| Posted | Nick | Remark | |
|---|---|---|---|
| #openstack-sdks - 2023-01-31 | |||
| 11:36:52 | whoami-rajat | stephenfin, we've 2 weeks for client release right? or am i missing something | |
| 11:37:24 | stephenfin | Yeah, but we're cycle with intermediary so we can cut effectively whenever so long as we have *a* release per-cycle | |
| 11:38:00 | stephenfin | there are a lot of changes queued up (especially for glance - coverage is looking sooo much better there now) so let's get the bulk of them out before the panic | |
| 11:38:13 | whoami-rajat | ok, I've 3 more commands to add and then cinder will be fully in sync with OSC, at least for the commands part | |
| 11:38:40 | whoami-rajat | so are we planning to release again then with other client releases? | |
| 11:38:50 | stephenfin | Perfect. Ping me if/when you've those up and I'll happily review them. | |
| 11:39:01 | stephenfin | Yeah. We can release whenever it suits us | |
| 11:39:17 | whoami-rajat | cool, I will work on them then, thanks! | |
| 11:39:21 | stephenfin | Let's aim for a 6.2.0 in the next few weeks if you can get cinder coverage closed out | |
| 11:39:48 | whoami-rajat | stephenfin, do you want me to update this? just noticed your comments https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/python-openstackclient/+/869811 | |
| 11:40:03 | whoami-rajat | or better as a followup? | |
| 11:40:11 | stephenfin | follow-up would be better | |
| 11:40:23 | stephenfin | they're nits at best | |
| 11:41:00 | whoami-rajat | ok, sounds good | |
| 11:58:21 | opendevreview | suzhengwei proposed openstack/openstacksdk master: support notification vmoves for masakari https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/openstacksdk/+/872080 | |
| 12:18:55 | lajoskatona | stephenfin, gtema: thanks | |
| 12:41:00 | opendevreview | Merged openstack/python-openstackclient master: Move network trunk commands from python-neutronclient https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/python-openstackclient/+/869447 | |
| 12:43:34 | opendevreview | Merged openstack/python-openstackclient master: Add volume summary command https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/python-openstackclient/+/869436 | |
| 12:48:44 | odyssey4me | hi folks - I see https://review.opendev.org/q/project:openstack/python-openstackclient+branch:stable/wallaby has ~10 patches after the last tagged release... is there an intent to release a new tag at some point soon? | |
| 13:42:10 | opendevreview | Mridula Joshi proposed openstack/openstacksdk master: Add support for glance cache list https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/openstacksdk/+/869710 | |
| 14:10:10 | odyssey4me | never mind my query - wallaby is in extended maintenance, so I guess no more releases there | |
| 14:39:37 | stephenfin | odyssey4me: Yup, no more I'm afraid https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/releases/+/847937 | |
| 14:40:16 | gtema | I would say, now we can have a real party - https://pypi.org/project/openstacksdk/1.0.0/ is there | |
| 14:44:03 | stephenfin | #success openstacksdk 1.0.0 is out 🎉 | |
| 14:44:03 | stephenfin | #success openstacksdk 1.0.0 is out 🎉 | |
| 14:44:06 | opendevstatus | stephenfin: Added success to Success page (https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Successes) | |
| 14:44:33 | odyssey4me | w00t! | |
| 14:45:07 | stephenfin | gtema: did you merge more patches for the container orchestration layer? | |
| 14:45:14 | gtema | :) | |
| 14:45:15 | gtema | yes | |
| 14:45:23 | gtema | coe is also complete | |
| 14:48:49 | opendevreview | Stephen Finucane proposed openstack/openstacksdk master: Update README to indicate COE resource/proxy support https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/openstacksdk/+/872283 | |
| 14:49:15 | stephenfin | gtema: Probably want that so ^ | |
| 14:49:22 | stephenfin | it's trivial | |
| 14:49:59 | gtema | ah, there are too many pages not built from sources. This should be target for R2.0 ;-) | |
| 15:15:32 | opendevreview | Mridula Joshi proposed openstack/openstacksdk master: Add support for glance cache list https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/openstacksdk/+/869710 | |
| 15:29:19 | opendevreview | Merged openstack/openstacksdk master: Update README to indicate COE resource/proxy support https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/openstacksdk/+/872283 | |
| 15:58:51 | opendevreview | Alfredo Moralejo proposed openstack/python-openstackclient stable/wallaby: Replace assertItemsEqual with assertCountEqual https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/python-openstackclient/+/872327 | |
| 16:46:52 | timburke | hi! i've got some concerns about the stable/xena openstacksdk-functional-devstack job: https://zuul.opendev.org/t/openstack/builds?job_name=openstacksdk-functional-devstack&branch=stable%2Fxena | |
| 16:48:12 | timburke | it looks like the recently-merged-to-master https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/openstacksdk/+/865045 is getting picked up on the old stable branch (presumably because of https://github.com/openstack/openstacksdk/blob/master/.zuul.yaml#L34-L42) | |
