I had to disable the MS Anti-Spyware because it just slowed my machine to a=

crawl. I bet this will be the same.=0A=0A =0A=0A--- On Thu, 6/18/09, Alle=

n <profox@gatwicksoftware.com> wrote:=0A=0A> From: Allen <profox@gatwicksof=

tware.com>=0A> Subject: RE: [NF] the end of Symantec?=0A> To: profox@leafe.=

com=0A> Date: Thursday, June 18, 2009, 9:42 PM=0A> As I use avg im not both=

ered anyway=0A> Allen=0A> > -----Original Message-----=0A> From: profoxtech=

-bounces@leafe.com=0A> [mailto:profoxtech-bounces@leafe.com]=0A> On=0A> Beh=

alf Of gil hale=0A> Sent: 18 June 2009 18:50=0A> To: profoxtech@leafe.com=

=0A> Subject: Re: [NF] the end of Symantec?=0A> =0A> Free at what cost?=A0 =

If it fails to work as well as=0A> Symantec's AV solutions,=0A> who pays (d=

ollars or time)?=A0 M$, or the hapless victim=0A> who was foolish to=0A> th=

ink that somehow this time for sure M$ actually got it=0A> right?=A0 My mon=

ey is=0A> not on M$ to provide a thorough solution.=0A> =0A> =0A> _________=

______________________________________=0A> Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.c=

om=0A> Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox=

=0A> OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox=

tech=0A> Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox=0A> Th=

is message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/04C087313E9447C6B3647029=

5708F5B6@GSL.local=0A> ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise,=

are=0A> the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or=0A> med=

ical advice. This statement is added to the messages for=0A> those lawyers =

who are too stupid to see the obvious.=0A>