| Posted | Nick | Remark | |
|---|---|---|---|
| #openstack-sdks - 2020-02-18 | |||
| 19:26:19 | openstackgerrit | Merged openstack/ansible-collections-openstack master: Bump min openstacksdk version for os_network/{port_security_enabled,mtu} https://review.opendev.org/708119 | |
| 20:49:20 | openstackgerrit | Andreas Jaeger proposed openstack/service-types-authority master: Prepare service-types-authority-tox-publish for promote https://review.opendev.org/708514 | |
| 20:50:33 | openstackgerrit | Andreas Jaeger proposed openstack/service-types-authority master: Prepare service-types-authority-tox-publish for promote https://review.opendev.org/708514 | |
| 20:58:08 | openstackgerrit | Andreas Jaeger proposed openstack/service-types-authority master: Small cleanups https://review.opendev.org/708515 | |
| 21:07:50 | openstackgerrit | Andreas Jaeger proposed openstack/service-types-authority master: Switch service-types-authority-tox-publish for promote https://review.opendev.org/708514 | |
| 21:08:49 | openstackgerrit | Simon Merrick proposed openstack/python-openstackclient master: Add storage policy option to create container command https://review.opendev.org/708277 | |
| 23:54:32 | iokiwi | mordred, review please https://review.opendev.org/#/c/708277/ | |
| #openstack-sdks - 2020-02-19 | |||
| 00:04:43 | mordred | iokiwi: lgtm. ugh though - I should really get to work on getting that API layer to use sdk ... | |
| 00:09:31 | iokiwi | Thanks mordred :D | |
| 09:23:11 | openstackgerrit | Bram Verschueren proposed openstack/ansible-collections-openstack master: Add os_routers_info module https://review.opendev.org/703927 | |
| 12:15:08 | openstackgerrit | Merged openstack/ansible-collections-openstack master: Add os_routers_info module https://review.opendev.org/703927 | |
| 13:22:47 | stephenfin | mordred, dtroyer: I've pushed a patch for a 5.0.0 release of openstackclient because there's a lot of stuff on master that hasn't been released including Python 2.7 culling. It's here if you agree https://review.opendev.org/708650 | |
| 13:32:55 | openstackgerrit | Stephen Finucane proposed openstack/python-openstackclient stable/stein: Stop silently ignoring invalid 'server create --hint' options https://review.opendev.org/708652 | |
| 13:34:26 | openstackgerrit | Stephen Finucane proposed openstack/python-openstackclient stable/rocky: Stop silently ignoring invalid 'server create --hint' options https://review.opendev.org/708653 | |
| 15:58:37 | gtema | mordred, dtantsur: please look again at https://review.opendev.org/#/c/700219/ (project cleanup) | |
| 15:59:44 | dtantsur | brain overflow today, will hopefully reach it tomorrow | |
| 16:01:37 | gtema | thks | |
| 16:02:46 | gtema | I have brain overflow since couple of months and my vacation slowly coming after only 8 month uninterrupted work | |
| 16:06:44 | dtantsur | ugh | |
| 16:07:03 | dtantsur | I have a midcycle meeting next week, will probably relax a bit | |
| 16:07:42 | gtema | well, I'm off for nearly whole March (need to consume last year's vacations), so will have some time to work in garden :D | |
| 16:41:29 | dtantsur | nice :) | |
| 16:41:37 | stephenfin | smcginnis: have you stable osc powazzz? https://review.opendev.org/#/c/705630/ | |
| 16:42:41 | stephenfin | seems like a very obvious bugfix and until today I'd an open bug downstream for it | |
| 16:48:26 | smcginnis | stephenfin: Ah, yep. Looked earlier yesterday and was waiting for the recheck to clear. | |
| 16:48:28 | smcginnis | Looking now. | |
| 16:50:24 | stephenfin | spot on, thanks! | |
| 17:00:03 | openstackgerrit | Merged openstack/service-types-authority master: Switch service-types-authority-tox-publish for promote https://review.opendev.org/708514 | |
| #openstack-sdks - 2020-02-20 | |||
| 01:08:18 | iokiwi | dtroyer or dtantsur can I please get a workflow + 1 on https://review.opendev.org/#/c/708277/ | |
| 10:25:37 | openstackgerrit | Vishakha Agarwal proposed openstack/python-openstackclient master: Adding options to user cli https://review.opendev.org/697444 | |
| 10:51:31 | brtknr | hey all | |
| 10:52:34 | brtknr | just wondering why get_coe_cluster returns the uuid with key id whereas create_coe_cluster returns the field as uuid | |
| 11:51:31 | dtantsur | iokiwi: sorry, I don't have +2 on OSC | |
| 12:17:16 | brtknr | looking at magnum's response body, the result definitely comes back as uuid: http://paste.openstack.org/show/789794/ | |
| 12:40:08 | brtknr | so looks like openstacksdk converts the uuid to id when its a get request but not when its a create reqst | |
| 13:54:22 | openstackgerrit | Mark Goddard proposed openstack/cliff master: Fix nested argument groups with ignore conflict handler https://review.opendev.org/708882 | |
