Earlier  
Later
New Search
Posted Nick Remark
#openstack-sdks - 2021-04-23
10:08:37 gtema 2.8 is old but zuul is still supporting it
10:09:03 frickler and always running a job that is known to fail isn't friendly to CI resources. we can always re-add the job if someone repairs it
10:09:03 frickler and always running a job that is known to fail isn't friendly to CI resources. we can always re-add the job if someone repairs it
10:09:46 frickler I can mention the removal patch in #zuul so maybe someone is then motivated to fix it
10:09:46 frickler I can mention the removal patch in #zuul so maybe someone is then motivated to fix it
10:10:23 gtema not sure zuul is interested in the job, I mean there is still support for in in the community
10:10:23 gtema not sure zuul is interested in the job, I mean there is still support for in in the community
10:11:34 frickler by the ansible community or which one?
10:11:34 frickler by the ansible community or which one?
10:11:38 gtema maybe 2.8 we can really at least disable for the beginning
10:11:38 gtema maybe 2.8 we can really at least disable for the beginning
10:11:52 gtema zuul community, since zuul still supports 2.8
10:11:52 gtema zuul community, since zuul still supports 2.8
10:12:09 gtema and zuul relies on sdk
10:12:09 gtema and zuul relies on sdk
14:11:23 frickler meh, gate is slow, lots of neutron failures causing resets :(
14:11:23 frickler meh, gate is slow, lots of neutron failures causing resets :(
14:12:25 mordred yeah - I don;'t think we use any openstack ansible modules in zuul
14:12:25 mordred yeah - I don;'t think we use any openstack ansible modules in zuul
14:12:49 mordred so the 2.8 job is probably not as important as the 37 support?
14:12:49 mordred so the 2.8 job is probably not as important as the 37 support?
14:13:11 gtema i guess ansible 2.8 job is coming from collections and not from sdk itself
14:13:11 gtema i guess ansible 2.8 job is coming from collections and not from sdk itself
14:14:40 mordred yah - but if it's always failing and nobody is fixing it, it's probably not providing much value to run it on sdk patches
14:14:40 mordred yah - but if it's always failing and nobody is fixing it, it's probably not providing much value to run it on sdk patches
14:14:50 gtema yupp
14:16:22 gtema mordred - was missing you in sdk room during ptg
14:16:22 gtema mordred - was missing you in sdk room during ptg
14:16:25 gtema :(
14:16:25 gtema :(
14:16:37 frickler the jobs are defined here https://opendev.org/openstack/openstacksdk/src/branch/master/.zuul.yaml#L295-L333
14:16:37 frickler the jobs are defined here https://opendev.org/openstack/openstacksdk/src/branch/master/.zuul.yaml#L295-L333
14:17:06 frickler the ansible-collections job is passing
14:17:06 frickler the ansible-collections job is passing
14:17:43 gtema hm, I was sure those were added for collections
14:17:43 gtema hm, I was sure those were added for collections
14:18:22 frickler but https://opendev.org/openstack/openstacksdk/src/branch/master/.zuul.yaml#L379 is weird, that should have been wallaby and now become xena, any idea why that wasn't updated earlier? just oversight?
14:18:22 frickler but https://opendev.org/openstack/openstacksdk/src/branch/master/.zuul.yaml#L379 is weird, that should have been wallaby and now become xena, any idea why that wasn't updated earlier? just oversight?
