Earlier  
Posted Nick Remark
#openstack-sdks - 2023-02-22
17:19:23 lutimura I have a custom plugin that introduces some commands to the OSC's CLI and also overrides some of the entry points defined by other plugins (e.g., python-glanceclient). Due to these entry points overrides, the order in which my plugin is loaded in OSC is extremely important to determine whether the CLI will be able to redirect the Glance-related commands to my entry points or not (for example, to python-glanceclient's entry points instead).
17:19:44 lutimura So my question is, currently, is there a way to set the plugin load order in OSC? To ensure all custom plugins are loaded last?
18:48:37 frickler lutimura: I don't think that we (want to) support that use case. IMO the best solution for your issue would be to also patch the existing plugins to drop the commands you want to override. or even better, submit your changes upstream for those plugins
19:04:15 opendevreview Merged openstack/os-api-ref master: Fix the 'No such file or directory' error https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/os-api-ref/+/874332
19:04:22 gtema +1 to fricler's statement
20:15:23 lutimura frickler: Thanks for answering. I agree with you. It really makes more sense to keep the plugins focused on extending the CLI instead of overwriting existing entry points (of other plugins). Anyways, I'll think about some alternatives and I'll definitely consider the possibility of going upstream. Again, thank you.
21:21:50 opendevreview Christopher Parks proposed openstack/openstacksdk master: Add share types to shared file systems. https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/openstacksdk/+/783123
21:34:17 opendevreview Christopher Parks proposed openstack/openstacksdk master: Add share types to shared file systems. https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/openstacksdk/+/783123
21:47:59 opendevreview Christopher Parks proposed openstack/openstacksdk master: Add share types to shared file systems. https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/openstacksdk/+/783123
22:28:40 opendevreview Arvid Requate proposed openstack/keystoneauth master: New auth plugin v3oidcdeviceauthz https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/keystoneauth/+/869876
#openstack-sdks - 2023-02-23
01:18:14 opendevreview Christopher Parks proposed openstack/openstacksdk master: Add share types to shared file systems. https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/openstacksdk/+/783123
04:28:58 opendevreview Christopher Parks proposed openstack/openstacksdk master: Add share types to shared file systems. https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/openstacksdk/+/783123
09:09:19 opendevreview Arvid Requate proposed openstack/keystoneauth master: New auth plugin v3oidcdeviceauthz https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/keystoneauth/+/869876
09:15:21 opendevreview Ke Niu proposed openstack/os-api-ref master: remove unicode prefix from code https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/os-api-ref/+/852970
10:54:43 opendevreview Mridula Joshi proposed openstack/openstacksdk master: Adds SDK support for ``glance cache-delete`` https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/openstacksdk/+/874584
11:04:54 noonedeadpunk Fun thing about released ansible-collections 2.0 - they can't be used as of today as now SDK in U-C lower version then needed: https://opendev.org/openstack/requirements/src/branch/master/upper-constraints.txt#L453
11:05:22 noonedeadpunk I bet it was discussed, but is sdk 1.0 will end up in UC for 2023.1?
11:14:29 frickler noonedeadpunk: there are two blockers still if you look at the reqs patch. octaviaclient should get fixed today, not sure about kuryr. also not sure whether it would need and get yet another ffe
11:15:34 frickler we are having the same issue in kolla fwiw
11:16:35 noonedeadpunk Yeah, I truly believe I'm not alone struggling with mathing sdk with collections hehe
11:17:26 noonedeadpunk but it's all fair, I wasn't following closely lately so decided to ask
11:26:45 frickler gtema: did you have any discussion regarding this with reqs or release teams yet? would you want to push that still?
11:35:01 gtema fricler: I wasn't discussing this so far
11:37:50 frickler gtema: so do you think we should keep sdk<1.0 for A? or still bump it despite being in client freeze? https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/releases/+/874864 should fix the osc docs build issue fwiw
11:39:17 gtema No, we should make it >=1.0
11:39:43 gtema We had release for quite a while already
11:40:15 gtema Just that UC patch never landed
11:42:28 frickler yes, because of the above mentioned blockers. I would support ignoring the kuryr issue, as there is a patch for them, just their CI seems broken anyway
11:43:11 frickler do you want to pick this up with the release team? I can try to do it myself, but ptl-authority might work better
12:07:33 gtema So what you think I should discuss with them, approval on finally merging UC patch?
