Earlier  
Later
New Search
Posted Nick Remark
#openstack-sdks - 2021-05-18
20:20:00 Steap Hello! I tried to tackle https://storyboard.openstack.org/#!/story/2008890 , which is currently blocking the CI. This is caused by a bug in openstacksdk, introduced in 0.56.0 and fixed on the master branch. I cannot pin openstacksdk to 0.55.0 though. Could this be because of the upper constraints? If so, is there a way to work around this?
#openstack-sdks - 2021-05-19
12:05:32 openstackgerrit Merged openstack/openstacksdk master: placement: Add support for resource classes https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/openstacksdk/+/783350
12:05:32 openstackgerrit Merged openstack/openstacksdk master: placement: Add support for resource classes https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/openstacksdk/+/783350
13:01:07 openstackgerrit Per Lind proposed openstack/ansible-collections-openstack master: Fix inventory plugin on Ansible 2.11 https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/ansible-collections-openstack/+/792138
13:37:37 openstackgerrit Tosin Farai proposed openstack/ansible-collections-openstack master: Add support for node vendor passthru methods https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/ansible-collections-openstack/+/773399
13:37:37 openstackgerrit Tosin Farai proposed openstack/ansible-collections-openstack master: Add support for node vendor passthru methods https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/ansible-collections-openstack/+/773399
14:59:18 openstackgerrit Merged openstack/openstacksdk master: tests: Remove dead code https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/openstacksdk/+/788214
14:59:19 openstackgerrit Merged openstack/openstacksdk master: tests: Remove dead code https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/openstacksdk/+/788214
16:00:05 openstackgerrit Ryan Zimmerman proposed openstack/openstacksdk master: WIP Add compute microversion 2.78 https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/openstacksdk/+/786290
16:00:05 openstackgerrit Ryan Zimmerman proposed openstack/openstacksdk master: WIP Add compute microversion 2.78 https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/openstacksdk/+/786290
17:45:38 openstackgerrit Ryan Zimmerman proposed openstack/openstacksdk master: Add compute microversion 2.78 https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/openstacksdk/+/786290
17:52:57 melwitt does anyone know if --sort-descending --sort-column <column> in OSC is intended to work on all commands or is it separate support per command?
17:52:57 melwitt does anyone know if --sort-descending --sort-column <column> in OSC is intended to work on all commands or is it separate support per command?
17:59:18 stephenfin melwitt: That's provided by cliff. It should work for all commands but it does rely on objects being comparable
17:59:18 stephenfin melwitt: That's provided by cliff. It should work for all commands but it does rely on objects being comparable
17:59:41 melwitt thanks stephenfin
17:59:41 melwitt thanks stephenfin
18:00:58 stephenfin melwitt: for context https://github.com/openstack/cliff/commit/c1c991045cece85dd55494f9d4670429e370e131 https://github.com/openstack/cliff/commit/4f45f9a30e657265c5b5ac119af3aaa0e5ec7184
18:00:58 stephenfin melwitt: for context https://github.com/openstack/cliff/commit/c1c991045cece85dd55494f9d4670429e370e131 https://github.com/openstack/cliff/commit/4f45f9a30e657265c5b5ac119af3aaa0e5ec7184
18:01:27 stephenfin (in case you're encountering bugs)
18:01:27 stephenfin (in case you're encountering bugs)
18:04:37 openstackgerrit Paul Belanger proposed openstack/ansible-collections-openstack master: Add bindep.txt for ansible-builder https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/ansible-collections-openstack/+/792230
18:04:37 openstackgerrit Paul Belanger proposed openstack/ansible-collections-openstack master: Add bindep.txt for ansible-builder https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/ansible-collections-openstack/+/792230
18:16:45 melwitt cool thanks!
18:16:45 melwitt cool thanks!
