Earlier  
Later
New Search
Posted Nick Remark
#openstack-sdks - 2022-06-30
15:15:28 gtema I feel sharing your opinion diablo_rojo
15:15:42 stephenfin Yeah, that's what I was concerned about. Oh well
15:18:47 diablo_rojo They didn't listen to me when I said that its a very small team that prioritizes work over admin + organization :)
15:18:57 diablo_rojo (rightfully so in my opinion)
15:19:21 diablo_rojo And I havent done as good a job helping as I would like to, but I figure if I can do the admin so you don't have to, that's good too?
15:19:46 gtema Yes, that might be an option
15:20:14 gtema (sorry, being in train through EU therefore internet lags)
15:20:58 diablo_rojo gtema, no worries at all
16:39:10 diablo_rojo stephenfin, would you have time next week to go over how you generated the cinder list with me?
16:39:17 diablo_rojo arne_wiebalck, maybe would want to come too?
16:40:55 arne_wiebalck stephenfin: diablo_rojo: we have someone starting next week and needed to find an assignment, having a list of low-hanging OSC/SDK tasks would be very handy now
16:41:37 arne_wiebalck along the lines of what was discussed at the summit: need organisations to come with resources to help implement the gaps
16:50:32 diablo_rojo arne_wiebalck, they can use the cinder one for now
16:50:40 diablo_rojo and then we can work on building out the others
16:51:11 diablo_rojo arne_wiebalck, I can also tag all the open reviews left from previous students if they wanted to pick those up and finish them
16:51:18 diablo_rojo 'fair game' or something
19:48:45 arne_wiebalck diablo_rojo: thanks, do you have a link to the cinder one (or the others), so that we can have a look?
20:50:27 opendevreview Artem Goncharov proposed openstack/ansible-collections-openstack master: Add SDK logging option for openstack ansible collections. https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/ansible-collections-openstack/+/844559
#openstack-sdks - 2022-07-01
09:30:32 opendevreview Dr. Jens Harbott proposed openstack/python-openstackclient master: DNM: Test neutron segments fix https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/python-openstackclient/+/848397
09:31:11 frickler ralonsoh: ^^ I hope my idea to run multiple copies of the job in one patch works
09:31:35 ralonsoh it does, I've done it before
09:47:45 stephenfin diablo_rojo_phone: Sure, I can do that. tl;dr though, I just ran 'cinder --help' with sequential versions of 'OS_VOLUME_API_VERSION' and did a side-by-side comparison. Not particularly clever 😅
09:48:03 stephenfin gtema: Care to look at https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/python-openstackclient/+/844268 (and maybe the follow-ups, but they're less important)
09:48:07 stephenfin *?
09:48:27 gtema going to look right now
09:49:32 gtema okay, so upstream Friday can finally go on
09:50:32 gtema we just maybe should fix networking tests first, cause they will bring us to endless rechecks again
09:55:50 frickler gtema: my local testing makes me rather optimistic on ralonsoh's fix in neutron that is being tested in 848397
09:57:17 gtema yes, that would be awesome
09:57:53 gtema and I see neutron fix is eventually going to land in 1-2 hours
11:19:15 opendevreview Merged openstack/python-openstackclient master: Fix: create image from volume command https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/python-openstackclient/+/844268
12:55:52 viks__ hi, i'm using python openstacksdk.. why project object returned by `conn.identity.projects` does not contain custom property key-value pair?
13:27:10 opendevreview Cyril Roelandt proposed openstack/python-openstackclient stable/yoga: Fix: create image from volume command https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/python-openstackclient/+/848446
13:35:10 opendevreview Cyril Roelandt proposed openstack/python-openstackclient stable/wallaby: openstack image create: honor protection/visibility flags https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/python-openstackclient/+/848448
13:35:11 opendevreview Cyril Roelandt proposed openstack/python-openstackclient stable/wallaby: Fix: create image from volume command https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/python-openstackclient/+/848449
13:55:41 opendevreview Dr. Jens Harbott proposed openstack/python-openstackclient master: Add support for CRUD operations for QoS minimum packet rate rule https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/python-openstackclient/+/810559
14:48:25 stephenfin gtema: Could we include the python-openstackclient-core group in the python-openstackclient-stable-maint group, like we do for openstacksdk?
