Earlier  
Posted Nick Remark
#openstack-cyborg - 2018-01-17
15:03:48 zhipeng #Howard
15:03:51 zhipeng shit
15:03:57 zhipeng #info Howard
15:04:10 jkilpatr #info Justin
15:04:13 NokMikeR dont worry you can fix that in post production.
15:04:17 jkilpatr good morning everyone.
15:04:51 zhipeng morning, evening, half-day struggling everyone
15:05:53 NokMikeR morning / evening all. Im back, not that I was actualy away, just busy trying to get something installed.
15:06:39 zhipeng NokMikeR always great to have you
15:06:46 Vipparthy Good Morning Folks
15:06:47 zhuli #info zhuli
15:08:05 zhuli morning/evening everyone
15:09:13 zhipeng #topic Queens Dev Progress
15:09:18 zhipeng #link https://review.openstack.org/#/q/status:open+project:openstack/cyborg
15:09:38 Li_Liu #info Li_Liu
15:09:40 zhipeng glad we finally managed to land lots of patches last week
15:09:51 zhipeng let's comb through the ones we have
15:10:04 zhipeng #info FPGA data modeling
15:10:20 zhipeng #link https://review.openstack.org/526559
15:10:27 Li_Liu I have just submitted a patch for zhuli's comments
15:10:39 zhipeng zhuli have you reviewed the updated patch ?
15:11:05 zhuli reviewing now
15:11:53 zhipeng other than zhuli's comment, any other concerns about this spec ?
15:15:03 zhipeng if there are no other concerns, we should land this spec today
15:15:12 zhipeng #action landing fpga data modeling spec today
15:15:27 zhipeng #info zhuli's api/db patch
15:15:43 zhipeng #link https://review.openstack.org/527396
15:16:12 zhipeng jkilpatr crushil could either of you guys give a workflow +1 for this patch ?
15:16:21 zhipeng crushil_
15:17:43 jkilpatr I'm still confused, the tox command should run linters but not actual test code.
15:17:59 jkilpatr unless the tox.ini is setup to run actual test code in the linter categories which I don't think it is
15:18:04 zhuli liliu, you mean the attributes are constant which will be initialized with deployable object together and do not need further methods to modify?
15:21:59 zhipeng Li_Liu per zhuli's question ?
15:22:14 zhipeng zhuli could you take a look at jkilpatr's problem ?
15:22:54 Li_Liu Zhuli, yes, that's what I meant
15:24:00 Li_Liu the attributes table should be transparent to users
15:25:24 zhuli jkilpatr, tox can support both linters check and unit test according to your command, for instance 'tox -epep8' for linters and 'tox -epy27' for unittest
15:27:53 zhuli the openstack-tox-pep8 and openstack-tox-py27 gerrit jobs run against these two situation
15:28:47 jkilpatr ok there we go I'll wf it
15:29:04 jkilpatr unless crushil_ has objections?
15:31:06 zhuli jkilpatr, you can see the detail in these links
15:31:07 zhuli http://logs.openstack.org/96/527396/11/check/openstack-tox-pep8/185864a/job-output.txt.gz#_2018-01-13_18_12_47_975849
15:31:18 zhuli http://logs.openstack.org/96/527396/11/check/openstack-tox-py27/7cf69da/job-output.txt.gz#_2018-01-13_18_08_40_533805
15:34:37 zhipeng_ #info crushil_'s generic driver
15:34:41 zhipeng_ #link https://review.openstack.org/525057
15:34:45 zhipeng_ crushil_ any ETA on a full implementation ready for review and landing ?
15:34:48 zhuli liliu, ok, I'm ok with this, will help merge the patch if there is no other objections
15:35:10 Li_Liu Thanks a lot Zhuli
15:35:36 crushil_ zhipeng_, It's almost ready. Need to write accompanying unit tests
15:35:55 crushil_ You can start reviewing now
15:35:59 zhipeng_ sounds gr8t !
15:36:15 zhipeng_ #action land zhuli's pacth today
15:36:31 zhipeng_ #action start reviewing crushil_'s generic driver patch
15:37:03 zhipeng_ i think what we miss now is the conductor's report functionality to sync up resource info with Placement
15:37:14 zhipeng_ jkilpatr could you help on this ?