| 16:49:59 | timburke | which is causing import errors down in python-openstackclient (which *is* using stable/xena) because it picked up an undeclared dependency on munch in https://opendev.org/openstack/python-openstackclient/commit/8b7a2c8d5931f15b69d1ef6baad994f4b9904579 | |
| 17:13:37 | gmann | yeah, I also noticed this in devstack fix on stable/wallaby and openstacksdk-functional-devstack job is failing 100% on <=stable/wallaby https://zuul.openstack.org/builds?job_name=openstacksdk-functional-devstack&branch=stable%2Fxena&branch=stable%2Fwallaby&skip=0 | |
| 17:14:06 | gmann | but If I am not wrong sdk master supposed to work for all supported stable branch ? | |
| 17:23:44 | gtema | gmann, the issue is apparently not the SDK itself, but rather old OSC which doesn't want to work good with new SDK. This looks bit weird for me | |
| 17:27:56 | gtema | installing munch lib there (with 5.6.1) helps to solve this, so most likely we need to extend requirements in old branches | |
| 17:29:47 | gmann | ok, so osc was relying on the munch being installed from sdks requirements.txt and with that removal from sdks it broke osc | |
| 17:30:01 | gtema | yes, apparently | |
| 17:30:01 | gmann | we should have that here https://opendev.org/openstack/python-openstackclient/src/branch/master/requirements.txt | |
| 17:30:11 | gmann | let me push change | |
| 17:30:36 | gtema | but only for xena, this is not required anywhere else | |
| 17:34:01 | gmann | right | |
| 17:34:46 | gtema | and interestingly stephenfin just today made release of OSC for xena, what a facepalm on a R1.0 day | |
| 17:35:12 | gmann | humm it worked there? | |
| 17:35:43 | gtema | well, as usual it all depend on the constellation | |
| 17:40:34 | opendevreview | Ghanshyam proposed openstack/python-openstackclient stable/xena: [stable-only] Add munch in requirements.txt https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/python-openstackclient/+/872340 | |
| 17:40:56 | gmann | gtema: stephenfin: ^^ | |
| 17:41:06 | gtema | yes, I see. Thanks a lot gmann | |
| 17:41:18 | stephenfin | thanks | |
| 17:44:48 | opendevreview | Ghanshyam proposed openstack/python-openstackclient stable/wallaby: [stable-only] Add munch in requirements.txt https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/python-openstackclient/+/872341 | |
| 18:51:23 | opendevreview | Jakob Meng proposed openstack/ansible-collections-openstack master: Added workaround for non-determinism in ansible-inventory output https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/ansible-collections-openstack/+/872344 | |
| 18:52:09 | opendevreview | Jakob Meng proposed openstack/ansible-collections-openstack master: Bump minimum required openstacksdk release to 1.0.0 https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/ansible-collections-openstack/+/872066 | |
| 18:52:27 | opendevreview | Jakob Meng proposed openstack/ansible-collections-openstack master: Refactored coe_cluster{,_template} modules again https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/ansible-collections-openstack/+/872039 | |
| 18:52:39 | opendevreview | Jakob Meng proposed openstack/ansible-collections-openstack master: Publish 2.0.0 release https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/ansible-collections-openstack/+/872077 | |
| 19:42:59 | opendevreview | Arvid Requate proposed openstack/keystoneauth master: New auth plugin v3oidcdeviceauthz https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/keystoneauth/+/869876 | |
| 20:30:58 | opendevreview | Merged openstack/python-openstackclient stable/xena: [stable-only] Add munch in requirements.txt https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/python-openstackclient/+/872340 | |
| 20:40:01 | odyssey4me | stephenfin when you have a moment, please take a look at https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/python-openstackclient/+/872327 which helps to resolve some tests on CS9 for wallaby | |
| 21:39:10 | opendevreview | Merged openstack/ansible-collections-openstack master: Added workaround for non-determinism in ansible-inventory output https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/ansible-collections-openstack/+/872344 | |
| 21:45:26 | opendevreview | Merged openstack/ansible-collections-openstack master: Bump minimum required openstacksdk release to 1.0.0 https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/ansible-collections-openstack/+/872066 | |
| 22:03:03 | opendevreview | Merged openstack/ansible-collections-openstack master: Refactored coe_cluster{,_template} modules again https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/ansible-collections-openstack/+/872039 | |
| 22:03:04 | opendevreview | Merged openstack/ansible-collections-openstack master: Publish 2.0.0 release https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/ansible-collections-openstack/+/872077 | |
| 22:16:14 | gmann | stephenfin: please check sdks job fix for stable/wallaby also https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/python-openstackclient/+/872341 | |
| 23:59:02 | opendevreview | Merged openstack/python-openstackclient stable/wallaby: Replace assertItemsEqual with assertCountEqual https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/python-openstackclient/+/872327 | |