14:18:49 mordred gtema: yah - me too :(
14:18:49 mordred gtema: yah - me too :(
14:19:41 mordred gtema: I think those might be the pre-collections jobs
14:19:41 mordred gtema: I think those might be the pre-collections jobs
14:19:57 gtema maybe
14:19:57 gtema maybe
14:20:00 openstackgerrit Artem Goncharov proposed openstack/openstacksdk master: Drop jobs failing for too long https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/openstacksdk/+/787754
14:20:00 openstackgerrit Artem Goncharov proposed openstack/openstacksdk master: Drop jobs failing for too long https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/openstacksdk/+/787754
14:20:05 mordred yeah - almost certainly - these still pull in the ansible github repo
14:20:05 mordred yeah - almost certainly - these still pull in the ansible github repo
14:20:07 gtema patch is there to disable those
14:20:07 gtema patch is there to disable those
14:20:20 mordred so I think these were the jobs we added to test against the modules when they were still in ansible tree
14:20:20 mordred so I think these were the jobs we added to test against the modules when they were still in ansible tree
14:20:29 gtema frickler - I guess nobody really noticed that
14:20:29 gtema frickler - I guess nobody really noticed that
14:29:32 openstackgerrit Artem Goncharov proposed openstack/openstacksdk master: Switch to openstack-python3-xena-jobs template https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/openstacksdk/+/787758
14:29:32 openstackgerrit Artem Goncharov proposed openstack/openstacksdk master: Switch to openstack-python3-xena-jobs template https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/openstacksdk/+/787758
18:41:39 openstackgerrit Merged openstack/openstacksdk master: placement: Add support for resource providers https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/openstacksdk/+/745375
18:41:39 openstackgerrit Merged openstack/openstacksdk master: placement: Add support for resource providers https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/openstacksdk/+/745375
#openstack-sdks - 2021-04-24
00:01:48 openstackgerrit Merged openstack/openstacksdk master: Drop jobs failing for too long https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/openstacksdk/+/787754
00:01:48 openstackgerrit Merged openstack/openstacksdk master: Drop jobs failing for too long https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/openstacksdk/+/787754
09:56:17 openstackgerrit Dr. Jens Harbott proposed openstack/openstacksdk stable/wallaby: Don't send empty remote_address_group_id for security groups https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/openstacksdk/+/787838
09:56:17 openstackgerrit Dr. Jens Harbott proposed openstack/openstacksdk stable/wallaby: Don't send empty remote_address_group_id for security groups https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/openstacksdk/+/787838
10:55:16 openstackgerrit Merged openstack/openstacksdk master: Switch to openstack-python3-xena-jobs template https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/openstacksdk/+/787758
10:55:16 openstackgerrit Merged openstack/openstacksdk master: Switch to openstack-python3-xena-jobs template https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/openstacksdk/+/787758
17:37:38 openstackgerrit Dylan Zapzalka proposed openstack/openstacksdk master: Add support for the GroupType resource https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/openstacksdk/+/784178
17:37:38 openstackgerrit Dylan Zapzalka proposed openstack/openstacksdk master: Add support for the GroupType resource https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/openstacksdk/+/784178
22:23:11 openstackgerrit Dylan Zapzalka proposed openstack/openstacksdk master: Added support for the Quota set extension resource https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/openstacksdk/+/784704
23:14:59 openstackgerrit Dylan Zapzalka proposed openstack/openstacksdk master: Added support for the Quota set extension resource https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/openstacksdk/+/784704
#openstack-sdks - 2021-04-25
02:53:24 openstackgerrit Wenping Song proposed openstack/python-openstackclient master: Dropping lower constraints testing https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/python-openstackclient/+/787861
02:53:24 openstackgerrit Wenping Song proposed openstack/python-openstackclient master: Dropping lower constraints testing https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/python-openstackclient/+/787861
#openstack-sdks - 2021-04-26
07:50:34 openstackgerrit Xuan Yandong proposed openstack/cliff master: setup.cfg: Replace dashes with underscores https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/cliff/+/787931
09:16:11 openstackgerrit Merged openstack/cliff master: Use py3 as the default runtime for tox https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/cliff/+/787034
09:16:12 openstackgerrit Merged openstack/cliff master: Use py3 as the default runtime for tox https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/cliff/+/787034
09:47:36 frickler gtema: I updated the release patch on Saturday, can you please doublecheck it when you have time? https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/releases/+/786598
