RE: [OT] M$ wants their layoff $$ back

A very revealing comment.

-----Original Message-----

From: profox-bounces@leafe.com [mailto:profox-bounces@leafe.com] On Behalf

Of Michael Madigan

Sent: Tuesday, 24 February 2009 8:34 AM

To: ProFox Email List

Subject: Re: [OT] M$ wants their layoff $$ back

Based on what formula? IF someone writes you a check and then says I paid

you too much, how do you know?

"Microsoft wants the money back within two weeks. The incentive? An adjusted

employee tax statement from Microsoft. Otherwise, you're liable for the

income tax on the extra cash."

I'll pay the extra income tax, thanks!

*************************************************

1/20/2013 Eviction Notice

--- On Mon, 2/23/09, Ken Kixmoeller/fh

<foxhelp@information-architecture.com> wrote:

> From: Ken Kixmoeller/fh <foxhelp@information-architecture.com>

> Subject: Re: [OT] M$ wants their layoff $$ back

> To: "ProFox Email List" <profox@leafe.com>

> Date: Monday, February 23, 2009, 4:16 PM

> On Feb 23, 2009, at 3:08 PM, Michael Madigan wrote:

> > What's unethical?

> Oh, let me ponder this... "What's unethical about

> keeping money to

> which you are not entitled?" Gee, that is a tough one.

> _______________________________________________

> Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com

> Subscription Maintenance:

> OT-free version of this list:

> This message:

information-architecture.com

> ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are

> the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or

> medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for

> those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.

[excessive quoting removed by server]