12:13:42 frickler gtema: yes, because formally requirements are frozen now until the release
12:14:45 frickler next step would then be discussing the kuryr situation, not sure if that is also release-affecting
12:16:21 frickler oh, seems that stephenfin has that mostly covered, too. so would need just another ffe likely https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/kuryr-kubernetes/+/874571/4
12:20:18 frickler I just mentioned the situation in #-release, feel free to chime in as you see fit
16:20:05 opendevreview Mridula Joshi proposed openstack/openstacksdk master: Adding support for glance cache-queue Command https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/openstacksdk/+/874372
16:49:35 opendevreview Mridula Joshi proposed openstack/openstacksdk master: Adds Support for ``glance cache-clear`` https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/openstacksdk/+/874940
20:21:57 opendevreview Jakob Meng proposed openstack/ansible-collections-openstack master: Respect description option and delete security group rules first https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/ansible-collections-openstack/+/874960
21:40:11 opendevreview Merged openstack/python-openstackclient master: zuul: Merge osc-functional-devstack-base into only child https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/python-openstackclient/+/863898
22:00:25 opendevreview Merged openstack/ansible-collections-openstack master: Use true and false instead of yes and no for boolean values https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/ansible-collections-openstack/+/874538
23:16:22 opendevreview Christopher Parks proposed openstack/openstacksdk master: Add share types to shared file systems. https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/openstacksdk/+/783123
#openstack-sdks - 2023-02-24
00:14:32 opendevreview Christopher Parks proposed openstack/openstacksdk master: Add share types to shared file systems. https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/openstacksdk/+/783123
09:50:16 opendevreview Christian Kueppers proposed openstack/ansible-collections-openstack master: Fix for AttributeError: 'dict' object has no attribute 'status'. https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/ansible-collections-openstack/+/874996
15:10:34 opendevreview OpenStack Release Bot proposed openstack/keystoneauth stable/2023.1: Update .gitreview for stable/2023.1 https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/keystoneauth/+/875104
15:10:35 opendevreview OpenStack Release Bot proposed openstack/keystoneauth stable/2023.1: Update TOX_CONSTRAINTS_FILE for stable/2023.1 https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/keystoneauth/+/875105
15:10:36 opendevreview OpenStack Release Bot proposed openstack/keystoneauth master: Update master for stable/2023.1 https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/keystoneauth/+/875106
20:01:17 ozzzo_work I'm trying to use the SDK to stop a server with: lambda serverID: cloud.compute.update_server(serverID,'status=SHUTOFF'), and then output = argdict[resource]['stop'](key)
20:01:46 ozzzo_work but I get an error TypeError: update_server() takes 2 positional arguments but 3 were given
20:01:56 ozzzo_work is that not the right way to stop a server?
20:09:44 ozzzo_work This is my code: https://bpa.st/2HVQY
20:12:09 ozzzo_work er... bad paste: it's https://bpa.st/MD3K6
20:12:43 ozzzo_work The relevant lines are 32 and 119
#openstack-sdks - 2023-02-25
04:35:05 opendevreview Reynaldo proposed openstack/openstacksdk master: Add share snapshot instance resource https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/openstacksdk/+/798464
#openstack-sdks - 2023-02-27
12:20:09 opendevreview Merged openstack/os-api-ref master: remove unicode prefix from code https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/os-api-ref/+/852970
13:48:32 opendevreview Mridula Joshi proposed openstack/openstacksdk master: Adds Support for ``glance cache-clear`` https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/openstacksdk/+/874940
14:05:04 opendevreview Mridula Joshi proposed openstack/openstacksdk master: Adding support for glance cache-queue Command https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/openstacksdk/+/874372
14:58:10 opendevreview Merged openstack/keystoneauth stable/2023.1: Update .gitreview for stable/2023.1 https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/keystoneauth/+/875104
15:10:33 opendevreview Merged openstack/keystoneauth stable/2023.1: Update TOX_CONSTRAINTS_FILE for stable/2023.1 https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/keystoneauth/+/875105
15:37:33 ozzzo_work What am I doing wrong here? https://bpa.st/MD3K6
15:38:11 ozzzo_work I'm providing two arguments to update_server but the error says 3 were given
15:39:29 ozzzo_work The 'delete' part where I only pass a variable seems to work - it looks like I may not be passing the text argument correctly
15:40:46 gtema ozzzo_work: you should be using function stop_server(serverID) [https://opendev.org/openstack/openstacksdk/src/branch/master/openstack/compute/v2/_proxy.py#L1092] instead
15:41:39 gtema also - you cannot simply pass parameters as a string into the update. Only passing them as regular function parameters is supported
15:54:18 opendevreview Lajos Katona proposed openstack/openstacksdk master: Add BGPVPN to SDK https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/openstacksdk/+/875530
15:58:49 ozzzo_work gtema: ty! I was looking at https://docs.openstack.org/openstacksdk/latest/user/proxies/compute.html but I see that it is missing some things
16:22:02 ozzzo_work how can I change a text argument into a regular function parameter?
