| Posted | Nick | Remark | |
|---|---|---|---|
| #openstack-sdks - 2022-09-16 | |||
| 15:18:10 | opendevreview | Stephen Finucane proposed openstack/python-openstackclient master: WIP: identity: Implement 'project unset' for identity v3 https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/python-openstackclient/+/858164 | |
| 15:55:16 | opendevreview | Eunyoung Kim proposed openstack/openstacksdk master: image: Add metadef schema resource to v2 api https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/openstacksdk/+/857200 | |
| 21:19:28 | opendevreview | Jay Faulkner proposed openstack/keystoneauth master: Drop parameters when connecting to a redirected endpoint https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/keystoneauth/+/841169 | |
| #openstack-sdks - 2022-09-17 | |||
| 05:05:40 | opendevreview | Seongsoo Cho proposed openstack/openstacksdk master: Add support for other metadef property operations https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/openstacksdk/+/857727 | |
| #openstack-sdks - 2022-09-19 | |||
| 01:14:50 | opendevreview | Takashi Natsume proposed openstack/python-openstackclient master: Replace assertItemsEqual with assertCountEqual https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/python-openstackclient/+/853842 | |
| 07:43:26 | opendevreview | Arx Cruz proposed openstack/ansible-collections-openstack master: Update federation_mapping_info module to use proxy https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/ansible-collections-openstack/+/849283 | |
| 07:44:24 | opendevreview | Arx Cruz proposed openstack/ansible-collections-openstack master: Update federation_mapping_info module to use proxy https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/ansible-collections-openstack/+/849283 | |
| 08:23:26 | opendevreview | Ulrich Schwickerath proposed openstack/python-openstackclient master: Added "openstack image metadefs namespace list" command https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/python-openstackclient/+/854557 | |
| 09:21:58 | opendevreview | Artem Goncharov proposed openstack/openstacksdk master: Improve project cleanup for cinder https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/openstacksdk/+/858268 | |
| 09:58:42 | opendevreview | Ulrich Schwickerath proposed openstack/python-openstackclient master: Added "openstack image metadefs namespace list" command https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/python-openstackclient/+/854557 | |
| 10:50:03 | opendevreview | Christian Rohmann proposed openstack/openstacksdk master: Add support for updated_at field for volume snapshots https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/openstacksdk/+/858289 | |
| 11:42:03 | frickler | gtema: do we still need this workaround in devstack for the r1 branch? I'm hoping we could drop it by now https://github.com/openstack/devstack/blob/master/.zuul.yaml#L5-L7 | |
| 11:43:30 | gtema | oh yes, we can drop it now already | |
| 11:44:14 | gtema | I would then just move one remaining merged thing from r1 to master and if there would be enough contribution we move non merged (manila) changes to master directly | |
| 12:00:15 | opendevreview | Ulrich Schwickerath proposed openstack/python-openstackclient master: Added "openstack image metadefs namespace list" command https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/python-openstackclient/+/854557 | |
| 12:16:32 | opendevreview | Ananya proposed openstack/ansible-collections-openstack master: Makes stack module compatible with new sdk version https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/ansible-collections-openstack/+/848266 | |
| 12:33:05 | opendevreview | Taehyun Park proposed openstack/openstacksdk master: Add image metadef object operations https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/openstacksdk/+/858350 | |
| 12:43:46 | frickler | gtema: I've restored https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/devstack/+/814674 , maybe you can comment there | |
| 12:44:51 | gtema | did | |
| 12:55:00 | opendevreview | HaeIYoon proposed openstack/openstacksdk master: Add image metadef object operations https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/openstacksdk/+/858350 | |
| 13:32:51 | opendevreview | Ulrich Schwickerath proposed openstack/python-openstackclient master: Added "openstack image metadefs namespace list" command https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/python-openstackclient/+/854557 | |
| 16:23:45 | whoami-rajat | stephenfin, hey, what is the next step for my nova 2.93 feature? should i backport both changes to zed? https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/python-openstackclient/+/831014 | |
