| Posted | Nick | Remark | |
|---|---|---|---|
| #openstack-sdks - 2020-05-07 | |||
| 18:49:03 | mordred | dtroyer: maybe there's a transform happening cloud-side or something | |
| 18:50:40 | dtroyer | I do know it is VMware's Queens-era vSphere+OpenStack whatever-they-call-it but that's about it | |
| 18:50:52 | mordred | dtroyer: clarkb says: | |
| 18:50:54 | mordred | clarkb>mordred: ish. They dont do anything useful except for the swift based upload dedup | |
| 18:51:03 | mordred | clarkb>mordred: glance can change the image without telling you and so thr checksum you provide to glance is uselss also glance doesnt check it aiui | |
| 18:51:33 | mordred | dtroyer: so it's possible we're providing a checksum to glance now which is potentially problematic because $sadness | |
| 18:52:18 | dtroyer | I suppose it should be noted too that these are vmdk images, which I've never uploaded to Glance before, dunno if there is anything to that | |
| 18:52:36 | mordred | dtroyer: if you find that to be true, I'd definitley be in support of just not providing it if it's garbage with no value and only serves to possible break people | |
| 18:53:45 | mordred | dtroyer: look for validate_checksum in openstack/image/v2/_proxy.py | |
| 18:53:51 | dtroyer | when I loop back around to this I can tweak that out to see if it matters…kk | |
| 18:53:51 | dtroyer | when I loop back around to this I can tweak that out to see if it matters…kk | |
| 18:54:18 | mordred | dtroyer: I think as an easy first step - we can probably just set that to false in osc | |
| 18:54:35 | mordred | dtroyer: and if that fixes it - maybe we change the default value in sdk to false | |
| 18:55:23 | mordred | dtroyer: when the cloud backend is swift and we have to upload to swift first, we use the locally calculated checksums as a de-duplication step so that if yo have to upload again you can avoid re-uploading swift objects | |
| 18:55:34 | mordred | but I thnik for non-swift it really is just a waste of energy | |
| 18:55:58 | mordred | and even in the swift case I don't think the glance checksum helps anything | |
| 19:52:40 | openstackgerrit | Merged openstack/openstacksdk master: Add cipher list support for octavia https://review.opendev.org/721351 | |
| 21:38:55 | brtknr | mordred: weirdly that issue has magically disappeared now. not sure why it was there in the first place | |
| 21:39:24 | brtknr | its working for me now, nothing to worry about | |
| 21:59:02 | mordred | brtknr: \o/ | |
| #openstack-sdks - 2020-05-08 | |||
| 10:04:43 | openstackgerrit | Merged openstack/openstacksdk master: Fix metric names in the object_store https://review.opendev.org/726167 | |
| 14:47:02 | nightmare_unreal | how does osc cli determine which api version to use ?? | |
| 15:30:50 | openstackgerrit | Alex Schultz proposed openstack/openstacksdk master: Don't error if clouds.yaml is not readable https://review.opendev.org/726416 | |
| 15:44:54 | openstackgerrit | Sagi Shnaidman proposed openstack/ansible-collections-openstack master: DNM test q branch https://review.opendev.org/726421 | |
| 16:03:23 | gtema | mordred, we don't have a PTG slot planned for SDK or API-SIG? Or am I blind | |
| 16:06:29 | gtema | dtantsur, elmiko ^^. Deadline seems to be this Sunday | |
| 16:07:22 | elmiko | we put forth no planned session for the api-sig | |
| 16:07:45 | elmiko | is there a desire to have one? (i feel like we are running on fumes at this point, activity-wise) | |
| 16:08:03 | gtema | we were talking to have some | |
| 16:08:13 | gtema | discovery documents, etc | |
| 16:08:45 | elmiko | gtema: if you want to take the lead on proposing a session for api-sig, i'm +2 for it =) | |
| 16:08:46 | gtema | and definitely on SDK part | |
| 16:08:58 | elmiko | i figured sdk would have something to talk about | |
| 16:10:36 | gtema | okay, filling the form | |
| 16:15:04 | gtema | does anyone knows, whether it's only about filling form (we want), or also the time planning in ethercalc? | |
| 16:17:49 | elmiko | i'm not sure | |
| 16:18:13 | gtema | I'm also lost in all those emails | |
| 16:18:41 | elmiko | maybe reach out to diablo_rojo_phon ? | |
