mutil-host
14:23:17 shaohe_feng_ zhipeng: we does not try multi-host.
14:23:36 zhipeng MULTI_HOST=False
14:24:18 shaohe_feng_ zhipeng: got it.
14:24:36 shaohe_feng_ more details more easy to fix it.
14:26:18 zhipeng yes I was just saying that to the author
14:27:06 zhipeng ok I just reviewed kosamara's bug report
14:27:09 zhipeng i think it is related
14:27:23 zhipeng maybe we should not have a enable_service cyborg
14:27:32 zhipeng since there is no cyborg service
14:27:56 zhipeng let me re-paste kosamara's report
14:28:12 shaohe_feng_ zhipeng: enable cyborg plugin?
14:28:22 zhipengh[m] Hi! I was trying cyborg in devstack again. At some point devstack is checking if every service is running and 2 things related to cyborg occur:
14:30:02 zhipeng ....
14:30:25 zhipeng Guest52678 we are reviewing another bug report
14:30:31 zhipeng which might be related to yours
14:30:39 shaohe_feng_ zhipeng: does the author enable cyborg plugin?
14:30:53 zhipeng shaohe_feng_ i don't think so
14:31:16 shaohe_feng_ zhipeng: https://storyboard.openstack.org/#!/story/2001827 the link just enable service.
14:31:31 Li_Liu I remember Jinghan or someone provided a localrc file or something like that before
14:31:38 Guest52678 Hi .. Yes i have enabled cyborg services
14:31:51 Guest52678 But still it was failing
14:32:02 zhipeng #link http://paste.openstack.org/show/ym8eEtMcHQjEWeLSkT0F/
14:32:07 shaohe_feng_ it should enable both service and plugin
14:32:24 zhipeng I think another reason is my enable mutable config patch
14:32:49 zhipeng ERROR cyborg TypeError: launch_service() got an unexpected keyword argument 'restart_method'
14:32:55 Guest52678 Hi Zhipeng, i got the same type of error msg
14:32:58 zhipeng i will take a look into that
14:33:02 Guest52678 like the link you provided
14:33:21 zhipeng Guest52678 yeah I probably know what triggers it lol
14:33:44 shaohe_feng_ good
14:33:53 zhipeng #link https://review.openstack.org/559303
14:35:02 zhipeng Guest52678 the solution is three fold I guess: (1)remove cyborg from enable_service(2)add cyborg plugin in the enable_service(3) wait for my patch on the restart_method error
14:36:15 Guest52678 ok
14:36:38 zhipeng thx for the bug report :)
14:36:54 zhipeng I would otherwise has no clue about the problem I introduced
14:37:33 zhipeng okey let's move on
14:37:44 zhipeng #topic Rocky Critical Spec Review
14:37:59 zhipeng now let's start from the mature ones
14:38:15 zhipeng #info Sundar's sched spec
14:38:18 zhipeng #link https://review.openstack.org/554717
14:38:30 zhipeng shaohe_feng_ Li_Liu looks good to you guys ?
14:38:35 zhipeng edleaf
14:38:50 zhipeng edleafe sorry
14:40:54 Li_Liu Overall looks good to me. But I think Jay's most recently comment still needs to be addressed
14:41:01 zhipeng okey
14:41:30 Li_Liu shouldn't be a big change
14:42:21 zhipeng #info programming spec
14:42:27 zhipeng #link https://review.openstack.org/559395
14:42:33 edleafe zhipeng: sorry, on a call
14:42:42 edleafe zhipeng: I'll review it today
14:42:47 zhipeng edleafe no problem :) thx man
14:43:51 zhipeng Guest18705 are you around ?
14:44:06 zhipeng I think you or chuck should help review the programming spec
14:44:13 shaohe_feng_ zhipeng: looks good to me.
14:44:34 zhipeng altho Li_Liu should have more than enough exprience on Xilinx FPGA :)
14:46:14 zhipeng okey next
14:46:25 zhipeng #info bitstream metadata standardization
14:46:27 zhipeng #link https://review.openstack.org/558265
14:46:28 Li_Liu zhipeng: about the fpga reconfigure spec, should we put that in for R? or we wait for future?
14:46:40 Li_Liu I mentioned in the community email last week
14:46:48 zhipeng Li_Liu I doubt we have enough bandwidth on that
14:46:57 Li_Liu ok, great
14:47:00 zhipeng don't forget to reply to Jay's comment :)
14:47:30 Li_Liu Sure, but hope Sundar can provide some insights as well
14:47:39 Li_Liu for Jay's comment I mean
14:47:39 zhipeng of course
14:48:21 chucksong ok, I will take a look at the programming spec
14:48:22 zhipeng I guess metadata still needs Sundar's further review
14:48:31 zhipeng hey thx chucksong

Earlier   Later