Disputed isle in Bay of Bengal disappears into sea. http://articles.latimes.com/2010/mar/25/world/la-fg-disappearing-island25-2010mar25
Result of global warming. Seventeen percent of Bengal will be under water by 2050.
--- StripMime Report -- processed MIME parts ---
multipart/alternative
text/plain (text body -- kept)
text/html
---
_______________________________________________
Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com
Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox
OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech
Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox
This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/0561BC54A096441CA082EC8565503292@dual
** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
Nothing in that article to indicate that it was "global warming" that
caused the island to disappear.
::michael
Nicholas Geti wrote:
> Disputed isle in Bay of Bengal disappears into sea. http://articles.latimes.com/2010/mar/25/world/la-fg-disappearing-island25-2010mar25
>
> Result of global warming. Seventeen percent of Bengal will be under water by 2050.
>
>
> --- StripMime Report -- processed MIME parts ---
> multipart/alternative
> text/plain (text body -- kept)
> text/html
> ---
>
[excessive quoting removed by server]
_______________________________________________
Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com
Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox
OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech
Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox
This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/4BACDFA2.8020005@gmail.com
** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
Author: Virgil Bierschwale
Posted: 2010-03-26 12:42:33 Link
or that it wont reverse in a few years
On 3/26/2010 11:24 AM, Michael Oke, II wrote:
> Nothing in that article to indicate that it was "global warming" that
> caused the island to disappear.
>
> ::michael
>
> Nicholas Geti wrote:
>
>> Disputed isle in Bay of Bengal disappears into sea. http://articles.latimes.com/2010/mar/25/world/la-fg-disappearing-island25-2010mar25
>>
>> Result of global warming. Seventeen percent of Bengal will be under water by 2050.
>>
>>
>> --- StripMime Report -- processed MIME parts ---
>> multipart/alternative
>> text/plain (text body -- kept)
>> text/html
>> ---
>>
>>
[excessive quoting removed by server]
_______________________________________________
Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com
Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox
OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech
Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox
This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/4BACE3F9.7020805@ktc.com
** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
On Fri, Mar 26, 2010 at 11:42 AM, Virgil Bierschwale <vbiersch@ktc.com> wrote:
> or that it wont reverse in a few years
---------------
Ask the city of Venice about their experience in that.
--
Stephen Russell
Sr. Production Systems Programmer
CIMSgts
901.246-0159 cell
_______________________________________________
Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com
Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox
OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech
Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox
This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/c4313dbe1003260948q47b2d69fjf0b79f0414a4a92f@mail.gmail.com
** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
Author: Virgil Bierschwale
Posted: 2010-03-26 13:02:16 Link
venice is a much different situation as it was already at sea level.
we have at most, 200 years worth of valid data, and by that I mean
accurate and something that historians havent rewritten over the centuries
who is to say that in another 200 years we won't be back where we are at?
On 3/26/2010 11:48 AM, Stephen Russell wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 26, 2010 at 11:42 AM, Virgil Bierschwale<vbiersch@ktc.com> wrote:
>
>> or that it wont reverse in a few years
>>
> ---------------
>
> Ask the city of Venice about their experience in that.
>
>
>
>
>
> No virus found in this incoming message.
> Checked by AVG - www.avg.com
> Version: 9.0.791 / Virus Database: 271.1.1/2771 - Release Date: 03/26/10 02:33:00
>
>
--
Virgil Bierschwale
Vets Finding Vets <http://www.VetsFindingVets.org>
Keep America At Work <http://www.KeepAmericaAtWork.com>
--- StripMime Report -- processed MIME parts ---
multipart/alternative
text/plain (text body -- kept)
text/html
---
_______________________________________________
Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com
Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox
OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech
Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox
This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/4BACE898.7070200@ktc.com
** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
On Fri, Mar 26, 2010 at 12:02 PM, Virgil Bierschwale <vbiersch@ktc.com> wrote:
> venice is a much different situation as it was already at sea level.
> we have at most, 200 years worth of valid data, and by that I mean
> accurate and something that historians havent rewritten over the centuries
>
> who is to say that in another 200 years we won't be back where we are at?
-------------------
Historians, scientists, locals, who else won't you listen to?