14:48:49 stephenfin I'd like to be able to review croelandt's changes above ^
14:49:16 gtema looking
14:49:34 stephenfin You're in the latter, so you should be able to add python-openstackclient-core to Included Groups here https://review.opendev.org/admin/groups/83af131761f12c002cab329fe1a1ea7ffdbaf7cd,members
14:50:01 stephenfin We probably want to drop Steve, Lee and Dean too
14:50:47 gtema I remembered now: only admins can do this. I myself cant change the group
14:51:42 stephenfin gtema: By admins do you mean fungi or clarkb?
14:52:05 gtema yeah, l remember asking fungi to add myself into this group
14:52:56 fungi https://review.opendev.org/admin/groups/python-openstackclient-stable-maint
14:53:10 fungi "owners: stable-maint-core"
14:53:32 fungi https://review.opendev.org/admin/groups/stable-maint-core,members
14:53:49 stephenfin TIL that group owners were a thing in Gerrit. Every day a new adventure
14:54:05 fungi that's the list of people who decide to add/remove anyone from python-openstackclient-stable-maint
14:54:49 gtema hmm, and is this how we want it to be?
14:54:50 stephenfin fungi++ Thanks, I didn't know that
14:55:06 fungi gtema: that's probably something to discuss with the openstack stable maintainers and tc
14:55:09 stephenfin diablo_rojo_phone is in there (via Release Managers). Now is diablo_rojo_phone around? 🤔
14:56:40 fungi it used to be that the openstack stable maintenance team wanted to be able to confirm people who were added to per-project stable maintenance groups were familiar with the stable backport review policies for openstack before adding them, so the release managers tend to not get involved in that. not sure whether that's still the case
14:56:48 stephenfin gtema: fungi: Yeah, I note that at least octavia-stable-maint and openstacksdk-stable-maint are owned by themselves
14:57:08 stephenfin fungi: I suspect today we'll take stable cores where we can find them :)
14:57:18 stephenfin openstacksdk https://review.opendev.org/admin/groups/1b6ed81aaf8ad4ab52cc54284be7199607dcaa8d
14:57:19 fungi i think it had to do with whether the project asserted stable:follows-policy
14:57:24 stephenfin octavia https://review.opendev.org/admin/groups/e93320d644e6a71c904d06ec6e379efb541f6dd8
14:57:38 stephenfin oh, aren't those policies gone now?
14:57:49 stephenfin maybe it was another thing to do with badges
14:58:02 fungi right, which is why i don't know what the current approval workflow is, hence my suggestion to check with the tc
14:58:46 stephenfin mistral-stable-maint, neutron-lib-stable-maint, neutron-vpnaas-stable-maint and karbor-stable-maint too. Likely more (those are all I checked)
14:58:52 stephenfin fungi: I'll post to openstack-discuss now
14:58:55 fungi ideally, if stable-maint-core no longer needs to be an oversight body for per-project stable-maint groups, then we'd go through and make all those groups self-owned at the same time rather than dealing with a lot of one-off requests for them
14:59:07 johnsom Octavia asserts stable:follows-policy
14:59:32 johnsom The special group was a hold over from when we were starting the project up from scratch
15:00:48 fungi yeah, far enough back in time, there weren't per-project stable-maint groups and instead the central openstack-stable-maint members handled all backports, then they started delegating some of it to project-specific reviewers as long as they were familiar with and agreed to follow openstack's backport policies
15:01:31 johnsom Yep, that is kind of where we landed
15:01:51 fungi now that there isn't much of a central stable-maint group any longer, i think the idea is to just hand that over to the per-project groups, but it would be nice to have that clearly asserted somewhere and then update all the existing groups to that new model
15:03:13 gtema someone should open discuss thread about it?
