Earlier  
Later
New Search
Posted Nick Remark
#openstack-sdks - 2021-04-09
16:29:43 cenne no space between the -c and the rest of the stuff and the -r and the rest. I thought that was weird, and then well, it also
16:30:23 cenne (coincidentally)? it did fail. Just curious is that on purpose?
16:30:55 gtema_ that's on purpose and is working this way
16:32:53 cenne ok cool. thank you. i'll try to find ou what else might have got it to fail then. thanks.
16:58:32 openstackgerrit Merged openstack/osc-lib master: Add support for SDK auth caching https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/osc-lib/+/765650
23:29:06 openstackgerrit Merged openstack/python-openstackclient master: Add support for token caching https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/python-openstackclient/+/765652
#openstack-sdks - 2021-04-10
05:42:37 openstackgerrit Dylan Zapzalka proposed openstack/openstacksdk master: Add support for the GroupType resource https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/openstacksdk/+/784178
11:43:27 openstackgerrit Cenne proposed openstack/openstacksdk master: Implement driver vendor passthrough (List Methods) https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/openstacksdk/+/785753
17:00:39 openstackgerrit Cenne proposed openstack/openstacksdk master: Implement driver vendor passthrough (List Methods) https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/openstacksdk/+/785753
18:32:38 openstackgerrit Cenne proposed openstack/openstacksdk master: Implement driver vendor passthrough (List Methods) https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/openstacksdk/+/785753
#openstack-sdks - 2021-04-11
10:17:49 openstackgerrit Kajal Sah proposed openstack/openstacksdk master: Adds Node Vendor passthru https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/openstacksdk/+/785445
10:24:22 openstackgerrit Kajal Sah proposed openstack/openstacksdk master: Adds Node Vendor passthru https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/openstacksdk/+/785445
17:08:22 openstackgerrit Cenne proposed openstack/openstacksdk master: Implement driver vendor passthrough (List Methods + Passthru) https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/openstacksdk/+/785753
17:22:35 openstackgerrit Cenne proposed openstack/openstacksdk master: Implement driver vendor passthrough (List Methods + Passthru) https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/openstacksdk/+/785753
#openstack-sdks - 2021-04-12
01:26:00 openstackgerrit Kajal Sah proposed openstack/openstacksdk master: Adds Node Vendor passthru https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/openstacksdk/+/785445
08:08:05 openstackgerrit sue proposed openstack/python-openstackclient master: remove Volume v1 https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/python-openstackclient/+/785827
08:40:09 openstackgerrit Aija Jauntēva proposed openstack/openstacksdk master: Add deploy_steps to baremetal node provisioning https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/openstacksdk/+/785829
08:40:09 openstackgerrit Aija Jauntēva proposed openstack/openstacksdk master: Add deploy_steps to baremetal node provisioning https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/openstacksdk/+/785829
09:32:15 openstackgerrit sue proposed openstack/python-openstackclient master: remove Volume v1 https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/python-openstackclient/+/785827
17:53:33 openstackgerrit Cenne proposed openstack/openstacksdk master: Implement driver vendor passthrough (List Methods + Passthru) https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/openstacksdk/+/785753
17:59:27 openstackgerrit Cenne proposed openstack/openstacksdk master: Implement driver vendor passthrough (List Methods + Passthru) https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/openstacksdk/+/785753
18:16:31 openstackgerrit Cenne proposed openstack/openstacksdk master: Implement driver vendor passthrough (List Methods + Passthru) https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/openstacksdk/+/785753
23:13:05 openstackgerrit Merged openstack/openstacksdk master: Add deploy_steps to baremetal node provisioning https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/openstacksdk/+/785829
#openstack-sdks - 2021-04-13
05:15:34 openstackgerrit Cenne proposed openstack/openstacksdk master: Implement driver vendor passthrough https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/openstacksdk/+/785753
13:00:58 openstackgerrit Slawek Kaplonski proposed openstack/openstacksdk master: Allow unknown attributes to be included in request body https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/openstacksdk/+/768208
15:27:41 openstackgerrit Cenne proposed openstack/openstacksdk master: Implement driver vendor passthrough https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/openstacksdk/+/785753
15:50:46 openstackgerrit Riccardo Pittau proposed openstack/openstacksdk master: Fixing more import orders https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/openstacksdk/+/782809
15:50:47 openstackgerrit Riccardo Pittau proposed openstack/openstacksdk master: Fix more import orders https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/openstacksdk/+/786070
19:40:12 ianw fyi i'm seeing https://storyboard.openstack.org/#!/story/2008577 with a new cloud we're setting up