| 18:29:19 | opendevreview | Ulrich Schwickerath proposed openstack/python-openstackclient master: Added "openstack image metadefs namespace list" command https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/python-openstackclient/+/854557 | |
| #openstack-sdks - 2022-09-20 | |||
| 01:07:43 | qwebirc57827 | could someone please review https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/openstacksdk/+/853703? It has been in the queue for many days, with no review | |
| 02:40:09 | opendevreview | Rafael Castillo proposed openstack/ansible-collections-openstack master: Updates server action for 2.0.0 https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/ansible-collections-openstack/+/857976 | |
| 04:19:32 | diablo_rojo | stephenfin: gtema did we want to book an hour during the virtual PTG? We could make it time to talk to our BU students and anyone else that wants to join - seongsoocho if you had mentees that would be interested in joining, we can make that work. | |
| 04:29:16 | seongsoocho | yes. My mentees also interested in PTG. So some of them will join | |
| 04:30:38 | diablo_rojo | Okay. Maybe I will organize an informal poll in the etherpad then so we can find some not horrible times for you all | |
| 05:18:02 | frickler | stephenfin: is https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/openstacksdk/+/853703 something for you to review? | |
| 07:55:33 | opendevreview | Jakob Meng proposed openstack/ansible-collections-openstack master: Makes security group rule info compatible with new sdk version https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/ansible-collections-openstack/+/846148 | |
| 07:56:28 | opendevreview | Jakob Meng proposed openstack/ansible-collections-openstack master: Makes security group rule info compatible with new sdk version https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/ansible-collections-openstack/+/846148 | |
| 08:15:40 | opendevreview | Jakob Meng proposed openstack/ansible-collections-openstack master: Makes security group rule info compatible with new sdk version https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/ansible-collections-openstack/+/846148 | |
| 08:31:54 | opendevreview | Ananya proposed openstack/ansible-collections-openstack master: Makes stack module compatible with new sdk version https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/ansible-collections-openstack/+/848266 | |
| 08:34:51 | opendevreview | Jakob Meng proposed openstack/ansible-collections-openstack master: Makes security_group_rule_info compatible with new sdk version https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/ansible-collections-openstack/+/846148 | |
| 08:42:35 | opendevreview | Jakob Meng proposed openstack/ansible-collections-openstack master: Makes security_group_rule_info compatible with new sdk version https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/ansible-collections-openstack/+/846148 | |
| 08:53:28 | opendevreview | Jakob Meng proposed openstack/ansible-collections-openstack master: Makes security_group_rule_info compatible with new sdk version https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/ansible-collections-openstack/+/846148 | |
| 08:59:09 | opendevreview | Arx Cruz proposed openstack/ansible-collections-openstack master: Update address scope to use proxy https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/ansible-collections-openstack/+/848635 | |
| 09:25:13 | stephenfin | diablo_rojo: yes, sure. I was assuming gtema would do that tbh :) | |
| 09:33:48 | opendevreview | Merged openstack/ansible-collections-openstack master: Use Python 3.10 for Ansible's devel branch https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/ansible-collections-openstack/+/852526 | |
| 09:46:06 | opendevreview | Jakob Meng proposed openstack/ansible-collections-openstack master: Update federation_mapping_info module to be compatible with new sdk https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/ansible-collections-openstack/+/849283 | |
| 09:50:52 | opendevreview | Jakob Meng proposed openstack/ansible-collections-openstack stable/1.0.0: Use Python 3.10 for Ansible's devel branch https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/ansible-collections-openstack/+/858462 | |
| 10:02:42 | opendevreview | Jakob Meng proposed openstack/ansible-collections-openstack master: Allow networks to be updated https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/ansible-collections-openstack/+/854170 | |
| 10:31:45 | opendevreview | Ananya proposed openstack/ansible-collections-openstack master: Makes stack module compatible with new sdk version https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/ansible-collections-openstack/+/848266 | |