09:47:36 frickler gtema: I updated the release patch on Saturday, can you please doublecheck it when you have time? https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/releases/+/786598
09:47:47 gtema sure, thks
09:47:47 gtema sure, thks
10:13:59 openstackgerrit Jesper Schmitz Mouridsen proposed openstack/openstacksdk master: Support description in sg-rule creation https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/openstacksdk/+/787952
10:13:59 openstackgerrit Jesper Schmitz Mouridsen proposed openstack/openstacksdk master: Support description in sg-rule creation https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/openstacksdk/+/787952
10:24:07 openstackgerrit Merged openstack/openstacksdk master: Add support for the GroupType resource https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/openstacksdk/+/784178
10:24:07 openstackgerrit Merged openstack/openstacksdk master: Add support for the GroupType resource https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/openstacksdk/+/784178
23:33:11 openstackgerrit melanie witt proposed openstack/openstacksdk master: Add min_count and max_count attributes to Server https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/openstacksdk/+/788098
#openstack-sdks - 2021-04-27
00:00:29 openstackgerrit melanie witt proposed openstack/openstacksdk master: Add min_count and max_count attributes to Server https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/openstacksdk/+/788098
02:46:21 openstackgerrit Dylan Zapzalka proposed openstack/openstacksdk master: WIP Added support for the Group resource https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/openstacksdk/+/782013
03:19:33 openstackgerrit melanie witt proposed openstack/openstacksdk master: Allow unknown attributes in Server resource requests https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/openstacksdk/+/788098
03:19:33 openstackgerrit melanie witt proposed openstack/openstacksdk master: Allow unknown attributes in Server resource requests https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/openstacksdk/+/788098
08:58:06 openstackgerrit Stephen Finucane proposed openstack/openstacksdk master: placement: Add support for resource classes https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/openstacksdk/+/783350
08:58:07 openstackgerrit Stephen Finucane proposed openstack/openstacksdk master: tests: Sanity check 'test_proxy_base' https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/openstacksdk/+/788215
08:58:07 openstackgerrit Stephen Finucane proposed openstack/openstacksdk master: tests: Remove dead code https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/openstacksdk/+/788214
08:58:08 openstackgerrit Stephen Finucane proposed openstack/openstacksdk master: tests: Remove final use of 'TestProxyBase._verify' https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/openstacksdk/+/788216
08:58:09 openstackgerrit Stephen Finucane proposed openstack/openstacksdk master: tests: Rename 'TestProxyBase._verify2' to '_verify' https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/openstacksdk/+/788217
08:58:10 openstackgerrit Stephen Finucane proposed openstack/openstacksdk master: WIP: placement: Add support for resource provider inventories https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/openstacksdk/+/788218
10:12:34 openstackgerrit wu.chunyang proposed openstack/ansible-collections-openstack master: Fix the idempotent of compute_flavor module https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/ansible-collections-openstack/+/788236
10:12:34 openstackgerrit wu.chunyang proposed openstack/ansible-collections-openstack master: Fix the idempotent of compute_flavor module https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/ansible-collections-openstack/+/788236
16:29:08 twilit_dragon gtema, for the API Extension resource, is there an example of the namespace response parameter I can view? It's mentioned within the Block Storage API but it's not included in the response example of the API Extensions resource.
16:29:08 twilit_dragon gtema, for the API Extension resource, is there an example of the namespace response parameter I can view? It's mentioned within the Block Storage API but it's not included in the response example of the API Extensions resource.
18:08:09 openstackgerrit Thiago Paiva Brito proposed openstack/openstacksdk master: Adding retype_volume to BlockStorageCloudMixin https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/openstacksdk/+/776272
18:08:09 openstackgerrit Thiago Paiva Brito proposed openstack/openstacksdk master: Adding retype_volume to BlockStorageCloudMixin https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/openstacksdk/+/776272
18:14:25 openstackgerrit Thiago Paiva Brito proposed openstack/openstacksdk master: Implement metadata operation support for Volumes https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/openstacksdk/+/777801
18:14:25 openstackgerrit Thiago Paiva Brito proposed openstack/openstacksdk master: Implement metadata operation support for Volumes https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/openstacksdk/+/777801

Earlier   Later