| Posted | Nick | Remark | |
|---|---|---|---|
| #openstack-sdks - 2021-09-09 | |||
| 15:14:44 | ebbex | so there is only setting the property or unsetting it? But nova respects the property if 'no' or 'yes'? (I'll have to check that out next) | |
| 15:15:19 | gtema | this question I can not answer sadly | |
| 15:16:59 | ebbex | nova/objects/image_meta.py: 'hw_qemu_guest_agent': fields.FlexibleBooleanField() | |
| 15:19:34 | ebbex | so nova seems to respect the the value, they even have tests for it with values "yes" and "no". | |
| 15:20:11 | gtema | https://opendev.org/openstack/oslo.utils/src/branch/master/oslo_utils/strutils.py#L122 | |
| 15:20:15 | gtema | this is where it lands | |
| 15:20:47 | gtema | anyway - we should fix it in SDK. This is clearly not a bool, but string for us | |
| 15:22:57 | ebbex | thanks, any place I should file a bug for this? | |
| 15:23:20 | gtema | reports are not welcome, but fixes are ;-) | |
| 15:23:28 | gtema | I will do this shortly | |
| 15:24:07 | opendevreview | Merged openstack/openstacksdk master: Add compute microversion 2.78 https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/openstacksdk/+/786290 | |
| 15:24:52 | ebbex | Is it as easy as changing the line "hw_qemu_guest_agent = resource.Body('hw_qemu_guest_agent', type=bool)" ? | |
| 15:25:14 | ebbex | (to something else that is) | |
| 15:31:07 | opendevreview | Artem Goncharov proposed openstack/openstacksdk master: Change image.hw_qemu_guest_agent to be string https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/openstacksdk/+/808101 | |
| 15:31:30 | gtema | yeah ebbex - like that but also test should be adapted | |
| #openstack-sdks - 2021-09-10 | |||
| 12:56:05 | thomasb06 | gtema: Hello. The directory baremetal could be split too but it's v1 only. It is ok? | |
| 12:56:27 | gtema | sure - everything what you find and you think is reasonable | |
| 12:57:15 | thomasb06 | cool. It's the third I make so maybe I should follow the alphabetical order from now on | |
| 12:57:42 | gtema | yeah | |
| 13:13:42 | thomasb06 | There's TestMisc too: https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/openstacksdk/+/808209 | |
| 14:34:25 | opendevreview | OpenStack Release Bot proposed openstack/cliff stable/xena: Update .gitreview for stable/xena https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/cliff/+/808339 | |
| 14:34:27 | opendevreview | OpenStack Release Bot proposed openstack/cliff stable/xena: Update TOX_CONSTRAINTS_FILE for stable/xena https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/cliff/+/808340 | |
| 14:34:29 | opendevreview | OpenStack Release Bot proposed openstack/cliff master: Add Python3 yoga unit tests https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/cliff/+/808341 | |
| 14:35:09 | opendevreview | OpenStack Release Bot proposed openstack/openstacksdk stable/xena: Update .gitreview for stable/xena https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/openstacksdk/+/808353 | |
| 14:35:12 | opendevreview | OpenStack Release Bot proposed openstack/openstacksdk stable/xena: Update TOX_CONSTRAINTS_FILE for stable/xena https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/openstacksdk/+/808355 | |
| 14:35:15 | opendevreview | OpenStack Release Bot proposed openstack/openstacksdk master: Update master for stable/xena https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/openstacksdk/+/808356 | |
| 14:35:18 | opendevreview | OpenStack Release Bot proposed openstack/openstacksdk master: Add Python3 yoga unit tests https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/openstacksdk/+/808360 | |
| 14:35:37 | opendevreview | OpenStack Release Bot proposed openstack/osc-lib stable/xena: Update .gitreview for stable/xena https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/osc-lib/+/808361 | |
| 14:35:41 | opendevreview | OpenStack Release Bot proposed openstack/osc-lib stable/xena: Update TOX_CONSTRAINTS_FILE for stable/xena https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/osc-lib/+/808362 | |
| 14:35:51 | opendevreview | OpenStack Release Bot proposed openstack/osc-lib master: Update master for stable/xena https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/osc-lib/+/808366 | |
| 14:35:55 | opendevreview | OpenStack Release Bot proposed openstack/osc-lib master: Add Python3 yoga unit tests https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/osc-lib/+/808368 | |
| 17:39:18 | opendevreview | Merged openstack/openstacksdk master: Add support for reading node's "boot_mode" and "secure_boot" fields https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/openstacksdk/+/802101 | |
| 17:39:28 | opendevreview | Merged openstack/openstacksdk master: Add support for changing baremetal node's boot_mode and secure_boot states https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/openstacksdk/+/804529 | |
| #openstack-sdks - 2021-09-13 | |||
| 05:46:16 | thomasb06 | gtema: the build didn't rerun, would you have an idea why: https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/openstacksdk/+/808209 ? | |
| 05:51:34 | gtema | What do you mean? It finished | |
| 05:57:17 | thomasb06 | The build didn't rerun over my last commit | |
| 05:58:09 | thomasb06 | Next folder in the list seems to be `instance_ha`, if I didn't forget one in the middle | |
| 06:03:43 | gtema | What was you expecting that you say "didn't return"? | |
| 06:06:41 | thomasb06 | Zuul should have run the build again, shouldn't it? | |
| 06:18:55 | gtema | Why? When? | |