15:37:30 zhipeng_ on the basis of zhuli's patch
15:37:54 Vipparthy Also Zhipeng, Any feedback on Cyborg-Nova Integration Code
15:38:15 jkilpatr zhipeng_, this is on crushil_'s patch?
15:38:30 jkilpatr or zhuli's patch?
15:38:51 zhipeng_ zhuli's
15:39:17 jkilpatr I'll look at it
15:39:31 zhipeng_ something like adding a report.py from nova-compute to cyborg-conductor
15:39:42 zhipeng_ with the corresponding modifications
15:40:45 zhipeng_ #action jkilpatr to start working on the cyborg-conductor report function
15:41:13 zhipeng_ Vipparthy the above mentioned code is about the cyborg-nova integration
15:41:27 zhipeng_ Dutch dude are you still around ?
15:43:58 zhipeng_ $topic Xilinx SDAccel introduction
15:44:07 zhipeng_ #topic Xilinx SDAccel introduction
15:45:29 zhipeng #topic Xilinx SDAccel introduction
15:45:50 zhipeng So I'm glad to have Dutch from Xilinx to join our dev team
15:45:58 zhipeng Dutch the floor is yours sir
15:46:30 zhuli dutch welcome
15:47:20 Dutch Thanks! Hey everyone, I work with the Xilinx SDAccel team on our cloud program. I can help provide any resources or support from Xilinx. Also can help with SDAccel framework in general
15:48:10 Dutch We are still coming up to speed on the Cyborg project but the project looks great and we are happy to get involved
15:49:54 zhipeng Dutch could you provide some info on SDAccel ?
15:50:37 Dutch Sure, SDAccel is basically the framework for PCIe attached Xilinx FPGAs. Currently we use two PFs. PF0 is user space for DMA and PF1 is management for ioctls
15:52:02 Dutch Are people familiar with the driver at all?
15:52:17 zhipeng I think you could give a quick overview :P
15:52:52 Dutch Haha, I can't say I have done it over IRC before, this is usually consumed in slides with lots of images
15:53:39 Dutch Also, caution, I am not on the drivers team, so there are times when I don't know all the details
15:53:42 zhipeng haha i know
15:53:55 zhipeng maybe you could drop a link here ?
15:54:01 zhipeng for a good overview slide ?
15:54:29 Dutch Sure #link https://www.xilinx.com/html_docs/xilinx2017_4/sdaccel_doc/index.html
15:54:37 zhuli thanks, that's very helpful
15:55:20 Dutch These are most of the user guides in one place instead of dealing with the PDFs, contents are the same
15:55:21 zhipeng gr8t thx!
15:55:40 zhipeng are there any support yet in the OpenStack for SDAccel ?
15:55:46 zhipeng for example nova driver ?
15:56:41 Dutch There is also a helpful platform guide UG1164, this is still a PDF
15:56:47 Dutch #link https://www.xilinx.com/support/documentation/sw_manuals/xilinx2017_4/ug1164-sdaccel-platform-development.pdf
15:57:11 NokMikeR are there any xilinx parts with an open bitstream? (and tools to program them)?
15:57:33 Dutch Still no nova support, our openstack cluster is using pass-through, which as you can image is a serious limitation
15:59:08 Dutch The drivers could be open, but bitstream generation is IP so unlikely we will ever see that open
16:00:00 Dutch NokMikeR, what in particular do you want open?
16:00:40 NokMikeR any way to program the device via e.g an arm cpu so the synthesis and routing is done on the board - that way the entry level for the programmer is lower.
16:03:13 Dutch For drivers and runtime, absolutely. For synthesis and P&R, I am less sure.
16:04:01 Dutch I am also not sure what "done on the board" means
16:04:59 NokMikeR pcie board with fpga + additional cpu to generate the bitstream. you send that vhdl/verilog, "other code" and it all magically works :)
16:05:34 NokMikeR self contained basically. no reliance on vivado etc.

Earlier   Later