Earlier  
Later
New Search
Posted Nick Remark
#openstack-sdks - 2020-02-17
16:05:43 tacco seems to be some kind of a edge case.. when this happens.
17:20:17 openstackgerrit Merged openstack/ansible-collections-openstack master: Support json type for the ironic_node config_drive parameter https://review.opendev.org/706664
23:51:25 openstackgerrit Simon Merrick proposed openstack/python-openstackclient master: Add storage policy option to create container command https://review.opendev.org/708277
23:55:17 iokiwi review please https://review.opendev.org/#/c/708277/
#openstack-sdks - 2020-02-18
04:05:51 openstackgerrit Simon Merrick proposed openstack/python-openstackclient master: Add storage policy option to create container command https://review.opendev.org/708277
04:43:58 gryf hi mordred. could you please take a look at the https://review.opendev.org/#/q/topic:bulk-resource?
09:14:30 tacco gtema: found out that with a minimal creation of a server the os_stack module fails. if i have a empty deploy.yml it is running fine.. but as soon as i put something in like. Create a server it always failes. But if i use the deploy.yml from cli with openstack stack create it is running well.
09:15:25 gtema if you use CLI with --debug option, can you check what is the return code of the stack creation response?
09:16:33 gtema it should be actually 201
09:16:49 tacco let me check
09:18:39 openstackgerrit Rodolfo Alonso Hernandez proposed openstack/python-openstackclient master: Add qos_network_policy_id to network port tests https://review.opendev.org/701786
09:20:16 gtema tacco: and the additional thing to verify - ansible itself might be using different python version, compared to what you use to call ansible (often happens on Mac). So if ansible invoking os_stack is using different version of SDK it might be also very well the reason
09:24:29 tacco http://paste.openstack.org/show/789683/
09:24:33 tacco uh.. thats strange
09:24:39 tacco i get a error with debuging
09:24:50 tacco but the stack still gets created and is create in progress
09:25:45 gtema well, at least this would be the reason why ansible fails as well
10:22:47 openstackgerrit Vishakha Agarwal proposed openstack/python-openstackclient master: Adding options to user cli https://review.opendev.org/697444
11:54:56 dtantsur elmiko: hey! did not have time to talk to you on Thursday. Do we plan on any API SIG time at the PTG?
11:55:27 dtantsur Honestly, I doubt it. But maybe allocate an "office hour"?
12:29:14 openstackgerrit Sagi Shnaidman proposed openstack/ansible-collections-openstack master: WIP: build ansible collection before release https://review.opendev.org/708372
12:30:20 tacco gtema: hm.. now i found out that on the heat backend is a auth error.. hm. Have to figure out what is wrong here..
12:30:33 tacco gtema: but thanks for your quick respones and inputs..
12:30:44 gtema okay, good luck hunting it down
12:30:50 gtema welcome
12:45:13 openstackgerrit Jesse Pretorius (odyssey4me) proposed openstack/ansible-collections-openstack master: Bump min openstacksdk version for os_network/{port_security_enabled,mtu} https://review.opendev.org/708119
12:46:05 openstackgerrit Jesse Pretorius (odyssey4me) proposed openstack/ansible-collections-openstack master: Bump min openstacksdk version for os_network/{port_security_enabled,mtu} https://review.opendev.org/708119
12:50:19 openstackgerrit Roman Dobosz proposed openstack/openstacksdk master: Add method for bulk creating objects. https://review.opendev.org/708112
12:50:20 openstackgerrit Roman Dobosz proposed openstack/openstacksdk master: Add bulk port create. https://review.opendev.org/708113
13:26:22 openstackgerrit Sagi Shnaidman proposed openstack/ansible-collections-openstack master: WIP: build ansible collection before release https://review.opendev.org/708372
14:48:52 openstackgerrit Sagi Shnaidman proposed openstack/ansible-collections-openstack master: WIP: build ansible collection before release https://review.opendev.org/708372
19:26:19 openstackgerrit Merged openstack/ansible-collections-openstack master: Bump min openstacksdk version for os_network/{port_security_enabled,mtu} https://review.opendev.org/708119
20:49:20 openstackgerrit Andreas Jaeger proposed openstack/service-types-authority master: Prepare service-types-authority-tox-publish for promote https://review.opendev.org/708514
20:50:33 openstackgerrit Andreas Jaeger proposed openstack/service-types-authority master: Prepare service-types-authority-tox-publish for promote https://review.opendev.org/708514
20:58:08 openstackgerrit Andreas Jaeger proposed openstack/service-types-authority master: Small cleanups https://review.opendev.org/708515
21:07:50 openstackgerrit Andreas Jaeger proposed openstack/service-types-authority master: Switch service-types-authority-tox-publish for promote https://review.opendev.org/708514
21:08:49 openstackgerrit Simon Merrick proposed openstack/python-openstackclient master: Add storage policy option to create container command https://review.opendev.org/708277
23:54:32 iokiwi mordred, review please https://review.opendev.org/#/c/708277/
#openstack-sdks - 2020-02-19
00:04:43 mordred iokiwi: lgtm. ugh though - I should really get to work on getting that API layer to use sdk ...
