Author: Ted Roche
Posted: 2016-11-19 at 17:35:47
And user permissions, file permissions and SELinux permissions, but at
least they would not be intentionally hidden or underdocumented.
On Sat, Nov 19, 2016 at 5:51 PM, Alan Bourke <alanpbourke@fastmail.fm> wrote:
> m
>
> On Sat, 19 Nov 2016, at 06:03 PM, Allen wrote:
> >I
>> wish VFP9 worked on Linux (legally)
>> Al
>
> Then you could have bits of it in bin,usr, etc and so forth instead.
>
[excessive quoting removed by server]
_______________________________________________
Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com
Subscription Maintenance: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox
OT-free version of this list: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech
Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox
This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/CACW6n4tA0FU+w-kmp6F5Zj0V=GvXi6af=p3tpoVH4OirtJXKsQ@mail.gmail.com
** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.