BTW this island is at sea level as well. ;->
--
Stephen Russell
Sr. Production Systems Programmer
CIMSgts
901.246-0159 cell
_______________________________________________
Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com
Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox
OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech
Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox
This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/c4313dbe1003261007y7a49c07cm8bec865f3e2444b5@mail.gmail.com
** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
Author: Virgil Bierschwale
Posted: 2010-03-26 13:10:22 Link
well aware of it.
so exactly how many feet has the sea risen?
Lets just say that its 100 feet.
if that is the case, why isn't venice underwater?
On 3/26/2010 12:07 PM, Stephen Russell wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 26, 2010 at 12:02 PM, Virgil Bierschwale<vbiersch@ktc.com> wrote:
>
>> venice is a much different situation as it was already at sea level.
>> we have at most, 200 years worth of valid data, and by that I mean
>> accurate and something that historians havent rewritten over the centuries
>>
>> who is to say that in another 200 years we won't be back where we are at?
>>
> -------------------
>
> Historians, scientists, locals, who else won't you listen to?
>
> BTW this island is at sea level as well. ;->
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> No virus found in this incoming message.
> Checked by AVG - www.avg.com
> Version: 9.0.791 / Virus Database: 271.1.1/2771 - Release Date: 03/26/10 02:33:00
>
>
--
Virgil Bierschwale
Vets Finding Vets <http://www.VetsFindingVets.org>
Keep America At Work <http://www.KeepAmericaAtWork.com>
--- StripMime Report -- processed MIME parts ---
multipart/alternative
text/plain (text body -- kept)
text/html
---
_______________________________________________
Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com
Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox
OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech
Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox
This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/4BACEA7E.7000802@ktc.com
** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
On Fri, Mar 26, 2010 at 12:10 PM, Virgil Bierschwale <vbiersch@ktc.com> wrote:
> well aware of it.
> so exactly how many feet has the sea risen?
>
> Lets just say that its 100 feet.
> if that is the case, why isn't venice underwater?
------------------
Why don't you say how many inches and not feet? if it has risen 15
inches in 800 years that will make quite a few indoor swimming pools
in Venice.
--
Stephen Russell
Sr. Production Systems Programmer
CIMSgts
901.246-0159 cell
_______________________________________________
Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com
Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox
OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech
Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox
This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/c4313dbe1003261018m7ecc00d6p700fab6c1797145e@mail.gmail.com
** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
Virgil Bierschwale wrote:
> venice is a much different situation as it was already at sea level.
> we have at most, 200 years worth of valid data, and by that I mean
> accurate and something that historians havent rewritten over the centuries
>
> who is to say that in another 200 years we won't be back where we are at?
>
Yesterday I met this bloke. He had an ugly face and looked dangerous,
but I told myself - I've only seen him for about a minute, I don't have
enough data to judge him.-
Then he looked at me in an aggressive way, I told myself - It can be
interpreted in many ways, maybe he looks at me this way for some other
reason. -
I saw him curl his fist and prepare a punch and I told myself - Don't
get ahead of yourself, he may be aiming at somebody else, I've only seen
him for 5 minutes, I don't have enough data to know for certain he
intends to hit me.-
After he hit the shit out of me, while I was in the floor bleeding I
understood the old adage that says that if it looks like shit and smells
like shit you don't have to taste it to know it is shit. All these
pseudo-reasons you wave in front of us would be moot if it were YOUR
home, YOUR town, and YOUR family in danger. You'd just be preparing to
get out.
_______________________________________________
Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com
Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox
OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech
Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox
This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/4BACEC6A.4070502@gmail.com
** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
Author: Virgil Bierschwale
Posted: 2010-03-26 13:37:48 Link
agreed, except for one minor thing.
How do we know that all of the drilling and taking out oil and water
aren't displacing things?
How do we know that the latest conspiracy theory about our cia inventing
some type of earthquake making machines isn't having unintended side effects
There are so many possibilities and we won't know which one is correct
until history has recorded it.
at least that is the way it used to be because now we have countries
that are rewriting history.
Yeah I know ya'll don't like thinking about anything but the details,
and even I will admit that I used to believe everything I read or saw in
the media, but the last 9 years or so has taught me well that Tokyo Rose
is alive and well in America, and maybe even in all of the countries and
now I may be labeled a skeptic, but show me proof first, and by proof, I
don't mean proof that scients have knowingly doctored up to lend
credibility to their theory.
Bottom line, we don't know that island wasnt underwater 1,000 years ago.
On 3/26/2010 12:18 PM, Ricardo Ar