Posted	Nick	Remark
#openstack-sdks - 2021-03-05
09:41:42	openstackgerrit	Rico Lin proposed openstack/api-sig master: Change primary eamil for Rico Lin https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/api-sig/+/778863
12:05:04	openstackgerrit	Stephen Finucane proposed openstack/python-openstackclient master: compute: Add functional tests for --block-device https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/python-openstackclient/+/778763
12:05:43	openstackgerrit	Stephen Finucane proposed openstack/python-openstackclient master: compute: Add functional tests for --block-device https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/python-openstackclient/+/778763
12:56:32	openstackgerrit	Bharat Kunwar proposed openstack/python-openstackclient master: network: Allow user to unset gateway for a subnet https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/python-openstackclient/+/778906
12:58:38	openstackgerrit	Artem Goncharov proposed openstack/openstacksdk master: Switch networking function in cloud layer to proxy https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/openstacksdk/+/766783
13:11:33	openstackgerrit	Stephen Finucane proposed openstack/python-openstackclient master: compute: Add functional tests for --block-device https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/python-openstackclient/+/778763
13:11:34	openstackgerrit	Stephen Finucane proposed openstack/python-openstackclient master: compute: Add support for loading BDMs from files https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/python-openstackclient/+/778910
13:18:07	stephenfin	gtema: You might like https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/python-openstackclient/+/778910
13:18:23	gtema	;)
13:18:42	stephenfin	it's certainly a unique way of doing things, IMO :)
13:19:17	gtema	yeah
13:19:40	stephenfin	I have an open question on it that I think you would have good ideas on
13:19:50	stephenfin	(about what type of path we want to support)
13:20:12	stephenfin	I see some other examples in networking code that use plain paths, so I might be overcomplicating matters. idk
13:20:39	gtema	agree, also on swift we use FS paths
13:57:09	brtknr	mordred: frickler: Please take a look at https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/python-openstackclient/+/778906
14:16:08	openstackgerrit	Bharat Kunwar proposed openstack/python-openstackclient master: network: Add missing subnet unset --gateway https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/python-openstackclient/+/778906
14:54:45	openstackgerrit	Thiago Paiva Brito proposed openstack/openstacksdk master: Add update volume to image capability https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/openstacksdk/+/778956
17:48:04	mordred	slaweq: heya - do floating ips support tags? (the sdk resource looks like they do)
19:52:21	slaweq	mordred: hi, let me check that
19:52:55	slaweq	mordred: yes, https://docs.openstack.org/api-ref/network/v2/?expanded=update-floating-ip-detail,show-floating-ip-details-detail#floating-ips-floatingips
19:54:23	mordred	slaweq: cool - but that's only if the cloud has the standard-attr-tag extension, yeah?
19:54:38	slaweq	mordred: yes
19:54:58	mordred	cool.
20:00:33	slaweq	I'm glad I could help :)
#openstack-sdks - 2021-03-06
11:41:30	openstackgerrit	Merged openstack/python-openstackclient master: Add reno for change Ic3c555226a220efd9b0f27edffccf6c4c95c2747 https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/python-openstackclient/+/770128
13:57:30	openstackgerrit	Merged openstack/python-openstackclient master: network: Add missing subnet unset --gateway https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/python-openstackclient/+/778906
#openstack-sdks - 2021-03-08
08:06:17	openstackgerrit	Dylan Zapzalka proposed openstack/openstacksdk master: Added support for the Default Volume Types resource https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/openstacksdk/+/779172
12:08:14	openstackgerrit	Akihiro Motoki proposed openstack/openstackclient master: DNM: Test openstackclient-check-plugins job https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/openstackclient/+/779240
15:52:25	openstackgerrit	Riccardo Pittau proposed openstack/openstacksdk master: Apply pep8 import order style https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/openstacksdk/+/779288
#openstack-sdks - 2021-03-09
18:09:07	openstackgerrit	Radosław Piliszek proposed openstack/openstackclient master: osc-check-plugins job: Ensure OSC plugins from git https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/openstackclient/+/779240
18:09:27	openstackgerrit	Radosław Piliszek proposed openstack/openstackclient master: Add python-masakariclient https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/openstackclient/+/778542
18:10:07	openstackgerrit	Radosław Piliszek proposed openstack/openstackclient master: Add python-masakariclient https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/openstackclient/+/778542
20:32:44	yoctozepto	I might have a dumb question
20:33:12	yoctozepto	but is not the 'type' in 'Body' meant to convert the values on create/update?
20:33:23	yoctozepto	I would assume it, but it is not what I am observing
20:33:47	yoctozepto	when trying to get masakari segment to update its is_enabled
20:34:00	yoctozepto	it just passes the string 'False' or 'True' through
20:34:10	yoctozepto	remaps the attribute name properly
20:34:16	yoctozepto	but not the value
21:05:06	mordred	yoctozepto: what you want is: type=format.BoolStr
21:05:47	mordred	yoctozepto: (grep for "format.BoolStr" and you can see examples of use
21:07:19	yoctozepto	mordred: thanks, will check this out tomorrow; a quick followup question: any downsides to this? i.e., when stick to 'bool'
21:08:45	yoctozepto	when to* stick to
21:09:58	mordred	yoctozepto: I don't think there are any downsides - the main thinng is that the conversion code needs a constructor
21:10:12	mordred	if it's not a list or dict (which need logic) - the conversion code does type(value)
21:10:22	mordred	and sadly bool('False') == True
21:11:11	mordred	I honestly can't think of a reason why special casing bool in _convert_type would be bad ...
