via Twitter @laprice:
If you had any doubts that symantec was doomed, you may now abandon
them.
Matt Jarvis
Programmer/DBA
King | Retail Solutions
Electronic Privacy Notice. This e-mail, and any attachments, contains inf=
ormation that is, or may be, covered by electronic communications privacy l=
aws, and is also confidential and proprietary in nature. If you are not the=
intended recipient, please be advised that you are legally prohibited from=
retaining, using, copying, distributing, or otherwise disclosing this info=
rmation in any manner. Instead, please reply to the sender that you have re=
ceived this communication in error, and then immediately delete it. Thank y=
ou in advance for your cooperation.
Matt Jarvis wrote:
> via Twitter @laprice:
>
> If you had any doubts that symantec was doomed, you may now abandon
> them.
>
Hi Matt,
Didn't they try this in dos 6 something-or-other? ROFL!
In other news, a lady on the SLUG Linux list had some intruder from
Romania logged into her *LINUX* box and hung KDE for her. She is going
through it now trying to figure out what the intruder did.
She said her root password was "incredibly weak" and she has now changed it.
--
Regards,
Pete
How well did the Microsoft Anti-Spyware software work out? LOL
--- On Thu, 6/18/09, Matt Jarvis <matt.jarvis@kingrs.com> wrote:
> From: Matt Jarvis <matt.jarvis@kingrs.com>
> Subject: [NF] the end of Symantec?
> To: profox@leafe.com
> Date: Thursday, June 18, 2009, 5:12 PM
> via Twitter @laprice:
>
> If you had any doubts that symantec was doomed, you may now
> abandon
> them.
>
>
>
> Matt Jarvis
> Programmer/DBA
> King | Retail Solutions
>
>
>
>
>
>
> Electronic Privacy Notice. This e-mail, and any
> attachments, contains information that is, or may be,
> covered by electronic communications privacy laws, and is
> also confidential and proprietary in nature. If you are not
> the intended recipient, please be advised that you are
> legally prohibited from retaining, using, copying,
> distributing, or otherwise disclosing this information in
> any manner. Instead, please reply to the sender that you
> have received this communication in error, and then
> immediately delete it. Thank you in advance for your
> cooperation.
>
[excessive quoting removed by server]
Well for us now its free
Al
-----Original Message-----
From: profoxtech-bounces@leafe.com [mailto:profoxtech-bounces@leafe.com] On
Behalf Of Michael Madigan
Sent: 18 June 2009 18:07
To: profoxtech@leafe.com
Subject: Re: [NF] the end of Symantec?
How well did the Microsoft Anti-Spyware software work out? LOL
--- On Thu, 6/18/09, Matt Jarvis <matt.jarvis@kingrs.com> wrote:
> From: Matt Jarvis <matt.jarvis@kingrs.com>
> Subject: [NF] the end of Symantec?
> To: profox@leafe.com
> Date: Thursday, June 18, 2009, 5:12 PM
> via Twitter @laprice:
>
> If you had any doubts that symantec was doomed, you may now
> abandon
> them.
>
>
>
> Matt Jarvis
> Programmer/DBA
> King | Retail Solutions
>
>
>
>
>
>
> Electronic Privacy Notice. This e-mail, and any
> attachments, contains information that is, or may be,
> covered by electronic communications privacy laws, and is
> also confidential and proprietary in nature. If you are not
> the intended recipient, please be advised that you are
> legally prohibited from retaining, using, copying,
> distributing, or otherwise disclosing this information in
> any manner. Instead, please reply to the sender that you
> have received this communication in error, and then
> immediately delete it. Thank you in advance for your
> cooperation.
>
[excessive quoting removed by server]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=
gil hale wrote:
> Free at what cost? If it fails to work as well as Symantec's AV solutions, who pays (dollars or time)? M$, or the hapless victim who was foolish to think that somehow this time for sure M$ actually got it right? My money is not on M$ to provide a thorough solution.
>
> Gil
Hi Gil,
Chicks still dig a guy worth over a billion.