| 16:18:48 | smcginnis | I think the ethercalc is the important step. | |
| 16:19:15 | gtema | okay, will do so | |
| 16:19:47 | gtema | I guess for both API-SIG and SDK/CLI we are mostly Europe+US, right? | |
| 16:22:37 | gtema | those ironic guys, blocked almost each day ;-) | |
| 16:27:45 | gtema | entered 1 hour for API-SIG June 2nd 16 - 17 UTC, and for SDK/CLI: June 1st 15-17 UTC and 3rd 15-17 UTC | |
| 16:32:06 | diablo_rojo_phon | gtema: make sure to fill out the survey too and not just the ethercalc :) | |
| 16:32:16 | gtema | done already, thans | |
| 16:32:18 | gtema | thanks | |
| 16:43:26 | diablo_rojo_phon | Thank you! | |
| 16:45:13 | elmiko | gtema: thanks for taking the lead on that =) | |
| 17:56:35 | dtroyer | mordred, gtema: Setting validate_checksum=False fixed the image create issue with the vmware cloud… It is defaulted True in 3 places in the SDK, changing only BaseImageProxy.create_image is sufficient, or of course turning it off in OSC would work too. Do you guys have a preference? | |
| 17:56:35 | dtroyer | mordred, gtema: Setting validate_checksum=False fixed the image create issue with the vmware cloud… It is defaulted True in 3 places in the SDK, changing only BaseImageProxy.create_image is sufficient, or of course turning it off in OSC would work too. Do you guys have a preference? | |
| 18:08:55 | mordred | dtroyer: I think changing it in BaseImageProxy.create_image should be fine, yeah? I think we should just do that - best I can tell it's not super useful | |
| 19:35:37 | openstackgerrit | Dean Troyer proposed openstack/openstacksdk master: Set BaseImageProxy.create_image validate_checksum default to False https://review.opendev.org/726465 | |
| 19:37:26 | dtroyer | mordred: ^^^ only covers the unit testing updates | |
| #openstack-sdks - 2020-05-09 | |||
| 01:34:04 | rm_work | mordred / dtroyer: found one more weird thing... the "properties" shown on `show image` are slightly different | |
| 01:35:01 | rm_work | the new client using SDK doesn't return `owner_id` and DOES return `self` which contains the relative URL to the image | |
| 01:35:13 | rm_work | which messes with some code we had in our deployment pipeline | |
| 01:51:11 | rm_work | (if you try to copy every property from an `image show` into a new `image create`, passing self is not valid | |
| 01:51:14 | rm_work | ) | |
| 01:56:35 | rm_work | in the meantime i think i will strip out the `self` in our code, but ... i wonder if others will see this issue, and what (if anything) we should do about it... I guess `owner_id` should be added in the SDK | |
| 05:39:15 | AJaeger | mordred: https://opendev.org/openstack/openstackclient/src/branch/master/playbooks/openstackclient-check-plugins/run.yaml#L13 uses pbrx - do you want to rewrite that or should we stop retiring pbrx? | |
| 10:35:57 | openstackgerrit | Sagi Shnaidman proposed openstack/ansible-collections-openstack master: Ensure modules work with queens devstack https://review.opendev.org/726421 | |
| 14:36:12 | mordred | AJaeger: oh! good find. yeah, let's fix that in osc | |
| 14:37:08 | mordred | rm_work: yeah - let's fix sdk. let's add owner_id - and then for self, rather than stripping it (not sure if people need it) - let's update sdk to know not to try to send self when we create an image | |
| 14:44:35 | AJaeger | mordred: could you do the fix in osc, please? | |
| 14:57:10 | openstackgerrit | Monty Taylor proposed openstack/ansible-collections-openstack master: WIP Remove all of the os_ prefixes https://review.opendev.org/713056 | |
| 14:57:18 | openstackgerrit | Monty Taylor proposed openstack/ansible-collections-openstack master: WIP Remove all of the os_ prefixes https://review.opendev.org/713056 | |
| 15:44:47 | openstackgerrit | Monty Taylor proposed openstack/ansible-collections-openstack master: Remove all of the os_ prefixes https://review.opendev.org/713056 | |
| 15:44:48 | openstackgerrit | Monty Taylor proposed openstack/ansible-collections-openstack master: Rename all of the modules https://review.opendev.org/726538 | |
| 15:45:03 | mordred | AJaeger: yes - I will do it | |
| 16:07:30 | AJaeger | thanks, mordred | |
