well aware of it.

so exactly how many feet has the sea risen?

Lets just say that its 100 feet.

if that is the case, why isn't venice underwater?

On 3/26/2010 12:07 PM, Stephen Russell wrote:

> On Fri, Mar 26, 2010 at 12:02 PM, Virgil Bierschwale<vbiersch@ktc.com> wrote:

>

>> venice is a much different situation as it was already at sea level.

>> we have at most, 200 years worth of valid data, and by that I mean

>> accurate and something that historians havent rewritten over the centuries

>>

>> who is to say that in another 200 years we won't be back where we are at?

>>

> -------------------

>

> Historians, scientists, locals, who else won't you listen to?

>

> BTW this island is at sea level as well. ;->

>

>

>

>

>

>

>

> No virus found in this incoming message.

> Checked by AVG - www.avg.com

> Version: 9.0.791 / Virus Database: 271.1.1/2771 - Release Date: 03/26/10 02:33:00

>

>

--

Virgil Bierschwale

Vets Finding Vets <http://www.VetsFindingVets.org>

Keep America At Work <http://www.KeepAmericaAtWork.com>

--- StripMime Report -- processed MIME parts ---

multipart/alternative

text/plain (text body -- kept)

text/html

---

_______________________________________________

Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com

Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox

OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech

Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox

This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/4BACEA7E.7000802@ktc.com

** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.