18:24:58 openstackgerrit Kevin Carter proposed openstack/osc-lib master: Add check for sdk_connection https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/osc-lib/+/792236
18:24:58 openstackgerrit Kevin Carter proposed openstack/osc-lib master: Add check for sdk_connection https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/osc-lib/+/792236
20:57:33 openstackgerrit Merged openstack/openstacksdk master: tests: Sanity check 'test_proxy_base' https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/openstacksdk/+/788215
21:31:46 openstackgerrit Merged openstack/openstacksdk master: tests: Remove final use of 'TestProxyBase._verify' https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/openstacksdk/+/788216
#openstack-sdks - 2021-05-20
07:00:00 openstackgerrit Artem Goncharov proposed openstack/openstacksdk master: tests: Rename 'TestProxyBase._verify2' to '_verify' https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/openstacksdk/+/788217
07:00:00 openstackgerrit Artem Goncharov proposed openstack/openstacksdk master: tests: Rename 'TestProxyBase._verify2' to '_verify' https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/openstacksdk/+/788217
07:49:20 gtema is anybody using senlin with OpenStackSDK. In reworking of cloud layer (connection.***_cluster_***) I have figured out that it doesn't really work at all
07:49:20 gtema is anybody using senlin with OpenStackSDK. In reworking of cloud layer (connection.***_cluster_***) I have figured out that it doesn't really work at all
07:49:35 gtema and all the tests are also verifying things not how they should work
07:49:35 gtema and all the tests are also verifying things not how they should work
07:50:16 gtema therefore I am weighting dropping cloud layer support for senlin, since it is quite a big effort to fix it
07:50:16 gtema therefore I am weighting dropping cloud layer support for senlin, since it is quite a big effort to fix it
07:50:40 gtema proxy layer is reasonable and will surely stay
07:50:40 gtema proxy layer is reasonable and will surely stay
08:35:25 dtantsur gtema: I'm wondering if we even need to cloud layer.. at least for most of projects
08:35:25 dtantsur gtema: I'm wondering if we even need to cloud layer.. at least for most of projects
08:35:47 gtema ansible modules mostly use cloud layer now
08:35:47 gtema ansible modules mostly use cloud layer now
08:35:55 gtema I will start changing them soon
08:35:55 gtema I will start changing them soon
08:36:49 gtema and afaik zuul(nodepool) is also in some cases
08:36:49 gtema and afaik zuul(nodepool) is also in some cases
08:37:51 gtema create server is one of the tricky cases
08:37:51 gtema create server is one of the tricky cases
13:20:59 openstackgerrit Brian Rosmaita proposed openstack/python-openstackclient master: Add check for cinderclient.v2 support https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/python-openstackclient/+/792375
13:20:59 openstackgerrit Brian Rosmaita proposed openstack/python-openstackclient master: Add check for cinderclient.v2 support https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/python-openstackclient/+/792375
15:33:20 diablo_rojo gtema, stephenfin are we having a meeting today?
15:33:20 diablo_rojo gtema, stephenfin are we having a meeting today?
15:33:35 diablo_rojo and sdks meeting not an ndsu one
15:33:35 diablo_rojo and sdks meeting not an ndsu one
15:33:40 gtema hmm
15:33:40 gtema hmm
15:33:46 gtema you mean with students?
15:33:47 gtema you mean with students?
15:34:29 gtema oh, and now with a glitch the second message came in
15:34:29 gtema oh, and now with a glitch the second message came in
15:34:47 gtema I haven't received reminder from my calendar
15:34:47 gtema I haven't received reminder from my calendar
15:35:42 diablo_rojo gtema, perhaps I have it wrong- calendar says we have one in about a half hour?
15:35:42 diablo_rojo gtema, perhaps I have it wrong- calendar says we have one in about a half hour?
15:36:09 gtema well, it should be. It's 3rd Thursday of the month
15:36:09 gtema well, it should be. It's 3rd Thursday of the month
15:36:36 gtema I'm there, so we can do it if we have agenda
15:36:36 gtema I'm there, so we can do it if we have agenda
15:38:38 gtema calendar glitches also, now it shows one for today, but at a wrong time. What a nice day
15:38:38 gtema calendar glitches also, now it shows one for today, but at a wrong time. What a nice day
15:38:55 diablo_rojo Seems like a monday lol
15:38:55 diablo_rojo Seems like a monday lol
15:39:13 diablo_rojo Do you have things to discuss?
15:39:13 diablo_rojo Do you have things to discuss?
15:39:17 gtema yeah, but it should not be Monday, otherwise there are still 5 days to work
15:39:17 gtema yeah, but it should not be Monday, otherwise there are still 5 days to work
15:39:28 diablo_rojo I can probably invent things but I also don't need to :)
15:39:28 diablo_rojo I can probably invent things but I also don't need to :)
15:39:34 gtema well, the only thing would be tons of changes I have done for R1
15:39:34 gtema well, the only thing would be tons of changes I have done for R1
15:39:43 diablo_rojo gtema, yeah I mostly meant with everything going wrong.
15:39:43 diablo_rojo gtema, yeah I mostly meant with everything going wrong.
15:39:57 gtema sure
15:40:00 diablo_rojo gtema, sounds like we have an agenda then :) It can be a quick meeting.
15:40:00 diablo_rojo gtema, sounds like we have an agenda then :) It can be a quick meeting.
15:40:05 diablo_rojo (in 20 min)
15:40:05 diablo_rojo (in 20 min)
15:40:10 gtema yupp
15:40:10 gtema yupp
16:00:27 openstack Meeting started Thu May 20 16:00:27 2021 UTC and is due to finish in 60 minutes. The chair is gtema. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot.
16:00:27 gtema #startmeeting sdk_osc
16:00:27 openstack Meeting started Thu May 20 16:00:27 2021 UTC and is due to finish in 60 minutes. The chair is gtema. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot.
16:00:27 gtema #startmeeting sdk_osc
16:00:28 openstack Useful Commands: #action #agreed #help #info #idea #link #topic #startvote.
16:00:28 openstack Useful Commands: #action #agreed #help #info #idea #link #topic #startvote.
16:00:30 openstack The meeting name has been set to 'sdk_osc'
16:00:30 openstackgerrit Stephen Finucane proposed openstack/python-openstackclient master: compute: Update 'server resize --revert', '--confirm' help https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/python-openstackclient/+/792406
16:00:30 openstackgerrit Stephen Finucane proposed openstack/python-openstackclient master: compute: Update 'server resize --revert', '--confirm' help https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/python-openstackclient/+/792406
16:00:31 openstack The meeting name has been set to 'sdk_osc'

Earlier   Later