| 06:19:59 | gtema | According to https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/openstacksdk/+/808209 you pushed on Sep. 10 last time, Zuul checked and posted results | |
| 06:29:13 | thomasb06 | Ha, I didn't refresh the web page... My bad | |
| 06:30:28 | thomasb06 | The last one: https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/openstacksdk/+/808580 | |
| 08:24:59 | thomasb06 | The build fails but it doesn't seem to have something to do with me? | |
| 08:27:00 | gtema | nope, it's not. You can leave comment "recheck" in the web ui. Zuul will restart | |
| 10:04:30 | thomasb06 | indeed, this time it passed. Thanks | |
| 12:55:02 | thomasb06 | class KeyManager: https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/openstacksdk/+/808761 | |
| #openstack-sdks - 2021-09-14 | |||
| 07:41:23 | thomasb06 | The Message class: https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/openstacksdk/+/808876 | |
| 10:44:46 | vkmc | hi folks | |
| 10:44:57 | vkmc | trying to tweak and output to be more user friendly | |
| 10:45:10 | vkmc | I'm using this function over here https://github.com/openstack/osc-lib/blob/master/osc_lib/utils/__init__.py#L487 | |
| 10:45:35 | vkmc | basically the resource we have has it's id and the project_id | |
| 10:45:42 | vkmc | wanted to add the project_name as well | |
| 10:45:59 | vkmc | any tips on how to do this? | |
| 10:46:19 | gtema | where do you want to add it to? | |
| 10:46:26 | vkmc | to the output | |
| 10:46:42 | gtema | in the output is load said - which output, which command? | |
| 10:47:05 | vkmc | ah sorry | |
| 10:47:14 | vkmc | manila share group type access list | |
| 10:47:22 | vkmc | so, openstack share group type access list | |
| 10:47:26 | vkmc | patch is here | |
| 10:47:34 | gtema | generally we only "output" what API sends to us | |
| 10:47:40 | vkmc | https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/python-manilaclient/+/805064 | |
| 10:47:55 | vkmc | more context here | |
| 10:47:56 | vkmc | https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/python-manilaclient/+/805064/16/manilaclient/osc/v2/share_group_type_access.py#89 | |
| 10:47:58 | gtema | normally we do not add anything else, but there are exceptions where i.e. for server we also extend it with flavor details | |
| 10:48:11 | vkmc | yep, is feeling a bit "against" the design to add that info | |
| 10:50:04 | vkmc | gtema, so this use case is nowhere in some other projects implementations? | |
| 10:50:08 | vkmc | I just want to keep consistency on how we do things | |
| 10:50:20 | gtema | in principle the approach is fine. But definitely this is not really performant to find project each time | |
| 10:50:45 | vkmc | hmm good point | |
| 10:50:50 | gtema | this particular approach of extending output with project_name - no, it's not present anywhere | |
| 10:51:14 | vkmc | I'll discuss with the reviewer | |
| 10:51:35 | gtema | another issue is that the user might not really have priviliges to list/find project. This is unlikely, but you anyway can never say for sure it will work | |
| 10:52:09 | vkmc | so this is an admin operation, in which case that shouldn't be the issue | |
| 10:52:41 | vkmc | unless I'm missing something | |
| 10:52:42 | gtema | ok, but you know - admin of manilla is not necessarily having admin privs in identity | |
| 10:52:48 | vkmc | yep | |
| 10:53:27 | vkmc | it's a good point | |
| 10:53:36 | gtema | cloud operators are keen to really separate privs as much as possible and even you are domain admin but with the project scope token you might not have privs to list projects | |
| 10:54:11 | vkmc | makes sense | |
| 18:08:53 | gouthamr | the admin in this context is a system admin | |
| 18:09:21 | gouthamr | at least by default; although its possible to override | |
| #openstack-sdks - 2021-09-15 | |||
| 18:17:42 | opendevreview | Daniel Speichert proposed openstack/ansible-collections-openstack master: Added missing warn() used in cloud.openstack.quota https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/ansible-collections-openstack/+/805534 | |
| 18:38:51 | opendevreview | Daniel Speichert proposed openstack/ansible-collections-openstack master: Added missing warn() used in cloud.openstack.quota https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/ansible-collections-openstack/+/805534 | |
| #openstack-sdks - 2021-09-16 | |||
| 15:45:28 | diablo_rojo | o/ | |
| 15:45:38 | diablo_rojo | Did we want a meeting in 15 min stephenfin gtema?> | |
| 15:45:52 | gtema | well, I also got reminder popup | |
| 15:46:03 | gtema | I am available | |
| 15:50:31 | diablo_rojo | Me too | |
| 15:50:42 | diablo_rojo | Maybe we do some PTG planning? | |
| 15:51:27 | gtema | maybe. I only reserved 1h slot but looking to the current activity I can't really say what to talk about ;-) | |
| 15:54:27 | diablo_rojo | Haha fair. | |
| 15:54:36 | diablo_rojo | I haven't heard from Orran about students yet either. | |
| 15:55:32 | gtema | we have thomasb06 here from Franch recently. I had small session with him last week and gave some tasks | |
| 15:55:55 | gtema | s/Franch/France | |
| 15:56:27 | diablo_rojo | Oh yes! lbragstad had connected him with me and I directed him here to help :) | |
| 15:57:06 | gtema | I have however figured out that replacing cinderclient in OSC must be done pretty urgently. With drop of v2 support there we are going in unpleasant situation for older clouds | |
| 15:58:04 | gtema | I would say block storage in SDK is now pretty in a good shape, but most of things in proper form are now in r1 branch | |
| 15:58:32 | gtema | what somehow forces to merge those quickly back to master | |