Earlier  
Later
New Search
Posted Nick Remark
#openstack-sdks - 2021-05-20
16:10:53 stephenfin out of curiosity, what was the reason for the feature branch?
16:11:01 stephenfin so we can keep cutting 0.x releases until it's ready?
16:11:01 stephenfin so we can keep cutting 0.x releases until it's ready?
16:11:05 gtema breaking of ansible
16:11:05 gtema breaking of ansible
16:11:18 gtema networking change is breaking ansible
16:11:18 gtema networking change is breaking ansible
16:11:24 stephenfin ah, okay
16:11:24 stephenfin ah, okay
16:11:42 gtema due to the fact that ansible modules are not explicitly converting result to dict and Ansible tries to modify objects
16:11:43 gtema due to the fact that ansible modules are not explicitly converting result to dict and Ansible tries to modify objects
16:11:52 gtema we have surely our reasons to forbid that
16:11:52 gtema we have surely our reasons to forbid that
16:12:13 gtema so I wanted to finish this massive rework and in the meanwhile I started preparation in ansible modules
16:12:13 gtema so I wanted to finish this massive rework and in the meanwhile I started preparation in ansible modules
16:12:25 gtema so that we would have sdk1.0 and ansible-collections R2.0
16:12:25 gtema so that we would have sdk1.0 and ansible-collections R2.0
16:12:27 stephenfin gotcha, that makes sense
16:12:28 stephenfin gotcha, that makes sense
16:13:00 gtema anything from your side?
16:13:00 gtema anything from your side?
16:13:26 stephenfin nope, I'm hoping to pick up work again on cinder stuff for OSC
16:13:27 stephenfin nope, I'm hoping to pick up work again on cinder stuff for OSC
16:13:41 stephenfin and try reach feature parity with cinderclient this cycle
16:13:41 stephenfin and try reach feature parity with cinderclient this cycle
16:13:51 diablo_rojo stephenfin, that would be pretty legit
16:13:51 diablo_rojo stephenfin, that would be pretty legit
16:14:04 gtema yeah, this actually in my mind also heavily depending on the r1 work on restructure and adding of general features (quotaset, metadata)
16:14:04 gtema yeah, this actually in my mind also heavily depending on the r1 work on restructure and adding of general features (quotaset, metadata)
16:14:13 stephenfin I'm still hoping to do so using legacy cinderclient calls and migrate over afterwards, since it's easier focus on one thing at a time
16:14:13 stephenfin I'm still hoping to do so using legacy cinderclient calls and migrate over afterwards, since it's easier focus on one thing at a time
16:14:34 stephenfin On that note, I also need to continue migrating nova things to SDK, now that we have feature parity there
16:14:34 stephenfin On that note, I also need to continue migrating nova things to SDK, now that we have feature parity there
16:14:50 gtema yeah, that's also great
16:14:50 gtema yeah, that's also great
16:14:51 stephenfin nova would like to deprecate novaclient entirely sooner rather than later
16:14:51 stephenfin nova would like to deprecate novaclient entirely sooner rather than later
16:15:10 diablo_rojo One less thing to maintain
16:15:10 diablo_rojo One less thing to maintain
16:15:15 stephenfin exactly
16:15:15 stephenfin exactly
16:15:16 gtema sounds like a honey to my ears
16:15:16 gtema sounds like a honey to my ears
16:16:10 gtema I think half of the things are already migrated. Only the most complex things left ;-)
16:16:11 gtema I think half of the things are already migrated. Only the most complex things left ;-)
16:17:58 gtema ok. Feels like we have nothing else
16:17:58 gtema ok. Feels like we have nothing else
16:18:41 diablo_rojo zimmery said that he was almost done with the nova microversions
16:18:41 diablo_rojo zimmery said that he was almost done with the nova microversions
16:18:48 diablo_rojo he's got like one bigger one left
16:18:48 diablo_rojo he's got like one bigger one left
16:18:58 diablo_rojo and then they are at parity i think
16:18:58 diablo_rojo and then they are at parity i think
16:19:05 gtema sounds cool
16:19:05 gtema sounds cool
16:19:27 diablo_rojo I told him to send an email to the discuss list when he finishes to be like, look! I did a thing!