15:03:52 fungi stephenfin just said he was going to
15:04:34 gtema oh, right, overseen
15:09:24 diablo_rojo_phone I'm around. What's up?
15:10:07 stephenfin diablo_rojo_phone: ttx beat you to the punch. We were trying to get osc core added to osc stable core and needed a release manager or openstack stable core to do it
15:10:20 diablo_rojo_phone Ohhh got it. Sorry!
15:31:40 stephenfin Took me a while but sent http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-discuss/2022-July/029367.html
15:35:35 stephenfin gtema: What do you think about patches like https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/python-openstackclient/+/848448 ? Technically it's a feature backport. I don't personally mind these for user-facing tool like OSC but wanted to double check before I +2'd
15:36:23 gtema ok for me as well
15:37:24 gtema I feel here pretty similar situation to sdk - we should eventually not having branches for OSC at all. It just should work with any older cloud
15:39:17 stephenfin Agreed
15:39:51 opendevreview Merged openstack/python-openstackclient master: image: Trivial style changes https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/python-openstackclient/+/848252
16:05:48 opendevreview Cyril Roelandt proposed openstack/python-openstackclient stable/yoga: Fix: create image from volume command https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/python-openstackclient/+/848446
16:16:30 opendevreview Stephen Finucane proposed openstack/python-openstackclient master: The Python 3.6 and Python 3.7 Support has been dropped since zed https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/python-openstackclient/+/844259
16:23:11 opendevreview Cyril Roelandt proposed openstack/python-openstackclient stable/wallaby: Fix: create image from volume command https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/python-openstackclient/+/848449
18:00:59 opendevreview Merged openstack/python-openstackclient master: image: Make better use of argparse https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/python-openstackclient/+/848253
18:01:02 opendevreview Merged openstack/python-openstackclient master: image: Split image creation depending on service https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/python-openstackclient/+/848254
18:01:09 opendevreview Merged openstack/python-openstackclient master: Stop testing lower-constraints https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/python-openstackclient/+/841389
#openstack-sdks - 2022-07-04
03:24:39 opendevreview Seyeong Kim proposed openstack/python-openstackclient stable/victoria: compute: Add missing options for 'server group list' https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/python-openstackclient/+/848505
03:27:07 opendevreview Seyeong Kim proposed openstack/python-openstackclient stable/ussuri: compute: Add missing options for 'server group list' https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/python-openstackclient/+/848506
04:48:29 opendevreview Seyeong Kim proposed openstack/python-openstackclient stable/train: compute: Add missing options for 'server group list' https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/python-openstackclient/+/848507
06:20:44 opendevreview Seyeong Kim proposed openstack/python-openstackclient stable/ussuri: Fix gate due to switch to focal https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/python-openstackclient/+/848508
09:54:16 opendevreview Jakob Meng proposed openstack/ansible-collections-openstack master: Updates security group rule for latest sdk https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/ansible-collections-openstack/+/846830
10:22:31 opendevreview Stephen Finucane proposed openstack/python-openstackclient stable/xena: Stop testing lower-constraints https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/python-openstackclient/+/848612
10:23:46 opendevreview Stephen Finucane proposed openstack/python-openstackclient stable/wallaby: Stop testing lower-constraints https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/python-openstackclient/+/848613
10:24:54 opendevreview Stephen Finucane proposed openstack/python-openstackclient stable/victoria: Stop testing lower-constraints https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/python-openstackclient/+/848614
10:25:47 opendevreview Stephen Finucane proposed openstack/python-openstackclient stable/ussuri: Stop testing lower-constraints https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/python-openstackclient/+/848615
10:27:49 opendevreview Stephen Finucane proposed openstack/python-openstackclient stable/train: Stop testing lower-constraints https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/python-openstackclient/+/848616
10:29:36 stephenfin gtema: Dropping l-c testing from all active stable OSC branches ^
10:29:54 stephenfin I can self approve if you want too

Earlier   Later