Index
2007-03-29 14:25Ted Roche : Re: [OT] - RE: Energy efficient vehicles
2007-03-29 14:31Ed Leafe : Re: [OT] - RE: Energy efficient vehicles
2007-03-29 14:50Michael Madigan : Re: [OT] - RE: Energy efficient vehicles
2007-03-29 14:55Michael Madigan : Re: [OT] - RE: Energy efficient vehicles
2007-03-29 17:57Ed Leafe : Re: [OT] - RE: Energy efficient vehicles
2007-03-29 18:29Ricardo Aráoz : Re: [OT] - RE: Energy efficient vehicles
2007-03-29 18:54Michael Madigan : Re: [OT] - RE: Energy efficient vehicles
2007-03-30 10:25Vince Teachout : Re: [OT] - RE: Energy efficient vehicles
2007-03-30 18:27Ricardo Aráoz : Re: [OT] - RE: Energy efficient vehicles
2007-03-31 08:00Stephen the Cook : [OT] - RE: Energy efficient vehicles
Back to top
Re: [OT] - RE: Energy efficient vehicles

Author: Ted Roche

Posted: 2007-03-29 14:25:09   Link

On 3/29/07, Chet Gardiner <chetdude@pacbell.net> wrote:

> Not when you don't have to factor in the cost of a bloated military to

> insure that we continue get "OUR" cheap oil... ;-)

Oh, for cripes sake. Tell me you don't think this is Off-Topic. Take

it there, please. All you have to do is alter the subject line, as I

did above.

> Europe was "stupid" enough to invest in a great inter-city rail system

> including in many cases high-speed rail. The great cities of Europe are

> also laid out in such a way that most of the time one doesn't need a car

> around town either...silly Europeans.

Agreed. And the US and Allies did a fine job of rebuilding them as

part of the Marshall Plan after we and the opposition blew them to

pieces. I wish we'd do as good a job on the Amtrak Acela. Great idea,

poorly funded and supported.

> I'd rather travel by rail and Metro in Europe than by air OR motor

> vehicle anywhere else.

Yep, I have fond memories of taking a series of trains out into the

hinterlands of the Netherlands late last century. A great system.

But NotFox. NotTechnology. OffTopic. Please.

Darcy won't be the only one unsubscribing if we keep trashing the

mailing list like this.

--

Ted Roche

Ted Roche & Associates, LLC

http://www.tedroche.com

©2007 Ted Roche
Back to top
Re: [OT] - RE: Energy efficient vehicles

Author: Ed Leafe

Posted: 2007-03-29 14:31:01   Link

On Mar 29, 2007, at 3:25 PM, Ted Roche wrote:

> Darcy won't be the only one unsubscribing if we keep trashing the

> mailing list like this.

I have a splinter in my finger, so I'll cut off my arm.

Twit filters are a much better solution than unsubscribing when the

problems stem from a consistent small group of people who can't be

bothered to be considerate of others. I'd probably hate the list

without 'em.

-- Ed Leafe

-- http://leafe.com

-- http://dabodev.com

©2007 Ed Leafe
Back to top
Re: [OT] - RE: Energy efficient vehicles

Author: Michael Madigan

Posted: 2007-03-29 14:50:16   Link

We took the trains from ingolstadt to Munich and back

several times while I was in Germany.

We loved the cleanliness and convenience of the trains

as well as the Munich subway.

However.

In the US there is no real rail alternatives and

people are not going to get behind rail travel except

for limited point to point destinations.

Taking the train from NJ to Washington DC is good, but

there's no way to get from here to Louisville without

going through Chicago. So it's either bus, plane or

car.

Additionally, rail is almost as expensive as flying.

--- Ted Roche <tedroche@gmail.com> wrote:

> On 3/29/07, Chet Gardiner <chetdude@pacbell.net>

> wrote:

>

> > Not when you don't have to factor in the cost of a

> bloated military to

> > insure that we continue get "OUR" cheap oil...

> ;-)

>

> Oh, for cripes sake. Tell me you don't think this is

> Off-Topic. Take

> it there, please. All you have to do is alter the

> subject line, as I

> did above.

>

> > Europe was "stupid" enough to invest in a great

> inter-city rail system

> > including in many cases high-speed rail. The

> great cities of Europe are

> > also laid out in such a way that most of the time

> one doesn't need a car

> > around town either...silly Europeans.

>

> Agreed. And the US and Allies did a fine job of

> rebuilding them as

> part of the Marshall Plan after we and the

> opposition blew them to

> pieces. I wish we'd do as good a job on the Amtrak

> Acela. Great idea,

> poorly funded and supported.

>

> > I'd rather travel by rail and Metro in Europe than

> by air OR motor

> > vehicle anywhere else.

>

> Yep, I have fond memories of taking a series of

> trains out into the

> hinterlands of the Netherlands late last century. A

> great system.

>

> But NotFox. NotTechnology. OffTopic. Please.

>

> Darcy won't be the only one unsubscribing if we keep

> trashing the

> mailing list like this.