| 22:31:27 | rm_work | mordred: hmm yeah that'd work | |
| #openstack-sdks - 2020-05-10 | |||
| 00:27:21 | openstackgerrit | Adam Harwell proposed openstack/openstacksdk master: Show owner_id AND owner as properties https://review.opendev.org/726562 | |
| 00:30:04 | openstackgerrit | Adam Harwell proposed openstack/python-openstackclient master: Ignore `self` property if passed on image create https://review.opendev.org/726563 | |
| 00:33:16 | rm_work | mordred: ^^ fixed. | |
| 00:33:54 | rm_work | any idea when https://review.opendev.org/#/c/725427/ might merge? Are you the only core reviewer really merging things at this point? T_T | |
| 01:04:39 | openstackgerrit | Adam Harwell proposed openstack/openstacksdk master: Show owner_id AND owner as properties https://review.opendev.org/726562 | |
| 02:16:50 | openstackgerrit | Adam Harwell proposed openstack/python-openstackclient master: Ignore `self` property if passed on image create https://review.opendev.org/726563 | |
| 07:06:39 | rm_work | mordred: so i don't really understand why the one tox-py36-tips test would have the failures it does | |
| 07:06:41 | rm_work | in https://review.opendev.org/#/c/726562/ | |
| 11:03:35 | sshnaidm|off | need an opinion of SDK devs - are there possible problems when using latest SDK to manage openstack old release, like Queens for example? | |
| 12:24:03 | mordred | sshnaidm|off: no, it should 100% work and is explicitly supported | |
| 12:44:15 | mordred | rm_work: looking at it | |
| 12:51:48 | openstackgerrit | Victor Coutellier proposed openstack/openstacksdk master: Add name query filter to keystone service https://review.opendev.org/726621 | |
| 12:54:33 | sshnaidm|off | mordred, great, so modules should work too | |
| 13:01:53 | mordred | sshnaidm|off: yes. if they don't it's a bug | |
| 13:02:13 | mordred | sshnaidm|off: imo, there is no reason to ever use any release of openstacksdk other than the most recent one | |
| 13:03:03 | mordred | rm_work: ok - looking in to this - I think this is a slightly different/worse issue :( | |
| 13:03:48 | mordred | rm_work: "owner_id" should never have existed - that's an sdk-side API break. the glance value is owner, the sdk value has been owner for a very long time, and it looks like the osc value was owner before the update | |
| 13:04:14 | mordred | rm_work: I'm going to see if I can't figure out how to fix it without things completely sucking | |
| 13:07:59 | openstackgerrit | Sagi Shnaidman proposed openstack/ansible-collections-openstack master: Ensure modules work with queens devstack https://review.opendev.org/726421 | |
| 13:20:24 | mordred | rm_work: also, we're supposed to be stripping self from the image object in sdk - but we're apparently only doing it in list() | |
| 13:21:30 | openstackgerrit | Monty Taylor proposed openstack/openstacksdk master: Strip self from incoming glance properties https://review.opendev.org/726626 | |
| 13:21:31 | openstackgerrit | Monty Taylor proposed openstack/openstacksdk master: Fix image owner field https://review.opendev.org/726627 | |
| 13:27:47 | openstackgerrit | Monty Taylor proposed openstack/openstacksdk master: Remove some unneeded things from test-requirements https://review.opendev.org/715707 | |
| 13:27:48 | openstackgerrit | Monty Taylor proposed openstack/openstacksdk master: Remove uses of from six.moves https://review.opendev.org/715712 | |
| 13:29:48 | openstackgerrit | Monty Taylor proposed openstack/openstacksdk master: Stop subclassing object https://review.opendev.org/715714 | |
| 13:29:48 | openstackgerrit | Monty Taylor proposed openstack/openstacksdk master: Remove use of six https://review.opendev.org/715713 | |
| 14:21:02 | openstackgerrit | Merged openstack/ansible-collections-openstack master: Updated allocation pool checks https://review.opendev.org/723064 | |
| 15:18:29 | openstackgerrit | Dean Troyer proposed openstack/openstacksdk master: Set BaseImageProxy.create_image validate_checksum default to False https://review.opendev.org/726465 | |
| 15:43:11 | openstackgerrit | Merged openstack/openstacksdk master: Add "id" to Port's query parameters https://review.opendev.org/726050 | |