| 12:16:36 | opendevreview | Jakob Meng proposed openstack/openstacksdk master: Drop query parameter 'id' from identity mapping https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/openstacksdk/+/858522 | |
| 12:20:22 | opendevreview | Jakob Meng proposed openstack/ansible-collections-openstack master: Update federation_mapping_info module to be compatible with new sdk https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/ansible-collections-openstack/+/849283 | |
| 12:34:14 | opendevreview | Jakob Meng proposed openstack/ansible-collections-openstack master: Refactored baremetal_node and baremetal_node_info modules https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/ansible-collections-openstack/+/854113 | |
| 12:50:55 | opendevreview | Merged openstack/ansible-collections-openstack stable/1.0.0: Use Python 3.10 for Ansible's devel branch https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/ansible-collections-openstack/+/858462 | |
| 13:45:20 | opendevreview | Rabi Mishra proposed openstack/python-openstackclient master: WIP Skip ndp_proxy tests with older openstacksdk https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/python-openstackclient/+/858533 | |
| 14:02:19 | jm1 | gtema, frickler: ^ | |
| 14:03:57 | jm1 | gtema, frickler: intention is to get openstackclient compatible with both <0.99.0 and >= 0.99.0 | |
| 14:06:45 | frickler | jm1: ack, will have a look later, but would also be good to have an actual job testing the former scenario | |
| 14:08:24 | jm1 | frickler: please put your suggestion as comments to the patch. i am not really deep inside osc 😅 | |
| 14:38:49 | opendevreview | Arx Cruz proposed openstack/ansible-collections-openstack master: Update address scope to use proxy https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/ansible-collections-openstack/+/848635 | |
| 14:46:36 | opendevreview | Jakob Meng proposed openstack/openstacksdk master: Drop query parameter 'id' from identity mapping https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/openstacksdk/+/858522 | |
| 15:15:00 | opendevreview | JaeSeong-Shin proposed openstack/openstacksdk master: Add image metadef object operations https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/openstacksdk/+/858350 | |
| 15:23:01 | opendevreview | Polina Gubina proposed openstack/ansible-collections-openstack master: Group assignment update https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/ansible-collections-openstack/+/858543 | |
| 16:13:52 | opendevreview | Stephen Finucane proposed openstack/cliff master: columns: Useful __str__, __repr__ implementation https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/cliff/+/858550 | |
| 16:14:39 | opendevreview | Stephen Finucane proposed openstack/cliff master: columns: Useful __str__, __repr__ implementation https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/cliff/+/858550 | |
| 16:22:33 | opendevreview | Merged openstack/python-openstackclient master: Adding missing command mapping in docs https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/python-openstackclient/+/857728 | |
| 17:23:02 | opendevreview | Polina Gubina proposed openstack/ansible-collections-openstack master: Group assignment update https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/ansible-collections-openstack/+/858543 | |
| 18:24:46 | opendevreview | Dr. Jens Harbott proposed openstack/python-openstackclient master: DNM: Test job with capped sdk https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/python-openstackclient/+/858569 | |
| 18:24:46 | opendevreview | Dr. Jens Harbott proposed openstack/python-openstackclient master: Run swift in -tips job https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/python-openstackclient/+/858568 | |
| #openstack-sdks - 2022-09-21 | |||
| 00:23:42 | opendevreview | Merged openstack/ansible-collections-openstack master: Allow networks to be updated https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/ansible-collections-openstack/+/854170 | |
| 00:27:26 | opendevreview | Rafael Castillo proposed openstack/ansible-collections-openstack master: Makes security_group_rule_info compatible with new sdk version https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/ansible-collections-openstack/+/846148 | |
| 02:09:57 | diablo_rojo | More than happy to let gtema do it, stephenfin :D | |
| 02:39:09 | opendevreview | Merged openstack/ansible-collections-openstack master: Makes security_group_rule_info compatible with new sdk version https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/ansible-collections-openstack/+/846148 | |