| #openstack-sdks - 2023-02-01 | |||
| 00:03:56 | timburke | gmann, gtema, thanks for looking at the busted job -- unfortunately, looks like https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/python-openstackclient/+/872340 wasn't sufficient. as best i can tell, the job is only installing python-openstackclient from a tagged release, not git? | |
| 00:04:41 | timburke | see https://zuul.opendev.org/t/openstack/build/4b92987487b44219953cbe90716f51c6/log/controller/logs/devstacklog.txt#10818 -- i'm assuming that the 5.6.0 (rather than recently-released 5.6.1) is just because of an out-of-date mirror | |
| 00:10:33 | timburke | i'm still trying to figure out just what the value is we're hoping to get out of the job -- do we actually expect anyone to ever run xena python-openstackclient with master openstacksdk? | |
| 00:55:34 | gmann | timburke: yeah, we need to wait until its released and upper constraints are updated. | |
| 00:56:10 | gmann | I think that is the goal of this job but gtema or stephenfin can correct | |
| 00:57:41 | opendevreview | suzhengwei proposed openstack/openstacksdk master: support notification vmoves for masakari https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/openstacksdk/+/872080 | |
| 01:10:16 | timburke | particularly given the infrequent releases on stable branches, i would've thought it'd make more sense to run those xena tests on openstacksdk's master branch then, no? | |
| 05:24:21 | gtema | timburke, this is alsoy assumption now. It does feel logical that both SDK and OSC are added explicitly though Zuul project requirements, and still released OSC is used | |
| 07:12:55 | opendevreview | Merged openstack/python-openstackclient stable/wallaby: [stable-only] Add munch in requirements.txt https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/python-openstackclient/+/872341 | |
| 08:25:22 | opendevreview | Artem Goncharov proposed openstack/openstacksdk master: Implement acceptance test job https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/openstacksdk/+/860399 | |
| 09:39:08 | opendevreview | Rajat Dhasmana proposed openstack/python-openstackclient master: Add block storage work cleanup command https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/python-openstackclient/+/872390 | |
| 10:03:51 | opendevreview | Shnaidman Sagi (Sergey) proposed openstack/ansible-collections-openstack master: Fix issue with multiple records in recordset https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/ansible-collections-openstack/+/872392 | |
| 10:04:34 | opendevreview | Shnaidman Sagi (Sergey) proposed openstack/ansible-collections-openstack master: Fix issue with multiple records in recordset https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/ansible-collections-openstack/+/872392 | |
| 15:23:47 | opendevreview | Artom Lifshitz proposed openstack/python-openstackclient master: Add func test for compute 2.94 https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/python-openstackclient/+/872420 | |
| 15:55:56 | gmann | gtema: as you know osc cannot be released in stable/wallaby https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/releases/+/872382 | |
| 15:56:13 | gtema | yes, I already figured this out | |
| 15:56:42 | gmann | gtema: we have two option to unblock stable/wallaby gate 1. remove the sdk testing 2. test with old sdk removing master branch from here https://github.com/openstack/openstacksdk/blob/stable/wallaby/.zuul.yaml#L40 | |
| 15:56:42 | gtema | don't know what to do though | |
| 15:56:54 | gmann | 2nd one seems conflict with the notes there | |
| 15:59:04 | gtema | 1st option is not good. On the other side if we are not able to have any releases there I see honestly absolutely no reason to keep this testing | |
| 16:02:33 | gmann | gtema: humm, but testing with old sdk version does not make sense if I am not wrong | |
| 16:03:48 | gtema | it makes as much sense as it was 1 week ago till the change. But What I am saying is that if we can not even release any bugfix - what is the sense of testing? | |
| 16:07:06 | gtema | I mean I tend rather to option 1) and stop testing on wallaby completely | |
| 17:02:08 | gmann | gtema: I think I agree with you. let's go for that and stop testing. we do have same recommendation for any other testing on EM branch if they stop working then stop testing like grenade, tempest master etc | |
| 17:02:55 | gtema | Ok | |
| 19:26:35 | opendevreview | Shnaidman Sagi (Sergey) proposed openstack/ansible-collections-openstack master: Fix issue with multiple records in recordset https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/ansible-collections-openstack/+/872392 | |
| 19:42:34 | opendevreview | Rajat Dhasmana proposed openstack/python-openstackclient master: Add block storage log level {list, set} commands https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/python-openstackclient/+/869811 | |
| 20:00:43 | opendevreview | Rajat Dhasmana proposed openstack/python-openstackclient master: Add block storage log level {list, set} commands https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/python-openstackclient/+/869811 | |