00:09:31 iokiwi Thanks mordred :D
09:23:11 openstackgerrit Bram Verschueren proposed openstack/ansible-collections-openstack master: Add os_routers_info module https://review.opendev.org/703927
12:15:08 openstackgerrit Merged openstack/ansible-collections-openstack master: Add os_routers_info module https://review.opendev.org/703927
13:22:47 stephenfin mordred, dtroyer: I've pushed a patch for a 5.0.0 release of openstackclient because there's a lot of stuff on master that hasn't been released including Python 2.7 culling. It's here if you agree https://review.opendev.org/708650
13:32:55 openstackgerrit Stephen Finucane proposed openstack/python-openstackclient stable/stein: Stop silently ignoring invalid 'server create --hint' options https://review.opendev.org/708652
13:34:26 openstackgerrit Stephen Finucane proposed openstack/python-openstackclient stable/rocky: Stop silently ignoring invalid 'server create --hint' options https://review.opendev.org/708653
15:58:37 gtema mordred, dtantsur: please look again at https://review.opendev.org/#/c/700219/ (project cleanup)
15:59:44 dtantsur brain overflow today, will hopefully reach it tomorrow
16:01:37 gtema thks
16:02:46 gtema I have brain overflow since couple of months and my vacation slowly coming after only 8 month uninterrupted work
16:06:44 dtantsur ugh
16:07:03 dtantsur I have a midcycle meeting next week, will probably relax a bit
16:07:42 gtema well, I'm off for nearly whole March (need to consume last year's vacations), so will have some time to work in garden :D
16:41:29 dtantsur nice :)
16:41:37 stephenfin smcginnis: have you stable osc powazzz? https://review.opendev.org/#/c/705630/
16:42:41 stephenfin seems like a very obvious bugfix and until today I'd an open bug downstream for it
16:48:26 smcginnis stephenfin: Ah, yep. Looked earlier yesterday and was waiting for the recheck to clear.
16:48:28 smcginnis Looking now.
16:50:24 stephenfin spot on, thanks!
17:00:03 openstackgerrit Merged openstack/service-types-authority master: Switch service-types-authority-tox-publish for promote https://review.opendev.org/708514
#openstack-sdks - 2020-02-20
01:08:18 iokiwi dtroyer or dtantsur can I please get a workflow + 1 on https://review.opendev.org/#/c/708277/
10:25:37 openstackgerrit Vishakha Agarwal proposed openstack/python-openstackclient master: Adding options to user cli https://review.opendev.org/697444
10:51:31 brtknr hey all
10:52:34 brtknr just wondering why get_coe_cluster returns the uuid with key id whereas create_coe_cluster returns the field as uuid
11:51:31 dtantsur iokiwi: sorry, I don't have +2 on OSC
12:17:16 brtknr looking at magnum's response body, the result definitely comes back as uuid: http://paste.openstack.org/show/789794/
12:40:08 brtknr so looks like openstacksdk converts the uuid to id when its a get request but not when its a create reqst
13:54:22 openstackgerrit Mark Goddard proposed openstack/cliff master: Fix nested argument groups with ignore conflict handler https://review.opendev.org/708882
14:14:32 openstackgerrit Merged openstack/service-types-authority master: Small cleanups https://review.opendev.org/708515
16:00:36 elmiko API SIG office hour now open
16:01:01 dtantsur hey! :)
16:01:15 dtantsur I don't remember if we discussed it or not, but do we need any PTG presence?
16:01:21 elmiko haha
16:01:28 gtema you was asking, but ...
16:01:38 elmiko we did not discuss it, but i am happy to support from afar if i can
16:01:57 dtantsur elmiko: are you coming?
16:02:09 elmiko no, i won't be able to make it
16:02:13 elmiko lol
16:02:24 gtema hmm
16:02:25 dtantsur ouch, that's sad. I'm in "dunno, budget.." stage, hoping to make it
16:02:38 gtema me same
16:02:54 dtantsur I guess we don't have to plain anything specific, just hallway discussions
16:03:07 gtema in my case the chances are bigger if I get a slot for something
16:03:28 gtema but list of tracks is like from the sky - very weird
16:03:35 dtantsur gtema: if you come up with an API SIG session, we can totally organize it
16:03:43 elmiko i'm not sure about the value of having an api sig presence, we have been low on activity in the past few cycles
16:03:48 dtantsur indeed
16:03:52 gtema and for Forum there is still no procedure defined
16:04:03 dtantsur I don't even fully understand how it is going to look
16:04:15 dtantsur Morning - Forum, afternoon - PTG, something like this?
16:04:27 gtema I was asking and told they are working on the procedure
16:04:40 gtema or on an idea how it may look like
16:04:44 dtantsur about the right time, a few weeks after starting ticket sale :D
16:04:54 gtema I wanted exactly to present my "project_cleanup" status
16:05:13 gtema yupp - right point, few weeks before early bird ends
16:06:10 dtantsur if you need my opinion, project_cleanup status is a good session idea
16:06:18 gtema we can arrange joint API/SDK presense - I can surely see something useful there
16:06:47 gtema project_cleanup is a long-runner, where people have need for and wait for decision
16:06:58 dtantsur that's why I wondered if we can have something like "API/SDK office hour" to go over some popular topics
16:07:09 gtema so I wanted exactly smth like: here it is, this is a plan, and here how you can support
16:07:50 elmiko that sounds good to me

Earlier   Later