| 04:10:31 | opendevreview | JaeSeong-Shin proposed openstack/openstacksdk master: Add image metadef object operations https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/openstacksdk/+/858604 | |
| 05:17:01 | opendevreview | Dr. Jens Harbott proposed openstack/python-openstackclient master: DNM: Test job with capped sdk https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/python-openstackclient/+/858569 | |
| 08:39:40 | opendevreview | Jakob Meng proposed openstack/ansible-collections-openstack master: Updated network module docs https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/ansible-collections-openstack/+/858642 | |
| 08:53:04 | frickler | jm1: gtema: stephenfin: 9 failures with sdk from stable/yoga, all look like recently added new features to me, makes me wonder whether we should consider backporting those sdk additions instead of just conditionalizing the osc tests https://zuul.opendev.org/t/openstack/build/6e2faca3ff0b45729d74e72eb7191260 | |
| 08:54:25 | gtema | frickler, we always say both sdk and osc are backward compatible | |
| 08:55:14 | gtema | I am now also working on adding "functional" tests running on real clouds, and there we simply have no other option rather then improving tests detecting features | |
| 09:03:24 | frickler | backwards compatible against older clouds, yes, but should current osc also work with older sdk or not? | |
| 09:04:01 | gtema | it should work, maybe complaining the "feature" is not supported by the cloud | |
| 09:04:21 | gtema | and tests correspondingly should detect feature presence and skip when it is not | |
| 09:04:59 | gtema | ah, the question was about osc vs sdk? | |
| 09:05:29 | frickler | yes | |
| 09:05:40 | gtema | okay | |
| 09:06:01 | frickler | osc from master, sdk from stable/yoga, testing against master devstack | |
| 09:06:27 | gtema | we were discussing, but never really did - change the release model to not to have stable branches anymore. This will partially help to get rid of this "compatibility" | |
| 09:06:35 | frickler | (sdk from stable/yoga was easier and more flexible than just pinning to 0.61.0) | |
| 09:08:25 | frickler | maybe we don't need a general solution, just one for the current ansible-collection situation | |
| 09:09:08 | gtema | tja, this is just a 3rd dimension of compatibility issues | |
| 09:10:11 | gtema | I am actually wondering why "osc from master, sdk from stable/yoga, testing against master devstack"? | |
| 09:10:36 | gtema | this is wrong in my eyes | |
| 09:11:25 | frickler | the question is whether people can co-install ansible-collections and OSC | |
| 09:11:37 | frickler | s/can/should be able to/ | |
| 09:11:45 | frickler | currently they can't | |
| 09:11:54 | gtema | I would say the should be able to | |
| 09:12:08 | gtema | we have few cases on our side requiring that | |
| 09:12:12 | jm1 | gtema: "osc from master, sdk from stable/yoga and other openstack components from master" is what we might have to fallback to in rdo/tripleo. aoc is not compatible to new sdk, hence tripleo is not, too... | |
| 09:12:14 | frickler | ansible-collections still depends on sdk<0.99 | |
| 09:12:45 | frickler | osc requires sdk>=0.99, at least for testing to pass | |
| 09:16:03 | jm1 | gtema, frickler: we are currently discussing how to solve this sdk version deadlock for rdo zed release: one solution is "sdk+aoc+tripleo from yoga, everything else from zed". another solution is to use everything from zed, including a half-broken aoc release and a has-to-be-ported-to-new-aoc-until-zed-release tripleo. difficult tradeoff.. | |
| 09:23:41 | jm1 | gtema, frickler: zed's osc being backward compatible with yoga's sdk would help with the first approach | |
| 09:26:06 | gtema | tja, and how to make zed osc to yoga sdk without backporting mess? | |
| 09:27:25 | frickler | so there are three features involved: server_group, router_ndp_proxy and network_qos_rule. we can either make OSC just ignore these features with older sdk or backport to stable/yoga sdk. the former solution might be more difficult from a UI perspective. like you will still have the commands listed in the help output, but cannot use them | |
| 09:28:24 | opendevreview | Jakob Meng proposed openstack/ansible-collections-openstack master: Refactored baremetal_node and baremetal_node_info modules https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/ansible-collections-openstack/+/854113 | |
| 09:28:49 | opendevreview | Jakob Meng proposed openstack/ansible-collections-openstack master: Refactored baremetal_node_action module https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/ansible-collections-openstack/+/854357 | |
| 09:28:53 | frickler | gtema: are you completly opposed to backporting? if not, I'd start by taking a look at ndp_proxy and see how much work that would be | |