19:40:41 ianw BadRequestException: 400: Client Error for url: http://arm-openstack.osuosl.org:9696/v2.0/security-group-rules, Unrecognized attribute(s) 'remote_address_group_id'
19:41:19 ianw https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/openstacksdk/+/755644
19:41:38 ianw looking now; it seems there's neutron and nova paths for security groups and i'm not sure which is being taken
19:52:41 openstackgerrit Kajal Sah proposed openstack/openstacksdk master: Adds Node Vendor passthru https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/openstacksdk/+/785445
20:06:51 mordred ianw: neutron
20:07:19 mordred ianw: the places where we go down the nova path should be vanishingly small these days - but in this case it looks like your traceback is definitely going down the neutron branch
20:07:58 ianw mordred: yeah; it seems like the original change bumped the API version, but i don't quite see if/where openstacksdk is checking that
20:09:32 mordred ianw: yeah - I'm not sure how this would detect whether or not to send that attribute
20:10:12 mordred slaweq: ^^ when you get a chance
20:10:57 mordred my guess is that remote_address_group_id only exists either on newer neutron or if a plugin is installed - but the patch adding support is causing it to be sent to the remote side unconditionally
20:11:10 mordred Ill be honest - I don't know what the right story is for that for neutron
20:11:21 mordred but slaweq knows everything
20:14:07 ianw i feel like it's always there, but yeah, only for recent-ish neutron
20:26:40 ianw revision_number = resource.Body('revision_number', type=int)
20:26:40 ianw #: Revision number of the resource. *Type: int*
20:26:44 ianw feels like it might be relevant?
20:34:30 ianw no, that's more for syncing object changes
23:47:22 openstackgerrit Ian Wienand proposed openstack/openstacksdk master: Don't send empty remote_address_group_id for security groups https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/openstacksdk/+/786148
23:48:33 ianw mordred / slaweq: ^ that's about my best guess
#openstack-sdks - 2021-04-14
01:17:33 openstackgerrit Ian Wienand proposed openstack/openstacksdk master: Don't send empty remote_address_group_id for security groups https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/openstacksdk/+/786148
03:43:31 openstackgerrit Ian Wienand proposed openstack/openstacksdk master: Don't send empty remote_address_group_id for security groups https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/openstacksdk/+/786148
03:43:31 openstackgerrit Ian Wienand proposed openstack/openstacksdk master: Don't send empty remote_address_group_id for security groups https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/openstacksdk/+/786148
06:03:52 slaweq mordred: ianw: sorry, I wasn't online yesterday evening
06:03:52 slaweq mordred: ianw: sorry, I wasn't online yesterday evening
06:03:58 slaweq I just reviewed Your patch
06:03:58 slaweq I just reviewed Your patch
07:03:03 openstackgerrit Ryan Zimmerman proposed openstack/openstacksdk master: Add compute microversion 2.77 https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/openstacksdk/+/786169
09:20:02 openstackgerrit Slawek Kaplonski proposed openstack/openstacksdk master: Allow unknown attributes to be included in request body https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/openstacksdk/+/768208
09:20:02 openstackgerrit Slawek Kaplonski proposed openstack/openstacksdk master: Allow unknown attributes to be included in request body https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/openstacksdk/+/768208
14:10:06 openstackgerrit Merged openstack/python-openstackclient master: requirements: Drop os-testr https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/python-openstackclient/+/785306
14:10:06 openstackgerrit Merged openstack/python-openstackclient master: requirements: Drop os-testr https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/python-openstackclient/+/785306
17:40:55 openstackgerrit Ryan Zimmerman proposed openstack/openstacksdk master: WIP Add compute microversion 2.78 https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/openstacksdk/+/786290
17:45:04 openstackgerrit Ryan Zimmerman proposed openstack/openstacksdk master: WIP Add compute microversion 2.78 https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/openstacksdk/+/786290
21:14:01 ade_lee_ fungi, hey - would like to pick your brain a bit on the best way to set up some ci jobs
21:14:01 ade_lee_ fungi, hey - would like to pick your brain a bit on the best way to set up some ci jobs
21:15:27 ade_lee_ specifically, I'd like to set up some jobs in various projects to make sure that no code that fails fips gets merged in -- I tried to do this for barbican as a test case here .. https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/barbican/+/760665/15/.zuul.yaml
21:15:27 ade_lee_ specifically, I'd like to set up some jobs in various projects to make sure that no code that fails fips gets merged in -- I tried to do this for barbican as a test case here .. https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/barbican/+/760665/15/.zuul.yaml
21:17:03 ade_lee_ if I want to do this more generally -- will it work to check in that enable-fips.yaml playbook somewhere (maybe devstack) and then just invoke it as a pre-run in whatever job I want to be in fips?