| 14:14:32 | openstackgerrit | Merged openstack/service-types-authority master: Small cleanups https://review.opendev.org/708515 | |
| 16:00:36 | elmiko | API SIG office hour now open | |
| 16:01:01 | dtantsur | hey! :) | |
| 16:01:15 | dtantsur | I don't remember if we discussed it or not, but do we need any PTG presence? | |
| 16:01:21 | elmiko | haha | |
| 16:01:28 | gtema | you was asking, but ... | |
| 16:01:38 | elmiko | we did not discuss it, but i am happy to support from afar if i can | |
| 16:01:57 | dtantsur | elmiko: are you coming? | |
| 16:02:09 | elmiko | no, i won't be able to make it | |
| 16:02:13 | elmiko | lol | |
| 16:02:24 | gtema | hmm | |
| 16:02:25 | dtantsur | ouch, that's sad. I'm in "dunno, budget.." stage, hoping to make it | |
| 16:02:38 | gtema | me same | |
| 16:02:54 | dtantsur | I guess we don't have to plain anything specific, just hallway discussions | |
| 16:03:07 | gtema | in my case the chances are bigger if I get a slot for something | |
| 16:03:28 | gtema | but list of tracks is like from the sky - very weird | |
| 16:03:35 | dtantsur | gtema: if you come up with an API SIG session, we can totally organize it | |
| 16:03:43 | elmiko | i'm not sure about the value of having an api sig presence, we have been low on activity in the past few cycles | |
| 16:03:48 | dtantsur | indeed | |
| 16:03:52 | gtema | and for Forum there is still no procedure defined | |
| 16:04:03 | dtantsur | I don't even fully understand how it is going to look | |
| 16:04:15 | dtantsur | Morning - Forum, afternoon - PTG, something like this? | |
| 16:04:27 | gtema | I was asking and told they are working on the procedure | |
| 16:04:40 | gtema | or on an idea how it may look like | |
| 16:04:44 | dtantsur | about the right time, a few weeks after starting ticket sale :D | |
| 16:04:54 | gtema | I wanted exactly to present my "project_cleanup" status | |
| 16:05:13 | gtema | yupp - right point, few weeks before early bird ends | |
| 16:06:10 | dtantsur | if you need my opinion, project_cleanup status is a good session idea | |
| 16:06:18 | gtema | we can arrange joint API/SDK presense - I can surely see something useful there | |
| 16:06:47 | gtema | project_cleanup is a long-runner, where people have need for and wait for decision | |
| 16:06:58 | dtantsur | that's why I wondered if we can have something like "API/SDK office hour" to go over some popular topics | |
| 16:07:09 | gtema | so I wanted exactly smth like: here it is, this is a plan, and here how you can support | |
| 16:07:50 | elmiko | that sounds good to me | |
| 16:08:05 | gtema | should we also invite mordred here to go again with this this discussion? | |
| 16:08:11 | elmiko | dtantsur: ahh, that makes sense if we have a specific topic | |
| 16:08:34 | dtantsur | gtema: never a bad idea to invite mordred | |
| 16:08:51 | gtema | topic - finalizing service_catalog / version_discovery docs | |
| 16:09:05 | gtema | also long runner | |
| 16:10:04 | elmiko | yeah, those version discover docs | |
| 16:10:05 | gtema | wanted to put faces of my colleagues into those docs, but they are still not final. No luck | |
| 16:10:33 | elmiko | imo, we need to just clean them up and merge even with the TODO sections | |
| 16:10:40 | gtema | so - a session in Vancouver for finishing those online | |
| 16:11:09 | elmiko | we could probably get them finished that way, nice idea | |
| 16:12:26 | gtema | so, then let's ask for that | |
| 16:12:36 | dtantsur | ++ gtema wanna do it? | |
| 16:12:47 | gtema | sure, why not | |
| 16:12:51 | gtema | or you mean asking? | |
| 16:12:57 | dtantsur | gtema: asking, chairing | |
| 16:13:08 | dtantsur | we'll get you a nice fake beard and pretend you're elmiko | |
| 16:13:12 | gtema | chairing - sure. Asking - do you know whom? | |
| 16:13:13 | elmiko | LOL | |
| 16:13:33 | gtema | I haven't really understood the process this time | |
| 16:13:44 | dtantsur | gtema: no clue, Kendall? | |
| 16:13:47 | elmiko | maybe reach out to diablo_roja? | |
| 16:13:49 | elmiko | hehe | |
| 16:13:52 | gtema | beard is there (my wife is already complaining :D) | |
| 16:13:58 | elmiko | XD | |
| 16:14:29 | dtantsur | gtema: I have a form to request space for API SIG (not a specific session)_ | |
| 16:14:33 | dtantsur | I can fill it in | |
| 16:14:34 | gtema | okay, will try to ping them | |
| 16:15:00 | gtema | dtantsur: gimme | |
| 16:16:07 | dtantsur | gtema: I've submitted it actually, it was pretty easy | |
| 16:16:18 | dtantsur | you can still talk to Kendall about it | |
| 16:17:39 | dtantsur | I've requested 1/4 day time, should be more than enough | |