--
Regards,
Pete
Not the chicks you want to spend your life with.=0A=0A=0A******************=
******************************* =0AJoin the OBAMA RESISTANCE MOVEMENT!=0A=
=0Ahttp://www.cafepress.com/rightwingmike/6181419=0A=0A=0A--- On Thu, 6/18/=
09, Pete Theisen <petetheisen@verizon.net> wrote:=0A=0A> From: Pete Theisen=
<petetheisen@verizon.net>=0A> Subject: Re: [NF] the end of Symantec?=0A> T=
o: "ProFox Email List" <profox@leafe.com>=0A> Date: Thursday, June 18, 2009=
, 7:23 PM=0A> gil hale wrote:=0A> > Free at what cost?=A0 If it fails to wo=
rk as well=0A> as Symantec's AV solutions, who pays (dollars or=0A> time)?=
=A0 M$, or the hapless victim who was foolish to=0A> think that somehow thi=
s time for sure M$ actually got it=0A> right?=A0 My money is not on M$ to p=
rovide a thorough=0A> solution.=0A> > =0A> > Gil=0A> =0A> Hi Gil,=0A> =0A> =
Chicks still dig a guy worth over a billion.=0A> =0A> -- =0A> Regards,=0A> =
=0A> Pete=0A> http://pete-theisen.com/=0A> http://elect-pete-theisen.com/=
=0A> =0A> _______________________________________________=0A> Post Messages=
to: ProFox@leafe.com=0A> Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailma=
n/listinfo/profox=0A> OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailma=
n/listinfo/profoxtech=0A> Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/sea=
rch/profox=0A> This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/4A3ACC6=
7.7040906@verizon.net=0A> ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwi=
se, are=0A> the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or=0A> =
medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for=0A> those lawye=
rs who are too stupid to see the obvious.=0A>
Michael Madigan wrote:
> Not the chicks you want to spend your life with.
Hi Michael!
Not me, not you, the Gates guy's lunch companions.
>>> Free at what cost? If it fails to work as well
>> as Symantec's AV solutions, who pays (dollars or time)? M$, or the
>> hapless victim who was foolish to think that somehow this time for
>> sure M$ actually got it right? My money is not on M$ to provide a
>> thorough solution.
>> Chicks still dig a guy worth over a billion.
--
Regards,
Pete
As I use avg im not bothered anyway
Allen
-----Original Message-----
From: profoxtech-bounces@leafe.com [mailto:profoxtech-bounces@leafe.com] On
Behalf Of gil hale
Sent: 18 June 2009 18:50
To: profoxtech@leafe.com
Subject: Re: [NF] the end of Symantec?
Free at what cost? If it fails to work as well as Symantec's AV solutions,
who pays (dollars or time)? M$, or the hapless victim who was foolish to
think that somehow this time for sure M$ actually got it right? My money is
not on M$ to provide a thorough solution.
I had to disable the MS Anti-Spyware because it just slowed my machine to a=
crawl. I bet this will be the same.=0A=0A =0A=0A--- On Thu, 6/18/09, Alle=
n <profox@gatwicksoftware.com> wrote:=0A=0A> From: Allen <profox@gatwicksof=
tware.com>=0A> Subject: RE: [NF] the end of Symantec?=0A> To: profox@leafe.=
com=0A> Date: Thursday, June 18, 2009, 9:42 PM=0A> As I use avg im not both=
ered anyway=0A> Allen=0A> > -----Original Message-----=0A> From: profoxtech=
-bounces@leafe.com=0A> [mailto:profoxtech-bounces@leafe.com]=0A> On=0A> Beh=
alf Of gil hale=0A> Sent: 18 June 2009 18:50=0A> To: profoxtech@leafe.com=
=0A> Subject: Re: [NF] the end of Symantec?=0A> =0A> Free at what cost?=A0 =
If it fails to work as well as=0A> Symantec's AV solutions,=0A> who pays (d=
ollars or time)?=A0 M$, or the hapless victim=0A> who was foolish to=0A> th=
ink that somehow this time for sure M$ actually got it=0A> right?=A0 My mon=
ey is=0A> not on M$ to provide a thorough solution.=0A> =0A> =0A> _________=
______________________________________=0A> Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.c=
om=0A> Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox=
=0A> OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox=
tech=0A> Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox=0A> Th=
is message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/04C087313E9447C6B3647029=
5708F5B6@GSL.local=0A> ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise,=
are=0A> the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or=0A> med=
ical advice. This statement is added to the messages for=0A> those lawyers =
who are too stupid to see the obvious.=0A>