21:17:03 ade_lee_ if I want to do this more generally -- will it work to check in that enable-fips.yaml playbook somewhere (maybe devstack) and then just invoke it as a pre-run in whatever job I want to be in fips?
21:19:37 ade_lee_ or do I need to define something like a devstack-tox-functional-fips etc.?
21:19:37 ade_lee_ or do I need to define something like a devstack-tox-functional-fips etc.?
21:20:17 ade_lee_ sorry - not sure if this is the right channel for these questions ..
21:20:17 ade_lee_ sorry - not sure if this is the right channel for these questions ..
21:25:14 fungi ade_lee_: well, this is more appropriate for openstacksdk and openstackclient discussions, but no worries. yeah what you've got there could be included in devstack or openstack-zuul-jobs... you might consider making it an ansible role rather than a playbook though, as that would allow you to include it in a job variant without having to rely on more heavyweight job inheritance
21:25:14 fungi ade_lee_: well, this is more appropriate for openstacksdk and openstackclient discussions, but no worries. yeah what you've got there could be included in devstack or openstack-zuul-jobs... you might consider making it an ansible role rather than a playbook though, as that would allow you to include it in a job variant without having to rely on more heavyweight job inheritance
21:26:33 ade_lee_ fungi, do you have an example of where that is used?
21:26:33 ade_lee_ fungi, do you have an example of where that is used?
21:26:45 fungi i'll see what i can dig up, just a sec
21:26:45 fungi i'll see what i can dig up, just a sec
21:33:52 fungi may take me a little longer to find a good example of what i'm thinking of (job writing isn't actually one of my strengths, but you've got me curious now too)
21:33:52 fungi may take me a little longer to find a good example of what i'm thinking of (job writing isn't actually one of my strengths, but you've got me curious now too)
21:34:41 ade_lee_ fungi, ack - thanks -- no problem -- I'll just check back here later to see if you've found something
21:34:41 ade_lee_ fungi, ack - thanks -- no problem -- I'll just check back here later to see if you've found something
21:41:54 fungi ade_lee_: okay, i have a fairly concise example relevant to the sdk channel even... ;)
21:41:54 fungi ade_lee_: okay, i have a fairly concise example relevant to the sdk channel even... ;)
21:41:58 fungi https://opendev.org/openstack/openstacksdk/src/branch/master/playbooks/devstack/post.yaml#L9
21:41:58 fungi https://opendev.org/openstack/openstacksdk/src/branch/master/playbooks/devstack/post.yaml#L9
21:42:39 fungi that "devstack" playbook in openstacksdk includes the process-stackviz role, which is itself defined in the devstack repo: https://opendev.org/openstack/devstack/src/branch/master/roles/process-stackviz
21:42:39 fungi that "devstack" playbook in openstacksdk includes the process-stackviz role, which is itself defined in the devstack repo: https://opendev.org/openstack/devstack/src/branch/master/roles/process-stackviz
21:43:18 ade_lee_ fungi, cool
21:43:18 ade_lee_ fungi, cool
21:43:35 fungi so what i was (poorly) trying to express earlier is that by encapsulating your tasks into a role, that role can reside easily in a different repository than the playbooks (and hence job definitions) which rely on it
21:43:35 fungi so what i was (poorly) trying to express earlier is that by encapsulating your tasks into a role, that role can reside easily in a different repository than the playbooks (and hence job definitions) which rely on it
21:44:35 fungi so multiple jobs and their playbooks in different projects, e.g. nova, heat, grenade... reuse that role in jobs they've defined
21:44:35 fungi so multiple jobs and their playbooks in different projects, e.g. nova, heat, grenade... reuse that role in jobs they've defined
21:44:56 ade_lee_ fungi, ack thats the model I was looking for , rather than job inheritance
21:44:56 ade_lee_ fungi, ack thats the model I was looking for , rather than job inheritance
21:45:42 ade_lee_ fungi, thanks -- looking at how opensdk uses that now
21:45:42 ade_lee_ fungi, thanks -- looking at how opensdk uses that now
21:45:50 ade_lee_ but this is great - thanks!
21:45:50 ade_lee_ but this is great - thanks!

Earlier   Later