Hi guys
One of my customers has an issue. First a user has my VFP9 program with the
program in program files 86 and the runtimes in common files. All works
fine. New user added and this user gets a problem with resource files not
found. I assume these are the ones in common files plus the c++ dll. Anyone
know why one user works and the other fails?
TIA
Al
_______________________________________________
Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com
Subscription Maintenance: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox
OT-free version of this list: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech
Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox
This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/421DC267A8254A0AADC26AEDB22FED80@gslredacer
** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
So, these two users are sharing the same machine?
I'd be inclined to have the second user install the app also, since
Windows does weird things these days with folder redirections.
On Sat, Nov 19, 2016 at 7:49 AM, Allen <profox@gatwicksoftware.com> wrote:
> Hi guys
> One of my customers has an issue. First a user has my VFP9 program with the
> program in program files 86 and the runtimes in common files. All works
> fine. New user added and this user gets a problem with resource files not
> found. I assume these are the ones in common files plus the c++ dll. Anyone
> know why one user works and the other fails?
> TIA
> Al
>
[excessive quoting removed by server]
_______________________________________________
Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com
Subscription Maintenance: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox
OT-free version of this list: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech
Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox
This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/CACW6n4tkzFdAv-EPN791QQ3tAnWF4UML=Eox4Ut5SMikBpop-w@mail.gmail.com
** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
Thanks for the reply Ted.
This behaviour has only started in win 10. I should have, by now, put
everything in its own directory and not used the windows program files. What
with that and appdata it's a big problem. Oh well we learn, eventually. I
wish VFP9 worked on Linux (legally)
Al
-----Original Message-----
From: Ted Roche
Sent: Saturday, November 19, 2016 6:10 PM
To: profoxtech@leafe.com
Subject: Re: VFP9 runtimes windows 10;
So, these two users are sharing the same machine?
I'd be inclined to have the second user install the app also, since
Windows does weird things these days with folder redirections.
On Sat, Nov 19, 2016 at 7:49 AM, Allen <profox@gatwicksoftware.com> wrote:
> Hi guys
> One of my customers has an issue. First a user has my VFP9 program with
> the
> program in program files 86 and the runtimes in common files. All works
> fine. New user added and this user gets a problem with resource files not
> found. I assume these are the ones in common files plus the c++ dll.
> Anyone
> know why one user works and the other fails?
> TIA
> Al
>
[excessive quoting removed by server]
_______________________________________________
Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com
Subscription Maintenance: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox
OT-free version of this list: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech
Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox
This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/FA5059463E4244558E5DF6D3B5FCDA80@gslredacer
** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
m
On Sat, 19 Nov 2016, at 06:03 PM, Allen wrote:
>I
> wish VFP9 worked on Linux (legally)
> Al
Then you could have bits of it in bin,usr, etc and so forth instead.
_______________________________________________
Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com
Subscription Maintenance: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox
OT-free version of this list: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech
Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox
This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/1479595883.1988669.793304265.6F9373AB@webmail.messagingengine.com
** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
And user permissions, file permissions and SELinux permissions, but at
least they would not be intentionally hidden or underdocumented.
On Sat, Nov 19, 2016 at 5:51 PM, Alan Bourke <alanpbourke@fastmail.fm> wrote:
> m
>
> On Sat, 19 Nov 2016, at 06:03 PM, Allen wrote:
> >I
>> wish VFP9 worked on Linux (legally)
>> Al
>
> Then you could have bits of it in bin,usr, etc and so forth instead.
>
[excessive quoting removed by server]
_______________________________________________
Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com
Subscription Maintenance: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox
OT-free version of this list: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech
Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox
This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/CACW6n4tA0FU+w-kmp6F5Zj0V=GvXi6af=p3tpoVH4OirtJXKsQ@mail.gmail.com
** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
Or go back to windows 8 where this didn't happen. And you could also see
your raw photos.
Al
-----Original Message-----
And user permissions, file permissions and SELinux permissions, but at
least they would not be intentionally hidden or underdocumented.
_______________________________________________
Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com
Subscription Maintenance: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox
OT-free version of this list: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech
Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox
This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/000901d2433a$29690bc0$7c3b2340$@com
** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
Very well documented on MSDN.
--
Alan Bourke
alanpbourke (at) fastmail (dot) fm
_______________________________________________
Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com
Subscription Maintenance: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox
OT-free version of this list: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech
Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox
This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/1479722465.3259648.794352905.767AB6B4@webmail.messagingengine.com
** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
Hi Alan
Can you point me a bit nearer please
Al
-----Original Message-----
Very well documented on MSDN.
_______________________________________________
Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com
Subscription Maintenance: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox
OT-free version of this list: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech
Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox
This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/002101d243f1$61217e50$23647af0$@com
** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
Author: mbsoftwaresolutions@mbsoftwaresolutions.com
Posted: 2016-11-22 06:20:42 Link
On 2016-11-19 13:03, Allen wrote:
> I wish VFP9 worked on Linux (legally)
> Al
Al,
I think it could, and I doubt you'd get a legal challenge, but then
again, IANAL and can't pay your legal bills. :-)
_______________________________________________
Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com
Subscription Maintenance: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox
OT-free version of this list: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech
Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox
This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/1f2da8289481f5bbb7a8ba5e7d541135@mbsoftwaresolutions.com
** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
Check out:
1. Wine
2. CrossOver
Worst-case scenario is to use virtualization.
On Tue, Nov 22, 2016 at 8:20 PM,
<mbsoftwaresolutions@mbsoftwaresolutions.com> wrote:
> On 2016-11-19 13:03, Allen wrote:
>>
>> I wish VFP9 worked on Linux (legally)
>> Al
>
> I think it could, and I doubt you'd get a legal challenge, but then again,
> IANAL and can't pay your legal bills. :-)
--
.~. Might, Courage, Vision. SINCERITY!
/ v \ 64-bit Ubuntu 9.10 (Linux kernel 2.6.39.3)
/( _ )\ http://sites.google.com/site/changmw
^ ^ May the Force and farces be with you!
_______________________________________________
Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com
Subscription Maintenance: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox
OT-free version of this list: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech
Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox
This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/CAGv=MJC-4h1LvYBzXjbS6=gHcbOar=cBuURjns=94m6GWbKmUQ@mail.gmail.com
** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.