16:44:32 gtema update method accepts same parameters as create call (not all of them are allowed to be changed though)
16:46:37 ozzzo_work I tried "statusVar = "status=SHUTOFF"" and then: lambda serverID,statusVar: cloud.compute.update_server(serverID,statusVar)
16:46:46 ozzzo_work but I still get the "3 were given" error
16:47:35 gtema I repeat - you should use stop_server to shut it down, simply setting it's status is a very very wrong way
16:47:59 ozzzo_work Is that because "status" can't be changed?
16:48:11 gtema second, if you want to i.e. change server name you do conn.compute.update_server(MY_SERVER_ID, name='NEW_NAME')
16:48:17 ozzzo_work I get that, but I still want to know how to set status
16:48:45 gtema status is more or less a read only property set by service side and not by client
16:48:54 ozzzo_work ok I'll try it with name
16:50:30 ozzzo_work ok that works, ty!
19:47:22 opendevreview Lajos Katona proposed openstack/openstacksdk master: Add BGPVPN to SDK https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/openstacksdk/+/875530
20:42:45 ozzzo_work Is there a similar function for disabling a port? I'm looking here but I don't see it: https://opendev.org/openstack/openstacksdk/src/branch/master/openstack/network/v2/_proxy.py
20:49:32 ozzzo_work oic i had to updaate admin_state_up
#openstack-sdks - 2023-02-28
10:08:34 opendevreview Jiri Podivin proposed openstack/cliff master: Removing helper functions providing Python < 3.3 compatibility https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/cliff/+/862689
13:42:17 opendevreview Lajos Katona proposed openstack/openstacksdk master: Add BGPVPN to SDK https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/openstacksdk/+/875530
14:18:37 opendevreview Christopher Scott Parks proposed openstack/openstacksdk master: [WIP] Adds service resource to shared file system https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/openstacksdk/+/873328
18:11:46 opendevreview Christopher Scott Parks proposed openstack/openstacksdk master: [WIP] Adds service resource to shared file system https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/openstacksdk/+/873328
19:03:00 opendevreview Christopher Scott Parks proposed openstack/openstacksdk master: Add share types to shared file systems. https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/openstacksdk/+/783123
19:11:09 opendevreview Benjamin Alan Beasley proposed openstack/cliff master: Use importlib.metadata on Python 3.10+ https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/cliff/+/859579
19:18:06 opendevreview Christopher Scott Parks proposed openstack/openstacksdk master: [WIP] Adds service resource to shared file system https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/openstacksdk/+/873328
19:20:17 opendevreview Christopher Scott Parks proposed openstack/openstacksdk master: [WIP] Adds service resource to shared file system https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/openstacksdk/+/873328
19:20:18 opendevreview Reynaldo proposed openstack/openstacksdk master: Add share network subnet resource to shared file system https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/openstacksdk/+/783582
19:29:04 opendevreview Christopher Scott Parks proposed openstack/openstacksdk master: [WIP] Adds service resource to shared file system https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/openstacksdk/+/873328
20:38:55 opendevreview Christopher Scott Parks proposed openstack/openstacksdk master: Add share types to shared file systems. https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/openstacksdk/+/783123
20:57:44 opendevreview Christopher Scott Parks proposed openstack/openstacksdk master: [WIP] Adds service resource to shared file system https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/openstacksdk/+/873328
22:21:05 opendevreview Samuel Loegering proposed openstack/openstacksdk master: Add share network resource to shared file system https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/openstacksdk/+/873363
23:55:57 opendevreview Christopher Scott Parks proposed openstack/openstacksdk master: Add share types to shared file systems. https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/openstacksdk/+/783123
#openstack-sdks - 2023-03-01
05:39:25 opendevreview Goutham Pacha Ravi proposed openstack/openstacksdk master: Add share access rules to shared file system https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/openstacksdk/+/784162
08:15:38 opendevreview Jiri Podivin proposed openstack/cliff master: Removing helper functions providing Python < 3.3 compatibility https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/cliff/+/862689
08:18:25 opendevreview Jiri Podivin proposed openstack/cliff master: Removing helper functions providing Python < 3.3 compatibility https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/cliff/+/862689
18:43:12 opendevreview Samuel Loegering proposed openstack/openstacksdk master: Add share network resource to shared file system https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/openstacksdk/+/873363
18:44:56 opendevreview Samuel Loegering proposed openstack/openstacksdk master: Add share network resource to shared file system https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/openstacksdk/+/873363
23:14:23 opendevreview Reynaldo proposed openstack/openstacksdk master: Add share network subnet resource to shared file system https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/openstacksdk/+/783582
#openstack-sdks - 2023-03-02
00:56:36 opendevreview Samuel Loegering proposed openstack/openstacksdk master: Add share network resource to shared file system https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/openstacksdk/+/873363
14:10:15 opendevreview OpenStack Release Bot proposed openstack/cliff stable/2023.1: Update .gitreview for stable/2023.1 https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/cliff/+/876125

Earlier   Later