21:11:51	mordred	but there might be a reason I'm not thinking of, and using format.BoolStr is safe enough until we could be happy of that
21:12:02	mordred	so - long story short - no, I can't think of many reasons to just use bool somewhere
21:12:51	mordred	yoctozepto: type=bool works fine if the server is returning a json bool and not a string
#openstack-sdks - 2021-03-10
06:02:53	frickler	this reminds me of https://twitter.com/RachelTrue/status/1365461618977476610 , not sure if that's really a True story, though
06:17:49	yoctozepto	mordred: thanks for your answer
06:18:01	yoctozepto	the server returns a bool
06:18:17	yoctozepto	I am asking about converting what client sets
06:18:33	yoctozepto	(just in case these are two different things)
06:19:54	yoctozepto	frickler: hehehe, I saw that already, that was an overly smart form haha
09:44:11	yoctozepto	mordred: yeah, I figured there was a misunderstanding between us - the server uses json booleans and it's the client that does not do the conversion
09:44:24	yoctozepto	so I understand this is only from the server to client
09:44:35	yoctozepto	and client should know what to set locally
10:59:01	openstackgerrit	Polina Gubina proposed openstack/ansible-collections-openstack master: Container module for management Swift containers https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/ansible-collections-openstack/+/779712
11:09:28	openstackgerrit	Polina Gubina proposed openstack/ansible-collections-openstack master: Object module for management Swift objects https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/ansible-collections-openstack/+/779718
11:16:33	openstackgerrit	Polina Gubina proposed openstack/ansible-collections-openstack master: Object module for management Swift objects https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/ansible-collections-openstack/+/779718
11:17:18	openstackgerrit	Polina Gubina proposed openstack/ansible-collections-openstack master: Container module for management Swift containers https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/ansible-collections-openstack/+/779712
11:17:43	openstackgerrit	Polina Gubina proposed openstack/ansible-collections-openstack master: Container module for management Swift containers https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/ansible-collections-openstack/+/779712
11:18:45	openstackgerrit	Polina Gubina proposed openstack/ansible-collections-openstack master: Container module for management Swift containers https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/ansible-collections-openstack/+/779712
11:20:51	openstackgerrit	Polina Gubina proposed openstack/ansible-collections-openstack master: Object module for management Swift objects https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/ansible-collections-openstack/+/779718
11:21:50	openstackgerrit	Polina Gubina proposed openstack/ansible-collections-openstack master: Container module for management Swift containers https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/ansible-collections-openstack/+/779712
11:32:56	openstackgerrit	Polina Gubina proposed openstack/ansible-collections-openstack master: Container module for management Swift containers https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/ansible-collections-openstack/+/779712
11:33:50	openstackgerrit	Polina Gubina proposed openstack/ansible-collections-openstack master: Object module for management Swift objects https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/ansible-collections-openstack/+/779718
14:41:33	openstackgerrit	Polina Gubina proposed openstack/ansible-collections-openstack master: Container module for management Swift containers https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/ansible-collections-openstack/+/779712
15:14:02	openstackgerrit	Polina Gubina proposed openstack/ansible-collections-openstack master: Object module for management Swift objects https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/ansible-collections-openstack/+/779718
15:43:12	openstackgerrit	Polina Gubina proposed openstack/ansible-collections-openstack master: Container module for management Swift containers https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/ansible-collections-openstack/+/779712
15:46:44	openstackgerrit	Polina Gubina proposed openstack/ansible-collections-openstack master: Object module for management Swift objects https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/ansible-collections-openstack/+/779718
19:16:40	yoctozepto	I just realised that for an update (PUT), osdk gives me GET-PUT-GET even though the PUT sends the objects in full
19:16:48	yoctozepto	so it's quite wasteful
19:17:11	yoctozepto	any reasoning behind that?
19:17:55	gtema	all depends on the dedicated set of calls. If you have concrete object - it should not, if you have just name - we will first search
19:39:13	yoctozepto	but if I have the UUID
19:39:24	yoctozepto	no search should be happening, PUT can happen directly
19:39:50	gtema	gimme you script please
19:45:40	yoctozepto	sorry, my eyes tricked me, it's only PUT-GET (doing it consecutively I mistakenly saw GET-PUT-GET)
19:45:51	yoctozepto	so the issue is only
19:45:55	yoctozepto	why PUT&GET
19:46:14	gtema	no problem. There are definitely cases it will do it this way if SDK doesn't really know what it has
19:46:56	yoctozepto	ignore me, I should rest more, I have this another GET too
19:47:10	yoctozepto	:D
19:47:12	gtema	PUT&GET - which service/call? there afair cases where it is required
19:47:40	yoctozepto	noo, it's just me overlooking own code
19:47:53	yoctozepto	twice in one case, need to go rest
19:48:02	gtema	oki :)
20:12:09	mordred	:)
20:13:01	mordred	(there are definitely cases where we do a followup GET on the user's behalf, because sometimes the result from the PUT is not a useable full object - server comes to mind ... but glad to hear this time it wasn't us)
#openstack-sdks - 2021-03-11
07:36:18	yoctozepto	cross-posting this message on #openstack-release and #openstack-sdks)
07:36:18	yoctozepto	hello dears, I have a question regarding openstacksdk release; I have just noticed it is not treated as "client library" and had its "final release" on Mar 03; the issue is masakariclient has code that depends on unreleased openstacksdk features; please let me know if openstacksdk may release again for wallaby or masakari is doomed (/me
08:13:49	openstackgerrit	Polina Gubina proposed openstack/ansible-collections-openstack master: Object module for management Swift objects https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/ansible-collections-openstack/+/779718
08:49:48	yoctozepto	specifically I am about https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/openstacksdk/+/777299
09:56:30	yoctozepto	(I got answers on #openstack-sdk)
09:58:13	yoctozepto	(I got answers on #openstack-release) sorry :-)
09:59:05	gtema	yoctozepto, we can release SDK "any" point in time

Earlier   Later