>

> --

> Ted Roche

> Ted Roche & Associates, LLC

> http://www.tedroche.com

>

>

> _______________________________________________

> Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com

> Subscription Maintenance:

> http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox

> OT-free version of this list:

> http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech

> ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise,

> are the opinions of the author, and do not

> constitute legal or medical advice. This statement

> is added to the messages for those lawyers who are

> too stupid to see the obvious.

>

©2007 Michael Madigan
Back to top
Re: [OT] - RE: Energy efficient vehicles

Author: Michael Madigan

Posted: 2007-03-29 14:55:49   Link

Chet believes the TV infomercials too. "All the Rage

in Europe", "Most popular can opener in Europe",

"Europe's favorite pasta fork, The Eurofork".

LMAO

--- Derek Kalweit <dkalweit@gmail.com> wrote:

> On 3/29/07, Chet Gardiner <chetdude@pacbell.net>

> wrote:

> > Europe was "stupid" enough to invest in a great

> inter-city rail system

> > including in many cases high-speed rail. The

> great cities of Europe are

> > also laid out in such a way that most of the time

> one doesn't need a car

> > around town either...silly Europeans.

> >

> > I'd rather travel by rail and Metro in Europe than

> by air OR motor

> > vehicle anywhere else.

>

> Chet, why are you moving to Tuscon instead of

> Europe? Seems you like

> everything there better...

>

>

> --

> Derek

>

>

> _______________________________________________

> Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com

> Subscription Maintenance:

> http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox

> OT-free version of this list:

> http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech

> ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise,

> are the opinions of the author, and do not

> constitute legal or medical advice. This statement

> is added to the messages for those lawyers who are

> too stupid to see the obvious.

>

Right Wing, Conservative and Republican Gear!

http://www.cafepress.com/rightwingmike

Thoroughbred Horse Racing Group

http://sports.groups.yahoo.com/group/mikes_horse_racing/

©2007 Michael Madigan
Back to top
Re: [OT] - RE: Energy efficient vehicles

Author: Ed Leafe

Posted: 2007-03-29 17:57:34   Link

On Mar 29, 2007, at 6:56 PM, Ricardo Aráoz wrote:

> Lucky me, we are paying around U$ 0.50/Litre. And still we complain!

What's worse is people who complain about $3/gallon for gasoline,

but merrily pay $1 for a pint of water.

-- Ed Leafe

-- http://leafe.com

-- http://dabodev.com

©2007 Ed Leafe
Back to top
Re: [OT] - RE: Energy efficient vehicles

Author: Ricardo Aráoz

Posted: 2007-03-29 18:29:46   Link

Ed Leafe wrote:

> On Mar 29, 2007, at 6:56 PM, Ricardo Aráoz wrote:

>

>> Lucky me, we are paying around U$ 0.50/Litre. And still we complain!

>

> What's worse is people who complain about $3/gallon for gasoline,

> but merrily pay $1 for a pint of water.

>

Spent some time in UK and always thought a pint could only refer to

beer. ;c)

©2007 Ricardo Aráoz
Back to top
Re: [OT] - RE: Energy efficient vehicles

Author: Michael Madigan

Posted: 2007-03-29 18:54:36   Link

The first funny thing you've ever said.

> Wow! You really have high temperatures over there.

> Around here water

> boils at 100°.

©2007 Michael Madigan
Back to top
Re: [OT] - RE: Energy efficient vehicles

Author: Vince Teachout

Posted: 2007-03-30 10:25:40   Link

Kenneth Kixmoeller/fh wrote:

> "Sheep!" (--> [OT])

>

Honestly, I don't think sheep are all that energy efficient, as a means

of transportation.

©2007 Vince Teachout
Back to top
Re: [OT] - RE: Energy efficient vehicles

Author: Ricardo Aráoz

Posted: 2007-03-30 18:27:58   Link

Michael Madigan wrote:

> The first funny thing you've ever said.

>

Michael! You devil!

You keep this and we'll end up dating ,c)

>> Wow! You really have high temperatures over there.

>> Around here water

>> boils at 100°.

>

>

>

[excessive quoting removed by server]

©2007 Ricardo Aráoz
Back to top
[OT] - RE: Energy efficient vehicles

Author: Stephen the Cook

Posted: 2007-03-31 08:00:23   Link

Ed Leafe <> wrote:

> On Mar 30, 2007, at 10:02 AM, Dave Crozier wrote:

>

>> That's why it is impossible to have a boiled egg when you are

>> climbing Everest. One good reason why I don't want to go. <BG>

>

> Boil 'em before starting the climb. Makes the eggs a bit more

> durable, too.

You could just tell the sherpa to go get some more ;->

Stephen Russell

DBA / .Net Developer

Memphis TN 38115

901.246-0159

"A good way to judge people is by observing how they treat those who

can do them absolutely no good." ---Unknown

http://spaces.msn.com/members/srussell/

--

No virus found in this outgoing message.

Checked by AVG Free Edition.

Version: 7.5.446 / Virus Database: 268.18.23/740 - Release Date: 3/30/2007

1:15 PM

©2007 Stephen the Cook