16:19:27 diablo_rojo I told him to send an email to the discuss list when he finishes to be like, look! I did a thing!
16:19:42 gtema yeah, would be cool
16:19:42 gtema yeah, would be cool
16:19:49 diablo_rojo And just generally update on the state of the sdk wrt nova
16:19:49 diablo_rojo And just generally update on the state of the sdk wrt nova
16:19:56 gtema sure
16:19:56 gtema sure
16:20:06 diablo_rojo Oh, and he is going to keep helping us through the summer
16:20:07 diablo_rojo Oh, and he is going to keep helping us through the summer
16:20:13 diablo_rojo (northern hemisphere summer)
16:20:13 diablo_rojo (northern hemisphere summer)
16:20:17 gtema awesome
16:20:17 gtema awesome
16:21:27 gtema anything else?
16:21:27 gtema anything else?
16:22:07 diablo_rojo Nope
16:22:07 diablo_rojo Nope
16:22:14 diablo_rojo I think we can end this :)
16:22:14 diablo_rojo I think we can end this :)
16:22:29 gtema cool. Thank you both
16:22:29 gtema cool. Thank you both
16:22:34 diablo_rojo Thank you!
16:22:34 diablo_rojo Thank you!
16:22:39 gtema #endmeeting
16:22:39 gtema #endmeeting
16:22:42 openstack Meeting ended Thu May 20 16:22:39 2021 UTC. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot . (v 0.1.4)
16:22:42 openstack Meeting ended Thu May 20 16:22:39 2021 UTC. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot . (v 0.1.4)
16:22:43 openstack Minutes: http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/sdk_osc/2021/sdk_osc.2021-05-20-16.00.html
16:22:43 openstack Minutes: http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/sdk_osc/2021/sdk_osc.2021-05-20-16.00.html
16:22:44 openstack Minutes (text): http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/sdk_osc/2021/sdk_osc.2021-05-20-16.00.txt
16:22:44 openstack Minutes (text): http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/sdk_osc/2021/sdk_osc.2021-05-20-16.00.txt
16:22:45 openstack Log: http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/sdk_osc/2021/sdk_osc.2021-05-20-16.00.log.html
16:22:45 openstack Log: http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/sdk_osc/2021/sdk_osc.2021-05-20-16.00.log.html
16:23:58 gtema stephenfin, if you find a minute - https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/openstacksdk/+/788217 (updated your patch for finishing unittest cleanup)
16:23:58 gtema stephenfin, if you find a minute - https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/openstacksdk/+/788217 (updated your patch for finishing unittest cleanup)
16:24:17 stephenfin ack, will look shortly
16:24:17 stephenfin ack, will look shortly
16:24:23 gtema thks
16:24:23 gtema thks
16:46:48 openstackgerrit Artem Goncharov proposed openstack/ansible-collections-openstack master: Switch role_assignment module to OpenStackModule https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/ansible-collections-openstack/+/792416
16:46:49 openstackgerrit Artem Goncharov proposed openstack/ansible-collections-openstack master: Switch Recordset module to OpenStackModule https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/ansible-collections-openstack/+/792417
16:46:50 openstackgerrit Artem Goncharov proposed openstack/ansible-collections-openstack master: Switch Quota module to OpenStackModule https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/ansible-collections-openstack/+/792418
16:46:51 openstackgerrit Artem Goncharov proposed openstack/ansible-collections-openstack master: Switch ProjectAccess module to OpenStackModule https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/ansible-collections-openstack/+/792419
16:46:52 openstackgerrit Artem Goncharov proposed openstack/ansible-collections-openstack master: Switch port_info module to OpenStackModule https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/ansible-collections-openstack/+/792420

Earlier   Later